U.S. Supreme Court: In Cory Maples Case, Scalia Is Only Justice to O.K. Capital Punishment Despite Mailroom Mix-Up
Capital punishment is a subject that has received a good deal of media play over the past month or so. In particular, the cases of Texas inmate Duane Buck, who was temporarily spared though a stay in execution, and Georgia inmate Troy Davis, who was killed even though a slew of evidence and witness reports that led to his conviction were later recanted, led to widespread discussions about the nation's application of the death penalty and the legal snags that can make or break a case.
The latest court battle surrounding capital punishment now involves a legal and moral question that has even puzzled the U.S. Supreme Court -- should a prisoner be executed because of a mail room mix-up?
The case in question involves Cory R. Maples, an Alabama death row inmate who is facing execution because two lawyers at a New York law firm handling his appeal left their firm without notifying Maples or the state of Alabama.
Maples was convicted of gunning down two friends after a night of heavy drinking in 1997, with a jury sentencing him to death with a 10-2 vote. Because Alabama is the only state that does not grant taxpayer funded legal assistance to death-row inmates seeking to challenge what happened at trial, when Maples appealed the death sentence he had local counsel acting in name only and was actually represented pro bono by two 2nd-year associates from the New York law firm Sullivan & Cromwell.
It seems like a lucky break, but it wasn't. Maples' lawyers, who associated themselves with an Alabama-licensed attorney, John Butler, Jr., as required by state law, initially filed a petition arguing that their client's death sentence should be overturned due to "ineffective assistance of counsel" at trial. 18 months later, a judge dismissed the petition and the court sent notice of the decision to all three lawyers. However, by that time, both of the New York attorneys had left Sullivan & Cromwell, leading the firm's mailroom to send the decision back to the Alabama court with "Return to Sender" written on the unopened envelope. The county clerk filed the envelope away without informing Butler it had been returned and subsequently Maples -- who thought he had three lawyers on his team but in fact didn't have any -- missed the 42-day deadline for filing another appeal. Eventually, the state sent a notice directly to Maples about his denied appeal.
Although Butler had also received a copy of the ruling, he reportedly did not do anything with it because he assumed Maples' New York team would handle it.
Reviewing courts all rejected Maples' request for an extension in the filing deadline, with the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals ruling that "any and all fault here lies with Maples for not filing a timely notice of appeal." Now, the U.S. Supreme Court must decide whether Maples' missed filing deadline can be excused if he was blameless and if the actions by the Alabama government were a contributing factor to the confusion.
The Supreme Court may have some extreme characters, but according to reports of the hearing, none of them want to be the person that says a man should be executed as a result of a mailing mistake... except Justice Antonin Scalia.
Most of the court seemed surprised at Alabama's decision to deny a man the right to appeal what is literally a life or death sentence when, according to Justice Samuel Alito, the mix up occurred "through no fault of his [Maples] own, through a series of very unusual and unfortunate circumstances."
Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor and Chief Justice John Roberts all questioned former U.S. Solicitor General Gregory Garre, who was hired to represent Maples, on whether the clerk of the court should have known that Butler was not substantively aiding Maples.
Kagan, Roberts and Justice Anthony Kennedy also questioned whether the Alabama court should have been suspicious when Maples did not file his appeal since it is unusual for an inmate to not appeal a death penalty decision. Even Alabama Solicitor General John Neiman, when prompted by Kagan, admitted that if he had in the state's position and had the letter sent back unopened from the missing lawyers, he "suspects that in those circumstances I might well personally do something else."
Scalia, however, said there is nothing in the U.S. Constitution or federal rules of procedure that says an accused party has the right to judicial notice, noting that even in capital punishment cases, "Once you are in court and you have a lawyer, it's up to your lawyer to follow what goes on in the court."
That may be the point many Americans should take away from this case. Because, if Scalia is right, it means that in the U.S. court system, an accused party's only lifeline is with their attorney -- whether that attorney is competent or not. It means that even if a lawyer unceremoniously (and unprofessionally) drops a client, even one facing lethal injection, well ... that's just tough.
Source: International Business Times, October 6, 2011
Related articles:
Oct 05, 2011
Alabama is a step from executing Cory Maples for a reason so grievously wrong that the case argued Tuesday at the Supreme Court should leave no doubt why the death penalty should be abolished. Besides being barbaric ...
Mar 22, 2011
Lawyers at the firm, Sullivan & Cromwell, had agreed to represent Cory R. Maples, a death row inmate in Alabama, without charge. When an Alabama court sent two copies of a ruling in Mr. Maples's case to the firm in New ...
Comments
Post a Comment
Pro-DP comments will not be published.