Japan makes major step toward revising controversial retrial system

Japan has taken a major step toward revising the country's retrial system, which has been criticized as making the process of overturning a wrongful conviction excessively lengthy.

But the prospects of swift reform are unclear, with fierce opposition from within the Justice Ministry to one of the key proposed changes -- restricting objections from prosecutors against court decisions ordering retrials.

On March 28, the Legislative Council, a ministry advisory body, was asked by Justice Minister Keisuke Suzuki to look into the issue.

"The public's interest (in the issue) is extremely high. I expect to receive recommendations as early as possible," Suzuki told a press conference earlier in the day.

The move followed the highly publicized acquittal last year of 89-year-old Iwao Hakamada, who had spent nearly half a century on death row following a quadruple murder conviction.

"It's not just a matter of saving Iwao," said his sister Hideko Hakamada, 92, as she attended a gathering in the Diet several days earlier to seek the revision of a system that has been left untouched since the criminal procedure law was established in 1948.

It took 42 years after first applying for a retrial to reopen her brother's high-profile 1966 murder case.

In the decades-long struggle for justice by the former boxer and his family, they faced what seemed an insuperable hurdle in prosecutors' reluctance to disclose evidence and their objections to reopening the case.

The criminal procedure law stipulates that a retrial will be opened if there is "clear evidence to find the accused not guilty." But it lacks provisions on the disclosure of evidence held by prosecutors, hindering efforts to overturn convictions, experts say.

Iwao Hakamada is not the only one who had to wait for decades until new evidence opened the door for a retrial.

Shoshi Maekawa, 59, filed a request for a retrial in 2004 after serving a seven-year sentence for the 1986 murder of a junior high school girl in central Japan.

The Nagoya High Court's Kanazawa branch decided in 2011 to reopen the case, but the decision was overturned by the Nagoya High Court following an objection from prosecutors.

After filing a second request for a retrial in 2022, the Kanazawa court ordered a retrial as 287 new pieces of evidence disclosed by prosecutors undermined the credibility of the testimonies from Maekawa's acquaintances that led to his conviction.

He is almost certain to be acquitted after his retrial was held in March.

The Japan Federation of Bar Associations has criticized the current system for allowing prosecutors to file objections against court decisions to reopen a case, which often result in the rulings being overturned.

"It has been a major factor delaying relief for the victims facing false accusations," said the group, which has been supporting many seeking retrials.

That issue, along with rules on evidence disclosure for deciding on retrials, are the main topics of the council's discussions.

"It is true that there are problems. The ministry will lose trust if we do nothing," said a senior ministry official.

But some legal and prosecution officials are strongly against restricting prosecutors from appealing. Another senior ministry official, for instance, cited a 1979 murder case in which a 97-year-old woman was convicted.

Ayako Haraguchi served 10 years in prison for killing her brother-in-law in Kagoshima Prefecture in 1979. In her third request for a retrial, the Supreme Court decided against reopening the case although district and high courts had ruled in her favor.

"Even courts have diverging views. We should still leave room for three rounds of deliberations," the official said.

Under the usual process of legal revisions, the council would recommend the outline for revisions following discussions. The ministry would then prepare a bill and submit it to parliament for deliberation.

The process only requires a month if the path toward revisions is clear from the beginning, but it is likely to take more than one year if there are many points of disagreements, with one official expecting discussions to take at least a year.

Meanwhile, a group of over 370 cross-party lawmakers is working with the Japan Federation of Bar Associations to amend the system through legislation drafted by Diet members during the current session.

Masahiko Shibayama, the leader of the lawmakers' group, said revisions needing urgent responses can be made through lawmaker-drafted legislation with remaining issues left for examination by the ministry panel.

Its outline of a bill to revise the criminal procedure law includes obliging courts to order prosecutors to disclose evidence if requested by lawyers acting for those seeking retrials as well as banning objections from prosecutors against reopening cases.

"Parliament is the highest organ of state power. It is clear that our process should be prioritized (over the ministry's move) under the Constitution," Shibayama said.

Source: Japan Today, Staff, April 14, 2025

"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted."

— Oscar Wilde

Comments

South Carolina executes Mikal Mahdi

Mikal Mahdi, 42, was executed for the 2004 murder of 56-year-old James Myers A man facing the death penalty for committing two murders was executed by firing squad on Friday, the second such execution in the US state of South Carolina this year. Mikal Mahdi, 42, was executed for the 2004 murder of 56-year-old James Myers, an off-duty police officer, and the murder of a convenience store employee three days earlier. According to a statement from the prison, "the execution was performed by a three-person firing squad at 6:01 pm (2201 GMT)," with Mahdi pronounced dead four minutes later.

Afghanistan | Four men publicly executed by Taliban with relatives of victims shooting them 'six or seven times' at sport stadium

Four men have been publicly executed by the Taliban, with relatives of their victims shooting them several times in front of spectators at a sport stadium. Two men were shot around six to seven times by a male relative of the victims in front of spectators in Qala-i-Naw, the centre of Afghanistan's Badghis province, witnesses told an AFP journalist in the city. The men had been 'sentenced to retaliatory punishment' for shooting other men, after their cases were 'examined very precisely and repeatedly', the statement said. 'The families of the victims were offered amnesty and peace but they refused.'

USA | Why the firing squad may be making a comeback

South Carolina plans to execute Mikal Mahdi on Friday for the murder of a police officer, draping a hood over his head and firing three bullets into his heart. The choice to die by firing squad – rather than lethal injection or the electric chair – was Mahdi’s own, his attorney said last month: “Faced with barbaric and inhumane choices, Mikal Mahdi has chosen the lesser of three evils.” If it proceeds, Mahdi’s execution would be the latest in a recent string of events that have put the spotlight on the firing squad as a handful of US death penalty states explore alternatives to lethal injection, by far the nation’s dominant execution method.

Florida executes Michael Tanzi

Florida on Tuesday executed a death row inmate described by one local detective as a "fledgling serial killer" for the murder of a beloved Miami Herald employee. Florida executed Michael Tanzi on Tuesday, 25 years after the murder of beloved Miami Herald employee Janet Acosta, who was attacked in broad daylight on her lunch break in 2000. Michael Tanzi, 48, was executed by lethal injection at the Florida State Prison in Raiford and pronounced dead at 6:12 p.m. ET.

I spent 16 years in solitary in South Carolina. This is what it did to me. | Opinion

South Carolinian Randy Poindexter writes about the effects 16 years of solitary confinement had on him ahead of South Carolina’s planned execution of Mikal Mahdi , who spent months in solitary as a young man. For 16 years, I lived in a concrete cell. Twenty-three hours a day, every day, for more than 3,000 days, South Carolina kept me in solitary confinement. I was a young man before I was sent to solitary — angry, untreated and unwell. I made mistakes. But I wasn’t sentenced to madness. That’s what solitary did to me. My mental health worsened with each passing day. At first, paranoia and depression set in. Then, hallucinations and self-mutilation. I talked to people who weren’t there. I cut myself to feel something besides despair. I could do nothing as four of my friends and fellow prisoners took their own lives rather than endure another day of torturous isolation.

Singapore executes man for 2017 murder of pregnant wife and daughter

Teo Ghim Heng, who strangled his pregnant wife and four-year-old daughter in 2017 before burning their bodies, was executed on 16 April 2025 after exhausting all legal avenues. His clemency pleas were rejected and his conviction upheld by the Court of Appeal in 2022. Teo Ghim Heng, who was convicted of murdering his pregnant wife and their four-year-old daughter in 2017, was executed on 16 April 2025. The Singapore Prison Service confirmed that Teo’s death sentence was carried out at Changi Prison Complex. In a news release on the same day, the police stated: “He was accorded full due process under the law, and was represented by legal counsel both at the trial and at the appeal. His petitions to the President for clemency were unsuccessful.”

Louisiana | Lawyers of Jessie Hoffman speak about their final moments before execution

As Louisiana prepared its first execution in 15 years, a team of lawyers from Loyola Law were working to save Jessie Hoffman’s life. “I was a young lawyer three years out of law school, and Jessie was almost finished with his appeals at that time, and my boss told me we needed to file something for Jessie because he’s in danger of being executed,” Kappel said. Kappel and her boss came up with a civil lawsuit to file that said since they wouldn’t give him a protocol for his execution, he was being deprived of due process, and the lawsuit was in the legal process for the next 10 years.

The Sordid, Unscientific Story Behind Lethal Injection

A new book by a national expert explores the failures of the United States’ favored execution method. Texas was the first U.S. state to execute someone by lethal injection, but the idea for the novel method came from Oklahoma. Our northern neighbor was the first to adopt the plan to replace the spectacle of the electric chair with something more palatable for witnesses and the public. Texas was just the first to test it out on a person. Since 1982, when state officials injected Charlie Brooks—convicted of murder in Fort Worth—with a lethal cocktail of drugs dreamt up by Oklahoma’s medical examiner but untested in any research setting, Texas has led the country in lethal injections. Secrets of the Killing State: The Untold Story of Lethal Injection (NYU Press, April 2025)—a new book by law professor, former prosecutor, and death penalty expert Corinna Barrett Lain—brings readers into the death chamber to bear disturbing witness to the reality of lethal injection.

South Carolina | Man who ambushed off-duty cop to face firing squad in second execution of its kind

Mikal Mahdi, 48, who was found guilty of killing an off-duty police officer and a convenience store worker, is the second inmate scheduled to executed by South Carolina's new firing squad A murderer who ambushed and shot an off duty police officer eight times before burning his body in a killing spree is set to become the second person to die by firing squad. South Carolina's highest court has rejected the last major appeal from Mikal Mahdi, 41, who is to be put to death with three bullets to the heart at 6pm on April 11 at the Broad River Correctional Institution in Columbia. Mahdi's lawyers said his original lawyers put on a shallow case trying to spare his life that didn't call on relatives, teachers or people who knew him and ignored the impact of weeks spent in solitary confinement in prison as a teen.

Indiana Supreme Court sets May 20 execution date for death row inmate Benjamin Ritchie

The condemned man has exhausted his appeals but is likely to seek a clemency plea. Indiana Supreme Court justices on Tuesday set a May 20 execution date for death row inmate Benjamin Ritchie, who was convicted in 2002 for killing a law enforcement officer from Beech Grove. The high court’s decision followed a series of exhausted appeals previously filed by Ritchie and his legal team. The inmate’s request for post-conviction relief was denied in Tuesday’s 13-page order, penned by Chief Justice Loretta Rush, although she disagreed with the decision in her opinion.

Death Penalty News

Search This Blog