Skip to main content

Georgia: Jury at impasse over death sentence for Gwinnett woman in starving death

Tiffany Moss and Emani Moss
Tiffany Moss convicted of murdering stepdaughter

It will likely go down as one of the least-surprising verdicts in the history of Georgia jurisprudence.

After deliberating just short of three hours, a Gwinnett County jury on Monday found Tiffany Moss guilty of murdering her stepdaughter Emani, starving the 10-year-old and then trying to burn her emaciated body. Moss, who took the unusual step of representing herself in a capital case, mounted no defense. She didn’t ask a single question of the witnesses who testified against her and offered no opening statement or closing argument. 

Upon hearing the guilty verdicts — for murder, felony murder, cruelty to children and trying to conceal death — Moss showed no emotion. But the jury of six men and six women appear conflicted over whether Moss, 36, should be sentenced to die. 

At day’s end, they sent Superior Court Judge George Hutchinson a note saying they were at an impasse and wanted to go home “and sleep on it.” He granted the request and they will return Tuesday morning to continue deliberating. 

In asking for a death sentence, Gwinnett District Attorney Danny Porter described in harrowing detail how how the body shuts down when denied food.  “Who in the world conceives of or executes a plan to starve a 10-year-old to death?” he asked. ” … There are some crimes that are so horrible, so heinous, the only balance you can pay is with your life. Justice demands the proper payment.”

It likely took weeks for Emani to die of starvation, Porter said. This meant Moss woke up every morning deciding, “I’m going to kill that baby (and) she did it without a second thought.” 

Moss does not deserve a sentence of life with parole because she’s not going to change, Porter said. “She’s shown you too much of her capacity for cruelty. There will always be that dark side waiting to come out.” Some may think life without parole is worse than a death sentence because they’ll think a killer will think about what he or she did every day for the rest of their life, Porter said. Not Moss, he insisted. “She’s never going to think about that child again.”  

Hutchinson told Moss she could address the jury, present mitigating evidence, even have her relatives who’ve attended the trial testify on her behalf. He also asked Moss if there was anything he could do to help her in the sentencing phase. Moss declined all offers, and when Porter finished his closing, Moss once again passed up the opportunity to address the jury.

Earlier Monday, Assistant District Attorney Lisa Jones said Emani’s tortured life began three years before her death in the fall of 2013. That’s when Tiffany Moss lashed the then six-year-old child with a belt for not doing her homework. After a teacher saw Emani’s bruises, Moss was charged with child cruelty. She pleaded guilty, was placed on probation and lost her job.  

After that, Moss despised Emani because of what happened, Jones said. “She wasn’t a child to her. She was a nuisance and she was a pain.” Over the next few years, when the Moss family lived with relatives, Emani thrived because there were others keeping an eye on her. But when the family lived on its own, Emani suffered at Moss’s hands, Jones said.

In mid-2013, the family moved into a three-bedroom apartment in the Lawrenceville area. By now, Moss had two children of her own with Emani’s father, Eman Moss. And the couple decided to home school Emani. “That was the beginning of the end for Emani,” Jones said. “… Home schooling was code words for isolate and hide. She will not have a teacher who can save her and protect her.”  

Emani pretty much disappeared from view after that, kept inside her bedroom which Jones described as “her own personal prison.” The prosecutor recounted testimony by a medical examiner who described how Emani wasted away with no food or drink, living in filth and waste in her own bed because she’d become too weak to move. She was just 32 pounds when she died. 

➤ FIND related content here

Tiffany MossThen Jones reminded jurors of messages Moss had sent her husband during this time while he was at work. On at least two occasions, she texted him photos of dishes she’d prepared that day. On another occasion, “Sexy Wifey,” Moss’s contact name on her husband’s phone, told Eman Moss she had a craving for chocolate and asked him to pick up some cookie dough on the way home. 

To this, Jones asked jurors to imagine what it must have been like for Emani to have smell of the cookies wafting through the apartment as she was starving to death.  “Emani lived with the evils in this world,” Jones said, looking at Tiffany Moss at the defense table. “The evils in the world and in her life lived in the next room.” 

To Moss, Emani “was disposable,” Jones said. “She was trash.”  But Emani was a daughter, a granddaughter, a friend and a friendly girl with an easy smile who brought happiness to her teachers, Jones said. “She was Emani and she mattered,” said an impassioned Jones, holding up a photo of the smiling young girl to the jury. “She mattered.”  Also Friday, Hutchinson held a brief hearing to consider a motion filed last week by state capital defenders seeking to represent Moss in the sentencing phase of her trial.

Capital defender Brad Gardner told Hutchinson that because Moss has done nothing in her defense during the guilt-innocence phase of the trial, there was no reason to believe she would change her strategy during sentencing. 

Gardner and defender Emily Gilbert were appointed “standby counsel” and have been sitting in the gallery behind Moss, who has occasionally sought their advice. 

In prior court filings, the defenders have said Moss suffers from brain damage.  

Hutchinson questioned whether he had the authority to grant such a request. “You’re asking me to impose representation on someone who doesn’t want it,” Hutchinson told Gardner. Porter objected to the defenders’ motion.  “We can’t interfere with this in the absence of her request for counsel,” Porter said. “It’s not their case. It’s her case. It’s her decision.” 

Before ruling, Hutchinson asked Moss if she continued to want to represent herself.  “I do,” Moss said. 

The judge then denied the defenders’ motion.

Source: ajc.com, Bill Rankin, April 29, 2019


⚑ | Report an error, an omission, a typo; suggest a story or a new angle to an existing story; submit a piece, a comment; recommend a resource; contact the webmaster, contact us: deathpenaltynews@gmail.com.


Opposed to Capital Punishment? Help us keep this blog up and running! DONATE!



"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted." -- Oscar Wilde

Most viewed (Last 7 days)

Kansas AG urges governor to deny clemency to 8 sentenced to death

TOPEKA — Attorney General Kris Kobach on Tuesday urged the governor to deny clemency to Kansas inmates who have been sentenced to death. Eight of nine people sentenced to death in Kansas formally filed clemency requests in May, according to a press release from the Attorney General’s Office. Kobach urged Gov. Laura Kelly to reject them.

Idaho will soon turn to firing squad executions. Police will pull the triggers

Trained members of Idaho law enforcement with demonstrated firearms proficiency are expected to fill slots for carrying out the death penalty by firing squad as the state prison system transitions to the controversial execution method next month.  Six volunteers certified for no less than three years apiece through Peace Officer Standards and Training, or POST, will be recruited to ensure the Idaho Department of Correction is ready to comply with a state law that prioritizes shooting prisoners to death over lethal injection starting July 1.  No one on the team may have faced disciplinary action over firearms, use of force, or related conduct over the prior year, according to new execution protocols the prison system released this week. 

SCOTUS: Alabama can’t execute Jeffery Lee by nitrogen; Thursday execution called off

After a week of legal volleyball, Alabama death row inmate Jeffery Lee’s execution—scheduled for Thursday evening—was called off after federal courts called the state’s nitrogen gas execution method “likely unconstitutional.” The state took the fight to the U.S. Supreme Court, hoping Lee could still be put to death tonight.  In an order issued at 8:10 p.m., the U.S. Supreme Court ordered that it would not lift a ban on Alabama executing Lee via nitrogen . In a short court order, the justices denied Alabama’s motion to go ahead with the execution.  Associate Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch would have granted the appeal and let the execution proceed, according to the order. 

Alabama | Judge bars nitrogen gas execution, says method is unconstitutionally cruel

MONTGOMERY, Ala. -- A federal judge on Tuesday permanently blocked Alabama from executing an inmate with nitrogen gas after declaring it violates the ban on cruel and unusual punishment. U.S. District Judge Emily Marks issued the ruling hours after an appeals court reversed her initial finding that the method was constitutional. Marks permanently enjoined the state from executing Jeffrey Lee, 49, by nitrogen gas. He was scheduled to be executed Thursday. The decision, for now, blocks the use of the controversial new execution method that the state has championed since 2024, but the issue will likely end up before the U.S. Supreme Court.

With nitrogen gas blocked, Alabama seeks to execute inmate by lethal injection

Jeffery Lee, who successfully challenged his scheduled Thursday execution by nitrogen gas, argued that execution by firing squad would be less painful. The Alabama Attorney General’s Office Friday sought to put an Alabama death row inmate to death by lethal injection a day after the U.S. Supreme Court rebuffed the state’s attempt to execute him by nitrogen gas. In a filing with the Alabama Supreme Court Friday afternoon, the state sought an expedited motion to set a new execution date for Jeffery Lee, 49. The state said that with a permanent injunction in place against nitrogen gas, the method by which the state intended to execute Lee on Thursday, it could execute him by lethal injection or the electric chair.

20 Minutes to Death: Witness to the Last Execution in France

The following document is a firsthand account of the final moments of Hamida Djandoubi, a convicted murderer executed by guillotine at Marseille’s Baumettes Prison on September 10, 1977. The record—dated September 9—was written by Monique Mabelly, a judge appointed by the state to witness the proceedings. Djandoubi’s execution would ultimately be the last carried out in France before capital punishment was abolished in 1981. At the time, President Valéry Giscard d'Estaing—who had publicly voiced his "deep aversion to the death penalty" prior to his election—rejected Djandoubi’s appeal for clemency. Choosing to let "justice take its course," the President allowed the execution to proceed, just as he had in two previous cases during his term:   Christian Ranucci , executed on July 28, 1976 and Jérôme Carrein , executed on June 23, 1977. Hamida Djandoubi , a Tunisian national, was sentenced to death for killing his former lover, Elisabeth Bousquet. He was execu...

New Mississippi billboard warns criminals: ‘Firing squad is legal’

DESOTO COUNTY, Miss. (WREG) — A billboard standing on Interstate 55 southbound as you cross the Tennessee state line and enter Mississippi from Memphis is sending a grim message to those coming into the state. DeSoto County District Attorney Matthew Barton recently announced the new billboard campaign, which features the sign reading, “WELCOME TO MISSISSIPPI. WHERE THE FIRING SQUAD IS LEGAL. THINK TWICE.” It references Mississippi’s law permitting execution by firing squad under certain circumstances for inmates sentenced to death. Barton says this campaign is aimed at deterring violent crime and sends a direct message to criminals entering Mississippi.

US | Army lays groundwork for death row executions if Trump gives approval

The Army is preparing to carry out the executions of the military's four death-row inmates if ordered to do so by the president, according to an internal planning document reviewed by ABC News. If carried out, it would mark the first time the military executed convicted American inmates in more than a half-century The plan, dubbed "Operation Resolute Justice" and issued internally in February, directs Army officials to coordinate with the Federal Bureau of Prisons to transfer condemned prisoners from the U.S. Disciplinary Barracks at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, to the federal execution facility in Terre Haute, Indiana, where the Justice Department carried out a series of non-military federal executions during President Donald Trump's first term.

Texas | Tanner Horner now incarcerated at the Polunsky Unit

Convicted child killer Tanner Horner has now taken up residence in one of the most brutal death row prisons after being sentenced to die by a Texas jury last month. Horner is incarcerated at the Polunsky Unit, an infamously restrictive prison outside Houston where the state's death row inmates are housed in an all-solitary confinement wing and spend at least 22 hours a day in their 60-square-foot cells. The former FedEx deliveryman, 34, was booked at the notorious prison on May 5 within hours of being sentenced for the gruesome murder of Athena Strand, 7, whom he admitted strangling while delivering a Christmas gift to her home in November 2022.

Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch wanted an execution that a Trump judge deemed illegal

The Supreme Court these days is generally in the business of helping executions go forward. But on Thursday night, the court did something notable: It told Alabama no. Even then, the court wasn't unanimous. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch dissented from the refusal to let the nitrogen gas execution of Jeffery Lee proceed. What prompted the rare rejection? In line with the typical shadow docket practice, the court didn't explain itself. Nor did the dissenters, who merely noted their disagreement. But a deeper look at the case helps us understand why a majority of the court was unwilling to help the state this time.