As the New York Times
notes, Kenneth Smith was the first person put to death by nitrogen hypoxia. He had been convicted “in the stabbing murder of Elizabeth Dorlene Sennett, 45, whose husband, a pastor, had recruited them to kill her in March 1988 in Colbert County, Ala.”
And Thursday marked Smith’s second trip to Alabama’s death chamber. The Times recounts that “In November 2022,
the state tried to execute Mr. Smith using lethal injection. But that night, a team of correctional facility workers tried and repeatedly failed to insert an intravenous line into Mr. Smith’s arms and hands and, eventually, a vein near his heart.”
After multiple attempts, “prison officials decided that they did not have the time to carry out the execution before the death warrant expired at midnight.”
America has a long history of botching executions. From 1900 to 2010, 276 (3.15%) of 8,776 execution attempts were messed up in some way.
Lethal injections had the highest botch rate (7.1%), with gassings coming in second (5.4%).
A botched execution
is one that departs from the governing legal protocol, standard operating procedure, or the advertised virtues of the method used. Generally, even a botched execution, like Smith’s experience with nitrogen hypoxia, succeeds in killing the condemned person, though in doing so it may impose more pain than is necessary or produce a lingering death.
One can trace the advertised virtues of nitrogen hypoxia, as The Atlantic’s Elizabeth Bruenig
notes, “to a California screenwriter by the name of Stuart Creque (author of the science-fiction and horror films
The Last Earth Girl,
He Knows, and
Memento Mori), who wrote a 1995 National Review article suggesting the technique for its humanity and simplicity.”
Creque, Bruenig says, “followed up on his original essay in The Wall Street Journal last year, praising officials in Alabama for preparing to realize his proposal. ‘Nitrogen anoxia is painless,’ Creque wrote, basing his analysis on the details of industrial accidents involving the gas. ‘It requires no drugs, poisons or medical procedures, and its effects are well-understood, consistent and reliable. Its first symptom is loss of consciousness.”
According to a
report in the Guardian, during the legislative debate about nitrogen hypoxia, Alabama state Senator Trip Pittman described it as a “more humane option” for putting condemned prisoners to death. Pittman compared the method to the way that passengers on a plane may pass out when the aircraft depressurizes.
Michael Copeland, one of the country’s leading proponents of nitrogen hypoxia as an execution method, made a similar
claim several years ago in testimony before the Oklahoma legislature. He
told the lawmakers that it would be a painless way to put someone to death.
Hypoxia, the journalist Jack Shuler
writes, “occurs when a person lacks an adequate supply of oxygen.” “Normally,” according to Copeland, “the air we breathe is 79 percent nitrogen and 21 percent oxygen.”
Nitrogen hypoxia during an execution “would be induced by having the offender breathing a gas mixture of pure nitrogen.” Because nitrogen is an inert gas, it doesn’t actually cause the death. As Copeland told the Oklahoma legislators, “It is the lack of oxygen that causes death.”
“The condemned person,” Copeland argued, “might not even know when the switch to pure nitrogen occurs, instead he would simply lose consciousness about 15 seconds after the switch was made. Approximately 30 seconds later, he would stop producing brain waves, and the heart would stop beating about two to three minutes after that.”
In litigation leading up to Smith’s execution, the Alabama attorney general’s office
repeated those promises. It called nitrogen hypoxia “the most painless and humane method of execution known to man.”
It said that the nitrogen gas will “cause unconsciousness within seconds, and cause death within minutes.” Unconsciousness within seconds.
That is the promise of nitrogen hypoxia, the standard against which it should be measured. That promise was broken when Alabama killed Kenneth Smith.
Lee Hedgepeth, a reporter who witnessed Smith’s execution, made that clear in his detailed account of what he saw.
“Around 7:53,” Hedgepeth wrote, “correctional officers opened the curtains to the execution chamber, revealing Smith, gas mask already affixed, just beyond. Smith lay crucifixion style, his arms outstretched at his sides, strapped to the gurney with taut black buckles.”
“Around 7:55, a correctional officer removed a cap on the side of the gas mask…Around 7:57, Smith began to react to the nitrogen flowing into the mask covering his face. He began thrashing against the straps, his whole body and head violently jerking back and forth for several minutes.”
“Soon, for around a minute, Smith appeared heaving and retching inside the mask. By around 8:00, Smith’s struggle against the restraints had lessened, though he continued to gasp for air. Each time he did so, his body lifted against the restraints. Smith’s efforts to breathe continued for several minutes…. Around 8:07 p.m., Smith made his last visible effort to breathe.”
Another witness
said that “Smith writhed and convulsed on the gurney. He took deep breaths, his body shaking violently with his eyes rolling in the back of his head. Smith clenched his fists, his legs shook … He seemed to be gasping for air. The gurney shook several times.”
As Professor Deborah Denno
told the New York Times, Smith’s execution was “appalling.” Pain, Denno said, “for two to four minutes, particularly when you’re talking about somebody who’s suffocating to death—that’s a really long period of time and a torturous period of time.”
Last week, Alabama rolled out another new method of execution, yielding yet another botched execution. We should have learned by now that no new method can assure that executions will be safe, reliable, and humane.
With his death, Kenneth Smith now joins
William Kemmler (electrocution),
Gee Jon (the gas chamber), and
Charles Brooks (lethal injection) on the list of people who were put to death by a previously untried execution method and whose botched executions became gruesome spectacles.
Source:
verdict.justia.com, Austin Sarat, January 29, 2024. Austin Sarat is the William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Jurisprudence and Political Science at Amherst College. Views expressed do not represent Amherst College.
_____________________________________________________________________
SUPPORT DEATH PENALTY NEWS
