Skip to main content

Whether or Not Ohio Ever Carries Out Another Execution Will Help Shape the Death Penalty’s Fate Across the Nation

On February 13, Ohio Governor Mike DeWine postponed the three Ohio executions that were scheduled for 2025. And he predicted that no one would be put to death during the remainder of his time in office which ends in 2026.

Columbus’s NBC4 reports that “the reprieves were issued due to ‘ongoing problems involving the willingness of pharmaceutical suppliers to provide drugs to the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (DRC), pursuant to DRC protocol, without endangering other Ohioans.’”

That other death penalty states have solved their drug supply problems suggests that there may be more going on in Ohio than is suggested in DeWine’s explanation of his decision to postpone executions. Given the size of the state’s death row and its long death penalty history, what happens in Ohio will reverberate well beyond its borders.

Even in the deep red Buckeye State, there is little appetite for turning death sentences into deaths. That may be why, since DeWine took office five years ago, Ohio has not carried out a single execution.

The three people whose executions DeWine delayed include Percy Hutton, who was sentenced for a murder he committed in 1985. His execution has been pushed back to 2028.

The second man, Samuel Moreland, was to be executed on July 30 for a crime he committed forty years ago. Like Hutton, he is now scheduled to be put to death in 2028.

The third man, Douglas Coley, has a new execution date of August 15, 2028. He was convicted and sentenced for a 1997 carjacking and murder.

There are more than one hundred people awaiting execution in Ohio, two of whom are women. Its death row population is the sixth largest in the country. 59% of that group are racial minorities.

Ohio ranks eighth among death penalty states in terms of the percentage of minority group members among those awaiting execution.

In recent years, the pace of death sentencing in the state has slowed to a trickle. It had only one new death sentence in 2024.

It was handed down in May in the case of Gurpreet Singh, who was charged with murdering his wife and three of her relatives. Before that, the last death sentence in the state was in 2020, when Joel Drain was convicted of murdering another inmate at the Warren Correctional Institution.

Looking over the period from 1977 to 2013 (the last date for which data is available) shows that Ohio’s death sentence/per capita ratio was .0286, the fifteenth highest among states retaining capital punishment.

While Mike DeWine has imposed a de facto moratorium on executions, he has never come out as a death penalty abolitionist. The closest he came was in 2019 after a federal district court ruled that Ohio’s execution protocol “will almost certainly subject [prisoners] to severe pain and needless suffering.”

The court found that they would be exposed to a “drowning sensation produced by the first drug in the protocol, Midazolam” and a “burning sensation caused by the third, heart-stopping drug because Midazolam doesn’t have the pain-killing properties that drugs such as opioids do.”

At the time, DeWine said, “Ohio is not going to execute someone under my watch when a federal judge has found it to be cruel and unusual punishment.” The governor did not change course even after an appellate court reversed the trial court’s decision.

By putting executions on hold, DeWine has shown Ohioans that they can live without them. The longer Ohio goes without an execution, the more time citizens have to get used to living without it.

Now, six and one-half years after Ohio’s last execution, the sky has not fallen. More to the point, the rate of violent crime is almost exactly what it was in 2018.

In addition, as the state’s Legislative Budget Office notes, “Ohio’s violent crime rate has remained consistently below the national average over the past ten years. In 2022, compared to the national average, Ohio’s violent crime rate was nearly 23% lower.”

Ohio’s death penalty is plagued with the kind of problems that are found across the nation, racial disparity being one of them. The Death Penalty Information Center (DPIC) notes that “[m]ultiple Ohio-specific studies have concluded that when a case involves a white victim — especially a white female victim — defendants are more likely to receive a death sentence or be executed.”

One study of executions in the state between 1976 and 2014 found that homicides involving white female victims are “six times more likely to result in an execution than homicides involving Black male victims.” A DPIC analysis of Ohio’s death penalty found that “75% of death sentences” in the state “were for cases with at least one white victim.”

It added that “most murder victims in the state are Black (66%).”

In addition, more than a decade ago, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Ohio and the President of the Ohio State Bar Association created a task force to review the administration of Ohio’s death penalty. It recommended

specialized trainings for judges, prosecutors, and defense attorneys to recognize and protect against racial biases; requiring judges to report state actors who act on the basis of race in a capital case; removing death penalty specifications that are disproportionately applied to Black defendants; creating a death penalty charging committee at the Ohio Attorney General’s Office; and enacting legislation allowing for racial disparity claims to be raised and developed in state court through a Racial Justice Act.

As DPIC notes, “none of the specific recommendations to reduce racial disparities in death penalty cases have been adopted.”

Moreover, in April 2024, Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost released the office’s annual “Capital Crimes Report.” The report called the state’s death penalty system “broken” and “enormously expensive.”

It estimated that “the extra cost of imposing the death penalty…on the 119 people currently on Death Row might range from $121 million to $363 million.” The report called that “a stunning amount of money to spend on a program that doesn’t achieve its purpose.”

In no uncertain terms, it delivered Its verdict. “Even if Ohio’s system is trustworthy in its sentencing decisions, it is not trustworthy in carrying them out…. This system,” the report explained, “is a testament to government impotence.

“At a time when faith in society’s institutions is at an all-time low, the failure of the capital-punishment system could be Exhibit A.” The report concluded that “If we were starting from scratch to design a system for the ultimate punishment—whether that punishment is execution or, instead, life in prison without parole—neither death-penalty opponents nor death-penalty supporters would create anything like Ohio’s current system, which produces churn, waste, and endless lawsuits but nothing else.”

That is why surveys have found that most Ohioans are ready to leave the death penalty behind. In September 2023, 56% said that the state should “do away with the death penalty and replace it with a life sentence for murder without the possibility of parole.” 58% want the legislature to pass a law “replacing the death penalty with a life sentence without the possibility of parole” and the governor to sign it.

While some in the state would revive executions by switching from lethal injection to nitrogen hypoxia, last month, NBC4 reported that “There is once again a renewed push to abolish the death penalty in Ohio but this time, with a bit of a twist.”

The twist is that the new bill would not only end capital punishment, but it would also prohibit the use of state funds to carry out an execution and also prohibit the use of state funds “for physician-assisted suicide and abortion, something already in Ohio law.”

A Republican supporter of the legislation says it seeks to make a simple statement. “Ohio will not fund death.” As Rep. Adam Mathews explains, “The state should not be subsidizing death. It should not be subsidizing ending human life, no matter the form, no matter the circumstance.”

Whether or not that proposal carries the day, Ohio may never carry out another execution. And, if it does not, it may help seal the fate of capital punishment across the United States.

What was once said about national elections may one day be said about the death penalty: As Ohio goes, so goes the nation.

Source: verdict.justia.com, Austin Sarat, February 17, 2025

_____________________________________________________________________








"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted."

— Oscar Wilde



Comments

Most viewed (Last 7 days)

Gov. Mike DeWine calls for Ohio to abolish the death penalty

COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — Gov. Mike DeWine Tuesday morning called on Ohio to abolish the death penalty, citing data that he said proves it is no longer a deterrent to violent crime. “For the state to take a human life, there must, in my opinion, there must be evidence that in doing so it will help protect the public, that the threat of that action will deter someone from committing murder,” DeWine said. “I do not believe that argument today can be successfully made.” DeWine cited data showing a decline in the last four decades of executions being carried out and an increase in the time inmates spend on death row.

I watched Ohio's last execution. Here's what it was like

As Gov. DeWine calls for Ohio to end capital punishment, the state’s last execution remains the one I witnessed in 2018 Inside Ohio's death house, there is a room for executions and separate witness rooms: one for those connected to the victim and another for those connected to the inmate. Windows separate the death chamber from those watching, the condemned from the living. I was there on July 18, 2018 – during Ohio’s most recent execution. Robert Van Hook was put to death that day for killing David Self in 1985. He sat on death row for three decades. I was one of three media witnesses to the execution.

Kansas AG urges governor to deny clemency to 8 sentenced to death

TOPEKA — Attorney General Kris Kobach on Tuesday urged the governor to deny clemency to Kansas inmates who have been sentenced to death. Eight of nine people sentenced to death in Kansas formally filed clemency requests in May, according to a press release from the Attorney General’s Office. Kobach urged Gov. Laura Kelly to reject them.

20 Minutes to Death: Witness to the Last Execution in France

The following document is a firsthand account of the final moments of Hamida Djandoubi, a convicted murderer executed by guillotine at Marseille’s Baumettes Prison on September 10, 1977. The record—dated September 9—was written by Monique Mabelly, a judge appointed by the state to witness the proceedings. Djandoubi’s execution would ultimately be the last carried out in France before capital punishment was abolished in 1981. At the time, President Valéry Giscard d'Estaing—who had publicly voiced his "deep aversion to the death penalty" prior to his election—rejected Djandoubi’s appeal for clemency. Choosing to let "justice take its course," the President allowed the execution to proceed, just as he had in two previous cases during his term:   Christian Ranucci , executed on July 28, 1976 and Jérôme Carrein , executed on June 23, 1977. Hamida Djandoubi , a Tunisian national, was sentenced to death for killing his former lover, Elisabeth Bousquet. He was execu...

New Mississippi billboard warns criminals: ‘Firing squad is legal’

DESOTO COUNTY, Miss. (WREG) — A billboard standing on Interstate 55 southbound as you cross the Tennessee state line and enter Mississippi from Memphis is sending a grim message to those coming into the state. DeSoto County District Attorney Matthew Barton recently announced the new billboard campaign, which features the sign reading, “WELCOME TO MISSISSIPPI. WHERE THE FIRING SQUAD IS LEGAL. THINK TWICE.” It references Mississippi’s law permitting execution by firing squad under certain circumstances for inmates sentenced to death. Barton says this campaign is aimed at deterring violent crime and sends a direct message to criminals entering Mississippi.

SCOTUS: Alabama can’t execute Jeffery Lee by nitrogen; Thursday execution called off

After a week of legal volleyball, Alabama death row inmate Jeffery Lee’s execution—scheduled for Thursday evening—was called off after federal courts called the state’s nitrogen gas execution method “likely unconstitutional.” The state took the fight to the U.S. Supreme Court, hoping Lee could still be put to death tonight.  In an order issued at 8:10 p.m., the U.S. Supreme Court ordered that it would not lift a ban on Alabama executing Lee via nitrogen . In a short court order, the justices denied Alabama’s motion to go ahead with the execution.  Associate Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch would have granted the appeal and let the execution proceed, according to the order. 

With nitrogen gas blocked, Alabama seeks to execute inmate by lethal injection

Jeffery Lee, who successfully challenged his scheduled Thursday execution by nitrogen gas, argued that execution by firing squad would be less painful. The Alabama Attorney General’s Office Friday sought to put an Alabama death row inmate to death by lethal injection a day after the U.S. Supreme Court rebuffed the state’s attempt to execute him by nitrogen gas. In a filing with the Alabama Supreme Court Friday afternoon, the state sought an expedited motion to set a new execution date for Jeffery Lee, 49. The state said that with a permanent injunction in place against nitrogen gas, the method by which the state intended to execute Lee on Thursday, it could execute him by lethal injection or the electric chair.

Alabama | Judge bars nitrogen gas execution, says method is unconstitutionally cruel

MONTGOMERY, Ala. -- A federal judge on Tuesday permanently blocked Alabama from executing an inmate with nitrogen gas after declaring it violates the ban on cruel and unusual punishment. U.S. District Judge Emily Marks issued the ruling hours after an appeals court reversed her initial finding that the method was constitutional. Marks permanently enjoined the state from executing Jeffrey Lee, 49, by nitrogen gas. He was scheduled to be executed Thursday. The decision, for now, blocks the use of the controversial new execution method that the state has championed since 2024, but the issue will likely end up before the U.S. Supreme Court.

Idaho will soon turn to firing squad executions. Police will pull the triggers

Trained members of Idaho law enforcement with demonstrated firearms proficiency are expected to fill slots for carrying out the death penalty by firing squad as the state prison system transitions to the controversial execution method next month.  Six volunteers certified for no less than three years apiece through Peace Officer Standards and Training, or POST, will be recruited to ensure the Idaho Department of Correction is ready to comply with a state law that prioritizes shooting prisoners to death over lethal injection starting July 1.  No one on the team may have faced disciplinary action over firearms, use of force, or related conduct over the prior year, according to new execution protocols the prison system released this week. 

Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch wanted an execution that a Trump judge deemed illegal

The Supreme Court these days is generally in the business of helping executions go forward. But on Thursday night, the court did something notable: It told Alabama no. Even then, the court wasn't unanimous. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch dissented from the refusal to let the nitrogen gas execution of Jeffery Lee proceed. What prompted the rare rejection? In line with the typical shadow docket practice, the court didn't explain itself. Nor did the dissenters, who merely noted their disagreement. But a deeper look at the case helps us understand why a majority of the court was unwilling to help the state this time.