Skip to main content

South Carolina wants more time to fight Alex Murdaugh's Supreme Court appeal; Murdaugh says no

Alex Murdaugh
The Attorney General's office cites the complexity and length of the case as reasons for needing an extension until August 8th


The South Carolina Attorney General's Office is seeking more time to respond to convicted murderer Alex Murdaugh's Supreme Court appeal brief, but Murdaugh's attorneys are strongly contesting that request.

On April 3, S.C. Attorney General Alan Wilson's office filed a motion for a second extension in Murdaugh's state Supreme Court appellate case, and the same day, Murdaugh's legal team promptly responded in opposition.

"We will not consent," wrote Murdaugh attorney Richard Harpootlian in an email to the state's attorneys.

If granted, this request for a 120-day extension would give the state an August 8 deadline to respond to Murdaugh's request for a Supreme Court hearing.

The S.C. Supreme Court has received both parties' motions and responses but has not issued an order or decision.

What led to Alex Murdaugh's murder case appeal?


On Dec. 10, 2024, attorneys for Richard "Alex" Murdaugh, a disbarred Hampton attorney convicted and serving back-to-back life sentences for the June 2021 shooting deaths of his wife, Maggie, and younger son, Paul, filed a motion to appeal those convictions and sentences before the South Carolina Supreme Court.

The appeals were based on allegations of jury tampering by a court official, former Colleton County Clerk of Court Becky Hill, alleged improper admission of evidence, and other contested matters during the highly publicized trial held in Walterboro.

The S.C. Attorney General's Office has a right to file a motion in response or opposition to this appeal before it can be scheduled for a hearing or arguments before the S.C. Supreme Court.

Murdaugh's attorneys originally agreed to allow AG Alan Wilson's office 90 days to respond, with a deadline of April 10, but now Murdaugh's legal team is vigorously contesting this request for another 120-day extension.

Why does the Attorney General want another extension?


In the April 3 court filing, signed and filed by two S.C. Deputy Attorney Generals, Don Zelenka and Mark Farthing, the state's prosecutors contend that their request for a second extension is due to extraordinary circumstances and is not intended to cause undue delay.

The AG's motion cites:
  • Murdaugh's appeal is over 121 pages long and raises nine identified issues.
  • The transcript of the six-week trial is more than 6,000 pages, including additional transcripts from other related hearings and proceedings.
  • There are numerous recordings and other exhibits of evidence that require review.
  • The attorneys of the AG's Office have a heavy workload, and the cover email to a Supreme Court clerk cited pending death penalty litigation.

Why is Murdaugh's legal team opposed to a second extension?


For five reasons, Murdaugh's legal team, led by Harpootlian and Jim Griffin, objected to this requested extension. Here are the three primary arguments:
  • The first reason cited involved the time since the initial appeals process began. Murdaugh was required to file his initial brief on the principal issue, the alleged "jury tampering for personal financial gain," on Aug. 12, 2024.
"If the State’s requested extension is granted, the State will have been given a full year to respond to that brief," writes Murdaugh's team. "Undersigned counsel is unaware of any criminal case—even a capital case—in which a state has been given a full year to respond to a defendant’s appellate brief, whether in South Carolina, some other state, or a federal court."
  • In response to the AG Office's "heavy workload" argument, Murdaugh's team writes:
"... Appellant appreciates the Office of the Attorney General’s hard work on behalf of South Carolina citizens, but the office has 'about 90 attorneys... And if those attorneys cannot meet reasonable court deadlines in major cases, they can retain outside counsel to assist."
  • Finally, Murdaugh's team argues that "the State is unlikely to prevail in this appeal, which means that delay is likely to prejudice" Murdaugh, adding that unless "the State has developed an unexpectedly strong counterargument that for some reason it is unwilling to reveal to the Court anytime soon, it is likely Appellant’s murder convictions will be overturned, and the requested briefing delay would serve only to delay the relief to which Appellant is entitled."
While Murdaugh is serving two life sentences without possibility of parole, a successful murder conviction appeal and retrial effort will not equate to freedom.

Murdaugh, who has steadfastly denied killing his family members since his arrest in 2021, has pleaded guilty to numerous financial crimes in both state and federal courts and is currently facing lengthy prison sentences in both jurisdictions after stealing millions from law partners and clients.

Source: greenvilleonline.com, Michael M. DeWitt, Jr. , April 7, 2025




"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted."
— Oscar Wilde


Comments

Most viewed (Last 7 days)

Florida executes Michael Tanzi

Florida on Tuesday executed a death row inmate described by one local detective as a "fledgling serial killer" for the murder of a beloved Miami Herald employee. Florida executed Michael Tanzi on Tuesday, 25 years after the murder of beloved Miami Herald employee Janet Acosta, who was attacked in broad daylight on her lunch break in 2000.   Michael Tanzi, 48, was executed by lethal injection at the Florida State Prison in Raiford and pronounced dead at 6:12 p.m. ET. 

South Carolina | Man who ambushed off-duty cop to face firing squad in second execution of its kind

Mikal Mahdi, 48, who was found guilty of killing an off-duty police officer and a convenience store worker, is the second inmate scheduled to executed by South Carolina's new firing squad A murderer who ambushed and shot an off duty police officer eight times before burning his body in a killing spree is set to become the second person to die by firing squad. South Carolina's highest court has rejected the last major appeal from Mikal Mahdi, 41, who is to be put to death with three bullets to the heart at 6pm on April 11 at the Broad River Correctional Institution in Columbia. Mahdi's lawyers said his original lawyers put on a shallow case trying to spare his life that didn't call on relatives, teachers or people who knew him and ignored the impact of weeks spent in solitary confinement in prison as a teen.

Lethal Injection, Electric Chair, or Firing Squad? An Inhumane Decision for Death Row Prisoners

South Carolina resumed executions with the firing squad killing of Brad Sigmon last month. Mikal Madhi’s execution date is days away. The curtain shrieked as it was yanked open to reveal a 67-year-old man tied to a chair. His arms were pulled uncomfortably behind his back. The red bull’s-eye target on his chest rose and fell as he desperately attempted to still his breathing. The man, Brad Sigmon, smiled at his attorney, Bo King, seated in the front row before guards placed a black bag over his head. King said Sigmon appeared to be trying his best to put on a brave face for those who had come to bear witness.

Afghanistan | Four men publicly executed by Taliban with relatives of victims shooting them 'six or seven times' at sport stadium

Four men have been publicly executed by the Taliban, with relatives of their victims shooting them several times in front of spectators at a sport stadium. Two men were shot around six to seven times by a male relative of the victims in front of spectators in Qala-i-Naw, the centre of Afghanistan's Badghis province, witnesses told an AFP journalist in the city.  The men had been 'sentenced to retaliatory punishment' for shooting other men, after their cases were 'examined very precisely and repeatedly', the statement said.  'The families of the victims were offered amnesty and peace but they refused.'

Arizona | The cruelty of isolation: There’s nothing ‘humane’ about how we treat the condemned

On March 19, I served as a witness to the execution of a man named Aaron Gunches, Arizona’s first since 2022. During his time on death row, he begged for death and was ultimately granted what is likely more appropriately described as an emotionless state-assisted suicide. This experience has profoundly impacted me, leading to deep reflection on the nature of death, humanity, and the role we play in our final moments. When someone is in the end stages of life, we talk about hospice care, comfort, care, easing suffering and humane death. We strive for a “good death” — a peaceful transition. I’ve seen good ones, and I’ve seen bad, unplanned ones. 

Louisiana | Lawyers of Jessie Hoffman speak about their final moments before execution

As Louisiana prepared its first execution in 15 years, a team of lawyers from Loyola Law were working to save Jessie Hoffman’s life. “I was a young lawyer three years out of law school, and Jessie was almost finished with his appeals at that time, and my boss told me we needed to file something for Jessie because he’s in danger of being executed,” Kappel said. Kappel and her boss came up with a civil lawsuit to file that said since they wouldn’t give him a protocol for his execution, he was being deprived of due process, and the lawsuit was in the legal process for the next 10 years.

USA | Why the firing squad may be making a comeback

South Carolina plans to execute Mikal Mahdi on Friday for the murder of a police officer, draping a hood over his head and firing three bullets into his heart. The choice to die by firing squad – rather than lethal injection or the electric chair – was Mahdi’s own, his attorney said last month: “Faced with barbaric and inhumane choices, Mikal Mahdi has chosen the lesser of three evils.” If it proceeds, Mahdi’s execution would be the latest in a recent string of events that have put the spotlight on the firing squad as a handful of US death penalty states explore alternatives to lethal injection, by far the nation’s dominant execution method.

I spent 16 years in solitary in South Carolina. This is what it did to me. | Opinion

South Carolinian Randy Poindexter writes about the effects 16 years of solitary confinement had on him ahead of South Carolina’s planned execution of Mikal Mahdi , who spent months in solitary as a young man. For 16 years, I lived in a concrete cell. Twenty-three hours a day, every day, for more than 3,000 days, South Carolina kept me in solitary confinement. I was a young man before I was sent to solitary — angry, untreated and unwell. I made mistakes. But I wasn’t sentenced to madness. That’s what solitary did to me. My mental health worsened with each passing day. At first, paranoia and depression set in. Then, hallucinations and self-mutilation. I talked to people who weren’t there. I cut myself to feel something besides despair. I could do nothing as four of my friends and fellow prisoners took their own lives rather than endure another day of torturous isolation.

'No Warning': The Death Penalty In Japan

Stakes for wrongful convictions are high in Japan, where the death penalty has broad public support despite criticism over how it is carried out. Tokyo: Capital punishment in Japan is under scrutiny again after the world's longest-serving death row prisoner, Iwao Hakamada, was awarded $1.4 million in compensation this week following his acquittal last year in a retrial. Stakes for wrongful convictions are high in Japan, where the death penalty has broad public support despite international criticism over how it is carried out.

Bangladesh | Botswana Woman Executed for Drug Trafficking

Dhaka, Bangladesh – Lesedi Molapisi, a Botswana national convicted of drug trafficking, was executed in Bangladesh on Friday, 21 March 2025. The 31-year-old was hanged at Dhaka Central Jail after exhausting all legal avenues to appeal her death sentence. Molapisi was arrested in January 2023 upon arrival at Hazrat Shahjalal International Airport in Dhaka, where customs officials discovered 3.1 kilograms of heroin hidden in her luggage. Following a trial under Bangladesh’s Narcotics Control Act, she was sentenced to death in May 2024. Her execution was initially delayed due to political unrest in the country but was carried out last week.