FEATURED POST

Communist Vietnam's secret death penalty conveyor belt: How country trails only China and Iran for 'astonishing' number of executions

Image
Prisoners are dragged from their cells at 4am without warning to be given a lethal injection Vietnam's use of the death penalty has been thrust into the spotlight after a real estate tycoon was on Thursday sentenced to be executed in one of the biggest corruption cases in the country's history. Truong My Lan, a businesswoman who chaired a sprawling company that developed luxury apartments, hotels, offices and shopping malls, was arrested in 2022.

As next execution looms, Florida debates the drugs it uses to kill

Florida's death chamber
Jose Jimenez is set to be executed Thursday night. Like many death row inmates, he has challenged the drugs Florida uses to execute prisoners.

The last time Florida carried out an execution, witnesses said the condemned man — Eric Branch — screamed and thrashed as lethal chemicals coursed through his veins.

Whether Branch's final acts that February night were theater or a response to severe pain has fueled new death row appeals in the 10 months since.

When the brown curtain rises once again inside the state's death chamber Thursday night, whatever follows will surely be scrutinized in what is a long-running debate over the state's lethal injection methods.

Barring an unlikely last-minute stay, Jose Antonio Jimenez will be strapped to a gurney at 6 p.m. and injected with a lethal combination of chemicals. Jimenez, 55, was condemned for the 1992 stabbing of 63-year-old Phyllis Minas, a court clerk slain after she caught Jimenez burglarizing her North Miami apartment.

Like other recent death penalty cases, Jimenez's final appeals have attacked the state's current lethal injection protocol.

Florida is the only state that uses etomidate as the lead drug in its executions. Critics say the drug is capable of causing severe pain — that it doesn't last long enough to ensure the prisoner won't feel the excruciating effects of the other two drugs in Florida’s execution cocktail.

The state’s old combination of execution drugs included a drug known as midazolam.

In recent years midazolam has become difficult to acquire for use in executions; pharmaceutical companies refuse to sell such products to prison agencies in states that have the death penalty.

In January 2017, Florida adopted what has been referred to as the etomidate protocol. 

In a letter to Gov. Rick Scott that month, Department of Corrections Secretary Julie Jones wrote that the procedure "is compatible with the evolving standards of decency that mark the progress of a maturing society, the concepts of the dignity of man, and advances in science, research, pharmacology and technology."

"The process will not involve unnecessary lingering or the unnecessary or wanton infliction of pain and suffering," Jones wrote.

Classified as a hypnotic, etomidate is administered in a massive dose designed to render the condemned inmate unconscious. After that comes rocuronium bromide, a paralytic meant to stop all movement and, ultimately, cause the subject to stop breathing. The final drug, potassium acetate, disrupts electrical activity in the heart, bringing on cardiac arrest.

"In general, the use of etomidate is a terrible idea," said Dr. David Lubarsky, an anesthesiologist and the vice chancellor of human health sciences at the University of California-Davis.

Lubarsky is one of several doctors who have weighed in on the effects of etomidate as part of the ongoing legal challenges to Florida's execution procedures.

"The pain from etomidate is significant, real pain," Lubarsky wrote, "and the prisoner will feel it at the injection site and will continue to feel it as the entire 200 mg of etomidate is pushed into his veins or until he loses consciousness."

Jose Antonio Jimenez
The doctor also wrote that etomidate is "ultra short-acting," that there is a substantial risk that it could wear off as the second and third drugs are administered. Any pain caused by those drugs would likely be masked by the second drug, rocuronium bromide, which renders the prisoner immobile.

The prisoner would experience a sensation “akin to being buried alive," Lubarsky wrote.

Four Florida prisoners have been executed using etomidate. Subsequent court filings have noted signs of movement during some of the executions.

But lawyers for the state said that there is no evidence that any of the four felt any significant pain. That includes Eric Branch.

"There were no irregularities in Branch's execution," Assistant Attorney General Lisa-Marie Lerner wrote in a court filing as part of the Jimenez case. "If there had been, the state would have conducted an inquiry into the execution."

Lethal injections have gone wrong before. In 2007, it took 34 minutes for Angel Nieves Diaz to be pronounced dead. Observers reported that he was still moving 24 minutes after the execution started and that he had to be given a second dose of the deadly chemicals.

Then-Gov. Jeb Bush ordered a temporary halt to executions and convened a panel to study the procedures. It was later revealed that the execution team had improperly placed the intravenous line in Diaz's arm, causing the deadly chemicals to saturate his flesh.

If Jimenez's execution takes place as planned, it will be the 28th carried out under Scott. He will leave office having presided over more executions than any governor in Florida history.

His successor, Republican Ron DeSantis, takes office Jan. 8.

Source: tampabay.com, Dan Sullivan, December 13, 2018


Florida Supreme Court Refuses To Halt Execution


Florida's death chamber
Rejecting what it described as a “novel” argument about a voter-approved constitutional amendment, the Florida Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to halt the scheduled Thursday evening execution of Death Row inmate Jose Antonio Jimenez.

Justices, in a unanimous decision, denied a motion to stay the execution of Jimenez, 55, who was convicted in the 1992 murder of a Miami-Dade County woman. Jimenez also had two cases pending Wednesday at the U.S. Supreme Court, according to an online docket. 

The execution is scheduled for 6 p.m. Thursday at Florida State Prison.

The Florida Supreme Court decision dealt with arguments by Jimenez’s attorneys that he should be spared execution because of a constitutional amendment that voters approved Nov. 6. Part of the amendment changed what is known as the “Savings Clause” of the Florida Constitution, a more than century-old provision dealing with how revisions in criminal laws should be applied to older crimes.

The Savings Clause historically has required that criminal laws in effect at the time crimes are committed govern the sentences that are imposed. But the November ballot measure, Amendment 11, included a change in the clause. It allowed revisions to criminal laws to affect sentences for older crimes.

Jimenez’s attorneys contended that the amendment is important in his case because of changes in Florida’s death-penalty sentencing laws in 2017. 

The sentencing laws had to be rewritten because of a 2016 U.S. Supreme Court decision that said the state’s death-penalty sentencing structure was unconstitutional because it gave too much power to judges, instead of juries.

With the passage of Amendment 11, Jimenez’s attorneys argued the revised laws should be applied to his case — and that they should prevent his execution. In part, the revised laws require juries to unanimously find at least one “aggravating” factor to help justify a death sentence, a tougher standard for prosecutors than was in place when Jimenez was sentenced to death.

But the justices flatly rejected the arguments, saying that the constitutional amendment does not take effect until Jan. 8 and that, “even if the amendment were in effect, it does not change the law applicable to Jimenez’s conviction of first-degree murder and sentence of death.”

The four-page decision called the arguments by Jimenez’s attorneys a “novel assertion” and said lawmakers will have authority to determine how to apply the change in the Savings Clause.

Justices said the change means “that there will no longer be any provision in the Florida Constitution that would prohibit the Legislature from applying an amended criminal statute retroactively to pending prosecutions or sentences. However, nothing in our Constitution does or will require the Legislature to do so, and the repeal of the prohibition will not require that they do so.”

Jimenez was convicted of killing Phyllis Minas, 63, during a burglary. Neighbors tried to enter the home through an unlocked front door after hearing Minas’ cries, but Jimenez slammed the door shut, locked it and fled by going onto a bedroom balcony, according to court documents.

Source: CBS, December 13, 2018




Use the PayPal button below to donate



⚑ | Report an error, an omission, a typo; suggest a story or a new angle to an existing story; submit a piece, a comment; recommend a resource; contact the webmaster, contact us: deathpenaltynews@gmail.com.


Opposed to Capital Punishment? Help us keep this blog up and running! DONATE!



"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted." -- Oscar Wilde

Most Viewed (Last 7 Days)

Communist Vietnam's secret death penalty conveyor belt: How country trails only China and Iran for 'astonishing' number of executions

Iran sentences popular rapper to death for supporting Mahsa Amini protests

Malaysia urged to extend moratorium on executions until full abolition of death penalty

Iraq executes 13 on ‘vague’ terrorism charges

Could Moscow attack suspects face execution in Belarus?

Iran | 9 prisoners executed in a single day

Kansas | Judge denies Carr brothers’ request for new sentence in death penalty murder case