Skip to main content

The deadliest woman in the Netherlands: Goeie Mie

Goeie's arrest
Maria Swanenburg is arguably the greatest female serial killer of all time, so why isn’t she world famous? Here’s a look at a fearsome former Leidener, and a group of modern day residents who are keeping her macabre legend alive. 

How many people did Maria ‘Goeie Mie’ Swanenburg kill in Leiden during her murder spree in the 19th century? Teacher and author Stefan Glasbergen believes he found the answer while he was working on a new biography about her. 

‘The story of Goeie Mie is surrounded by myths,’ the lifelong Leiden resident said. ‘If you go to Wikipedia, for example, I could point out at least six or seven statements on the page that are just not true.’

Glasbergen’s book, titled Goeie Mie: Biografie van een seriemoordenares, will hit bookstore shelves on 1 November. It’s set to become the most definitive account of her life and crimes to date. 

Arsenic 


Best known by her nickname ‘Goeie Mie’, Swanenburg poisoned no less than 65 people by sneaking arsenic into their food and drinks between 1864 and 1883. At least 23 of them later died. 

For decades, rumours and even news reports have falsely claimed she poisoned closer to 100. Other accounts have also painted her as an alluring femme fatale when she actually lived and dressed like a pauper. 

But the biggest enigma surrounding the notorious murderer is arguably why so few people have heard of her, especially outside of the Netherlands. 

An infamous killer 


Josine Heijnen grew up in the nearby town of Katwijk. She didn’t know about Goeie Mie until she found a short biography about her sitting on a bookshelf in her own childhood home. 

The tales of her crimes, which often involved poisoning food like porridge, scared Heijnen so badly that she refused to eat oatmeal for a long time afterwards. 

Years later, she was enjoying a meal with her friends when one of them made a silly joke about their food being poisoned. ‘’Oh, like Goeie Mie’, my friend said, but nobody knew what she was talking about,’ Heijnen recalled. ‘That’s when I realised that her story isn’t very well known, despite her being such a big deal.’ 

The joke helped inspire Heijnen to create a line of gin along with the help of a colleague who runs a distillery in Amsterdam.

‘History isn’t always about heroes, and she definitely wasn’t a nice character, but she’s a big part of the history of Leiden,’ Heijnen said. ‘I tried to think of a way to bring her story to a new generation, and I’m also a gin fan.’ 

Responses to it have been largely positive so far, and she’s received orders from as far away as Hong Kong. It’s also inspired an array of cocktails currently available on menus in local bars like Einstein, which serves one called ‘The Poison’. 

Wait, what’s in those bagels?!! 


Heijnen isn’t the only local who has worked on projects devoted to Goeie Mie. Along with an escape room that puts players in the shoes of detectives determined to capture her, she’s inspired a bagel at Leiden’s Better Bagels. 

Owner Frank Zweerus has spent much of his life in Leiden. During a recent interview, he and a few members of his staff who also grew up in the city wondered why more people don’t know about Goeie Mie. 

While trying to come up with a Leiden themed bagel a few years ago, he created one devoted to the killer to help promote a local film project. The crew at Better Bagels still make Goeie Mie Bagels, but only on the day preceding a full moon. 

Unlike others available in the cafe, these bagels come with a catch. Anyone who gets a “poisoned’ bagel must return to the cafe for the ‘antidote’. “It’s a regular poppy seed bagel but with poppy seeds all around,’ Zweerus said. ‘They help hide the ‘poison’, which is actually just a blueberry, but every once in a while they burst. The seeds hide which bagels have the poison in them.’

World famous, but only briefly 


It’s somewhat remarkable that Goeie Mie isn’t better known, given the hysteria following her arrest in December of 1883. 

She managed to hide her crimes for years due to various factors including high death rates caused by the deplorable living conditions found in the destitute Leiden neighbourhood where she lived. 

Local doctors often shunned the area and ‘house calls’ were a rarity. No one ever suspected the humble Goeie Mie of being anything other than a saint. 

She spent her life in poverty and was always eager to help her friends, family, and neighbours during times of trouble. 

This is how she earned her ‘Goeie’ nickname, which means ‘good’ in Dutch. 

Her matronly persona made the revelation of her increasingly brazen murders (she once poisoned several people attending a funeral by sneaking arsenic into their coffee) all the more shocking once she was finally caught. 

Needless to say, she was nearly lynched by angry mobs after authorities were forced to move her from Leiden to a jailhouse in Den Haag while she awaited trial. 

Journalists from around Europe and beyond breathlessly reported on her crimes and possible motives.

Psychopath 


Some claimed she killed her victims as part of insurance scams, but that didn’t explain why she lived so humbly and owed money to businesses all around Leiden. 

Others stuck with the simpler explanation that she was a bloodthirsty psychopath. 

The media made her famous around the world, if only for a short while. Goeie Mie became so notorious in this country that the Nederlandsche Panopticum wax museum in Amsterdam added a figure of her to their ‘Chamber of Horrors’. 

It stood in a gallery of various killers and torture devices and helped make the museum the second most visited attraction in the city in 1884. 

Elsewhere others cashed in on Goeie Mie’s crimes by selling morbid songs and drawings featuring her. A photo of her taken in prison also became a big money maker.

The ambassador of the United States was one of the many who packed the courtroom on the first day of her trial. 

While politicians and members of the public hotly debated whether or not to restore the national death penalty because Goeie Mie’s crimes were so horrific, various legal authorities quibbled over what to do with her. She was eventually sentenced to life in prison. 

A brutal legacy erased


Even in a world that remains fascinated by serial killers, it’s unlikely that Goeie Mie will get her own Netflix documentary or miniseries on the BBC anytime soon. 

Meanwhile in Leiden, aside from the projects listed above, there are few reminders of her crimes. ‘I think Leiden has mixed feelings about her,’ Glasbergen said. ‘It’s very sensational and it’s murder and it’s crime and it’s super interesting. On the other hand, is this really the person you want to be the most famous woman to ever live in Leiden? There’s no traces of her or a museum. The house where she grew up and the others where she lived as an adult were destroyed. There’s nothing to remind us all of her.’ 

After she was sent to prison, many in Leiden, especially those related to her, were eager to forget all about her. Following a serious illness, her husband even managed to remarry. Glasbergen said he reached out to several of Goeie Mie’s surviving relatives (she gave birth to seven children, three of whom survived into adulthood) while working on his book, and they were reluctant to respond. He eventually managed to speak with two of them.

Of the various misconceptions and outright myths that still surround Goeie Mie, one of the most prevalent is that many public records for the police investigation and trial were destroyed during bombings in World War 2. 

As Glasbergen discovered, there is actually plenty of information available in Leiden’s city and police archives. Along with the help of newspaper archives, he was able to piece together an accurate portrait of her life. 

The deadliest in history?


Goeie Mie could be the most prolific female serial killer in history. The trouble with determining if she deserves this dubious title depends on which metrics you use. 

The American serial killer Jane Toppan confessed to 31 murders when she was arrested in 1901, but only around 12 victims were confirmed. 

There are also others to consider like the notorious Amelia Dyer of Victorian-era Britain whose unspeakable crimes may have involved up to 400 victims, earning her the nickname ‘The Ogress of Reading’. 

Juana Barraza, a former professional wrestler later dubbed ‘La Mataviejitas’ (‘The Old Lady Killer’ in Spanish), is currently serving 759 years in prison for killing at least 11 elderly women in the late 1990s and early 2000s. 

No one seems to agree on the actual number. Some sources claim it could be as high as 48. A 1936 biography mistakenly claimed Goeie Mie killed no less than 100 people, and this has often been repeated over the years. 

Glasbergen is confident that 23 is the true number based on evidence from the police investigation and her trial, which arguably means she’s the deadliest female serial killer of all time. ‘During her trial, even her own attorney claimed the number was 23,’ he said. ‘I would say that’s accurate. If you look at all the interviews the police did and consider the fact that it was the trial of this attorney’s life and he was surrounded by reporters from all over Europe, I’m sure he would have gotten it right. If you compare it to the number in all the primary sources, it’s pretty correct. You can trace all those murders back.’

Source: dutchnews.nl, Brandon Hartley, October 31, 2019


⚑ | Report an error, an omission, a typo; suggest a story or a new angle to an existing story; submit a piece, a comment; recommend a resource; contact the webmaster, contact us: deathpenaltynews@gmail.com.


Opposed to Capital Punishment? Help us keep this blog up and running! DONATE!



"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted." -- Oscar Wilde

Most viewed (Last 7 days)

Gov. Mike DeWine calls for Ohio to abolish the death penalty

COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — Gov. Mike DeWine Tuesday morning called on Ohio to abolish the death penalty, citing data that he said proves it is no longer a deterrent to violent crime. “For the state to take a human life, there must, in my opinion, there must be evidence that in doing so it will help protect the public, that the threat of that action will deter someone from committing murder,” DeWine said. “I do not believe that argument today can be successfully made.” DeWine cited data showing a decline in the last four decades of executions being carried out and an increase in the time inmates spend on death row.

I watched Ohio's last execution. Here's what it was like

As Gov. DeWine calls for Ohio to end capital punishment, the state’s last execution remains the one I witnessed in 2018 Inside Ohio's death house, there is a room for executions and separate witness rooms: one for those connected to the victim and another for those connected to the inmate. Windows separate the death chamber from those watching, the condemned from the living. I was there on July 18, 2018 – during Ohio’s most recent execution. Robert Van Hook was put to death that day for killing David Self in 1985. He sat on death row for three decades. I was one of three media witnesses to the execution.

Kansas AG urges governor to deny clemency to 8 sentenced to death

TOPEKA — Attorney General Kris Kobach on Tuesday urged the governor to deny clemency to Kansas inmates who have been sentenced to death. Eight of nine people sentenced to death in Kansas formally filed clemency requests in May, according to a press release from the Attorney General’s Office. Kobach urged Gov. Laura Kelly to reject them.

20 Minutes to Death: Witness to the Last Execution in France

The following document is a firsthand account of the final moments of Hamida Djandoubi, a convicted murderer executed by guillotine at Marseille’s Baumettes Prison on September 10, 1977. The record—dated September 9—was written by Monique Mabelly, a judge appointed by the state to witness the proceedings. Djandoubi’s execution would ultimately be the last carried out in France before capital punishment was abolished in 1981. At the time, President Valéry Giscard d'Estaing—who had publicly voiced his "deep aversion to the death penalty" prior to his election—rejected Djandoubi’s appeal for clemency. Choosing to let "justice take its course," the President allowed the execution to proceed, just as he had in two previous cases during his term:   Christian Ranucci , executed on July 28, 1976 and Jérôme Carrein , executed on June 23, 1977. Hamida Djandoubi , a Tunisian national, was sentenced to death for killing his former lover, Elisabeth Bousquet. He was execu...

New Mississippi billboard warns criminals: ‘Firing squad is legal’

DESOTO COUNTY, Miss. (WREG) — A billboard standing on Interstate 55 southbound as you cross the Tennessee state line and enter Mississippi from Memphis is sending a grim message to those coming into the state. DeSoto County District Attorney Matthew Barton recently announced the new billboard campaign, which features the sign reading, “WELCOME TO MISSISSIPPI. WHERE THE FIRING SQUAD IS LEGAL. THINK TWICE.” It references Mississippi’s law permitting execution by firing squad under certain circumstances for inmates sentenced to death. Barton says this campaign is aimed at deterring violent crime and sends a direct message to criminals entering Mississippi.

SCOTUS: Alabama can’t execute Jeffery Lee by nitrogen; Thursday execution called off

After a week of legal volleyball, Alabama death row inmate Jeffery Lee’s execution—scheduled for Thursday evening—was called off after federal courts called the state’s nitrogen gas execution method “likely unconstitutional.” The state took the fight to the U.S. Supreme Court, hoping Lee could still be put to death tonight.  In an order issued at 8:10 p.m., the U.S. Supreme Court ordered that it would not lift a ban on Alabama executing Lee via nitrogen . In a short court order, the justices denied Alabama’s motion to go ahead with the execution.  Associate Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch would have granted the appeal and let the execution proceed, according to the order. 

With nitrogen gas blocked, Alabama seeks to execute inmate by lethal injection

Jeffery Lee, who successfully challenged his scheduled Thursday execution by nitrogen gas, argued that execution by firing squad would be less painful. The Alabama Attorney General’s Office Friday sought to put an Alabama death row inmate to death by lethal injection a day after the U.S. Supreme Court rebuffed the state’s attempt to execute him by nitrogen gas. In a filing with the Alabama Supreme Court Friday afternoon, the state sought an expedited motion to set a new execution date for Jeffery Lee, 49. The state said that with a permanent injunction in place against nitrogen gas, the method by which the state intended to execute Lee on Thursday, it could execute him by lethal injection or the electric chair.

Alabama | Judge bars nitrogen gas execution, says method is unconstitutionally cruel

MONTGOMERY, Ala. -- A federal judge on Tuesday permanently blocked Alabama from executing an inmate with nitrogen gas after declaring it violates the ban on cruel and unusual punishment. U.S. District Judge Emily Marks issued the ruling hours after an appeals court reversed her initial finding that the method was constitutional. Marks permanently enjoined the state from executing Jeffrey Lee, 49, by nitrogen gas. He was scheduled to be executed Thursday. The decision, for now, blocks the use of the controversial new execution method that the state has championed since 2024, but the issue will likely end up before the U.S. Supreme Court.

Idaho will soon turn to firing squad executions. Police will pull the triggers

Trained members of Idaho law enforcement with demonstrated firearms proficiency are expected to fill slots for carrying out the death penalty by firing squad as the state prison system transitions to the controversial execution method next month.  Six volunteers certified for no less than three years apiece through Peace Officer Standards and Training, or POST, will be recruited to ensure the Idaho Department of Correction is ready to comply with a state law that prioritizes shooting prisoners to death over lethal injection starting July 1.  No one on the team may have faced disciplinary action over firearms, use of force, or related conduct over the prior year, according to new execution protocols the prison system released this week. 

Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch wanted an execution that a Trump judge deemed illegal

The Supreme Court these days is generally in the business of helping executions go forward. But on Thursday night, the court did something notable: It told Alabama no. Even then, the court wasn't unanimous. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch dissented from the refusal to let the nitrogen gas execution of Jeffery Lee proceed. What prompted the rare rejection? In line with the typical shadow docket practice, the court didn't explain itself. Nor did the dissenters, who merely noted their disagreement. But a deeper look at the case helps us understand why a majority of the court was unwilling to help the state this time.