Skip to main content

Texas | El Paso Walmart mass shooter’s death penalty case languishes after 5 years

As El Pasoans gather for the fifth anniversary of the Aug. 3, 2019, mass shooting at an El Paso Walmart, the state of Texas' death penalty case against the gunman continues to languish in legal maneuvering and a judge's gag order.

The case has been delayed in state court for several reasons, mainly because state prosecutors and defense attorneys are continuing a years-long battle over how to handle the massive amount of evidence in the case.

The gunman, Patrick Crusius of Allen, Texas, faces one count of capital murder of multiple persons and 22 counts of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. El Paso District Attorney Bill Hicks is seeking the death penalty. A trial date has not been set in state court.

The mass shooting resulted in 23 people fatally shot and dozens more injured. A white supremacist, who is already convicted and sentenced in federal court, targeted Mexicans in El Paso as shoppers were out for what was a peaceful Saturday shopping trip.

A gag order issued in July 2022 is again being enforced by 409th District Court Judge Sam Medrano, who presides over the gunman's case. The gag order prevents state prosecutors, defense lawyers, witnesses, family members of the victims, or anyone else associated with the case from discussing it.

Hearing set for September; unknown if trial date will be set


A scheduling conference is set for 9 a.m. Friday, Sept. 12. The hearing is expected to focus on the handling of evidence and discussing any pretrial issues.

It is unknown if Medrano will set a trial date during September's hearing. The gag order prevents prosecutors and defense attorneys from discussing what arguments or issues they will present during the hearing.

September's hearing will come five years and one month after the mass shooting devastated El Paso and Juárez, which make up the Borderland's binational community.

A 2024 trial date is unlikely, legal observers said. The Walmart case is one of the largest cases ever seen in El Paso, with millions of pieces of evidence that prosecutors and defense lawyers must sort through to prepare to use for trial.

Hicks has repeatedly claimed his office is ready to try the case as soon as Medrano sets a court date. Defense attorneys have argued they have not been given the evidence with enough time for them to prepare for trial.

Further complicating matters is the Nov. 5 General Election. Hicks, a Republican appointed to the position by Gov. Greg Abbott, is facing Democrat James Montoya in one of the biggest races in El Paso County. Montoya was part of the then-DA team that aggressively sought justice against the shooter in 2019.

State prosecutors, defense attorneys continue to battle over evidence


The last time state prosecutors and defense lawyers met in court was during a Feb. 22 status conference. The hearing ended with no calendar date for the case to go to trial.

During the February status conference, defense attorneys argued they would need several more months to review the evidence and prepare for trial. They argued the long timeframe is needed because the evidence turned over by the state is unorganized, has thousands of duplicate documents, and new evidence improperly hidden in a folder titled “duplicates.”

State prosecutors countered that the district attorney's office turned over most of the evidence months, if not years ago, to the defense team. Any remaining pieces of evidence are being turned over to defense attorneys as the district attorney's office gets it, she added.

Judge: 'Everyone wants a resolution to this case'


Along with arguments over evidence, the state's case has been stalled because of several issues, including the COVID-19 pandemic, which shutdown the court system for months, the retirement of longtime District Attorney Jaime Esparza, the resignation of District Attorney Yvonne Rosales amid allegations of misconduct, and the federal case being handled first, Medrano said at the February hearing.

The long delay in trying the state's case against the gunman led to Medrano addressing the El Paso community about the case moving slowly in state court.

“I rarely address the community in court, but I believe it is important in this case," Medrano said. "It is going to be five years in August (since the shooting), but the court sees this as something the court has had for less than half a year. I am hoping this community understands that everyone wants a resolution to this case, but not at the expense of justice."

Who is who in the Walmart state death penalty case?


Patrick Crusius
Hicks, a Republican, is the third district attorney to prosecute the state of Texas' case against the gunman.

Esparza, a Democrat who is now the U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Texas, retired in 2020. Democrat Yvonne Rosales was elected district attorney in 2020 but resigned from office in November 2022 amid allegations of misconduct, including mishandling the Walmart case.

Hicks was appointed by Abbott to replace Rosales. Hicks' prosecution team includes Rebecca Tarango, Michael Williams and John Davis.

In the most recent death penalty case in El Paso, Hicks and his team successfully got a jury to sentence a man convicted of fatal shooting an El Paso County Sheriff's Office deputy to the death penalty last year.

The gunman's defense team is led by prominent El Paso attorney Joe Spencer. The defense team includes experienced criminal defense attorneys Mark Stevens, Felix Valenzuela and Rebecca Hudsmith.

Spencer, who handled the gunman's case in federal court, has tried dozens of high-profile criminal cases in El Paso, including successfully getting acquittals or lenient sentences for several clients who were either facing the death penalty or life in prison.

Judge Medrano is one of the most experienced and well-respected judges in El Paso. He has presided over thousands of high-profile criminal cases since he was first elected in 2001. Medrano's current term ends at the end of December. However, he will retain his seat as he runs unopposed in the 2024 general election.

Seeking justice five years after Walmart mass shooting


On Aug. 3, 2019, the gunman drove nearly 700 miles from Allen, Texas, to El Paso to attack Mexicans, who he claimed were invading the U.S., according to court documents and testimony in the gunman's federal trial.

The mass shooter parked at the El Paso Walmart at 7101 Gateway Blvd. West. He got out of his vehicle and began shooting people in the parking lot, federal prosecutor Ian Martinez Hanna said during the gunman's February plea hearing. He continued into Walmart, where he fatally shot nine people in a bank inside the store. He then continued, shooting another nine in the aisles of the Walmart.

The gunman used a GP WASR-10 semiautomatic rifle — a Romanian-made firearm that is a variant of the AK-47 assault rifle — and 7.62 x 39 mm hollow point ammunition, a federal indictment states. The gun and 1,000 rounds of ammunition were purchased June 19, 2019, on the internet by the gunman, the indictment states.

Minutes after the shooting, the gunman, then 21, emerged with his hands up from a vehicle that was stopped at a nearby intersection and told a Texas Department of Public Safety trooper, who was responding to the mass shooting, "I'm the shooter."

The gunman targeted Hispanics in an effort to dissuade Mexicans and other Hispanics from coming to the United States, federal prosecutors said. Minutes before the shooting, he posted a racist manifesto online outlining his motives for committing one of the most deadly shootings in U.S. history.

The gunman confessed to law enforcement that "they (Mexicans and other Hispanics) were to blame" and "he was trying to defend his country," federal prosecutor Ian Martinez Hanna said in the federal sentencing hearing for the gunman.

Walmart gun sentenced to life in prison in federal court


The gunman has already been sentenced to life in prison in federal court after the U.S. Attorney's Office elected not to seek the death penalty.

The gunman pleaded guilty  Feb. 9, 2023, to 23 counts of hate crimes resulting in death, 23 counts of use of a firearm to commit murder during and in relation to a crime of violence, 22 counts of hate crimes involving an attempt to kill, and 22 counts of use of a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence.

He was sentenced July 7 to 90 consecutive life sentences in federal court for the mass shooting. He was ordered to serve his federal prison sentence at ADX Florence supermax federal prison near Florence, Colorado. However, the gunman was transferred July 11 to state custody as the case in state court remains pending.

The gunman was ordered Sept. 25 to pay more than $5 million in federal restitution for the financial losses suffered by the victims and their families because of his actions.

Source: elpasotimes.com, Aaron Martinez, July 3, 2024

_____________________________________________________________________








"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted."

— Oscar Wilde



Most viewed (Last 7 days)

Tennessee executes Harold Wayne Nichols

Thirty-seven years after confessing to a series of rapes and the murder of Karen Pulley, Nichols expressed remorse in final words Strapped to a gurney in the execution chamber at Riverbend Maximum Security Institution Thursday morning, Harold Wayne Nichols made a final statement.  “To the people I’ve harmed, I’m sorry,” he said, according to prison officials and media witnesses. “To my family, know that I love you. I know where I’m going to. I’m ready to go home.”

China | Former Chinese senior banker Bai Tianhui executed for taking US$155 million in bribes

Bai is the second senior figure from Huarong to be put to death for corruption following the execution of Lai Xiaomin in 2021 China has executed a former senior banker who was found guilty of taking more than 1.1 billion yuan (US$155 million) in bribes. Bai Tianhui, the former general manager of the asset management firm China Huarong International Holdings, was executed on Tuesday after the Supreme People’s Court approved the sentence, state broadcaster CCTV reported.

Oklahoma board recommends clemency for inmate set to be executed next week

A voting board in Oklahoma decided Wednesday to recommend clemency for Tremane Wood, a death row inmate who is scheduled to receive a lethal injection next week at the state penitentiary in McAlester.  Wood, 46, faces execution for his conviction in the 2001 murder of Ronnie Wipf, a migrant farmworker, at an Oklahoma City hotel on New Year's Eve, court records show. The recommendation was decided in a 3-2 vote by the Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board, consisting of five members appointed by either the governor or the state's top judicial official, according to CBS News affiliate KWTV. Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Sitt will consider the recommendation as he weighs whether to grant or deny Wood's clemency request, which would mean sparing him from execution and reducing his sentence to life in prison without the possibility of parole.

Iran | Child Bride Saved from the Gallows After Blood Money Raised Through Donations, Charities

Iran Human Rights (IHRNGO); December 9, 2025: Goli Kouhkan, a 25-year-old undocumented Baluch child bride who was scheduled to be executed within weeks, has been saved from the gallows after the diya (blood money) was raised in time. According to the judiciary’s Mizan News Agency , the plaintiffs in the case of Goli Kouhkan, have agreed to forgo their right to execution as retribution. In a video, the victim’s parents are seen signing the relevant documents. Goli’s lawyer, Parand Gharahdaghi, confirmed in a social media post that the original 10 billion (approx. 100,000 euros) toman diya was reduced to 8 billion tomans (approx. 80,000 euros) and had been raised through donations and charities.

Burkina Faso to bring back death penalty

Burkina Faso's military rulers will bring back the death penalty, which was abolished in 2018, the country's Council of Ministers announced on Thursday. "This draft penal code reinstates the death penalty for a number of offences, including high treason, acts of terrorism, acts of espionage, among others," stated the information service of the Burkinabe government. Burkina Faso last carried out an execution in 1988.

Who Gets Hanged in Singapore?

Singapore’s death penalty has been in the news again.  Enshrined in law in 1975, a decade after the island split from Malaysia and became an independent state, the penalty can see people sentenced to hang for drug trafficking, murder or firearms offenses, among other crimes. Executions have often involved trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act, with offenses measured in grams.  Those executed have included people from low-income backgrounds and foreign nationals who are sometimes not fluent in English, according to human rights advocates such as Amnesty International and the International Drug Policy Consortium. 

Afghanistan's Taliban rulers carry out public execution in sports stadium

The man had been convicted of killing 13 members of a family, including children, and was executed by one of their relatives, according to police. Afghanistan's Taliban authorities carried out the public execution of a man on Tuesday convicted of killing 13 members of a family, including several children, earlier this year. Tens of thousands of people attended the execution at a sports stadium in the eastern city of Khost, which the Supreme Court said was the eleventh since the Taliban seized power in 2021 in the wake of the chaotic withdrawal of US and NATO forces.

USA | Should Medical Research Regulations and Informed Consent Principles Apply to States’ Use of Experimental Execution Methods?

New drugs and med­ical treat­ments under­go rig­or­ous test­ing to ensure they are safe and effec­tive for pub­lic use. Under fed­er­al and state reg­u­la­tions, this test­ing typ­i­cal­ly involves clin­i­cal tri­als with human sub­jects, who face sig­nif­i­cant health and safe­ty risks as the first peo­ple exposed to exper­i­men­tal treat­ments. That is why the law requires them to be ful­ly informed of the poten­tial effects and give their vol­un­tary con­sent to par­tic­i­pate in trials. Yet these reg­u­la­tions have not been fol­lowed when states seek to use nov­el and untest­ed exe­cu­tion meth­ods — sub­ject­ing pris­on­ers to poten­tial­ly tor­tur­ous and uncon­sti­tu­tion­al­ly painful deaths. Some experts and advo­cates argue that states must be bound by the eth­i­cal and human rights prin­ci­ples of bio­med­ical research before using these meth­ods on prisoners.

Afghanistan | Two Sons Of Executed Man Also Face Death Penalty, Says Taliban

The Taliban governor’s spokesperson in Khost said on Tuesday that two sons of a man executed earlier that day have also been sentenced to death. Their executions, he said, have been postponed because the heir of the victims is not currently in Afghanistan. Mostaghfer Gurbaz, spokesperson for the Taliban governor in Khost, also released details of the charges against the man executed on Tuesday, identified as Mangal. He said Mangal was accused of killing members of a family.

Utah | Ralph Menzies dies on death row less than 3 months after his execution was called off

Judge was set to consider arguments in December about Menzies’ mental fitness  Ralph Menzies, who spent more than 3 decades on Utah’s death row for the 1986 murder of Maurine Hunsaker, has died.  Menzies, 67, died of “presumed natural causes at a local hospital” Wednesday afternoon, according to the Utah Department of Corrections.  Matt Hunsaker, Maurine Hunsaker’s son, said Menzies’ death “was a complete surprise.”  “First off, I’d say that I’m numb. And second off, I would say, grateful,” Hunsaker told Utah News Dispatch. “I’m grateful that my family does not have to endure this for the holidays.”