FEATURED POST

States to try new ways of executing prisoners. Their latest idea? Opioids.

Image
The synthetic painkiller fentanyl has been the driving force behind the nation’s opioid epidemic, killing tens of thousands of Americans last year in overdoses. Now two states want to use the drug’s powerful properties for a new purpose: to execute prisoners on death row.
As Nevada and Nebraska push for the country’s first fentanyl-assisted executions, doctors and death penalty opponents are fighting those plans. They have warned that such an untested use of fentanyl could lead to painful, botched executions, comparing the use of it and other new drugs proposed for lethal injection to human experimentation.
States are increasingly pressed for ways to carry out the death penalty because of problems obtaining the drugs they long have used, primarily because pharmaceutical companies are refusing to supply their drugs for executions.
The situation has led states such as Florida, Ohio and Oklahoma to turn to novel drug combinations for executions. Mississippi legalized nitrogen gas this s…

Is death knell near for the death penalty in Texas?

Texas' death house, 'The Walls Unit', Huntsville, Texas
Texas' death house, 'The Walls Unit', Huntsville, Texas
Saturday marked 40 years since the Supreme Court’s Gregg v. Georgia decision, which brought about the modern death penalty, and Texas continues to lead the nation in executions. But a local death penalty case is coming back for review, and lawyers are starting to signal the death knell of state executions.

In September, oral arguments are scheduled in U.S. District Court in Amarillo to determine if a death row case in Potter County should be reopened.

John Lezell Balentine, 47, has spent 17 years on death row.

Balentine’s crime was the first recorded triple homicide in Amarillo history, according to Amarillo Globe-News files.

Balentine confessed to the murders after his arrest, according to the Texas Attorney General’s Office.

At one point in 2009, Balentine was one day away from execution before being granted a reprieve. In 2011, Balentine was within one hour of his execution before Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia stopped it.

The attorney general’s office said that the issue revolves around whether the court should reopen the case to consider whether Balentine’s lawyer failed to investigate and present evidence that would convince a jury not to sentence him to death.

James Farren, the Randall County criminal district attorney, was the prosecutor in Holberg’s case [Holberg, 43, was sentenced to death in 1998 for the 1996 murder and robbery of an 80-year-old man] and estimates it has cost $2 million to $3 million — and counting. Farren has not changed his mind about the philosophical questions around the death penalty, but sees it slowly dying off.

“I think (the death penalty) should only be sought when it is an egregious event, but the kind of case that would justify the death penalty is rarer, not because my opinion has changed as far as the morality of it, but because of practical issues,” Farren said.

“The process has become so onerous, time-draining and resource-draining that the local prosecutors who choose to seek the death penalty in most cases are going to opt not to. It’s simply unfair to the taxpayers to bankrupt the county pursuing that result in a single case.”

Farren said that laws regarding mitigating evidence, such as the Supreme Court decisions that all four death row inmates from Potter and Randall counties are relying on, has become the primary driving force in reviewing death penalty cases and has sent more cases back to its sentencing phase than any other issue.

Additionally, a changing demographic and changing laws allow even one juror to choose life imprisonment over death.

“It’s difficult to find 12 people who all agree that even though this person may die in prison to vote for the death penalty,” Farren said.

“The opponents of the death penalty have obtained through the back door what they couldn’t obtain through the front door. The practical effect is the eradication of the death penalty.”

Is the death penalty on the decline?

There are two executions scheduled for July 14, one in Georgia and one in Texas, according to the Death Penalty Information Center.

Perry Williams, 35, is set to die from lethal injection for shooting and killing a man who was returning a video.

If both Texas and Georgia go through with these executions, it will have been 64 days since the last one, which was a Missouri man convicted of a triple homicide.

Although the death penalty seems to be declining nationally and statewide, Texas continues to lead the nation.

In 2015, 13 people were executed in Texas. This year, there have been six executions, but seven more are still scheduled.

“Texas is trending downwards, but the difference is that Texas is still executing more people than anybody else in the western hemisphere,” said Robert Dunham, executive director of the Death Penalty Information Center.

“At the same time that it continues to execute people, the Texas courts are granting more stays of execution and Texas juries are returning more and more life sentences.”

In 2015, Texas had 274 people on death row; two died, nine were removed and two were added.


Source: amarillo.com, Aaron Davis, July 2, 2016

- Report an error, an omission: deathpenaltynews@gmail.com - Follow us on Facebook and Twitter

Most Viewed (Last 7 Days)

Nebraska: Omaha attorney signs on to help fight Jose Sandoval's execution

North Carolina death row becoming frail, aging

States to try new ways of executing prisoners. Their latest idea? Opioids.

Bali jailbreak: US inmate escapes notorious Kerobokan prison

California: Riverside County leads U.S. in death penalty sentences, but hasn’t executed anyone in 39 years

Saudi Arabia On Track To Execute The Most People This Year In Two Decades

Florida Governor Rick Scott continues death penalty fight with State Attorney Aramis Ayala

Iraq hangs 38 members of Daesh, al-Qaeda

Iran: Two Prisoners Hanged In Public

Iran: Five executed, one to be hanged in public, death sentence upheld for researcher