FEATURED POST

Texas Should Not Have Executed Robert Pruett

Image
Update: Robert Pruett was executed by lethal injection on Thursday.
Robert Pruett is scheduled to be executed by the State of Texas Thursday. He has never had a chance to live outside a prison as an adult. Taking his life is a senseless wrong that shows how badly the justice system fails juveniles.
Mr. Pruett was 15 years old when he last saw the outside world, after being arrested as an accomplice to a murder committed by his own father. Now 38, having been convicted of a murder while incarcerated, he will be put to death. At a time when the Supreme Court has begun to recognize excessive punishments for juveniles as unjust, Mr. Pruett’s case shows how young lives can be destroyed by a justice system that refuses to give second chances.
Mr. Pruett’s father, Sam Pruett, spent much of Mr. Pruett’s early childhood in prison. Mr. Pruett and his three siblings were raised in various trailer parks by his mother, who he has said used drugs heavily and often struggled to feed the children. Wh…

U.S.: Rethinking solitary confinement for death row inmates

A LAWSUIT challenging Virginia’s automatic use of solitary confinement for death row inmates is on track after a federal judge refused the state’s request for dismissal. It is good this issue will get the hearing it demands. Even better would be for the state to take to heart the judge’s admonition about “changing moral and legal standards” and voluntarily end a practice that is unnecessarily punitive and of questionable efficacy.

“I do not understand why the commonwealth is insisting on maintaining this level of these conditions,” District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema said in urging Virginia officials to “give some serious thought to trying to work this case out.” The suit brought by four death row inmates claims that isolation in small cells with no human contact for “nearly every hour of every day” violates the constitutional prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. Judge Brinkema had previously ruled automatic solitary confinement unconstitutional, but the case turned on the issue of due process and the ruling was overturned by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit.

Legal precedents may well be on the state’s side. But growing evidence about the harmful effects of long periods of solitary confinement and questions about its costs and usefulness should prompt state officials to rethink the practice. There is no question that safety in prisons must be a priority but, as attorneys for the inmates point out, studies have shown that inmates sentenced to death are no more dangerous than others convicted of violent crimes. A group of former corrections officers argued in another case that solitary is actually counterproductive to institutional safety.

Some states — including Missouri, North Carolina and Colorado — have abandoned automatic solitary confinement for those on death row without significant problems. As for the argument that those on death row deserve no consideration, we can’t help but think of the cases of those convicts who have been exonerated but, once freed, have had to deal with the mental-health effects of solitary confinement.


Source: The Washington Post, Editorial Board, June 10, 2015

Report an error, an omission: deathpenaltynews@gmail.com

Most Viewed (Last 7 Days)

New Hampshire: Death penalty repeal may be back on the table

Texas: Montgomery County DA asks governor to stay Anthony Shore's execution

Texas court halts execution to review claims that co-defendant lied at trial

Alabama executes Torrey Twane McNabb

The Execution Dock in London was used for more than 400 years to execute pirates, smugglers & mutineers

Texas Should Not Have Executed Robert Pruett

Hours before execution, Tourniquet Killer granted 90-day stay at DA's request

Papua New Guinea: Death row inmates denied full protection of the law

Justices Won’t Review Florida Death-Penalty Cases

More drug dealers to be shot dead: Indonesia's National Narcotics Agency chief