Skip to main content

Former Oklahoma death row inmate Richard Glossip goes free on $500k bond

Richard Glossip was released from jail Thursday, May 14, on a $500,000 bond.
Richard Glossip was released from jail Thursday, May 14, on a $500,000 bond, a major victory for the former death row inmate who has come so close to execution that he has had three last meals.

Glossip, 63, is awaiting his third trial in his 1997 murder-for-hire case.

He walked out the front door of the Oklahoma County jail, holding hands with his wife, Lea Glossip, as a stiff Oklahoma breeze whipped his hair. "I'm just thankful for my wife and my attorneys," he told reporters. "I'm just happy."

His release came hours after Oklahoma County District Judge Natalie Mai set bail in a 13-page order that pointed to issues with the key witness against him.

"It is the bedrock principle of Oklahoma law that bail is not used as a form of punishment," the judge wrote. "Rather, bail is simply the means to ensure that a defendant will appear to face the charges pending against him."

Glossip had been expected to be able to post bond because he has had support both nationally and internationally, including from celebrities like Kim Kardashian. His financial status has not been disclosed, but eight attorneys appeared on his behalf at a hearing in April.

Glossip has always maintained he is innocent of murder in the 1997 beating death of his boss at an Oklahoma City motel.


His lead attorney, Don Knight, said Glossip "now has the chance to taste freedom while his defense team continues to pursue justice on his behalf."

The attorney said the judge, in setting bail, "rejected the State’s claim that there is a strong case for guilt."

Glossip is out of custody for the first time since January 1997. Much of his time locked up has been at the Oklahoma State Penitentiary in McAlester. He has been held in the Oklahoma County jail for more than a year.

The judge's order was filed around 10 a.m. Thursday. Glossip was released from jail at 3:36 p.m. He walked out the jail's front door after 5 p.m. after an issue with his ankle monitor was addressed.

His attorneys had asked for a fair bond and said he would live in Oklahoma County with his wife. Prosecutors with the attorney general's office had asked the judge to deny bond.

Glossip and his wife wed on March 29, 2022, while he was confined at the Oklahoma State Penitentiary.

The judge ordered Glossip to reside only at the marital home, wear an ankle monitor, observe a nightly curfew and not travel outside the state.

She also ordered him not to use any alcohol, illegal drugs or marijuana.

Richard Glossip was released from jail Thursday, May 14, on a $500,000 bond.
Historically, Oklahoma County judges have almost never let a defendant out of jail while awaiting trial in a murder case.

Mai wrote that in granting bail, she was following a clear mandate in the Oklahoma Constitution and a 1998 Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals decision.

She wrote she could only deny Glossip bail if there was clear and convincing evidence that "proof of guilt is evident, or the presumption thereof is great." She pointed in her order to issues with the key witness against Glossip.

Prosecutors said they remain focused on retrying the case.

"Ultimately, the question of the defendant's guilt or innocence will be decided by a jury of Oklahoma citizens − not a judge," Attorney General Gentner Drummond's press secretary, Leslie Berger, said.

For years, Glossip was the state's highest-profile death row inmate because of the celebrity support for his innocence claim, his close calls and a 2017 documentary about his case.

Last year, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed his 2004 murder conviction on prosecutorial misconduct grounds.

In an unusual move, Drummond joined Glossip's attorneys in asking the high court for that relief.

In June, Drummond said Glossip will be prosecuted again for murder. However, he said the death penalty will no longer be sought.

In July, his original judge for the third trial denied Glossip bond.

A month later, District Judge Heather Coyle stepped down from the case after defense attorneys raised concerns about her. Mai took over the case in December after five other Oklahoma County district judges also recused.

In April, Mai rejected Glossip's request to enforce a "plea deal" that might have resulted in his release.

Drummond in 2023 had discussions with Knight about a deal. The AG claimed the deal was never finalized and is now off.

The judge agreed the deal was not complete, in part because the murder victim's family had not been consulted about it.

Had the deal gone through, Glossip would have been sentenced to 45 years in prison after pleading guilty to accessory after the fact to first-degree murder. His attorneys believed he would have been released immediately under credits for time served.

Background of Richard Glossip's case


Glossip is accused of having his boss, Barry Van Treese, an Oklahoma City motel owner, killed in 1997
Glossip is accused of having his boss, Barry Van Treese, an Oklahoma City motel owner, killed in 1997 to keep from being fired for embezzlement. Glossip was the motel manager.

Van Treese was found beaten to death in Room 102 of the Best Budget Inn on Jan. 7, 1997. The victim was 54 and lived in Lawton.

Justin Sneed, a motel maintenance man, confessed to killing Van Treese with a baseball bat in the motel room. He said Glossip pressured him into doing it and offered him $10,000 as payment. Sneed was the key witness against Glossip at the first two trials and is expected to testify again at the third trial.

Glossip's attorneys claim Sneed actually killed the motel owner during a botched robbery for drug money. They claim he incriminated Glossip to avoid getting the death penalty himself and later considered recanting his testimony.

Glossip was convicted and sentenced to death the first time in 1998. The Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals threw out that conviction in 2001 because of issues with his defense attorney. He was convicted and sentenced to death the second time at a 2004 retrial.

Judge Mai noted in her order that the Court of Criminal Appeals in 2001 described the evidence at the first trial, corroborating Sneed's testimony as "extremely weak."

She noted the Court of Criminal Appeals was closely divided about the corroborating evidence in a 2007 opinion upholding his second conviction.

She also noted that the U.S. Supreme Court determined last year that Sneed gave false testimony about why he was prescribed lithium after his arrest and that prosecutors did not correct it.

She wrote that the Supreme Court found that "had the prosecution corrected Sneed on the stand, his credibility plainly would have suffered."

Finally, she pointed out that Drummond himself told the Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board in a 2023 letter that "the record ... does not support that he is guilty of first degree murder beyond a reasonable doubt."

Glossip came the closest to being executed on Sept. 30, 2015. He was three hours away from execution when a doctor realized a pharmacist had supplied the wrong drug for the lethal injection. The execution ended up being called off.

The mistake contributed to a hiatus in executions in Oklahoma that lasted years.

Near the end of her order, Mai wrote, "The Court hopes that a new trial, free of error, will provide all interested parties, and the citizens of Oklahoma, the closure they deserve."

Source: oklahoman.com, Nolan Clay, May 14, 2026




"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted."
— Oscar Wilde
Globe
Death Penalty News For a World without the Death Penalty

Comments

Most viewed (Last 7 days)

Iran: flogging still a common practice

Flogging of Sufis in Gonabad: Fourteen Ne’matollahi dervishes received 25 lashes each for allegedly disturbing the public security Public flogging in Iran "The lash ruling against 14 Ne'matollahi dervishes of Gonabad was carried out. They were residents of Baydokht and had been arrested and condemned by the Public Prosecutor of Gonabad after a protest against the illegal treatment dealing with the Sufis in June of last year [2010]. According to the website of Majzuban-e-Nur, Mr. Sa'id Kashani, Mr. Amir Roshan-Mojaver-Sufi, Mr. Alimohammad Amanian, Mr. Ruhollah Safari, Mr. Ali Abbasi-Baydokhti, Mr. Ebrahim Abbaszadeh, Mr. Mohammadali Ja'fari, Mr. Hossein Mahdavi, Mr. Hossein Abbaszadeh-Baydokhti, Mr. Rahmat Hosseini, Mr. Reza Kakhki, Mr. Behruz Mojaver-Sufi, Mr. Ali Mir, and Mr. Hassan Baluchi-Baydokhti are the fourteen dervishes whose requests were not only rejected, but who were condemned to 25 lashes for disturbing the public security. It should be mentioned th...

I watched Ohio's last execution. Here's what it was like

As Gov. DeWine calls for Ohio to end capital punishment, the state’s last execution remains the one I witnessed in 2018 Inside Ohio's death house, there is a room for executions and separate witness rooms: one for those connected to the victim and another for those connected to the inmate. Windows separate the death chamber from those watching, the condemned from the living. I was there on July 18, 2018 – during Ohio’s most recent execution. Robert Van Hook was put to death that day for killing David Self in 1985. He sat on death row for three decades. I was one of three media witnesses to the execution.

Japan’s Internet Wants Uchida Riko Executed. Here’s Why That Won’t Happen

This week, the prosecution in the case of a murder of a 17-year-old girl in Hokkaido came out with its sentencing recommendation. Japanese social media reacted by clamoring for the accused woman’s blood. But, while the facts of the case are heinous, the prosecutor’s decision not to seek the death penalty is grounded in long-standing precedent. Murdered for looking at the accused wrong Uchida Riko (内田梨瑚), 23, and her friends stand accused of murdering 17-year-old Murayama Runa (村山瑠奈) in Hokkaido’s Asahikawa. Prosecutors say the dispute began after Murayama posted a photo of Uchida to social media. They say Uchida’s group abducted the girl, made her undress, and then forced her to jump from a bridge.

Kansas AG urges governor to deny clemency to 8 sentenced to death

TOPEKA — Attorney General Kris Kobach on Tuesday urged the governor to deny clemency to Kansas inmates who have been sentenced to death. Eight of nine people sentenced to death in Kansas formally filed clemency requests in May, according to a press release from the Attorney General’s Office. Kobach urged Gov. Laura Kelly to reject them.

Gov. Mike DeWine calls for Ohio to abolish the death penalty

COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — Gov. Mike DeWine Tuesday morning called on Ohio to abolish the death penalty, citing data that he said proves it is no longer a deterrent to violent crime. “For the state to take a human life, there must, in my opinion, there must be evidence that in doing so it will help protect the public, that the threat of that action will deter someone from committing murder,” DeWine said. “I do not believe that argument today can be successfully made.” DeWine cited data showing a decline in the last four decades of executions being carried out and an increase in the time inmates spend on death row.

New Mississippi billboard warns criminals: ‘Firing squad is legal’

DESOTO COUNTY, Miss. (WREG) — A billboard standing on Interstate 55 southbound as you cross the Tennessee state line and enter Mississippi from Memphis is sending a grim message to those coming into the state. DeSoto County District Attorney Matthew Barton recently announced the new billboard campaign, which features the sign reading, “WELCOME TO MISSISSIPPI. WHERE THE FIRING SQUAD IS LEGAL. THINK TWICE.” It references Mississippi’s law permitting execution by firing squad under certain circumstances for inmates sentenced to death. Barton says this campaign is aimed at deterring violent crime and sends a direct message to criminals entering Mississippi.

20 Minutes to Death: Witness to the Last Execution in France

The following document is a firsthand account of the final moments of Hamida Djandoubi, a convicted murderer executed by guillotine at Marseille’s Baumettes Prison on September 10, 1977. The record—dated September 9—was written by Monique Mabelly, a judge appointed by the state to witness the proceedings. Djandoubi’s execution would ultimately be the last carried out in France before capital punishment was abolished in 1981. At the time, President Valéry Giscard d'Estaing—who had publicly voiced his "deep aversion to the death penalty" prior to his election—rejected Djandoubi’s appeal for clemency. Choosing to let "justice take its course," the President allowed the execution to proceed, just as he had in two previous cases during his term:   Christian Ranucci , executed on July 28, 1976 and Jérôme Carrein , executed on June 23, 1977. Hamida Djandoubi , a Tunisian national, was sentenced to death for killing his former lover, Elisabeth Bousquet. He was execu...

With nitrogen gas blocked, Alabama seeks to execute inmate by lethal injection

Jeffery Lee, who successfully challenged his scheduled Thursday execution by nitrogen gas, argued that execution by firing squad would be less painful. The Alabama Attorney General’s Office Friday sought to put an Alabama death row inmate to death by lethal injection a day after the U.S. Supreme Court rebuffed the state’s attempt to execute him by nitrogen gas. In a filing with the Alabama Supreme Court Friday afternoon, the state sought an expedited motion to set a new execution date for Jeffery Lee, 49. The state said that with a permanent injunction in place against nitrogen gas, the method by which the state intended to execute Lee on Thursday, it could execute him by lethal injection or the electric chair.

Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch wanted an execution that a Trump judge deemed illegal

The Supreme Court these days is generally in the business of helping executions go forward. But on Thursday night, the court did something notable: It told Alabama no. Even then, the court wasn't unanimous. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch dissented from the refusal to let the nitrogen gas execution of Jeffery Lee proceed. What prompted the rare rejection? In line with the typical shadow docket practice, the court didn't explain itself. Nor did the dissenters, who merely noted their disagreement. But a deeper look at the case helps us understand why a majority of the court was unwilling to help the state this time.

SCOTUS: Alabama can’t execute Jeffery Lee by nitrogen; Thursday execution called off

After a week of legal volleyball, Alabama death row inmate Jeffery Lee’s execution—scheduled for Thursday evening—was called off after federal courts called the state’s nitrogen gas execution method “likely unconstitutional.” The state took the fight to the U.S. Supreme Court, hoping Lee could still be put to death tonight.  In an order issued at 8:10 p.m., the U.S. Supreme Court ordered that it would not lift a ban on Alabama executing Lee via nitrogen . In a short court order, the justices denied Alabama’s motion to go ahead with the execution.  Associate Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch would have granted the appeal and let the execution proceed, according to the order.