Skip to main content

North Texas jury sentences killer to death penalty for shooting Burleson woman, cop

A jury of 12 Johnson County residents voted Thursday to send 31-year-old Jerry Elders to death row for the murder of Robin Waddell, agreeing with prosecutors who requested the death penalty.

The defense argued for life in prison without parole, saying Thursday morning that Elders’ actions came after a lifetime of drug addiction and going in and out of jails and prisons, being kicked out of his family home as a teenager and not receiving support from family members.

The prosecution said that wasn’t true. Elders had support from a loving family, from housing to food to money to even a car, and refused to let them help him get off drugs, the state argued. Assistant District Attorney Matthew Staton told the jury Elders used drugs because he liked them.

Staton said the defendant is a coward who carjacked and killed Waddell because he didn’t want her to lead authorities to him after he shot a police officer during a traffic stop.

During jury selection, the majority of jurors said they believe that spending life in prison is a harsher sentence than being put to death, defense attorney Miles Brissette reminded them in his closing argument. Death was too easy, he said. The jurors seemed to have changed their minds.

Several jurors cried silently after the sentence was announced, clandestinely wiping their eyes. One appeared to pray. Another stared at the floor, not looking up until the judge addressed the jury again directly to discharge them from their duties.

Elders didn’t react when the verdict was read. He stood there, silent and still, his face carved from something solid and his eyes trained straight ahead.

Jurors began deliberating toward a punishment verdict around 10 a.m. Thursday and delivered their verdict shortly before 5:30 p.m. At one point, the jury asked to listen again to audio of the defendant’s phone calls from jail. Jurors also asked for clarification on whether Elders’ intoxication when he committed the crime would be a mitigating factor in deciding the sentence.

VICTIM’S FAMILY SPEAKS AFTER SENTENCING


Waddell’s daughter Patricia Cooke has been in court every day of the trial. When she took the stand to deliver a victim impact statement following the sentencing, she told Elders she wouldn’t call him by his name. He didn’t deserve to be called by a name, she said.

Cooke shifted in the witness stand, moving the chair and the microphone to make sure she could see him clearly.

“I’ll call you ‘killer,’ “ she told him. “Mother killer. Grandmother killer.”

She said that the defense claims that Elders was a “bungler” weren’t true. He knew what he was doing and was intentional about every move.

“You weren’t awfully clumsy,” Cooke said to him from the witness stand. “You fired five shots and five shots hit their target.”

She said she’s heard some people calling him “sweet Jer bear,” which she said was disgusting. It didn’t matter if he walked his partner’s children to the school bus or was loved by family members. He is the reason her daughters asked for chains on the doors and windows in their house. The reason she can’t think of her childhood anymore.

The basketball hoop where she used to play is now in her mind the place where he pointed a gun at her mother and forced her into the truck. The place the truck sat is now where he laid in wait. The memories of going to shoot targets with her father are tainted by the knowledge that her mother was shot to death.

And it’s made worse by the fact that the gun she and her father shot was a .38 Special, the same type Elders used in the killing.

She said she can’t even go to Joshua for a plate of nachos anymore.

“She was killed like an animal on the street, crawling up to a locked door,” Cooke told Elders. “At some point you will be sent back to hell where you belong. ... The law you so hate gave you a far better shot than you gave my mother.”

Robin Waddell’s daughter-in-law, Lori Waddell, told Elders that he took Robin not just from her children, but from her grandchildren.

“My daughter asked me to promise her that grandma would be OK and I couldn’t keep that promise,” she said.

Robin’s son, Phil Waddell, kept his statement short.

“The jury spoke for me,” he said.

ELDERS WAS CONVICTED OF CAPITAL MURDER


Elders was found guilty of capital murder last week. He shot a Burleson police officer during a 2021 traffic stop then fled, abducted 60-year-old Robin Waddell in her truck, shot her and threw her out of her truck in the back lot of the Joshua Police Department, authorities have said. Waddell died from her wounds. The officer, Joshua Lott, was shot three times but survived.

In a courtroom filled with law enforcement, on the first day of the three-week trial when the gallery was standing room only, the defense started the day asking Visiting Judge Lee Gabriel to expel uniformed law enforcement from the courtroom. The concern was that the jury would be intimidated by the uniforms or feel a sense of community expectation to deliver a death penalty verdict.

Gabriel denied the request, saying that if the general public is allowed in the courtroom that uniformed officers are as well.

HOW TEXAS JURIES DECIDE ON DEATH SENTENCE


When deciding a sentence in Texas capital murder cases, jurors are asked to answer whether they think the defendant is likely to be a future danger to society, and if there is mitigating evidence to support the lesser sentence of life without parole.

Staton argued in closing statements that not only would Elders continue to be a threat to the society in prison, but also he deserves the death penalty.

“Nobody is giving this man the death penalty,” Staton said. “You will answer two questions but nobody in this courtroom is giving him the death penalty. He earned that.”

Defense attorneys said in closing arguments Thursday morning that Elders was under the influence of drugs when he committed the crimes, was put on the streets by his family as a teenager and was seen by the Johnson County District Attorney’s Office as not being a threat to society because they previously let him out on probation.

The argument from prosecutors that Elders is a danger to society, even if sentenced to life in prison, falls flat on its face, Brissette told the jurors.


JURORS ASKED TO DECIDE WHO JERRY ELDERS REALLY IS


Staton said that witnesses the defense brought in the punishment phase of the trial didn’t know the true Elders. Family members talked about him being fun-loving, humorous and good with children, but Staton said they didn’t know he was stealing catalytic converters, doing drugs and plotting to murder a police officer.

“Who would want Jerry to babysit your kids?” Staton asked.

The prosecution called Elders a coward and said that “what’s buried deep in his soul ... is hatred for the law and for law enforcement.”

The defense said Elders is a man who has been rejected by his family and put on the streets at 13 or 14 years old. Brissette said he’s been in and out of jail since he was a kid, lacked support and faced jealousy from his sister, whose children he said liked Elders more than her.

The prosecution said Elders had support from his family. Staton said they gave him food to eat, money when he needed it and a place to stay when he wasn’t incarcerated.

Both agreed that it was up to the jury to look at the evidence and decide which version of Elders is true.

DEFENSE WILL APPEAL DEATH SENTENCE


Bob Gill will represent Elders in at least the first appeal of the death sentence.

After agreeing that Gill would represent him in his first appeal, Elders shook the hands of Gill, Brisette and an investigator for the attorneys.

A defendant who is sentenced to death is entitled to an automatic appeal to the. Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, which is the highest court of criminal jurisdiction in. Texas.

Source: amp.star-telegram.com, James Hartley, May 2, 2024

_____________________________________________________________________








"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted."

— Oscar Wilde



Most viewed (Last 7 days)

South Carolina executes Mikal Mahdi

Mikal Mahdi, 42, was executed for the 2004 murder of 56-year-old James Myers A man facing the death penalty for committing two murders was executed by firing squad on Friday, the second such execution in the US state of South Carolina this year. Mikal Mahdi, 42, was executed for the 2004 murder of 56-year-old James Myers, an off-duty police officer, and the murder of a convenience store employee three days earlier. According to a statement from the prison, "the execution was performed by a three-person firing squad at 6:01 pm (2201 GMT)," with Mahdi pronounced dead four minutes later.

Afghanistan | Four men publicly executed by Taliban with relatives of victims shooting them 'six or seven times' at sport stadium

Four men have been publicly executed by the Taliban, with relatives of their victims shooting them several times in front of spectators at a sport stadium. Two men were shot around six to seven times by a male relative of the victims in front of spectators in Qala-i-Naw, the centre of Afghanistan's Badghis province, witnesses told an AFP journalist in the city.  The men had been 'sentenced to retaliatory punishment' for shooting other men, after their cases were 'examined very precisely and repeatedly', the statement said.  'The families of the victims were offered amnesty and peace but they refused.'

USA | Why the firing squad may be making a comeback

South Carolina plans to execute Mikal Mahdi on Friday for the murder of a police officer, draping a hood over his head and firing three bullets into his heart. The choice to die by firing squad – rather than lethal injection or the electric chair – was Mahdi’s own, his attorney said last month: “Faced with barbaric and inhumane choices, Mikal Mahdi has chosen the lesser of three evils.” If it proceeds, Mahdi’s execution would be the latest in a recent string of events that have put the spotlight on the firing squad as a handful of US death penalty states explore alternatives to lethal injection, by far the nation’s dominant execution method.

I spent 16 years in solitary in South Carolina. This is what it did to me. | Opinion

South Carolinian Randy Poindexter writes about the effects 16 years of solitary confinement had on him ahead of South Carolina’s planned execution of Mikal Mahdi , who spent months in solitary as a young man. For 16 years, I lived in a concrete cell. Twenty-three hours a day, every day, for more than 3,000 days, South Carolina kept me in solitary confinement. I was a young man before I was sent to solitary — angry, untreated and unwell. I made mistakes. But I wasn’t sentenced to madness. That’s what solitary did to me. My mental health worsened with each passing day. At first, paranoia and depression set in. Then, hallucinations and self-mutilation. I talked to people who weren’t there. I cut myself to feel something besides despair. I could do nothing as four of my friends and fellow prisoners took their own lives rather than endure another day of torturous isolation.

Florida executes Michael Tanzi

Florida on Tuesday executed a death row inmate described by one local detective as a "fledgling serial killer" for the murder of a beloved Miami Herald employee. Florida executed Michael Tanzi on Tuesday, 25 years after the murder of beloved Miami Herald employee Janet Acosta, who was attacked in broad daylight on her lunch break in 2000.   Michael Tanzi, 48, was executed by lethal injection at the Florida State Prison in Raiford and pronounced dead at 6:12 p.m. ET. 

Singapore executes man for 2017 murder of pregnant wife and daughter

Teo Ghim Heng, who strangled his pregnant wife and four-year-old daughter in 2017 before burning their bodies, was executed on 16 April 2025 after exhausting all legal avenues. His clemency pleas were rejected and his conviction upheld by the Court of Appeal in 2022. Teo Ghim Heng, who was convicted of murdering his pregnant wife and their four-year-old daughter in 2017, was executed on 16 April 2025. The Singapore Prison Service confirmed that Teo’s death sentence was carried out at Changi Prison Complex. In a news release on the same day, the police stated: “He was accorded full due process under the law, and was represented by legal counsel both at the trial and at the appeal. His petitions to the President for clemency were unsuccessful.”

Louisiana | Lawyers of Jessie Hoffman speak about their final moments before execution

As Louisiana prepared its first execution in 15 years, a team of lawyers from Loyola Law were working to save Jessie Hoffman’s life. “I was a young lawyer three years out of law school, and Jessie was almost finished with his appeals at that time, and my boss told me we needed to file something for Jessie because he’s in danger of being executed,” Kappel said. Kappel and her boss came up with a civil lawsuit to file that said since they wouldn’t give him a protocol for his execution, he was being deprived of due process, and the lawsuit was in the legal process for the next 10 years.

South Carolina | Man who ambushed off-duty cop to face firing squad in second execution of its kind

Mikal Mahdi, 48, who was found guilty of killing an off-duty police officer and a convenience store worker, is the second inmate scheduled to executed by South Carolina's new firing squad A murderer who ambushed and shot an off duty police officer eight times before burning his body in a killing spree is set to become the second person to die by firing squad. South Carolina's highest court has rejected the last major appeal from Mikal Mahdi, 41, who is to be put to death with three bullets to the heart at 6pm on April 11 at the Broad River Correctional Institution in Columbia. Mahdi's lawyers said his original lawyers put on a shallow case trying to spare his life that didn't call on relatives, teachers or people who knew him and ignored the impact of weeks spent in solitary confinement in prison as a teen.

The Sordid, Unscientific Story Behind Lethal Injection

A new book by a national expert explores the failures of the United States’ favored execution method. Texas was the first U.S. state to execute someone by lethal injection, but the idea for the novel method came from Oklahoma. Our northern neighbor was the first to adopt the plan to replace the spectacle of the electric chair with something more palatable for witnesses and the public. Texas was just the first to test it out on a person.  Since 1982, when state officials injected Charlie Brooks—convicted of murder in Fort Worth—with a lethal cocktail of drugs dreamt up by Oklahoma’s medical examiner but untested in any research setting, Texas has led the country in lethal injections. Secrets of the Killing State: The Untold Story of Lethal Injection (NYU Press, April 2025)—a new book by law professor, former prosecutor, and death penalty expert Corinna Barrett Lain—brings readers into the death chamber to bear disturbing witness to the reality of lethal injection.

Indiana Supreme Court sets May 20 execution date for death row inmate Benjamin Ritchie

The condemned man has exhausted his appeals but is likely to seek a clemency plea. Indiana Supreme Court justices on Tuesday set a May 20 execution date for death row inmate Benjamin Ritchie, who was convicted in 2002 for killing a law enforcement officer from Beech Grove. The high court’s decision followed a series of exhausted appeals previously filed by Ritchie and his legal team. The inmate’s request for post-conviction relief was denied in Tuesday’s 13-page order, penned by Chief Justice Loretta Rush, although she disagreed with the decision in her opinion.