Skip to main content

Is this the end of the death penalty in California?

San Quentin prison: Dismantling the gas chamber
Both in 2012 and 2016, Californians cast their votes in favor — by extremely narrowly margins in ballot initiatives — of having the state retain the death penalty.

So on Wednesday, when Gov. Gavin Newsom put a moratorium on California’s use of the death penalty, he not only spared the lives of 737 men and women facing execution by the state, he stirred up a hornet’s nest of praise and invective.

For Elisabeth Semel, a UC Berkeley law professor and director of the Berkeley Law Death Penalty Clinic, much of the verbiage being thrown around to attack Newsom’s move is missing the point. The governor hasn’t overturned the vote, she says, and couldn’t if he wanted to.

“First of all, as governor, he has the absolute power to grant reprieves,” Semel says. “It’s in the constitution and not debatable. He hasn’t abolished the death penalty. But he is seeing where we take this as a state. The votes in 2012 and 2016 were (in favor of the death penalty) by a hair. This is a state that is divided on the issue 50-50.

“I believe that opposition to the death penalty is stronger than the result would indicate. We all know California ballot initiatives are highly complicated and a function of money. They aren’t a pure reflection of opinion. And it’s also a function of leadership. If the governor is out there supporting an initiative, that can make a big impact.”

California hasn’t executed anyone in 13 years, since 2006. And from 1978 to 2002, the state didn’t have any executions. In between, the state used its execution authority 13 times. Newsom has long been a proponent of getting rid of the death penalty, and he was facing a death row where 25 individuals had exhausted their appeals and whose names could come across his desk in the near future.

Nationally, California is home to about one-quarter of all residents of death row


Those 25, and those of the other 712 on death row, have not escaped execution, Semel says. It’s just that, as long as Newsom is governor, they will not be put to death. Nationally, it’s a big story, because California is home to about one-quarter of all residents of death row.

“This will not change the status of any of these people,” Semel says. “They are still on death row. And while there are 25 who have had the traditional rounds of review exhausted, it’s also true that, for any of them, there still could be a development that will allow them to go back to court.

“Newsom sees these 25 at risk, and he’s taken that off the table for as long as he’s governor. He has a broader vision for where he would like this to go. For now, he’s working within the limits of his authority as governor.”

California becomes the fourth state to have a current moratorium on executions, joining Oregon, Colorado and Pennsylvania. There are 20 states, plus the District of Columbia, that have banned the death penalty outright.

That’s not something Newsom has done with his executive order. Nor could he.

“Clearing death row is something some governors have the ability to do,” Semel says. “Not in California.”

Semel and the clinic she’s directed since 2001 offer pro bono representation to those facing the death penalty. Occasionally, the Death Penalty Clinic will be with a case from the start, but the bulk of its work is in post-conviction review.

“We represent some clients in California,” she says. “But mostly we represent people in states like Texas, Alabama and Georgia.”

According to statistics compiled by the nonprofit Death Penalty Information Center, those three states held a combined 46 executions from 2016 to 2018.


“We are training lawyers to handle cases like these,” Semel says. “These are difficult, complicated cases, and you don’t always represent popular clients. We frequently represent poor clients. They have plenty of issues, but they often were very poorly represented while on trial.”

California's death chamberShe says Newsom’s move Wednesday is likely to spark a heated conversation about the death penalty. It’s a conversation that the anti-death penalty community welcomes.

“I think, based on what he said today, that this is the first step on a longer journey,” Semel says. “That’s one reason he emphasized so heavily the failings of the process. He wanted that highlighted, so that we could have a pragmatic and profound conversation.”

It may be difficult to have that kind of conversation immediately. Death penalty advocates seem to believe that after the razor-thin approval in 2016 of Proposition 66, the Death Penalty Procedures Initiative, California would get back to executions after 13 years away.

“They are furious because they thought they were getting close to being able to get on with it,” Semel says. “It’s problematic. There were two measures on the ballots, and they were unbelievably confusing to the voters.”

Semel says that the voters haven’t had to deal with the realities of the death penalty because of the 13 years that have passed since the last one in California.

“California is more accustomed to having no executions than to having some,” she says. “The governor was going to be confronted with a bunch of executions, and California has never seen anything like it.

“It’s easy not to think about it, even when we are paying through the nose for it. Day to day, we haven’t had to think about it. That would change if those executions took place.”

And the conversation may change now that they won’t take place.

“California should pay attention to the whole of what the governor said today,” Semel says. “He covered a lot of territory about his motivations. His reflections and this thoughtfulness about the importance of the decision are worth talking about.”

Source: news.berkeley.edu, John Hickey, March 13, 2019


⚑ | Report an error, an omission, a typo; suggest a story or a new angle to an existing story; submit a piece, a comment; recommend a resource; contact the webmaster, contact us: deathpenaltynews@gmail.com.


Opposed to Capital Punishment? Help us keep this blog up and running! DONATE!



"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted." -- Oscar Wilde

Most viewed (Last 7 days)

Iran: Flogging still a common practice

Flogging of Sufis in Gonabad: Fourteen Ne’matollahi dervishes received 25 lashes each for allegedly disturbing the public security "The lash ruling against 14 Ne'matollahi dervishes of Gonabad was carried out. They were residents of Baydokht and had been arrested and condemned by the Public Prosecutor of Gonabad after a protest against the illegal treatment dealing with the Sufis in June of last year [2010]. According to the website of Majzuban-e-Nur, Mr. Sa'id Kashani, Mr. Amir Roshan-Mojaver-Sufi, Mr. Alimohammad Amanian, Mr. Ruhollah Safari, Mr. Ali Abbasi-Baydokhti, Mr. Ebrahim Abbaszadeh, Mr. Mohammadali Ja'fari, Mr. Hossein Mahdavi, Mr. Hossein Abbaszadeh-Baydokhti, Mr. Rahmat Hosseini, Mr. Reza Kakhki, Mr. Behruz Mojaver-Sufi, Mr. Ali Mir, and Mr. Hassan Baluchi-Baydokhti are the fourteen dervishes whose requests were not only rejected, but who were condemned to 25 lashes for disturbing the public security. It should be mentioned that Ruhollah Safari, the ...

Japan’s Internet Wants Uchida Riko Executed. Here’s Why That Won’t Happen

This week, the prosecution in the case of a murder of a 17-year-old girl in Hokkaido came out with its sentencing recommendation. Japanese social media reacted by clamoring for the accused woman’s blood. But, while the facts of the case are heinous, the prosecutor’s decision not to seek the death penalty is grounded in long-standing precedent. Murdered for looking at the accused wrong Uchida Riko (内田梨瑚), 23, and her friends stand accused of murdering 17-year-old Murayama Runa (村山瑠奈) in Hokkaido’s Asahikawa. Prosecutors say the dispute began after Murayama posted a photo of Uchida to social media. They say Uchida’s group abducted the girl, made her undress, and then forced her to jump from a bridge.

I watched Ohio's last execution. Here's what it was like

As Gov. DeWine calls for Ohio to end capital punishment, the state’s last execution remains the one I witnessed in 2018 Inside Ohio's death house, there is a room for executions and separate witness rooms: one for those connected to the victim and another for those connected to the inmate. Windows separate the death chamber from those watching, the condemned from the living. I was there on July 18, 2018 – during Ohio’s most recent execution. Robert Van Hook was put to death that day for killing David Self in 1985. He sat on death row for three decades. I was one of three media witnesses to the execution.

Kansas AG urges governor to deny clemency to 8 sentenced to death

TOPEKA — Attorney General Kris Kobach on Tuesday urged the governor to deny clemency to Kansas inmates who have been sentenced to death. Eight of nine people sentenced to death in Kansas formally filed clemency requests in May, according to a press release from the Attorney General’s Office. Kobach urged Gov. Laura Kelly to reject them.

Gov. Mike DeWine calls for Ohio to abolish the death penalty

COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — Gov. Mike DeWine Tuesday morning called on Ohio to abolish the death penalty, citing data that he said proves it is no longer a deterrent to violent crime. “For the state to take a human life, there must, in my opinion, there must be evidence that in doing so it will help protect the public, that the threat of that action will deter someone from committing murder,” DeWine said. “I do not believe that argument today can be successfully made.” DeWine cited data showing a decline in the last four decades of executions being carried out and an increase in the time inmates spend on death row.

New Mississippi billboard warns criminals: ‘Firing squad is legal’

DESOTO COUNTY, Miss. (WREG) — A billboard standing on Interstate 55 southbound as you cross the Tennessee state line and enter Mississippi from Memphis is sending a grim message to those coming into the state. DeSoto County District Attorney Matthew Barton recently announced the new billboard campaign, which features the sign reading, “WELCOME TO MISSISSIPPI. WHERE THE FIRING SQUAD IS LEGAL. THINK TWICE.” It references Mississippi’s law permitting execution by firing squad under certain circumstances for inmates sentenced to death. Barton says this campaign is aimed at deterring violent crime and sends a direct message to criminals entering Mississippi.

20 Minutes to Death: Witness to the Last Execution in France

The following document is a firsthand account of the final moments of Hamida Djandoubi, a convicted murderer executed by guillotine at Marseille’s Baumettes Prison on September 10, 1977. The record—dated September 9—was written by Monique Mabelly, a judge appointed by the state to witness the proceedings. Djandoubi’s execution would ultimately be the last carried out in France before capital punishment was abolished in 1981. At the time, President Valéry Giscard d'Estaing—who had publicly voiced his "deep aversion to the death penalty" prior to his election—rejected Djandoubi’s appeal for clemency. Choosing to let "justice take its course," the President allowed the execution to proceed, just as he had in two previous cases during his term:   Christian Ranucci , executed on July 28, 1976 and Jérôme Carrein , executed on June 23, 1977. Hamida Djandoubi , a Tunisian national, was sentenced to death for killing his former lover, Elisabeth Bousquet. He was execu...

Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch wanted an execution that a Trump judge deemed illegal

The Supreme Court these days is generally in the business of helping executions go forward. But on Thursday night, the court did something notable: It told Alabama no. Even then, the court wasn't unanimous. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch dissented from the refusal to let the nitrogen gas execution of Jeffery Lee proceed. What prompted the rare rejection? In line with the typical shadow docket practice, the court didn't explain itself. Nor did the dissenters, who merely noted their disagreement. But a deeper look at the case helps us understand why a majority of the court was unwilling to help the state this time.

With nitrogen gas blocked, Alabama seeks to execute inmate by lethal injection

Jeffery Lee, who successfully challenged his scheduled Thursday execution by nitrogen gas, argued that execution by firing squad would be less painful. The Alabama Attorney General’s Office Friday sought to put an Alabama death row inmate to death by lethal injection a day after the U.S. Supreme Court rebuffed the state’s attempt to execute him by nitrogen gas. In a filing with the Alabama Supreme Court Friday afternoon, the state sought an expedited motion to set a new execution date for Jeffery Lee, 49. The state said that with a permanent injunction in place against nitrogen gas, the method by which the state intended to execute Lee on Thursday, it could execute him by lethal injection or the electric chair.

SCOTUS: Alabama can’t execute Jeffery Lee by nitrogen; Thursday execution called off

After a week of legal volleyball, Alabama death row inmate Jeffery Lee’s execution—scheduled for Thursday evening—was called off after federal courts called the state’s nitrogen gas execution method “likely unconstitutional.” The state took the fight to the U.S. Supreme Court, hoping Lee could still be put to death tonight.  In an order issued at 8:10 p.m., the U.S. Supreme Court ordered that it would not lift a ban on Alabama executing Lee via nitrogen . In a short court order, the justices denied Alabama’s motion to go ahead with the execution.  Associate Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch would have granted the appeal and let the execution proceed, according to the order.