Skip to main content

Kentucky Man Pleads Guilty to Killing Father and Uncle, Cites Past Sexual Abuse in Abandoned Defense

A Lincoln County man pleaded guilty Wednesday to two counts of murder in the killings of his father and uncle, forgoing a trial where he planned to argue that years of childhood sexual abuse by the victims contributed to his actions.

Brandon Mullins, 27, of Eubank, Ky., entered the plea in Lincoln Circuit Court as part of an agreement with prosecutors. He will serve 40 years in prison. He is scheduled to be sentenced in April.

The bodies of Mullins' father, Dennis “Ed” Mullins, 57, and uncle, Anthony Mullins, 55, were discovered inside a trailer on Sandidge Spur Road in Eubank in what authorities described as a double homicide. Mullins faced additional charges including tampering with physical evidence.

He had been set to stand trial this summer, where his defense intended to present evidence of sexual abuse that occurred about 15 years earlier, when he was a preteen. According to his statements, the abuse began after the victims allegedly got him drunk on moonshine during a fishing trip. It was one of multiple instances of alleged abuse by the pair.

By accepting the plea, Mullins avoided a potential trial that could have aired graphic details of the alleged trauma. The agreement resolves the case without proceeding to a jury, which might have considered mitigating factors such as extreme emotional disturbance under Kentucky law — though such arguments rarely fully excuse homicide charges.

Death Penalty Consideration


The death penalty was not on the table in this case and could not have been sought. Kentucky reserves capital punishment for specific aggravating circumstances in murder cases, such as intentional multiple deaths or killings during certain felonies like robbery or rape. 

While this involved two victims, the facts did not meet the statutory thresholds for capital eligibility. Prosecutors pursued the case as non-capital murder, consistent with many intrafamily homicides.

Mullins' attorneys noted that the plea spared him the possibility of life without parole or death row.

Similar Cases and The Menendez Brothers' Case


Parricide cases involving claims of long-term sexual abuse as mitigation have appeared in Kentucky and elsewhere, though outcomes vary. In a prior Louisville case, Randall Buford pleaded guilty but mentally ill to manslaughter and related charges in 2024 after killing his adoptive father, whom he accused of years of sexual abuse starting in childhood. 

Buford received a sentence of 7½ years, with the court acknowledging the impact of the trauma while emphasizing accountability.

The Menendez brothers' case stands as a stark example of how claims of severe childhood sexual abuse were often marginalized or restricted in court during the 1990s, even when supported by detailed testimony and personal accounts.

In August 1989, Erik (then 18) and Lyle Menendez (21) shot and killed their parents, José and Kitty Menendez, with shotguns in their Beverly Hills home. The brothers admitted to the killings but insisted they acted in self-defense after enduring years of physical, emotional, and especially sexual abuse by their father—a high-powered entertainment executive—starting from a young age.

Their first trial in 1993–1994 ended in a mistrial, with separate juries deadlocking after hearing extensive evidence of the alleged abuse, including Erik's tearful courtroom testimony spanning days.

By the second trial in 1995–1996, however, the judge, Stanley M. Weisberg, imposed significant limits on the defense. He ruled that expert testimony on "battered child syndrome" (analogous to battered spouse syndrome) or the psychological impacts of prolonged abuse could not be presented, questioning its legal applicability in California. 

The court also restricted how much evidence of the sexual abuse could be introduced or emphasized, particularly barring broader expert explanations of trauma's effects on behavior and perception of threat. Crucially, the judge declined to instruct the jury on imperfect self-defense in a way that fully incorporated the abuse history as grounds for reducing murder to manslaughter—despite the brothers' claims of genuine (if unreasonable) fear of imminent harm. 

Prosecutors successfully framed the killings as premeditated for financial gain (inheritance), portraying the abuse allegations as fabricated excuses.

The jury convicted both brothers of first-degree murder with special circumstances, sentencing them to life without parole in 1996. Even though the sexual abuse claims were highly documented through the brothers' consistent, detailed accounts (corroborated in part by family testimony), the court's restrictions meant the jury heard a curtailed version of the trauma narrative. 

This reflected the era's broader skepticism toward abuse-based defenses in parricide cases, where such claims were frequently viewed as attempts to evade full responsibility rather than legitimate mitigating factors rooted in complex PTSD or learned helplessness.

Decades later, evolving understandings of trauma led to developments. In 2025, the brothers were resentenced to 50 years to life under youthful offender laws, making parole possible. Yet parole was denied later that year, and a habeas petition for a new trial—based on newly surfaced corroborating evidence like a pre-murder letter from Erik describing the abuse—was rejected in September 2025, with the judge ruling it wouldn't have altered the premeditation finding or swayed the original outcome.

The case illustrates how, until relatively recently, even well-documented histories of parental sexual abuse struggled for full recognition as mitigation in violent crime proceedings—often limited or sidelined by judicial gatekeeping—highlighting the slow shift toward trauma-informed justice seen in more contemporary cases.

Recurring Pattern


The case of Brandon Mullins highlights a recurring pattern in violent crime and capital cases, where childhood trauma — including sexual abuse — is common in the histories of offenders on death row.

The Death Penalty Information Center has documented elevated rates of such trauma, citing a 2015 analysis and the American Psychological Association's "The Cycle of Violence" study of 43 inmates, which found 59% had been sexually abused as children (alongside 94% physically abused and 83% witnessing adolescent violence). 

DPIC reviews of executions from 2020–2024 show severe childhood trauma in 75% of the 95 individuals executed, often including abuse contributing to effects like complex PTSD. 

Among women on death row, at least 96% experienced gender-based violence, frequently encompassing sexual abuse. 

Historically, such trauma was rarely presented as mitigation in capital proceedings, with juries seldom educated on its long-term impacts — a gap that modern defenses increasingly address with trauma experts. In non-capital cases like Mullins', these claims can shape pleas or sentences without excusing homicide.

Source: DPN, News outlets, Staff, API, March 19, 2026




"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted."

— Oscar Wilde
Globe
Death Penalty News For a World without the Death Penalty

Most viewed (Last 7 days)

Japan: Capital punishment for a minor

Death chamber at Tokyo Detention Center The Supreme Court's recent decision to uphold the death sentence given in a lay judge trial to a 24-year-old man for murders he committed when he was a minor raises questions about the lay judge trial system and capital punishment. These include whether the lay judges correctly understood the spirit of the Juvenile Law in sentencing the defendant to death. It was the 1st death sentence handed down on a minor in a lay judge trial. The murders took place in Ishinomaki, Miyagi Prefecture, in 2010 when Yutaro Chiba was 18 - meaning he fell under the purview of the Juvenile Law. Chiba was convicted of entering his ex-girlfriend's house and stabbing to death the girl's sister and a female friend of the girl with a butcher knife, seriously injuring a male friend of the sister and abducting the girl. Prosecutors said Chiba killed the victims because they were trying to separate him and his former girlfriend. Since Chiba pleaded n...

Saudi Arabia: Man beheaded for murder

April 27, 2010: Saudi authorities executed a man by beheading after he was sentenced to death for murder, the interior ministry announced. Saudi national Umair al-Shihri was put to death in the southern city of Bisha for shooting to death another Saudi, Muzakkir al Shahrani, with a machine gun, according to the announcement carried by the state news agency SPA. No details were given about the date or location of the crime, but the ministry said the execution had been put on hold until the victim's children came of age. Source: Agence France Presse, April 27, 2010

Former Florida cop to be executed on same day as 80-year-old Pasco man

In an unprecedented move in the modern history of capital punishment, Gov. Ron DeSantis on Tuesday cleared the way for 2 executions to occur on the same day.  DeSantis reset the execution of James Duckett, whose execution earlier this year was stayed amid efforts to secure DNA testing and analysis of evidence in his case.  Duckett’s execution was reset for July 28. That is the same day previously set for the execution of Dominick Occhicone.  Court records indicate that Duckett’s execution is scheduled for noon. Occhicone’s is set to follow at 6 p.m. 

19 July 1943 | Auschwitz's Largest Public Hanging: 12 Polish Prisoners Executed in Escape Reprisal

OSWIECIM, Poland — The SS carried out the largest public hanging in Auschwitz history on July 19, 1943, executing 12 Polish prisoners before other inmates as collective punishment for escapes and civilian contacts. The victims, all from the camp’s surveyors’ labor unit, were hanged on gallows built in front of the camp kitchen during an Auschwitz I roll call. The SS orchestrated this reprisal following prisoner escapes from the surveyors’ detail and unauthorized communication between inmates and civilians. Camp authorities used the recent escapes as a pretext to impose collective punishment.

Texas: The inmates who refused to die quietly and had to be gassed out of their cells before execution

Former crime reporter Michelle Lyons, who witnessed nearly 300 executions in Texas, US, reveals the desperate acts of death row prisoners who refused to accept their fate After spending years or often decades locked up in a tiny cell for 23 hours a day, most Death Row inmates go willingly to their executions. However, some refuse to die quietly - with officers forced to gas them out of cells, strap up their heads and even give chase across prison grounds. Michelle Lyons, who has witnessed nearly 300 executions in Texas, US, exclusively tells Sun Online how certain inmates "fight like hell" in their last moments. On most occasions, Michelle watched from the witness area, with the killers already on the gurney - the stretcher where they'd be given a lethal injection. Seven prisoners once tried to escape from the Row in Huntsville - with one shoving magazines and newspapers under his clothes to help him roll over razor-wire fences. Others have had to b...

Tennessee | Complaint accuses doctor involved in failed execution of violating medical ethics

A formal complaint has been filed with the Tennessee Department of Health regarding the conduct of a physician involved in the failed execution of death row inmate Tony Carruthers on May 21, 2026. The complaint, submitted by Carruthers’ sister, Tonya Hervey on July 15, alleges that Dr. Mark Walton Fowler engaged in unethical medical practices during the aborted procedure. The state’s attempt to execute Carruthers was halted after execution team members spent over an hour unsuccessfully attempting to establish a backup intravenous (IV) line. While a primary line was established, the team’s failure to secure the secondary access required by state protocol led Governor Bill Lee to grant a one-year reprieve.

Oldest inmate set to be executed in Florida will face strict spending limit for final meal

An entire category of food is also off-limits for final meal requests in Florida Florida is currently preparing to execute its oldest inmate later today (July 14), a 74-year-old convicted murderer who has been on death row since the 1980s—but his final meal will be limited by a strict budget. Dennis Sochor is scheduled to be put to death later today, making history as the oldest inmate to ever be executed in the state. The criminal, who has been on death row for nearly 40 years, will be administered the lethal three-drug injection, with the process due to begin at around 6pm.

Florida executes Dennis Sochor

Man, 74, becomes oldest inmate executed in Florida in state’s 10th lethal injection this year  Florida put to death one of its oldest prisoners in its history on Tuesday, a 74-year-old convicted murderer who was 1 of 3 older inmates scheduled for execution within the span of a month in the nation’s busiest death penalty state.  Dennis Sochor was pronounced dead at 6:16 p.m. following a 3-drug injection at Florida State Prison near Starke, the office of Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis said. He was convicted of killing a woman on Jan. 1, 1982, just hours after meeting her at a New Year’s Eve party. 

Idaho | Death row prisoners sue over state's new firing squad

BOISE (Idaho Statesman) – Days after Idaho made the switch to a firing squad for executions, two Idaho death row prisoners next in line to be put to death sued the state prison system, saying its director withheld information about how she settled on the specifics for carrying out the method. Attorneys for prisoners Thomas Creech and Gerald Pizzuto filed suit this week in state district court against Idaho Department of Correction Director Bree Derrick. In the filing, they called her approval of an updated standard operating procedure for the firing squad and lethal injection as a backup method “arbitrary, capricious, or an abuse of discretion and in excess of the statutory authority of the agency.”

Why America’s death rows are slowly emptying

The number of death sentences handed out by juries has plunged by more than 90% since the 1990s. On July 8, the Death Penalty Information Center, or DPIC, released its midyear update on capital punishment in the United States. Many of the findings were sadly, disturbingly familiar. For example, racial bias still plays a large role in who gets executed, and the Supreme Court continues to allow executions to proceed even when those being put to death have strong claims of innocence. But there was also encouraging news.