Skip to main content

USA | This Supreme Court means executions will continue — and they will be a gruesome affair

For those who want to see the end of the death penalty, there have been some troubling developments in 2021

50 years ago, the US Supreme Court in Furman v. Georgia held that the death penalty as applied was “cruel and unusual” and therefore in violation of the Eighth Amendment to the Constitution. The Court plurality found it inconsistent with “the evolving standards of decency that mark the progress of a maturing society.”

The decision itself was a 1-page per curiam decision with a series of plurality opinions. Justice Douglas highlighted a long and shameful history of racial disparity in executions. Justice Stewart wrote that the death sentences were so arbitrary and random that they were “cruel and unusual in the same way that being struck by lightning is cruel and unusual.” Justices Brennan and Marshall found the death penalty unconstitutional in all circumstances, citing the risk of mistaken execution of innocent people. For 4 years, no one was executed; in our bicentennial year, the Supreme Court reinstated the death penalty with certain new procedural requirements.

The results of a half century of executions illustrate the prescience of the Furman Court. Attitudes toward capital punishment have evolved in the United States, but there remain pockets of reaction, especially in the current Supreme Court. Racism, randomness and incompetence continue to abound, making a mockery of the moral authority of the State to take a life.

Since 1976 when the death penalty was reinstated, 1,540 people have been executed — 80 % in the death belt of the South, and nearly a third in Texas alone. Of those killed, 34.1 % have been Black, nearly 3 times the % of Black people in the US population. On American death rows today, 43.1 % of defendants are Black. 14 times as many Black defendants have been executed for killing a white victim as white defendants for killing a Black victim.

Since 1973, at least 186 people on death row were found to have been wrongly convicted and exonerated — one for every 8.3 executions. At least 20 people have been executed despite strong factual claims of innocence. 11 accomplices who did not commit the homicide have been executed; in some of those cases, the killer pled and avoided execution. 43 % of those executed between 200 and 2015 had been diagnosed with mental illness.

As 2021 ends, the standards of decency of American society with respect to the death penalty are simultaneously evolving and devolving. In 2021, only 18 death sentences were imposed and only 11 people executed, both lows since the reinstatement of the death penalty and way below the 279 sentences and 98 executions in 1999. Yet 6 of the 11 executions this year were of Black defendants. 10 of the 11 had significant impairments, including demonstrable mental illness, brain injury, intellectual disability or chronic serious childhood trauma and abuse.

Virginia, which historically had executed more people than any other state, became the first Southern state to abolish the death penalty, although the Legislature and Governor’s mansion could make that a short-lived milestone. Large swathes of the country have abolished the death penalty and many of those with the death penalty have declared or imposed de facto moratoriums. For the 7th year in a row, no state west of Texas conducted an execution although, ironically, California has by far the largest death row.

Only 3 states — Alabama, Oklahoma and Texas — have accounted for a majority of both death sentences and executions since 1976. In 2021, Texas and the departing Trump administration performed 3 executions each, while Oklahoma had 2, and Missouri and Mississippi 1 each. Oklahoma badly botched yet another execution, with a victim of the supposedly humane lethal injection writhing and vomiting on the gurney.

President Biden ran on an anti-death penalty platform, but while the Department of Justice has halted all federal executions pending a review, it is proceeding with litigation to execute the Charleston Church shooter and to obtain a death sentence against the Boston Marathon bomber, as well as continuing to seek the death penalty against 6 Guantanamo detainees. President Biden could simply commute all federal death sentences to life imprisonment; he has not.

The most troubling development on the horizon, however, is a highly polarized Supreme Court, where 6 members have shown themselves not only indifferent to substantial legal claims under relevant precedent, but affirmatively impatient with such claims by death row defendants. In case after case, the Supreme Court has declined certiorari and overruled stays issued by lower courts, often without opinion and within a few hours of governments appealing the granting of a stay. Strong claims of innocence, severe brain injury or disease, racial bias, or utter incompetence of counsel are all tossed out without hearing or even perfunctory statements of reasons, over the anguished dissents of the three liberals left on the court.

Hostility to arguments by capital defendants the Supreme Court are likely to continue for many years ahead. The Supreme Court does not need to revisit its earlier, less rigid jurisprudence; it can simply use the power not to hear any appeals or to dissolve stays issued by lower courts, to assure that executions will proceed — on time and without hearing.

It’s become clear that this Supreme Court wants to push on with the conveyor belt of death and ignore these final pleas for justice and for life. Thus, even if there are fewer death sentences and fewer executions from fewer places, it is almost certain that those whose lives are taken by the state will be those with the least voice, the least power, the least able to have their dignity recognized. There may be fewer executions in coming years, but the lingering stench — as Justice Sotomayor said in the abortion context — of racism and discrimination against the mentally ill and the marginal will make those executions an ever more squalid spectacle.

Source: independent.co.uk, Eric Lewis, December 25, 2021


🚩 | Report an error, an omission, a typo; suggest a story or a new angle to an existing story; submit a piece, a comment; recommend a resource; contact the webmaster, contact us: deathpenaltynews@gmail.com.


Opposed to Capital Punishment? Help us keep this blog up and running! DONATE!



"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted." -- Oscar Wilde

Most viewed (Last 7 days)

Tennessee executes Harold Wayne Nichols

Thirty-seven years after confessing to a series of rapes and the murder of Karen Pulley, Nichols expressed remorse in final words Strapped to a gurney in the execution chamber at Riverbend Maximum Security Institution Thursday morning, Harold Wayne Nichols made a final statement.  “To the people I’ve harmed, I’m sorry,” he said, according to prison officials and media witnesses. “To my family, know that I love you. I know where I’m going to. I’m ready to go home.”

USA | Should Medical Research Regulations and Informed Consent Principles Apply to States’ Use of Experimental Execution Methods?

New drugs and med­ical treat­ments under­go rig­or­ous test­ing to ensure they are safe and effec­tive for pub­lic use. Under fed­er­al and state reg­u­la­tions, this test­ing typ­i­cal­ly involves clin­i­cal tri­als with human sub­jects, who face sig­nif­i­cant health and safe­ty risks as the first peo­ple exposed to exper­i­men­tal treat­ments. That is why the law requires them to be ful­ly informed of the poten­tial effects and give their vol­un­tary con­sent to par­tic­i­pate in trials. Yet these reg­u­la­tions have not been fol­lowed when states seek to use nov­el and untest­ed exe­cu­tion meth­ods — sub­ject­ing pris­on­ers to poten­tial­ly tor­tur­ous and uncon­sti­tu­tion­al­ly painful deaths. Some experts and advo­cates argue that states must be bound by the eth­i­cal and human rights prin­ci­ples of bio­med­ical research before using these meth­ods on prisoners.

Georgia parole board suspends scheduled execution of Cobb County death row prisoner

The execution of a Georgia man scheduled for Wednesday has been suspended as the State Board of Pardons and Paroles considers a clemency application.  Stacey Humphreys, 52, would have been the state's first execution in 2025. As of December 16, 2025, Georgia has carried out zero executions in 2025. The state last executed an inmate in January 2020, followed by a pause due to COVID-19. Executions resumed in 2024, but none have occurred this year until now. Humphreys had been sentenced to death for the 2003 killings of 33-year-old Cyndi Williams and 21-year-old Lori Brown, who were fatally shot at the real estate office where they worked.

Oklahoma board recommends clemency for inmate set to be executed next week

A voting board in Oklahoma decided Wednesday to recommend clemency for Tremane Wood, a death row inmate who is scheduled to receive a lethal injection next week at the state penitentiary in McAlester.  Wood, 46, faces execution for his conviction in the 2001 murder of Ronnie Wipf, a migrant farmworker, at an Oklahoma City hotel on New Year's Eve, court records show. The recommendation was decided in a 3-2 vote by the Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board, consisting of five members appointed by either the governor or the state's top judicial official, according to CBS News affiliate KWTV. Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Sitt will consider the recommendation as he weighs whether to grant or deny Wood's clemency request, which would mean sparing him from execution and reducing his sentence to life in prison without the possibility of parole.

China | Former Chinese senior banker Bai Tianhui executed for taking US$155 million in bribes

Bai is the second senior figure from Huarong to be put to death for corruption following the execution of Lai Xiaomin in 2021 China has executed a former senior banker who was found guilty of taking more than 1.1 billion yuan (US$155 million) in bribes. Bai Tianhui, the former general manager of the asset management firm China Huarong International Holdings, was executed on Tuesday after the Supreme People’s Court approved the sentence, state broadcaster CCTV reported.

Iran | Child Bride Saved from the Gallows After Blood Money Raised Through Donations, Charities

Iran Human Rights (IHRNGO); December 9, 2025: Goli Kouhkan, a 25-year-old undocumented Baluch child bride who was scheduled to be executed within weeks, has been saved from the gallows after the diya (blood money) was raised in time. According to the judiciary’s Mizan News Agency , the plaintiffs in the case of Goli Kouhkan, have agreed to forgo their right to execution as retribution. In a video, the victim’s parents are seen signing the relevant documents. Goli’s lawyer, Parand Gharahdaghi, confirmed in a social media post that the original 10 billion (approx. 100,000 euros) toman diya was reduced to 8 billion tomans (approx. 80,000 euros) and had been raised through donations and charities.

Afghanistan's Taliban rulers carry out public execution in sports stadium

The man had been convicted of killing 13 members of a family, including children, and was executed by one of their relatives, according to police. Afghanistan's Taliban authorities carried out the public execution of a man on Tuesday convicted of killing 13 members of a family, including several children, earlier this year. Tens of thousands of people attended the execution at a sports stadium in the eastern city of Khost, which the Supreme Court said was the eleventh since the Taliban seized power in 2021 in the wake of the chaotic withdrawal of US and NATO forces.

Burkina Faso to bring back death penalty

Burkina Faso's military rulers will bring back the death penalty, which was abolished in 2018, the country's Council of Ministers announced on Thursday. "This draft penal code reinstates the death penalty for a number of offences, including high treason, acts of terrorism, acts of espionage, among others," stated the information service of the Burkinabe government. Burkina Faso last carried out an execution in 1988.

Who Gets Hanged in Singapore?

Singapore’s death penalty has been in the news again.  Enshrined in law in 1975, a decade after the island split from Malaysia and became an independent state, the penalty can see people sentenced to hang for drug trafficking, murder or firearms offenses, among other crimes. Executions have often involved trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act, with offenses measured in grams.  Those executed have included people from low-income backgrounds and foreign nationals who are sometimes not fluent in English, according to human rights advocates such as Amnesty International and the International Drug Policy Consortium. 

Afghanistan | Two Sons Of Executed Man Also Face Death Penalty, Says Taliban

The Taliban governor’s spokesperson in Khost said on Tuesday that two sons of a man executed earlier that day have also been sentenced to death. Their executions, he said, have been postponed because the heir of the victims is not currently in Afghanistan. Mostaghfer Gurbaz, spokesperson for the Taliban governor in Khost, also released details of the charges against the man executed on Tuesday, identified as Mangal. He said Mangal was accused of killing members of a family.