Skip to main content

Indiana Governor dismisses concerns about executions using new drug

Governor Eric Holcomb says he isn’t worried about a plan to put to death a state prisoner with a drug that’s never been used in an Indiana execution.

Holcomb said Thursday that while Indiana has never used pentobarbital in an execution, “Other states have, and we've done our due diligence.”


The proposed execution of Joseph Corcoran, convicted in four murders in 1998, would be the first state execution in Indiana in 15 years. On Wednesday, Indiana’s attorney general filed a court motion requesting an execution date.

“We’ve tracked this particular drug and feel comfortable that not only it’s the right drug but also that the (execution) protocol is in place, and we're prepared to carry out our duties,” Holcomb told reporters at an event in Indianapolis.

“We’ve tried to acquire the means to carry out our duty, and to follow the law, and carry out the law in a sentence. And we're in a position to do that. So, we are,” he said.

According to Holcomb, state officials have been trying for more than seven years to find a supplier of pentobarbital for use in executions.

“It's been harder to get for various reasons but recently we were able to,” he said.

Pentobarbital has been used for several years in other states that frequently execute prisoners such as Texas and Missouri.

States began turning to the drug after pharmaceutical companies banned the use of their medications in executions. The bans resulted in shortages that have put state executions on hold across the country for years.

Holcomb declined to say where the Indiana corrections department acquired the supply of pentobarbital, citing a 2017 secrecy law.

Death penalty experts say states are almost certainly getting their drugs from smaller companies rather than major manufacturers.

Due to the stigma against participating in executions in the medical profession, negligible revenues and potential for embarrassment if exposed, major drug companies generally steer clear of involvement in executions.

“The amount of money that you can make selling execution drugs to states is not even a drop in the bucket. It's not even a drop in the drop,” according to Robert Dunham, a defense attorney and expert on executions.

“And the doctors who are developing these drugs are not intending that the drugs be used to kill people. They're intending exactly the opposite. And they have a strong voice inside the company,” Dunham says.

Anti-death penalty activists have uncovered the identity of suppliers, which is why states go to extreme lengths to protect them.

"Secrecy laws are being put in place around the country,” says Abe Bonowitz, executive director of Death Penalty Action, which opposes capital punishment. “They don't want people who oppose the death penalty to shine a spotlight on those who are making it possible. It’s embarrassing, frankly.”

Bonowitz, whose group tracks the use of drugs like pentobarbital, says it isn’t particularly surprising that Indiana found the drug.

“We know that attorneys general talk to each other,” Bonowitz said. “You can get this stuff in veterinarians’ offices, theoretically.”

The use of pentobarbital in executions is particularly controversial. It’s been linked to numerous cases of pulmonary edema, a potentially excruciating condition in which blood pours into the lungs while the prisoner is still alive.

Records from autopsies of two prisoners executed in Terre Haute in 2020 and 2021 showed evidence of edema in the lungs.

The company accused of supplying the drug for those executions, Connecticut-based chemical manufacturer Absolute Standards, Inc., stopped making it in late 2020, according to documentation obtained by WFIU/WTIU News.

Absolute Standards said it had been inundated by calls and emails after a weeks-long campaign led by Death Penalty Action and another group.

“If we can figure out where this is coming from in Indiana, we’ll do it there, too,” Bonowitz said. “The pharmaceutical companies that make these drugs do not want it to be known that their drugs are being used for executions.” 

Bonowitz said that beyond the question how executions are conducted, there’s no compelling reason to restart them in Indiana.

“There's always going to be the empty chair at the table, and no amount of killing is going to bring back our loved ones,” he said. “We know that we can be holding people who've done awful crimes accountable and safe from them without executions. And we know that because in Indiana, we haven't had an execution in over 15 years. And in the vast majority of cases, they don't even get a death sentence.”

He added: “This is an unnecessary, political game.”

The man Holcomb’s administration is seeking to execute, Joseph Corcoran of Fort Wayne, was convicted of killing four people in 1998.

Allen Superior Court Judge Fran Gull sentenced him to death for the murders of his brother James Corcoran, his sister’s fiancé Robert Scott Turner, and two of their friends: Timothy Bricker and Douglas Stillwell.

In July 1997, a 22-year-old Joseph Corcoran was upstairs in a Fort Wayne home where he lived when he heard men's voices below. He thought they were talking about him and took a semi-automatic rifle downstairs. He shot his brother, Turner, and Bricker at close range. Stillwell tried to escape, but Corcoran chased him into the kitchen and shot him.

Offered a guilty plea or a bench trial in exchange for a sentence of life in prison, Corcoran went ahead with a jury trial after nine months of negotiations.

His lawyers intended to argue he was insane at the time of the shootings, but after evaluations from court-appointed psychiatrists found him to be competent to stand trial, that request was withdrawn, according to court documents. An Allen County Superior Court jury convicted him on all counts and he was sentenced to death in August 1999.

After he was sentenced to death, Corcoran repeatedly flip-flopped on his appeals, first refusing to sign a petition for post-conviction relief saying he should be put to death. In 2003, defense attorneys presented evidence he suffered from paranoid schizophrenia, and court officials acknowledged the same, according to court documents.

Multiple versions of his case — Corcoran I to Corcoran V — that have made their way through the state appeals courts, federal appeals courts, up to the U.S. Supreme Court and back down again. Issues raised have been his mental health and whether his rights were violated over the request he have a bench trial.

A final appeal to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals was denied in 2016, but no execution date has ever been set.

Source: indianapublicmedia.org, Staff, June 29, 2024

_____________________________________________________________________








"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted."

— Oscar Wilde



Most viewed (Last 7 days)

Kansas AG urges governor to deny clemency to 8 sentenced to death

TOPEKA — Attorney General Kris Kobach on Tuesday urged the governor to deny clemency to Kansas inmates who have been sentenced to death. Eight of nine people sentenced to death in Kansas formally filed clemency requests in May, according to a press release from the Attorney General’s Office. Kobach urged Gov. Laura Kelly to reject them.

With nitrogen gas blocked, Alabama seeks to execute inmate by lethal injection

Jeffery Lee, who successfully challenged his scheduled Thursday execution by nitrogen gas, argued that execution by firing squad would be less painful. The Alabama Attorney General’s Office Friday sought to put an Alabama death row inmate to death by lethal injection a day after the U.S. Supreme Court rebuffed the state’s attempt to execute him by nitrogen gas. In a filing with the Alabama Supreme Court Friday afternoon, the state sought an expedited motion to set a new execution date for Jeffery Lee, 49. The state said that with a permanent injunction in place against nitrogen gas, the method by which the state intended to execute Lee on Thursday, it could execute him by lethal injection or the electric chair.

Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch wanted an execution that a Trump judge deemed illegal

The Supreme Court these days is generally in the business of helping executions go forward. But on Thursday night, the court did something notable: It told Alabama no. Even then, the court wasn't unanimous. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch dissented from the refusal to let the nitrogen gas execution of Jeffery Lee proceed. What prompted the rare rejection? In line with the typical shadow docket practice, the court didn't explain itself. Nor did the dissenters, who merely noted their disagreement. But a deeper look at the case helps us understand why a majority of the court was unwilling to help the state this time.

Gov. Mike DeWine calls for Ohio to abolish the death penalty

COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — Gov. Mike DeWine Tuesday morning called on Ohio to abolish the death penalty, citing data that he said proves it is no longer a deterrent to violent crime. “For the state to take a human life, there must, in my opinion, there must be evidence that in doing so it will help protect the public, that the threat of that action will deter someone from committing murder,” DeWine said. “I do not believe that argument today can be successfully made.” DeWine cited data showing a decline in the last four decades of executions being carried out and an increase in the time inmates spend on death row.

SCOTUS: Alabama can’t execute Jeffery Lee by nitrogen; Thursday execution called off

After a week of legal volleyball, Alabama death row inmate Jeffery Lee’s execution—scheduled for Thursday evening—was called off after federal courts called the state’s nitrogen gas execution method “likely unconstitutional.” The state took the fight to the U.S. Supreme Court, hoping Lee could still be put to death tonight.  In an order issued at 8:10 p.m., the U.S. Supreme Court ordered that it would not lift a ban on Alabama executing Lee via nitrogen . In a short court order, the justices denied Alabama’s motion to go ahead with the execution.  Associate Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch would have granted the appeal and let the execution proceed, according to the order. 

I watched Ohio's last execution. Here's what it was like

As Gov. DeWine calls for Ohio to end capital punishment, the state’s last execution remains the one I witnessed in 2018 Inside Ohio's death house, there is a room for executions and separate witness rooms: one for those connected to the victim and another for those connected to the inmate. Windows separate the death chamber from those watching, the condemned from the living. I was there on July 18, 2018 – during Ohio’s most recent execution. Robert Van Hook was put to death that day for killing David Self in 1985. He sat on death row for three decades. I was one of three media witnesses to the execution.

20 Minutes to Death: Witness to the Last Execution in France

The following document is a firsthand account of the final moments of Hamida Djandoubi, a convicted murderer executed by guillotine at Marseille’s Baumettes Prison on September 10, 1977. The record—dated September 9—was written by Monique Mabelly, a judge appointed by the state to witness the proceedings. Djandoubi’s execution would ultimately be the last carried out in France before capital punishment was abolished in 1981. At the time, President Valéry Giscard d'Estaing—who had publicly voiced his "deep aversion to the death penalty" prior to his election—rejected Djandoubi’s appeal for clemency. Choosing to let "justice take its course," the President allowed the execution to proceed, just as he had in two previous cases during his term:   Christian Ranucci , executed on July 28, 1976 and Jérôme Carrein , executed on June 23, 1977. Hamida Djandoubi , a Tunisian national, was sentenced to death for killing his former lover, Elisabeth Bousquet. He was execu...

New Mississippi billboard warns criminals: ‘Firing squad is legal’

DESOTO COUNTY, Miss. (WREG) — A billboard standing on Interstate 55 southbound as you cross the Tennessee state line and enter Mississippi from Memphis is sending a grim message to those coming into the state. DeSoto County District Attorney Matthew Barton recently announced the new billboard campaign, which features the sign reading, “WELCOME TO MISSISSIPPI. WHERE THE FIRING SQUAD IS LEGAL. THINK TWICE.” It references Mississippi’s law permitting execution by firing squad under certain circumstances for inmates sentenced to death. Barton says this campaign is aimed at deterring violent crime and sends a direct message to criminals entering Mississippi.

Idaho will soon turn to firing squad executions. Police will pull the triggers

Trained members of Idaho law enforcement with demonstrated firearms proficiency are expected to fill slots for carrying out the death penalty by firing squad as the state prison system transitions to the controversial execution method next month.  Six volunteers certified for no less than three years apiece through Peace Officer Standards and Training, or POST, will be recruited to ensure the Idaho Department of Correction is ready to comply with a state law that prioritizes shooting prisoners to death over lethal injection starting July 1.  No one on the team may have faced disciplinary action over firearms, use of force, or related conduct over the prior year, according to new execution protocols the prison system released this week. 

Alabama | Judge bars nitrogen gas execution, says method is unconstitutionally cruel

MONTGOMERY, Ala. -- A federal judge on Tuesday permanently blocked Alabama from executing an inmate with nitrogen gas after declaring it violates the ban on cruel and unusual punishment. U.S. District Judge Emily Marks issued the ruling hours after an appeals court reversed her initial finding that the method was constitutional. Marks permanently enjoined the state from executing Jeffrey Lee, 49, by nitrogen gas. He was scheduled to be executed Thursday. The decision, for now, blocks the use of the controversial new execution method that the state has championed since 2024, but the issue will likely end up before the U.S. Supreme Court.