Texas Should Not Have Executed Robert Pruett

Update: Robert Pruett was executed by lethal injection on Thursday.
Robert Pruett is scheduled to be executed by the State of Texas Thursday. He has never had a chance to live outside a prison as an adult. Taking his life is a senseless wrong that shows how badly the justice system fails juveniles.
Mr. Pruett was 15 years old when he last saw the outside world, after being arrested as an accomplice to a murder committed by his own father. Now 38, having been convicted of a murder while incarcerated, he will be put to death. At a time when the Supreme Court has begun to recognize excessive punishments for juveniles as unjust, Mr. Pruett’s case shows how young lives can be destroyed by a justice system that refuses to give second chances.
Mr. Pruett’s father, Sam Pruett, spent much of Mr. Pruett’s early childhood in prison. Mr. Pruett and his three siblings were raised in various trailer parks by his mother, who he has said used drugs heavily and often struggled to feed the children. Wh…

Criticising blasphemy laws not blasphemous: Pakistan SC judge

"Criticism of blasphemy law does not amount to blasphemy"
"Criticism of blasphemy law does not amount to blasphemy"
Justice Khosa says press clippings presented in court do not provide sufficient evidence to maintain that former governor had committed blasphemy

Justice Asif Saeed Khosa of the Supreme Court of Pakistan said on Monday that criticism of the blasphemy law did not amount to blasphemy.

The judge gave these remarks while hearing an appeal filed by Mumtaz Qadri - the killer of former Punjab governor Salmaan Taseer - against his death penalty.

A 3-member bench headed by Justice Asif Saeed Khosa adjourned the hearing till today when Qadri's counsel Justice (r) Nazir Akhter is expected to continue his arguments.

During Monday's hearing, the bench observed that the entire argument of Qadri's counsel would be rendered irrelevant if it is not established that then governor Salmaan Taseer had committed blasphemy.

Justice Khosa in his remarks said that criticising a law does not amount to blasphemy and the press clippings presented in court do not provide sufficient evidence to maintain that the former governor had committed blasphemy.

Qadri, a former commando of Punjab police's Elite Force, was sentenced to death for assassinating former Punjab governor Salmaan Taseer in Islamabad's Kohsar Market. Qadri said he killed Taseer over the politician's vocal opposition to blasphemy laws of the country.

He had confessed to shooting Taseer dead outside an upmarket coffee shop close to the latter's residence in Islamabad.

Following the sentencing, Qadri's counsels had challenged the ATC's decision through 2 applications the same month.

The 1st petition had demanded that Qadri's death sentence be quashed and the 2nd asked for Section 7 of the ATA to be declared void.

In its ruling on the appeal, the IHC rejected Qadri's application against his death sentence under the PPC but accepted his application to void ATA's Section 7.

Qadri's counsels then challenged IHC's decision to uphold his death penalty in the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court on Monday directed Justice (r) Nazir Ahmed to conclude his arguments in the case till Tuesday (today).

The 3-member bench of the apex court comprising Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa, Justice Mushir Alam and Justice Dost Muhammad Khan heard the plea filed by Mumtaz Qadri.

Justice Asif Saeed asked Qadri's counsel how many witnesses appeared before the high court and how many accused were nominated in the case.

Justice (r) Nazir Ahmed told the bench that initially many accused were nominated in the case but challan was not filed against most of them. As many as 14 witnesses appeared before the high court, he added.

He said the Islamabad High Court (IHC) announced its verdict on March 09 and upheld Mumtaz Qadri's death sentence under Section 302 of the Pakistan Penal Code for killing Salmaan Taseer but Section 7 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA) was declared void from the sentencing.

He said the high court in its verdict ignored many points in the case. He said his client killed Salman Taseer in rage. He said that Mumtaz Qadri assassinated Salmaan Taseer for defending Asia Bibi, allegedly involved in blasphemy. "That is why, the security personnel present on the venue did not take any action against Mr Qadri while considering his action accurate and appropriate. Therefore, the ATC section should be declared void."

The killing of Salmaan Taseer was the most high-profile political assassination in Pakistan since former prime minister Benazir Bhutto died in a gun and suicide attack in December 2007.

Taseer had supported a Christian mother of 5 sentenced to death in November 2010 for alleged blasphemy in Punjab.

2 months after Taseer's killing, a government minister for minority affairs who had vowed to defy death threats over his opposition to the blasphemy laws was also shot dead in Islamabad.

While no one has ever been sent to the gallows under Pakistan's blasphemy law, activists say it is used to attack others out of personal enmity or because of business disputes.

Source: Daily Times, October 6, 2015

Report an error, an omission: deathpenaltynews@gmail.com

Most Viewed (Last 7 Days)

Texas Should Not Have Executed Robert Pruett

Texas: Montgomery County DA asks governor to stay Anthony Shore's execution

Texas court halts execution to review claims that co-defendant lied at trial

Texas: Houston Man Condemned in Family Murder Plot Loses High Court Appeal

Iran: Young man has hand judicially amputated over jewelry theft

Hours before execution, Tourniquet Killer granted 90-day stay at DA's request

Why Indonesia Delays Execution of Death Row Convicts

Pakistan's angel of death

Justices Won’t Review Florida Death-Penalty Cases

The Execution Dock in London was used for more than 400 years to execute pirates, smugglers & mutineers