Skip to main content

Iran | Actor, doctor, engineer: stories of Iranians sentenced to death over killing at protest

Five men apparently unknown to each other were probably forced to give false confessions

An actor, a radiologist, a poultry business employee, a karate champion, an engineer – these are five men sentenced to death in Iran for alleged crimes linked to anti-regime protests. The charges raised against them included murder. With court hearings held largely in secret, their trials have been widely condemned as a sham.

All are due to be executed in connection with the killing of an agent from the country’s feared paramilitary forces, the Basij. The court says Ruhollah Ajamian, 27, was stripped naked and murdered on 3 November. But the circumstances of Ajamian’s death are opaque. The alleged attack occurred at a protest commemorating a demonstrator, Hadis Najafi, who had been shot dead by security forces at a rally demanding rights for women.

Tehran has forcefully suppressed peaceful protests that erupted in September, and rights groups accuse pro-regime units of killing hundreds of unarmed demonstrators. Officials seek to portray the rallies as violent “riots” in which security forces have been set upon.

Verified information is scarce. Authorities have been no less hardline in their attempts to silence the families and friends of those on death row, warning them against speaking out. But some feel staying quiet could be worse.

The Guardian has spoken to family and friends of all five men accused of killing Ajamian. Their testimony suggests that the five – none of whom appear to have been acquainted with each other – were probably forced to give false confessions.

Hamid Ghare-Hasanlou, 53


Dr Hamid Ghare-Hasanlou, a radiologist from Karaj, was charged in the Ajamian case with “corruption on earth”, a term used by courts in the Islamic Republic. His wife, Farzaneh, was sentenced to up to 25 years in prison. Amnesty International has said Farzaneh was coerced into giving false incriminating statements against her husband.

Ghare-Hasanlou’s brother, Hasan, said his sibling and sister-in-law had been protesting peacefully, and were detained by police at 2am the next day. “They arrested them and beat Hamid in front of their 13-year-old daughter,” Hasan said. “She is traumatised now, and with what has happened during these weeks and the death sentence of her dad, she is not in a good mental condition. In only a few hours, their lives completely changed.

“We know that he was tortured in custody as well. Five of his rib bones broke while they tortured him into confessing what he had not done. His left lung got punctured and he started bleeding. They delayed in taking him to the hospital, so a blood clot formed in his lung.”

Speaking on the condition of anonymity, a close friend of Ghare-Hasanlou said: “They put a knife under Hamid’s throat when they wanted to arrest him while his daughter was right there. They threatened his daughter that they would kill her parents if she told anyone about what had happened before sunrise. They also have a son studying at a medical university. He is 20 years old and is on the run, going from one safe house to another so that they don’t arrest him in order to put more pressure on his parents.”

Mohammad Mehdi Karami, 22


“I’m a pedlar. I sell things on the street,” said a distraught Mashallah Karami, the father of 22-year-old Mehdi Karami, another of the accused. He was speaking in a video released by the reformist Etemad newspaper, pleading with authorities to release his son. “I’m asking and begging to remove the death penalty from my son’s file.”

Karami, a karate champion, had been convicted of “corruption on earth” by a court in Alborz province on 5 December. As well as the five people sentenced to death for allegedly killing Ajamian, 11 others received prison sentences. Iranian human rights groups and Amnesty International dismissed it as a show trial, saying the court did not even specify each defendant’s alleged involvement.

Etemad reported that Karami’s father had said authorities refused to let the family appoint their own lawyer.

Hossein Mohammadi, 26


Hossein Mohammadi, a theatre actor, was also convicted in the Ajamian case. “His family and close friends decided to announce his execution sentence publicly five days after they knew about it,” a close friend of Mohammadi told the Guardian. They took so long, the person said, because “they were scared to report it publicly” after their government-appointed defence lawyers warned them against it, saying it could negatively affect his case.

Mohammadi has a love of astronomy, and Interstellar is his favourite film, the friend said. “Hossein is a very emotional person, and he loves acting,” the friend said. “There’s not a lot of money in theatre acting, and so to make ends meet he worked in a post office.”

Seyyed Mohammad Hosseini, 39


An employee of a poultry company, Mohammad Hosseini was on his way to pay respects to his late parents at their graves on 3 November. He came across a large group of protesters who were marching in memory of Najafi, a close friend said.

The source said Seyyed had been battling mental health issues ever since his parents died about 15 years ago. He is the sole breadwinner and responsible for providing for his brother, who has a drug addiction.

“Seyyed wanted to go to the grave of his parents as he always did on Thursday nights. Then he didn’t come to work on Saturday, and I think it was on Monday that we saw him on state TV,” said the friend.

Iran’s judiciary has claimed Mohammad Hosseini confessed to stabbing Ajamian. “Seyyed is a quiet and good-natured man who was loved by many. He could not even stand on his feet before taking 7-8 pills daily for anxiety. Those knives that he had carried on that day were for sports since he was a martial arts teacher … he gave lessons to children for free. Seyyed has no one in this world and only makes about $190 a month.”

Mohammad Hosseini’s case has been closely followed by the Iranian diaspora. Darya Safai, a Belgian MP of Iranian origin, announced “political sponsorship” of Mohammad Hosseini, personally following up on his case.

A former political prisoner who was arrested and imprisoned in Iran during the 1999 protests, Safai said she felt strongly about the case. “I know that a prisoner keeps thinking ‘is the outside world going to forget about me’. I feel like it’s a responsibility for us to support these prisoners,” she said. “I chose him so I could be his family. I hope he knows that he has a huge family in the world now.”

An independent lawyer, Ali Sharifzadeh Ardakani, was not allowed to defend Mohammad Hosseini but has studied the case and sought to help him. He said on Twitter he had been allowed to meet Mohammad Hosseini. “His story was devastating – from torture to getting beaten up with his eyes closed and hands and feet tied up, to kicks in the head to the point that he passed out. From iron rods used to beat him on the soles of the feet and shocks in different parts of the body. His statements in court were made under torture and they have no legal grounds,” he said.

The chief justice of Alborz province, Hossein Fazeli Harikandi, has denied the accusations of torture.

Reza Arya, 43


Reza Arya has not been officially announced as the fifth person to have received a death sentence in connection to the Ajamian case, but a close relative told the Guardian that he is.

The relative said Arya was employed by the underground electricity department, and his family loves music. Arya plays the stringed santoor, while his son and his wife play drums.

Arya was driving to visit relatives on the day of the protest, the source said. “The heavy traffic blocked the road, so Reza got out of the car to see what was going on. When he stepped out, he saw people gathered around the spot where Ajamian was killed. He was already dead when Reza got there.”

Alireza Akhondi, a Swedish MP of Iranian origin, has sponsored Arya’s case. “In this difficult situation and the oppression that Iranian people are facing in the past 43 years, it is really important that we do whatever we can for these people,” he said. “These executions are not based on anything.”

Akhondi said attempts to communicate with Iranian officials regarding the case had failed. “They want to show that they don’t care … They are playing political games that are too familiar for us as politicians. I see this as the regime is scared. I think this is the first time that the regime sees that the situation is very serious.”

Arya’s relative said he was arrested at his workplace two weeks after the alleged crime, and was now in solitary confinement. He had been allowed to call his family from jail to say he would be executed.

“The children are not attending school any more,” the relative said. “His poor parents are both very old and religious. They keep crying every day. They have said that if he is executed, they will lose all their faith in Islam.”

Source: The Guardian, Deepa Parent and Ghoncheh Habibiazad, December 30, 2022

Most viewed (Last 7 days)

Gov. Mike DeWine calls for Ohio to abolish the death penalty

COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — Gov. Mike DeWine Tuesday morning called on Ohio to abolish the death penalty, citing data that he said proves it is no longer a deterrent to violent crime. “For the state to take a human life, there must, in my opinion, there must be evidence that in doing so it will help protect the public, that the threat of that action will deter someone from committing murder,” DeWine said. “I do not believe that argument today can be successfully made.” DeWine cited data showing a decline in the last four decades of executions being carried out and an increase in the time inmates spend on death row.

I watched Ohio's last execution. Here's what it was like

As Gov. DeWine calls for Ohio to end capital punishment, the state’s last execution remains the one I witnessed in 2018 Inside Ohio's death house, there is a room for executions and separate witness rooms: one for those connected to the victim and another for those connected to the inmate. Windows separate the death chamber from those watching, the condemned from the living. I was there on July 18, 2018 – during Ohio’s most recent execution. Robert Van Hook was put to death that day for killing David Self in 1985. He sat on death row for three decades. I was one of three media witnesses to the execution.

Kansas AG urges governor to deny clemency to 8 sentenced to death

TOPEKA — Attorney General Kris Kobach on Tuesday urged the governor to deny clemency to Kansas inmates who have been sentenced to death. Eight of nine people sentenced to death in Kansas formally filed clemency requests in May, according to a press release from the Attorney General’s Office. Kobach urged Gov. Laura Kelly to reject them.

20 Minutes to Death: Witness to the Last Execution in France

The following document is a firsthand account of the final moments of Hamida Djandoubi, a convicted murderer executed by guillotine at Marseille’s Baumettes Prison on September 10, 1977. The record—dated September 9—was written by Monique Mabelly, a judge appointed by the state to witness the proceedings. Djandoubi’s execution would ultimately be the last carried out in France before capital punishment was abolished in 1981. At the time, President Valéry Giscard d'Estaing—who had publicly voiced his "deep aversion to the death penalty" prior to his election—rejected Djandoubi’s appeal for clemency. Choosing to let "justice take its course," the President allowed the execution to proceed, just as he had in two previous cases during his term:   Christian Ranucci , executed on July 28, 1976 and Jérôme Carrein , executed on June 23, 1977. Hamida Djandoubi , a Tunisian national, was sentenced to death for killing his former lover, Elisabeth Bousquet. He was execu...

New Mississippi billboard warns criminals: ‘Firing squad is legal’

DESOTO COUNTY, Miss. (WREG) — A billboard standing on Interstate 55 southbound as you cross the Tennessee state line and enter Mississippi from Memphis is sending a grim message to those coming into the state. DeSoto County District Attorney Matthew Barton recently announced the new billboard campaign, which features the sign reading, “WELCOME TO MISSISSIPPI. WHERE THE FIRING SQUAD IS LEGAL. THINK TWICE.” It references Mississippi’s law permitting execution by firing squad under certain circumstances for inmates sentenced to death. Barton says this campaign is aimed at deterring violent crime and sends a direct message to criminals entering Mississippi.

SCOTUS: Alabama can’t execute Jeffery Lee by nitrogen; Thursday execution called off

After a week of legal volleyball, Alabama death row inmate Jeffery Lee’s execution—scheduled for Thursday evening—was called off after federal courts called the state’s nitrogen gas execution method “likely unconstitutional.” The state took the fight to the U.S. Supreme Court, hoping Lee could still be put to death tonight.  In an order issued at 8:10 p.m., the U.S. Supreme Court ordered that it would not lift a ban on Alabama executing Lee via nitrogen . In a short court order, the justices denied Alabama’s motion to go ahead with the execution.  Associate Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch would have granted the appeal and let the execution proceed, according to the order. 

With nitrogen gas blocked, Alabama seeks to execute inmate by lethal injection

Jeffery Lee, who successfully challenged his scheduled Thursday execution by nitrogen gas, argued that execution by firing squad would be less painful. The Alabama Attorney General’s Office Friday sought to put an Alabama death row inmate to death by lethal injection a day after the U.S. Supreme Court rebuffed the state’s attempt to execute him by nitrogen gas. In a filing with the Alabama Supreme Court Friday afternoon, the state sought an expedited motion to set a new execution date for Jeffery Lee, 49. The state said that with a permanent injunction in place against nitrogen gas, the method by which the state intended to execute Lee on Thursday, it could execute him by lethal injection or the electric chair.

Alabama | Judge bars nitrogen gas execution, says method is unconstitutionally cruel

MONTGOMERY, Ala. -- A federal judge on Tuesday permanently blocked Alabama from executing an inmate with nitrogen gas after declaring it violates the ban on cruel and unusual punishment. U.S. District Judge Emily Marks issued the ruling hours after an appeals court reversed her initial finding that the method was constitutional. Marks permanently enjoined the state from executing Jeffrey Lee, 49, by nitrogen gas. He was scheduled to be executed Thursday. The decision, for now, blocks the use of the controversial new execution method that the state has championed since 2024, but the issue will likely end up before the U.S. Supreme Court.

Idaho will soon turn to firing squad executions. Police will pull the triggers

Trained members of Idaho law enforcement with demonstrated firearms proficiency are expected to fill slots for carrying out the death penalty by firing squad as the state prison system transitions to the controversial execution method next month.  Six volunteers certified for no less than three years apiece through Peace Officer Standards and Training, or POST, will be recruited to ensure the Idaho Department of Correction is ready to comply with a state law that prioritizes shooting prisoners to death over lethal injection starting July 1.  No one on the team may have faced disciplinary action over firearms, use of force, or related conduct over the prior year, according to new execution protocols the prison system released this week. 

Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch wanted an execution that a Trump judge deemed illegal

The Supreme Court these days is generally in the business of helping executions go forward. But on Thursday night, the court did something notable: It told Alabama no. Even then, the court wasn't unanimous. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch dissented from the refusal to let the nitrogen gas execution of Jeffery Lee proceed. What prompted the rare rejection? In line with the typical shadow docket practice, the court didn't explain itself. Nor did the dissenters, who merely noted their disagreement. But a deeper look at the case helps us understand why a majority of the court was unwilling to help the state this time.