Skip to main content

Iran | Four 'Woman, Life, Freedom' Protesters Sentenced to Hang by 'Death Judge' in Sham Trial

Islamic Justice incarnated: “Death Judge” Salavati
Iran Human Rights (IHRNGO); 25 May 2026: Milad Armoun, Navid Najaran, Seyed Mohammad Mehdi Hosseini and Mehdi Imani, four “Woman, Life, Freedom” protesters, were sentenced to death by “Death Judge” Salavati after a grossly unfair trial. Defence counsel representing the defendants in what became known as the “Ekbatan case” have detailed the severe procedural and substantive flaws that violated fundamental due process rights and undermined the legitimacy of the rulings issued by Branch 15 of the Revolutionary Court. News of the judgement comes just days after the Criminal Court acquitted the defendants of murder charges.

IHRNGO considers the case to be a travesty of justice and entirely void of legal legitimacy. Mahmood Amiry-Moghaddam, the organisation’s director stated: “The Ekbatan case demonstrates the arbitrary and deeply unjust nature of the Islamic Republic’s judiciary. The Revolutionary Court functions as a tool of repression rather than justice, where judges issue death sentences with absolute disregard for the evidence or basic fair trial standards.”

According to Emtedad, Branch 15 of the Tehran Revolutionary Court has sentenced “Woman, Life, Freedom” protesters Milad Armoun, Navid Najaran, Seyed Mohammad Mehdi Hosseini and Mehdi Imani to death. Four other defendants in the case, Amir Mohammad Khosheghbal, Alireza Barmorzpournak, Alireza Kafayi and Hossein Nemati, received seven year prison terms for charges of “assembly and collusion against national security" and "propaganda against the system."

The judiciary’s Mizan News Agency reported that the protesters were sentenced to death on charges of efsad-fil-arz (corruption on earth) without naming them.

In the interview with Emtedad, Mohammad Hossein Aghasi, the legal counsel for Milad, criticised the court's failure to provide a written verdict, stating, "We do not know what the content of the ruling is, what the judge’s justifications are, and we have fundamentally neither seen the verdict nor been present at the sentencing." He emphasised that under the law, rulings must be served electronically or transcribed by legal teams, yet "none of this has happened." Aghasi also exposed severe contradictions in the capital charge itself, noting that "Milad has been sentenced to death on the charge of moharebeh, despite the fact that the charge of moharebeh had essentially been dropped from the case and amended to efsad-fil-arz." 

Regarding the court's irregular method of handling appeals directly with the prisoner behind closed doors, Aghasi recounted that when Milad objected to the verbal verdict, court officials told him they would file the appeal on his behalf themselves. He condemned this procedure, stating, "This method is fundamentally illegal; the Supreme Court does not accept this method of appeal." Furthermore, he highlighted the extreme physical restrictions placed on the legal teams, explaining, "We practically have no access to the court. To visit Branch 15, you have to go to the beginning of Moallem Street, have them call the branch from there, and if Mr Salavati grants permission, we can enter!"

Babak Paknia, the lawyer representing Alireza, strongly condemned the court's absolute disregard for statutory legal procedures, revealing that Judge Salavati had systematically shut him out of the proceedings. Protesting his exclusion, Paknia stated, "Mr Salavati did not allow me into any of the court hearings. He did not provide any legal justification for this either. How is it possible to bar a lawyer from both the trial hearings and the session where the verdict is served? There is absolutely no form of due process in this procedure." Confirming the irregularities of the notification process, Paknia stated that his client was verbally informed of his sentence and forced to sign confirmation of its delivery, pointing out that "the legal method for serving a verdict is entirely different from what the head of Branch 15 of the Tehran Revolutionary Court did today. Our question is, which law does this method of adjudication and notification originate from?"

Milad Armoun, Navid Najaran, Seyed Mohammad Mehdi Hosseini and Mehdi Imani
Paknia emphasised that by withholding official judgment numbers, the court is intentionally disrupting the defence's ability to challenge the rulings, noting, "The defence lawyers do not even know exactly under what charges their clients have been sentenced to death or imprisonment. They have not even given the judgment number to my client, making it impossible to appeal the ruling." On a substantive level, Paknia legally challenged the validity of the state's accusations altogether, explaining that "the actions committed by the defendants in the Ekbatan case do not constitute examples of efsad-fil-arz, because they did not disrupt the balance of society." He added that under Iranian law, moharebeh strictly requires drawing a weapon to terrorise the general public, asserting that "drawing a weapon against an officer cannot be categorised as moharebeh," which leaves the core substance of the case subject to serious legal challenge.

Ali Sharifzadeh, another lawyer representing Milad, confirmed that Judge Salavati had barred him from attending the trial hearings as well. 

The proceedings at Branch 15 of the Revolutionary Court constitute a flagrant violation of Article 14 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), to which Iran is a State party. By systematically barring defence counsel from hearings and delivering verbal sentences to the prisoners in secret, the court stripped the defendants of their fundamental rights to legal representation, a public trial and proper notification of charges. Furthermore, by actively withholding official judgment numbers, the judiciary intentionally paralysed the statutory appeal process. This parallel trial also directly breached the international principle against double jeopardy (ne bis in idem), as these death sentences were pushed through just days after a standard criminal court had already adjudicated the same conduct and acquitted multiple defendants of murder.

On 20 May, Emtedad reported that  Milad Armoun, Alireza Kafayi, Amir Mohammad Khosheghbal, Navid Najaran, Hossein Nemati and Alireza Barmazpournak were acquitted of murder charges. Milad, Alireza and Amir Mohammad Khosheghbal’s sentences were commuted to 5 years imprisonment  for “complicity in inflicting non-fatal injuries” and they were ordered to pay diya (blood money). Hossein will only have to pay diya and Navid and Alireza were fully acquitted.

At least 14 protesters have been executed in connection to the 2022 “Woman, Life, Freedom” nationwide protests and at least 14 others are at risk of the death penalty. 

Source: Iran Human Rights, Staff, May 25, 2026




"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted."
— Oscar Wilde
Globe
Death Penalty News For a World without the Death Penalty

Comments

Most viewed (Last 7 days)

Florida | Jury recommends death sentence for Jeffrey Crum in killing of 12-year-old girl

BROOKSVILLE, Fla. — A Hernando County jury has recommended the death penalty for a 65-year-old man who was found guilty last week of raping and killing 12-year-old Jennifer Odom. Sentencing for Jeffrey Crum was held this week. Crum abducted Odom in 1993 after she stepped off her school bus in Pasco County. Her body was found in a Hernando County orange grove six days later.

Oklahoma Sets November Execution Date for Air Force Veteran Jim Pavatt Amid Claims of Wrongful Conviction

OKLAHOMA CITY — The Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals has scheduled the execution of Air Force veteran and longtime death row prisoner Jim Pavatt for Nov. 12, as his attorneys continue to challenge his conviction and contend that prosecutors relied on false arguments, disputed forensic evidence and an alleged confession they later described as bogus. Pavatt, who served nearly 22 years in the Air Force and rose to the rank of master sergeant, was convicted and sentenced to death for the 2001 killing of Rob Andrew in Oklahoma City. His execution is scheduled for the day after Veterans Day.

Hanging of Osaka Arsonist is Japan’s First Execution Under Takaichi Government

As a majority of the international community has abolished capital punishment. Japan and the U.S. are the only two countries in the Group of Seven leading industrialized nations that put people to death. The execution of Takami Sunao—an arsonist whose 2009 attack in Osaka killed five—on August 21, 2026, was Japan’s first use of capital punishment in just over a year. Over a Decade from Sentencing to Execution Takami Sunao was executed on August 21, 2026 , for a 2009 arson attack at an Osaka pachinko parlor that killed five people. In July 2009, Takami poured gasoline on the floor of a pachinko parlor in Osaka and set it alight, killing 5 customers and staff members and injuring 10 more. While the defense argued that he was in a state of diminished capacity, the Supreme Court finalized his death sentence in February 2016. The execution took place 17 years after the initial crime and 10 and a half years after the death sentence was finalized.

Indiana high court sets Nov. 5 execution date for convicted child killer

The court’s decision came a little more than two months after Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita asked the justices to schedule Weisheit’s execution. State attorneys argued Weisheit had exhausted his state and federal appeals, had no active stay of execution, and could lawfully be put to death. The inmate’s attorneys opposed setting a date, saying they needed more time to pursue available legal proceedings and possible executive clemency. The defense additionally pointed to public records that it said showed the Indiana Department of Correction lacked the drugs needed to conduct an execution and had no lawful source from which to obtain them.

Spared execution eight times, oldest inmate in US dies at 101 after 76 years behind bars

Francis Clifford Smith was given his last meal eight times. But after being spared execution each time, he went on to be regarded as the longest-serving prisoner in the US before dying in June at 101 years old. Convicted of murder in 1950 when he was 25, he always maintained his innocence, those who knew him told the BBC. Andrius Banevicius, the public information officer for Connecticut's Department of Correction, recounted how Smith used to feed the birds while in Osborn Prison, earning him the nickname The Birdman of Osborn.

Israel’s Ben-Gvir posts video of gallows site for hanging Palestinian terrorists

Israel’s national security minister, Itamar Ben-Gvir, has posted a video of the construction of a gallows complex where Palestinians convicted of terror offenses will be hanged. Ben-Givr said the new execution site would be equipped with viewing booths for families of victims to watch the hangings. He posted the video on social media of a visit he had made to the unidentified location, where he can be seen pointing at foundations being laid and saying it was where “terrorists will be executed." Photographs in the Israeli media showed a bulldozer and heavy construction work in a cordoned-off area, reportedly close to a prison.

Japan executes man convicted of killing five in 2009 Osaka pachinko parlor arson

Japan on Friday announced the execution of a man convicted of killing five people after setting fire to an Osaka pachinko parlor in 2009, the first execution by Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi 's government as the country faces growing calls for more transparency and the abolition of capital punishment. The Justice Ministry said Sunao Takami, 58, was hanged to death earlier Friday. Takami in 2009 set fire to the crowded pachinko parlor in Osaka by spreading gasoline and throwing a lit match, engulfing the building, killing five and injuring 10 others, Justice Minister Hiroshi Hiraguchi said.

Cartoons about Capital Punishment

  More cartoons about capital punishment HERE

Israel builds execution chamber for Palestinians convicted of murder

In March, the Knesset approved legislation that calls for the execution of Palestinians convicted by a military court of killing Israelis Israeli authorities are preparing a prison wing—replete with an execution chamber—designated specifically for Palestinian prisoners convicted of murder, Israel’s i24NEWS channel reported Tuesday. The move comes after the Knesset (Israel’s parliament) approved legislation in March that calls for the execution of Palestinian prisoners convicted by a military court of murdering Israelis.

Florida executes William Frances Silvia

Florida executed its 13th death row prisoner of the year Tuesday evening amid the state’s aggressive use of the death penalty championed by Governor Ron DeSantis. William Frances Silvia, 61, who was convicted of fatally shooting his estranged wife and injuring his mother-in-law in 2006, was pronounced dead at 6:11 p.m. after receiving the lethal three-drug injection at Florida State Prison.  At 6 p.m. Tuesday, Silvia was already strapped to a gurney with an IV in his arm when the curtain to the death chamber went up.  He remained relatively motionless with his eyes and mouth open throughout most of the execution while a priest sat at his feet and prayed.