Skip to main content

Japan | Documentary reveals human side of exonerated death row inmate Hakamada

Iwao as a young boxer
When Chiaki Kasai set out to make a documentary about Iwao Hakamada, a Japanese man who was acquitted in a retrial of a 1966 quadruple murder case after spending more than four decades on death row, she hoped to tell the story of his life as a promising young boxer before his life was upended by tragedy.

It was a marked departure from the fascination with Hakamada as a presumed killer as a starting point, with the film describing a pugilist driven by ambitions of building a professional sporting career.

Sadly, the resilience he had in the ring could only be used as an asset in his fight against incarceration. He was recognized as the world's longest-serving death row inmate when new evidence won his release from prison in 2014.

"Fists and Prayers," directed by Kasai and released in October 2024 in Japan, also explores how the 88-year-old Hakamada created a spiritual world to comfort himself from the prospect of being sent to the gallows.

In 1966 when he was 30 years old, Hakamada, a retired professional boxer and live-in employee at a miso factory, was arrested for murdering the firm's senior managing director, his wife, and two of their children.

The victims were found dead from stab wounds at their house in Shizuoka Prefecture, which had been burned down.

Hakamada's lawyers say he was interrogated by police for a total of 430 hours over 23 days, and nearly 17 hours in at least one session, adding that a false confession was obtained after he was kicked, clubbed and denied water and access to a toilet.

He was indicted for murder, robbery, and arson. His mental state deteriorated over his interminable imprisonment, with signs of psychological strain manifesting from around 1980 when his death sentence was finalized.

Kasai, a 50-year-old former television reporter, first became acquainted with Hakamada's case in January 2002 when she was working on the Shizuoka prefectural police beat.

"The incident itself had all but been forgotten by the world," she recalled of the period from when Hakamada's first appeal for a retrial was denied almost a decade earlier by the Shizuoka District Court.

Once Kasai learned over 20 years ago that Hakamada had written letters to his family from behind bars, she knew that she had to hold and read them for herself as a way to engage physically with the man awaiting execution on death row.

She called his sister Hideko, now 91, and visited her at home a few days later where she was shown a pile of letters in a condition that made it clear they had been read many times. Handling them with care, she said, "They made me realize Mr. Hakamada  is a real person."

She said the writings were kind, if somewhat naive, showing how much he cared for his family, but Kasai could hardly believe they were written by a man who could be executed any day.

Even though she was busy with her TV reporting career, she continued to see Hideko now and again to learn more about her brother as visiting the prison to talk with him in person was impossible.

Iwao Hakamada
The documentary includes the scene when Hakamada was released from the Tokyo Detention House in March 2014, capturing his very first moments of freedom after 47 years and seven months behind bars.

No one, including his sister, could have expected him to be released so suddenly given he was still considered guilty, Kasai said.

Last year, Hakamada's case became the fifth in postwar Japan in which a retiral resulted in an exoneration after the death penalty was handed down but not carried out, with all rulings finalized without an appeal by prosecutors. But his was the first in which a death row inmate was released before winning an acquittal, Kasai said.

Kasai was one of only a handful of passengers inside the van that drove Hakamada away after he was freed, recalling the moment when she met him for the first time, saying, "It was such a miracle. I never thought that I would see him alive."

Shortly afterward, she set her mind on creating a film about Hakamada, adding, "I had no choice but to start filming to make it something that could be passed down through generations." It was this decision that put her on a path to becoming a freelance filmmaker.

Kasai took the bulk of over 400 hours of video footage captured after Hakamada's release and condensed it down, capturing his daily life and casual conversations at his residence with his sister where they lived together.

"What I desired to show in the film was not anything about the incident itself but rather about Mr. Hakamada as a person," she said, referring to how the focus of the murder case often became the starting point for people to talk about his life.

Rather, she was determined to humanize Hakamada by focusing on the "precious" 30 years of life before his arrest, especially as a professional fighter coming up in his 20s.

Many in Japan's boxing community came out to vouch for Hakamada innocence at the time of the accusations, speaking to the stoic nature of boxers who are used to rising from the canvas after being knocked down, says Shosei Nitta, who chairs the Iwao Hakamada support committee at the Japan Pro Boxing Associations.

Nitta suggested at a Tokyo press conference attended by Kasai that many could "empathize with the hardship and pain of a fellow fighter who, like in the ring, tries to overcome being knocked down."

When the film was screened last year for the first time overseas, in the United States, Kasai was moved by the audience who responded positively and even found humor in some scenes.

Many said they were riveted by Hakamada and the fictitious world he had created in which he referred to himself as "the omnipotent God," who had "absorbed" Iwao Hakamada and abolished the death penalty in Japan.

Mental health experts familiar with Hakamada's case but not featured in the film suggest his personality quirks were the result of his becoming institutionalized at the detention center.

Iwao and his sister Hideko
In the editing of the film, Kasai felt it essential to highlight Hakamada's enduring sense of humor.

Simple communication between Hakamada and Hideko often caused laughter due to his sister's jokes and his charming behavior, such as tipping a doctor who had lectured him about his high blood sugar levels, then asking if he could have a glass of juice.

"Humor has the power of showing not only superficial laughter but also the strength and kindness of human beings," Kasai said.

Although Hakamada and his sister were forced to spend much of their time apart during a cruel and tragic time until his acquittal on Sept. 26 last year, they have maintained a positive and cheerful outlook.

"I also wanted to make everyone feel invigorated after watching their humorous scenes together," she said.

The film has been screened at theaters across Japan.

Kasai and her work won the Japan Documentary Film Award given by the Japan Council of the University of Pittsburgh and Screenshot Asia, with a selection committee saying it made them "think deeply about how severely capital punishment impacts people."

Kasai, who says Hakamada's case is what sparked her interest in Japan's often criticized criminal justice system, plans to continue documenting his life. "Making a film was not the goal. Because Mr. Hakamada is a surviving witness, I film him," she said.

Capital punishment in Japan, in her estimate, has all but been hidden from society, but she believes there should be more opportunities to start a debate about the contemporary use of the death penalty, saying, "I want the film to be a catalyst to think about it."

Source: Japan Today, Risako Nakanishi, January 21, 2025

_____________________________________________________________________








"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted."

— Oscar Wilde



Comments

Most viewed (Last 7 days)

I watched Ohio's last execution. Here's what it was like

As Gov. DeWine calls for Ohio to end capital punishment, the state’s last execution remains the one I witnessed in 2018 Inside Ohio's death house, there is a room for executions and separate witness rooms: one for those connected to the victim and another for those connected to the inmate. Windows separate the death chamber from those watching, the condemned from the living. I was there on July 18, 2018 – during Ohio’s most recent execution. Robert Van Hook was put to death that day for killing David Self in 1985. He sat on death row for three decades. I was one of three media witnesses to the execution.

Kansas AG urges governor to deny clemency to 8 sentenced to death

TOPEKA — Attorney General Kris Kobach on Tuesday urged the governor to deny clemency to Kansas inmates who have been sentenced to death. Eight of nine people sentenced to death in Kansas formally filed clemency requests in May, according to a press release from the Attorney General’s Office. Kobach urged Gov. Laura Kelly to reject them.

Gov. Mike DeWine calls for Ohio to abolish the death penalty

COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — Gov. Mike DeWine Tuesday morning called on Ohio to abolish the death penalty, citing data that he said proves it is no longer a deterrent to violent crime. “For the state to take a human life, there must, in my opinion, there must be evidence that in doing so it will help protect the public, that the threat of that action will deter someone from committing murder,” DeWine said. “I do not believe that argument today can be successfully made.” DeWine cited data showing a decline in the last four decades of executions being carried out and an increase in the time inmates spend on death row.

20 Minutes to Death: Witness to the Last Execution in France

The following document is a firsthand account of the final moments of Hamida Djandoubi, a convicted murderer executed by guillotine at Marseille’s Baumettes Prison on September 10, 1977. The record—dated September 9—was written by Monique Mabelly, a judge appointed by the state to witness the proceedings. Djandoubi’s execution would ultimately be the last carried out in France before capital punishment was abolished in 1981. At the time, President Valéry Giscard d'Estaing—who had publicly voiced his "deep aversion to the death penalty" prior to his election—rejected Djandoubi’s appeal for clemency. Choosing to let "justice take its course," the President allowed the execution to proceed, just as he had in two previous cases during his term:   Christian Ranucci , executed on July 28, 1976 and Jérôme Carrein , executed on June 23, 1977. Hamida Djandoubi , a Tunisian national, was sentenced to death for killing his former lover, Elisabeth Bousquet. He was execu...

Japan’s Internet Wants Uchida Riko Executed. Here’s Why That Won’t Happen

This week, the prosecution in the case of a murder of a 17-year-old girl in Hokkaido came out with its sentencing recommendation. Japanese social media reacted by clamoring for the accused woman’s blood. But, while the facts of the case are heinous, the prosecutor’s decision not to seek the death penalty is grounded in long-standing precedent. Murdered for looking at the accused wrong Uchida Riko (内田梨瑚), 23, and her friends stand accused of murdering 17-year-old Murayama Runa (村山瑠奈) in Hokkaido’s Asahikawa. Prosecutors say the dispute began after Murayama posted a photo of Uchida to social media. They say Uchida’s group abducted the girl, made her undress, and then forced her to jump from a bridge.

New Mississippi billboard warns criminals: ‘Firing squad is legal’

DESOTO COUNTY, Miss. (WREG) — A billboard standing on Interstate 55 southbound as you cross the Tennessee state line and enter Mississippi from Memphis is sending a grim message to those coming into the state. DeSoto County District Attorney Matthew Barton recently announced the new billboard campaign, which features the sign reading, “WELCOME TO MISSISSIPPI. WHERE THE FIRING SQUAD IS LEGAL. THINK TWICE.” It references Mississippi’s law permitting execution by firing squad under certain circumstances for inmates sentenced to death. Barton says this campaign is aimed at deterring violent crime and sends a direct message to criminals entering Mississippi.

SCOTUS: Alabama can’t execute Jeffery Lee by nitrogen; Thursday execution called off

After a week of legal volleyball, Alabama death row inmate Jeffery Lee’s execution—scheduled for Thursday evening—was called off after federal courts called the state’s nitrogen gas execution method “likely unconstitutional.” The state took the fight to the U.S. Supreme Court, hoping Lee could still be put to death tonight.  In an order issued at 8:10 p.m., the U.S. Supreme Court ordered that it would not lift a ban on Alabama executing Lee via nitrogen . In a short court order, the justices denied Alabama’s motion to go ahead with the execution.  Associate Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch would have granted the appeal and let the execution proceed, according to the order. 

With nitrogen gas blocked, Alabama seeks to execute inmate by lethal injection

Jeffery Lee, who successfully challenged his scheduled Thursday execution by nitrogen gas, argued that execution by firing squad would be less painful. The Alabama Attorney General’s Office Friday sought to put an Alabama death row inmate to death by lethal injection a day after the U.S. Supreme Court rebuffed the state’s attempt to execute him by nitrogen gas. In a filing with the Alabama Supreme Court Friday afternoon, the state sought an expedited motion to set a new execution date for Jeffery Lee, 49. The state said that with a permanent injunction in place against nitrogen gas, the method by which the state intended to execute Lee on Thursday, it could execute him by lethal injection or the electric chair.

Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch wanted an execution that a Trump judge deemed illegal

The Supreme Court these days is generally in the business of helping executions go forward. But on Thursday night, the court did something notable: It told Alabama no. Even then, the court wasn't unanimous. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch dissented from the refusal to let the nitrogen gas execution of Jeffery Lee proceed. What prompted the rare rejection? In line with the typical shadow docket practice, the court didn't explain itself. Nor did the dissenters, who merely noted their disagreement. But a deeper look at the case helps us understand why a majority of the court was unwilling to help the state this time.

Alabama | Judge bars nitrogen gas execution, says method is unconstitutionally cruel

MONTGOMERY, Ala. -- A federal judge on Tuesday permanently blocked Alabama from executing an inmate with nitrogen gas after declaring it violates the ban on cruel and unusual punishment. U.S. District Judge Emily Marks issued the ruling hours after an appeals court reversed her initial finding that the method was constitutional. Marks permanently enjoined the state from executing Jeffrey Lee, 49, by nitrogen gas. He was scheduled to be executed Thursday. The decision, for now, blocks the use of the controversial new execution method that the state has championed since 2024, but the issue will likely end up before the U.S. Supreme Court.