The upcoming retrial of Richard Glossip, now scheduled for September 28, 2026, marks a pivotal moment in the Oklahoma judicial system. Following the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to vacate his conviction, the case has evolved from a capital punishment dispute into a fundamental test of institutional integrity. Central to this transition is the revelation of "Box 8," a trove of long-withheld prosecution records that exposed a systemic pattern of constitutional violations during the original 2004 proceedings.
Two former California death-sentenced prisoners, Ernest Dykes and Curtis Ervin , have filed lawsuits against Alameda County, accusing the District Attorney’s office of “set[ting] out to rig the juries” in their capital cases. Both men were released from prison after their death sentences were reduced because of the discovery of unconstitutional prosecutorial misconduct during each of their jury selections in the 1990s. The lawsuits allege that the Alameda County District Attorney’s Office (ACDAO) had a long-standing practice of engaging in racial discrimination during jury selection in capital cases. “The evidence shows that the errors were committed knowingly and not in isolation, but rather, borne from the product of a pattern and practice reinforced by those with supervisory authority within the ACDAO,” the suits state. Both lawsuits accuse the ACDAO of violating the men’s right to a fair trial by unconstitutionally...