The Supreme Court on Tuesday sided with a Texas man on death row who argued he was mentally disabled and could not be executed. In a 5-3 ruling, the court said the state's definition and standards for assessing intellectual disability "create an unacceptable risk that persons with intellectual disability will be executed." Those standards, known as the Briseno factors, take into account whether neighbors, teachers and friends think the person is intellectually disabled, makes plans or was impulsive, is a leader or a follower, responds in a rational way to situations, respond coherently to oral or written questions and can hide facts or lie to others in their own interest. In delivering the opinion of the court, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said adjudications of intellectual disability should be informed by the views of medical experts. "Texas cannot satisfactorily explain why it applies current medical standards for diagnosing intellectual disabilit...
Striving for a World without Capital Punishment