Iran | Four 'Woman, Life, Freedom' Protesters Sentenced to Hang by 'Death Judge' in Sham Trial

Islamic Justice incarnated: “Death Judge” Salavati

Iran Human Rights (IHRNGO); 25 May 2026: Milad Armoun, Navid Najaran, Seyed Mohammad Mehdi Hosseini and Mehdi Imani, four “Woman, Life, Freedom” protesters, were sentenced to death by “Death Judge” Salavati after a grossly unfair trial. Defence counsel representing the defendants in what became known as the “Ekbatan case” have detailed the severe procedural and substantive flaws that violated fundamental due process rights and undermined the legitimacy of the rulings issued by Branch 15 of the Revolutionary Court. News of the judgement comes just days after the Criminal Court acquitted the defendants of murder charges.

IHRNGO considers the case to be a travesty of justice and entirely void of legal legitimacy. Mahmood Amiry-Moghaddam, the organisation’s director stated: “The Ekbatan case demonstrates the arbitrary and deeply unjust nature of the Islamic Republic’s judiciary. The Revolutionary Court functions as a tool of repression rather than justice, where judges issue death sentences with absolute disregard for the evidence or basic fair trial standards.”

According to Emtedad, Branch 15 of the Tehran Revolutionary Court has sentenced “Woman, Life, Freedom” protesters Milad Armoun, Navid Najaran, Seyed Mohammad Mehdi Hosseini and Mehdi Imani to death. Four other defendants in the case, Amir Mohammad Khosheghbal, Alireza Barmorzpournak, Alireza Kafayi and Hossein Nemati, received seven year prison terms for charges of “assembly and collusion against national security" and "propaganda against the system."

The judiciary’s Mizan News Agency reported that the protesters were sentenced to death on charges of efsad-fil-arz (corruption on earth) without naming them.

In the interview with Emtedad, Mohammad Hossein Aghasi, the legal counsel for Milad, criticised the court's failure to provide a written verdict, stating, "We do not know what the content of the ruling is, what the judge’s justifications are, and we have fundamentally neither seen the verdict nor been present at the sentencing." He emphasised that under the law, rulings must be served electronically or transcribed by legal teams, yet "none of this has happened." Aghasi also exposed severe contradictions in the capital charge itself, noting that "Milad has been sentenced to death on the charge of moharebeh, despite the fact that the charge of moharebeh had essentially been dropped from the case and amended to efsad-fil-arz."

Regarding the court's irregular method of handling appeals directly with the prisoner behind closed doors, Aghasi recounted that when Milad objected to the verbal verdict, court officials told him they would file the appeal on his behalf themselves. He condemned this procedure, stating, "This method is fundamentally illegal; the Supreme Court does not accept this method of appeal." Furthermore, he highlighted the extreme physical restrictions placed on the legal teams, explaining, "We practically have no access to the court. To visit Branch 15, you have to go to the beginning of Moallem Street, have them call the branch from there, and if Mr Salavati grants permission, we can enter!"

Babak Paknia, the lawyer representing Alireza, strongly condemned the court's absolute disregard for statutory legal procedures, revealing that Judge Salavati had systematically shut him out of the proceedings. Protesting his exclusion, Paknia stated, "Mr Salavati did not allow me into any of the court hearings. He did not provide any legal justification for this either. How is it possible to bar a lawyer from both the trial hearings and the session where the verdict is served? There is absolutely no form of due process in this procedure." Confirming the irregularities of the notification process, Paknia stated that his client was verbally informed of his sentence and forced to sign confirmation of its delivery, pointing out that "the legal method for serving a verdict is entirely different from what the head of Branch 15 of the Tehran Revolutionary Court did today. Our question is, which law does this method of adjudication and notification originate from?"

Milad Armoun, Navid Najaran, Seyed Mohammad Mehdi Hosseini and Mehdi Imani

Paknia emphasised that by withholding official judgment numbers, the court is intentionally disrupting the defence's ability to challenge the rulings, noting, "The defence lawyers do not even know exactly under what charges their clients have been sentenced to death or imprisonment. They have not even given the judgment number to my client, making it impossible to appeal the ruling." On a substantive level, Paknia legally challenged the validity of the state's accusations altogether, explaining that "the actions committed by the defendants in the Ekbatan case do not constitute examples of efsad-fil-arz, because they did not disrupt the balance of society." He added that under Iranian law, moharebeh strictly requires drawing a weapon to terrorise the general public, asserting that "drawing a weapon against an officer cannot be categorised as moharebeh," which leaves the core substance of the case subject to serious legal challenge.

Ali Sharifzadeh, another lawyer representing Milad, confirmed that Judge Salavati had barred him from attending the trial hearings as well.

The proceedings at Branch 15 of the Revolutionary Court constitute a flagrant violation of Article 14 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), to which Iran is a State party. By systematically barring defence counsel from hearings and delivering verbal sentences to the prisoners in secret, the court stripped the defendants of their fundamental rights to legal representation, a public trial and proper notification of charges. Furthermore, by actively withholding official judgment numbers, the judiciary intentionally paralysed the statutory appeal process. This parallel trial also directly breached the international principle against double jeopardy (ne bis in idem), as these death sentences were pushed through just days after a standard criminal court had already adjudicated the same conduct and acquitted multiple defendants of murder.

On 20 May, Emtedad reported that Milad Armoun, Alireza Kafayi, Amir Mohammad Khosheghbal, Navid Najaran, Hossein Nemati and Alireza Barmazpournak were acquitted of murder charges. Milad, Alireza and Amir Mohammad Khosheghbal’s sentences were commuted to 5 years imprisonment for “complicity in inflicting non-fatal injuries” and they were ordered to pay diya (blood money). Hossein will only have to pay diya and Navid and Alireza were fully acquitted.

At least 14 protesters have been executed in connection to the 2022 “Woman, Life, Freedom” nationwide protests and at least 14 others are at risk of the death penalty.

Source: Iran Human Rights, Staff, May 25, 2026

"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted."
— Oscar Wilde

Death Penalty News For a World without the Death Penalty

Comments

Japan: Capital punishment for a minor

Death chamber at Tokyo Detention Center The Supreme Court's recent decision to uphold the death sentence given in a lay judge trial to a 24-year-old man for murders he committed when he was a minor raises questions about the lay judge trial system and capital punishment. These include whether the lay judges correctly understood the spirit of the Juvenile Law in sentencing the defendant to death. It was the 1st death sentence handed down on a minor in a lay judge trial. The murders took place in Ishinomaki, Miyagi Prefecture, in 2010 when Yutaro Chiba was 18 - meaning he fell under the purview of the Juvenile Law. Chiba was convicted of entering his ex-girlfriend's house and stabbing to death the girl's sister and a female friend of the girl with a butcher knife, seriously injuring a male friend of the sister and abducting the girl. Prosecutors said Chiba killed the victims because they were trying to separate him and his former girlfriend. Since Chiba pleaded n...

Saudi Arabia: Man beheaded for murder

April 27, 2010: Saudi authorities executed a man by beheading after he was sentenced to death for murder, the interior ministry announced. Saudi national Umair al-Shihri was put to death in the southern city of Bisha for shooting to death another Saudi, Muzakkir al Shahrani, with a machine gun, according to the announcement carried by the state news agency SPA. No details were given about the date or location of the crime, but the ministry said the execution had been put on hold until the victim's children came of age. Source: Agence France Presse, April 27, 2010

Former Florida cop to be executed on same day as 80-year-old Pasco man

In an unprecedented move in the modern history of capital punishment, Gov. Ron DeSantis on Tuesday cleared the way for 2 executions to occur on the same day. DeSantis reset the execution of James Duckett, whose execution earlier this year was stayed amid efforts to secure DNA testing and analysis of evidence in his case. Duckett’s execution was reset for July 28. That is the same day previously set for the execution of Dominick Occhicone. Court records indicate that Duckett’s execution is scheduled for noon. Occhicone’s is set to follow at 6 p.m.

19 July 1943 | Auschwitz's Largest Public Hanging: 12 Polish Prisoners Executed in Escape Reprisal

OSWIECIM, Poland — The SS carried out the largest public hanging in Auschwitz history on July 19, 1943, executing 12 Polish prisoners before other inmates as collective punishment for escapes and civilian contacts. The victims, all from the camp’s surveyors’ labor unit, were hanged on gallows built in front of the camp kitchen during an Auschwitz I roll call. The SS orchestrated this reprisal following prisoner escapes from the surveyors’ detail and unauthorized communication between inmates and civilians. Camp authorities used the recent escapes as a pretext to impose collective punishment.

Texas: The inmates who refused to die quietly and had to be gassed out of their cells before execution

Former crime reporter Michelle Lyons, who witnessed nearly 300 executions in Texas, US, reveals the desperate acts of death row prisoners who refused to accept their fate After spending years or often decades locked up in a tiny cell for 23 hours a day, most Death Row inmates go willingly to their executions. However, some refuse to die quietly - with officers forced to gas them out of cells, strap up their heads and even give chase across prison grounds. Michelle Lyons, who has witnessed nearly 300 executions in Texas, US, exclusively tells Sun Online how certain inmates "fight like hell" in their last moments. On most occasions, Michelle watched from the witness area, with the killers already on the gurney - the stretcher where they'd be given a lethal injection. Seven prisoners once tried to escape from the Row in Huntsville - with one shoving magazines and newspapers under his clothes to help him roll over razor-wire fences. Others have had to b...

Tennessee | Complaint accuses doctor involved in failed execution of violating medical ethics

A formal complaint has been filed with the Tennessee Department of Health regarding the conduct of a physician involved in the failed execution of death row inmate Tony Carruthers on May 21, 2026. The complaint, submitted by Carruthers’ sister, Tonya Hervey on July 15, alleges that Dr. Mark Walton Fowler engaged in unethical medical practices during the aborted procedure. The state’s attempt to execute Carruthers was halted after execution team members spent over an hour unsuccessfully attempting to establish a backup intravenous (IV) line. While a primary line was established, the team’s failure to secure the secondary access required by state protocol led Governor Bill Lee to grant a one-year reprieve.

Oldest inmate set to be executed in Florida will face strict spending limit for final meal

An entire category of food is also off-limits for final meal requests in Florida Florida is currently preparing to execute its oldest inmate later today (July 14), a 74-year-old convicted murderer who has been on death row since the 1980s—but his final meal will be limited by a strict budget. Dennis Sochor is scheduled to be put to death later today, making history as the oldest inmate to ever be executed in the state. The criminal, who has been on death row for nearly 40 years, will be administered the lethal three-drug injection, with the process due to begin at around 6pm.

Florida executes Dennis Sochor

Man, 74, becomes oldest inmate executed in Florida in state’s 10th lethal injection this year Florida put to death one of its oldest prisoners in its history on Tuesday, a 74-year-old convicted murderer who was 1 of 3 older inmates scheduled for execution within the span of a month in the nation’s busiest death penalty state. Dennis Sochor was pronounced dead at 6:16 p.m. following a 3-drug injection at Florida State Prison near Starke, the office of Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis said. He was convicted of killing a woman on Jan. 1, 1982, just hours after meeting her at a New Year’s Eve party.

Idaho | Death row prisoners sue over state's new firing squad

BOISE (Idaho Statesman) – Days after Idaho made the switch to a firing squad for executions, two Idaho death row prisoners next in line to be put to death sued the state prison system, saying its director withheld information about how she settled on the specifics for carrying out the method. Attorneys for prisoners Thomas Creech and Gerald Pizzuto filed suit this week in state district court against Idaho Department of Correction Director Bree Derrick. In the filing, they called her approval of an updated standard operating procedure for the firing squad and lethal injection as a backup method “arbitrary, capricious, or an abuse of discretion and in excess of the statutory authority of the agency.”

Why America’s death rows are slowly emptying

The number of death sentences handed out by juries has plunged by more than 90% since the 1990s. On July 8, the Death Penalty Information Center, or DPIC, released its midyear update on capital punishment in the United States. Many of the findings were sadly, disturbingly familiar. For example, racial bias still plays a large role in who gets executed, and the Supreme Court continues to allow executions to proceed even when those being put to death have strong claims of innocence. But there was also encouraging news.

Death Penalty News

Search This Blog