61 Executions in the First Half of 2023: Saudi Arabia Insistent on Killing

Since the beginning of 2023, till the end of June Saudi Arabia has announced the execution of 61 individuals.

All 61 executions were carried out in a span of three months, at a rate of one execution every two days.

With the European Saudi Organization for Human Rights monitoring in late 2022 of secret executions and the confirmation of the official Saudi Human Rights Commission to Amnesty the unannounced executions in 2022, it is possible that the actual number of executions carried out is even higher.

Statistics

According to official data, those executed included 2 women and 15 foreign nationals, including:

Saudi Nationals 45

● 2 Indian nationals

● 2 Pakistani nationals

● 2 Bahraini nationals

● 1 Filipino national

● 1 Jordanian national

● 5 Yemeni nationals

● 1 Nepalese national

● 1 Bangladeshi national

Saudi Arabia implements three types of criminal punishment: qisas (retributive), ta’zir (discretionary), and hudud (mandatory).

Despite repeated official promises to halt ta’zir executions, Saudi Arabia has carried out 27 ta’zir executions.

Ta’zir executions are discretionary, either legislated by the State or determined by the judge where there is no punishment specified in Islamic law or where the strict legal, procedural and evidential requirements for other sentences are not met.

And 28 Hudud sentences and 6 Qisas Hudud executions constituted 45% of all executions this year, while ta’zir executions accounted for 44% and qisas accounted for 9%. Last year, Hudud executions accounted for 2% of the total executions recorded in 2022; exemplifying the inconsistency and arbitrary nature of Saudi Arabia’s judicial system.

Failing International Obligations

Saudi Arabia’s executions in the first half of 2023 demonstrate the Kingdom's disregard for its obligations under international law.

According to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and arguably customary international law, the death penalty is reserved for only the ‘most serious’ crimes, which are defined as intentional homicide. Nevertheless, the European Saudi Organization for Human Rights (ESOHR) monitoring reveals that Saudi Arabia imposed the death penalty for less serious crimes, including participation in protests, expressing opinions, and non-lethal drug-related charges.

In addition, some of these sentences may be considered arbitrary deprivations of life, as they involved torture-tainted confessions and a lack of meaningful due process. For example, Hussain Abu al-Kheir reported credible claims of torture, which the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention found were never investigated by Saudi Arabia. Abu al-Kheir was also never appointed a lawyer.

Similarly, UN Special Rapporteurs affirmed a lack of fair trial guarantees in the cases of Sadeq Thamer and Jafar Sultan, who had been arbitrarily arrested and tortured. Saudi Arabia disregarded these opinions and proceeded with the executions.

Saudi Arabia has also persisted in its policy of withholding the bodies of those executed, despite families’ requests for them to be returned. The number of bodies currently held is at least 140.

During the reign of King Salman bin Abdulaziz and his son Mohammed bin Salman, which began in 2015, Saudi Arabia has carried out 1,083 death sentences.

This alarming rate and the Kingdom’s continuous disregard for promises, international obligations, and laws confirm that the danger to the lives of death row detainees in Saudi Arabia is increasing.

ESOHR has confirmed that at least 64 detainees currently face death sentences in Saudi Arabia.

Among those currently threatened are at least nine child defendants: Abdullah al-Howaiti, Abdullah al-Derazi, Jalal Labbad, Youssef al-Manasef, Ali al-Mabeyouq, Hassan Zaki al-Faraj, Ali Hassan al-Sbaiti, Jawad Qureiris, and Mahdi al-Mohsen. 9 قاصرين The Court of Appeal has also approved several death sentences for defendants who were tortured, such as Muhammad Labbad, Ali Al-Rabea, Saud Al-Faraj, and Muhammad Abdullah al-Faraj. In addition, scholars and researchers, like Hassan Farhan al-Maliki, Salman Alodah, and Ali al-Omari, continue to face the death penalty.

Source: ESOHR, Staff, July 2023

_____________________________________________________________________

FOLLOW US ON:

CONTACT: deathpenaltynews@gmail.com

"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted."

— Oscar Wilde

Gov. Mike DeWine calls for Ohio to abolish the death penalty

COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — Gov. Mike DeWine Tuesday morning called on Ohio to abolish the death penalty, citing data that he said proves it is no longer a deterrent to violent crime. “For the state to take a human life, there must, in my opinion, there must be evidence that in doing so it will help protect the public, that the threat of that action will deter someone from committing murder,” DeWine said. “I do not believe that argument today can be successfully made.” DeWine cited data showing a decline in the last four decades of executions being carried out and an increase in the time inmates spend on death row.

I watched Ohio's last execution. Here's what it was like

As Gov. DeWine calls for Ohio to end capital punishment, the state’s last execution remains the one I witnessed in 2018 Inside Ohio's death house, there is a room for executions and separate witness rooms: one for those connected to the victim and another for those connected to the inmate. Windows separate the death chamber from those watching, the condemned from the living. I was there on July 18, 2018 – during Ohio’s most recent execution. Robert Van Hook was put to death that day for killing David Self in 1985. He sat on death row for three decades. I was one of three media witnesses to the execution.

Kansas AG urges governor to deny clemency to 8 sentenced to death

TOPEKA — Attorney General Kris Kobach on Tuesday urged the governor to deny clemency to Kansas inmates who have been sentenced to death. Eight of nine people sentenced to death in Kansas formally filed clemency requests in May, according to a press release from the Attorney General’s Office. Kobach urged Gov. Laura Kelly to reject them.

20 Minutes to Death: Witness to the Last Execution in France

The following document is a firsthand account of the final moments of Hamida Djandoubi, a convicted murderer executed by guillotine at Marseille’s Baumettes Prison on September 10, 1977. The record—dated September 9—was written by Monique Mabelly, a judge appointed by the state to witness the proceedings. Djandoubi’s execution would ultimately be the last carried out in France before capital punishment was abolished in 1981. At the time, President Valéry Giscard d'Estaing—who had publicly voiced his "deep aversion to the death penalty" prior to his election—rejected Djandoubi’s appeal for clemency. Choosing to let "justice take its course," the President allowed the execution to proceed, just as he had in two previous cases during his term: Christian Ranucci , executed on July 28, 1976 and Jérôme Carrein , executed on June 23, 1977. Hamida Djandoubi , a Tunisian national, was sentenced to death for killing his former lover, Elisabeth Bousquet. He was execu...

New Mississippi billboard warns criminals: ‘Firing squad is legal’

DESOTO COUNTY, Miss. (WREG) — A billboard standing on Interstate 55 southbound as you cross the Tennessee state line and enter Mississippi from Memphis is sending a grim message to those coming into the state. DeSoto County District Attorney Matthew Barton recently announced the new billboard campaign, which features the sign reading, “WELCOME TO MISSISSIPPI. WHERE THE FIRING SQUAD IS LEGAL. THINK TWICE.” It references Mississippi’s law permitting execution by firing squad under certain circumstances for inmates sentenced to death. Barton says this campaign is aimed at deterring violent crime and sends a direct message to criminals entering Mississippi.

SCOTUS: Alabama can’t execute Jeffery Lee by nitrogen; Thursday execution called off

After a week of legal volleyball, Alabama death row inmate Jeffery Lee’s execution—scheduled for Thursday evening—was called off after federal courts called the state’s nitrogen gas execution method “likely unconstitutional.” The state took the fight to the U.S. Supreme Court, hoping Lee could still be put to death tonight. In an order issued at 8:10 p.m., the U.S. Supreme Court ordered that it would not lift a ban on Alabama executing Lee via nitrogen . In a short court order, the justices denied Alabama’s motion to go ahead with the execution. Associate Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch would have granted the appeal and let the execution proceed, according to the order.

With nitrogen gas blocked, Alabama seeks to execute inmate by lethal injection

Jeffery Lee, who successfully challenged his scheduled Thursday execution by nitrogen gas, argued that execution by firing squad would be less painful. The Alabama Attorney General’s Office Friday sought to put an Alabama death row inmate to death by lethal injection a day after the U.S. Supreme Court rebuffed the state’s attempt to execute him by nitrogen gas. In a filing with the Alabama Supreme Court Friday afternoon, the state sought an expedited motion to set a new execution date for Jeffery Lee, 49. The state said that with a permanent injunction in place against nitrogen gas, the method by which the state intended to execute Lee on Thursday, it could execute him by lethal injection or the electric chair.

Alabama | Judge bars nitrogen gas execution, says method is unconstitutionally cruel

MONTGOMERY, Ala. -- A federal judge on Tuesday permanently blocked Alabama from executing an inmate with nitrogen gas after declaring it violates the ban on cruel and unusual punishment. U.S. District Judge Emily Marks issued the ruling hours after an appeals court reversed her initial finding that the method was constitutional. Marks permanently enjoined the state from executing Jeffrey Lee, 49, by nitrogen gas. He was scheduled to be executed Thursday. The decision, for now, blocks the use of the controversial new execution method that the state has championed since 2024, but the issue will likely end up before the U.S. Supreme Court.

Idaho will soon turn to firing squad executions. Police will pull the triggers

Trained members of Idaho law enforcement with demonstrated firearms proficiency are expected to fill slots for carrying out the death penalty by firing squad as the state prison system transitions to the controversial execution method next month. Six volunteers certified for no less than three years apiece through Peace Officer Standards and Training, or POST, will be recruited to ensure the Idaho Department of Correction is ready to comply with a state law that prioritizes shooting prisoners to death over lethal injection starting July 1. No one on the team may have faced disciplinary action over firearms, use of force, or related conduct over the prior year, according to new execution protocols the prison system released this week.

Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch wanted an execution that a Trump judge deemed illegal

The Supreme Court these days is generally in the business of helping executions go forward. But on Thursday night, the court did something notable: It told Alabama no. Even then, the court wasn't unanimous. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch dissented from the refusal to let the nitrogen gas execution of Jeffery Lee proceed. What prompted the rare rejection? In line with the typical shadow docket practice, the court didn't explain itself. Nor did the dissenters, who merely noted their disagreement. But a deeper look at the case helps us understand why a majority of the court was unwilling to help the state this time.

Death Penalty News

Search This Blog