Skip to main content

California | Murder-for-hire killer on death row for 33 years must either be released or retried, judge rules

A murderer-for-hire who has been on death row for the past 33 years must be retried or released, a judge ruled, after it was found that some jurors were illegally excused based on their race or ethnic identity during the trial

Because of prosecutorial misconduct in the selection of the jury in the trial of a convicted death row murderer-for-hire, a judge ruled that the man must now be freed or, at the very least, retried.

The Alameda County prosecutor's office now has just 60 days to retry 71-year-old Curtis Lee Ervin or set him free, a California judge ruled at the request of California Attorney General Rob Bonta. Ervin was found guilty of a murder-for-hire in 1986 and has been on California's death row ever since.

But when the jury was being selected nearly four decades ago, several potential jurors were reportedly dismissed, especially those who were Black or Jewish.

Alameda County District Attorney Pamela Price says her office is in the process of reviewing dozens of death penalty cases in which prosecutors purposefully dismissed jurors based on their identities, a practice she told CNN occurred from the 1980s through the early 2000s.

Bonta argued that prosecutors illegally excluded Black jurors from Ervin's case, which could have impacted the outcome. Price told CNN that there's no plan yet on how to proceed with the case, but her office has until Sept. 30 to make a decision, it was reported.

Ervin was placed on death row in 1991 after being found guilty of murdering Carlene McDonald, a 43-year-old woman who was the ex-wife of Ervin's co-defendant, Robert McDonald. McDonald was also found guilty of the murder and died in prison.

Amid the possibility that Ervin could be freed after spending 33 years on death row, his lawyer, Pamala Sayasane, told CNN that her client is "overjoyed and in disbelief," since he's been in prison for a total of 38 years. She said he's "grateful to everyone who helped him" and said she herself is "in a daze" just like her client.

She said the decision made by the state's attorney general "is rarely made" and said it's a "big thing" that's "going to have ramifications for others on death row." In Ervin's case, Sayasane said all six Black women who may have been on the jury were dismissed, as were three Black men. Only one Black man was seated, and another was selected as an alternate, she told CNN.

Not only were the jurors excused based on sex but also because of their race, which violates the 14th Amendment and its Equal Protection Clause.

This isn't the first case Price is seeking to overturn or at least open an investigation into misconduct for, either. Last year, she opened an investigation into the jury selection in the case of Ernest Dykes, who was found guilty of shooting and killing a 9-year-old in 1993. She said that she has plans to get Dykes resentenced and that she was looking into another death row inmate's case for other Batson violations — the violations of the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause.

Price even said some investigators may have acted criminally as she vowed that a team of prosecutors would look into more cases. She said a current team uncovered boxes with notes that show previous deputy district attorneys intentionally dismissed jurors because they were Black or Jewish.

Attorney Brian Pomerantz, who is the lead counsel for three of the cases Price's office is reviewing, is also involved in the settlement of dozens of other cases. He told CNN, "The markings by the prosecutor next to the names of Black jurors were affirmative evidence of the prosecution’s fixation with the jurors’ race."

Pomerantz added, "All of these people deserve to have either a new trial or a resolution of their current case that rectifies the injustice ... of the unconstitutional trials that they had."

Linda Kenney Baden, a high-profile defense attorney, said prosecuting a crime that occurred over four decades ago, however, is "almost impossible." Witnesses have died, and jurors would therefore have to rely on transcripts, which can be grueling and difficult to sit through.

Newer prosecutors are also scared to touch the cases, she said, because doing so could mean tarnishing their reputations if they lose. Nevertheless, Price is committed to justice, and she's not planning on stopping until she helps as many death row inmates as she can.

Source: themirror.com, Jeremiah Hassel, August 3, 2024

_____________________________________________________________________








"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted."

— Oscar Wilde



Most viewed (Last 7 days)

Iran: Flogging still a common practice

Flogging of Sufis in Gonabad: Fourteen Ne’matollahi dervishes received 25 lashes each for allegedly disturbing the public security "The lash ruling against 14 Ne'matollahi dervishes of Gonabad was carried out. They were residents of Baydokht and had been arrested and condemned by the Public Prosecutor of Gonabad after a protest against the illegal treatment dealing with the Sufis in June of last year [2010]. According to the website of Majzuban-e-Nur, Mr. Sa'id Kashani, Mr. Amir Roshan-Mojaver-Sufi, Mr. Alimohammad Amanian, Mr. Ruhollah Safari, Mr. Ali Abbasi-Baydokhti, Mr. Ebrahim Abbaszadeh, Mr. Mohammadali Ja'fari, Mr. Hossein Mahdavi, Mr. Hossein Abbaszadeh-Baydokhti, Mr. Rahmat Hosseini, Mr. Reza Kakhki, Mr. Behruz Mojaver-Sufi, Mr. Ali Mir, and Mr. Hassan Baluchi-Baydokhti are the fourteen dervishes whose requests were not only rejected, but who were condemned to 25 lashes for disturbing the public security. It should be mentioned that Ruhollah Safari, the ...

Japan’s Internet Wants Uchida Riko Executed. Here’s Why That Won’t Happen

This week, the prosecution in the case of a murder of a 17-year-old girl in Hokkaido came out with its sentencing recommendation. Japanese social media reacted by clamoring for the accused woman’s blood. But, while the facts of the case are heinous, the prosecutor’s decision not to seek the death penalty is grounded in long-standing precedent. Murdered for looking at the accused wrong Uchida Riko (内田梨瑚), 23, and her friends stand accused of murdering 17-year-old Murayama Runa (村山瑠奈) in Hokkaido’s Asahikawa. Prosecutors say the dispute began after Murayama posted a photo of Uchida to social media. They say Uchida’s group abducted the girl, made her undress, and then forced her to jump from a bridge.

Kansas AG urges governor to deny clemency to 8 sentenced to death

TOPEKA — Attorney General Kris Kobach on Tuesday urged the governor to deny clemency to Kansas inmates who have been sentenced to death. Eight of nine people sentenced to death in Kansas formally filed clemency requests in May, according to a press release from the Attorney General’s Office. Kobach urged Gov. Laura Kelly to reject them.

I watched Ohio's last execution. Here's what it was like

As Gov. DeWine calls for Ohio to end capital punishment, the state’s last execution remains the one I witnessed in 2018 Inside Ohio's death house, there is a room for executions and separate witness rooms: one for those connected to the victim and another for those connected to the inmate. Windows separate the death chamber from those watching, the condemned from the living. I was there on July 18, 2018 – during Ohio’s most recent execution. Robert Van Hook was put to death that day for killing David Self in 1985. He sat on death row for three decades. I was one of three media witnesses to the execution.

New Mississippi billboard warns criminals: ‘Firing squad is legal’

DESOTO COUNTY, Miss. (WREG) — A billboard standing on Interstate 55 southbound as you cross the Tennessee state line and enter Mississippi from Memphis is sending a grim message to those coming into the state. DeSoto County District Attorney Matthew Barton recently announced the new billboard campaign, which features the sign reading, “WELCOME TO MISSISSIPPI. WHERE THE FIRING SQUAD IS LEGAL. THINK TWICE.” It references Mississippi’s law permitting execution by firing squad under certain circumstances for inmates sentenced to death. Barton says this campaign is aimed at deterring violent crime and sends a direct message to criminals entering Mississippi.

Gov. Mike DeWine calls for Ohio to abolish the death penalty

COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — Gov. Mike DeWine Tuesday morning called on Ohio to abolish the death penalty, citing data that he said proves it is no longer a deterrent to violent crime. “For the state to take a human life, there must, in my opinion, there must be evidence that in doing so it will help protect the public, that the threat of that action will deter someone from committing murder,” DeWine said. “I do not believe that argument today can be successfully made.” DeWine cited data showing a decline in the last four decades of executions being carried out and an increase in the time inmates spend on death row.

20 Minutes to Death: Witness to the Last Execution in France

The following document is a firsthand account of the final moments of Hamida Djandoubi, a convicted murderer executed by guillotine at Marseille’s Baumettes Prison on September 10, 1977. The record—dated September 9—was written by Monique Mabelly, a judge appointed by the state to witness the proceedings. Djandoubi’s execution would ultimately be the last carried out in France before capital punishment was abolished in 1981. At the time, President Valéry Giscard d'Estaing—who had publicly voiced his "deep aversion to the death penalty" prior to his election—rejected Djandoubi’s appeal for clemency. Choosing to let "justice take its course," the President allowed the execution to proceed, just as he had in two previous cases during his term:   Christian Ranucci , executed on July 28, 1976 and Jérôme Carrein , executed on June 23, 1977. Hamida Djandoubi , a Tunisian national, was sentenced to death for killing his former lover, Elisabeth Bousquet. He was execu...

Two men executed with AK-47 for raping and murdering boy, 12, in Yemen as children watch on

“Public execution is an even more grotesque violation of human rights, particularly in a country where the ability of the accused to obtain adequate legal representation and the coverage of the process is highly limited.” --  Human Rights Watch director Sarah Leah Whitson TWO  paedophiles have been executed with AK-47s in front of a bloodthirsty crowd for raping and murdering a 12-year-old boy in Yemen. Chilling images show Wadah Refat and Mohamed Khaled being marched at gunpoint through the port city of Aden. Yemen is one of the few countries in the world where capital punishment is legal, and even children were in attendance to watch the gruesome event. Refat, 28, and Khaled, 31, were condemned for the abduction, rape, and murder of a young boy who was snatched after playing next to the house of one of the men. The pair reportedly dragged him into their home and raped him. When sentencing the pair, The Daily Star reported that the judge said: “Afte...

Florida execution of 74-year-old death row inmate Dusty Ray Spencer reignites debate

Florida has set an execution date of June 25, 2026, for 74-year-old death row inmate Dusty Ray Spencer, a move that would make him the oldest person ever executed in the state’s history . Governor Ron DeSantis signed the death warrant on May 26, 2026, marking the tenth such warrant issued this year as the state continues its current pace of capital punishment. Spencer was convicted in 1992 of the first-degree murder of his wife, Karen Spencer, in Orange County. Court records detail a prolonged and violent pattern of abuse preceding the homicide. On January 18, 1992, after prior incidents of physical assault and threats, Spencer stabbed his wife to death in their backyard. The trial evidence included testimony that the victim was alive and conscious during the attack, which involved blunt force trauma and multiple stab wounds while the couple's son was present.

Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch wanted an execution that a Trump judge deemed illegal

The Supreme Court these days is generally in the business of helping executions go forward. But on Thursday night, the court did something notable: It told Alabama no. Even then, the court wasn't unanimous. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch dissented from the refusal to let the nitrogen gas execution of Jeffery Lee proceed. What prompted the rare rejection? In line with the typical shadow docket practice, the court didn't explain itself. Nor did the dissenters, who merely noted their disagreement. But a deeper look at the case helps us understand why a majority of the court was unwilling to help the state this time.