Skip to main content

Oregon’s only woman on death row to get new trial

Angela McAnulty
Judge says he’ll throw out her child-torture murder conviction

A judge is expected to throw out the 2011 aggravated murder conviction of Angela McAnulty, the only woman on Oregon’s death row, for the torture and starvation of her 15-year-old daughter, Jeanette Maples.

McAnulty should get a new trial because her attorneys failed to adequately represent or advise her during her trial, Senior Circuit Court Judge J. Burdette Pratt said in a draft ruling.

Pratt has yet to finalize and sign the ruling, but The Oregonian/OregonLive received a preliminary copy. The judge’s underlying finding isn’t expected to change.

Among major lapses cited by the judge: Defense attorneys Steven Krasik and Kenneth Hadley, both experienced capital punishment lawyers, made the highly unusual move of supporting McAnulty’s decision to plead guilty when the prosecution hadn’t agreed drop the death penalty as a possible punishment. After a 15-day trial to determine McAnulty’s sentence, 12 jurors unanimously chose the death penalty.

McAnulty is among 30 people on death row. Executions have been put on hold ever since then-Gov. John Kitzhaber instituted a moratorium in 2011. Gov. Kate Brown extended it during her tenure.

McAnulty’s case is one of the most notorious in modern Oregon history. Pratt noted the evidence was “particularly gruesome” and that even one of McAnulty’s trial attorneys “described it as the most indefensible case he had ever handled.”

According to prosecutors, McAnulty singled out Jeanette to beat and starve while allowing her other 2 children to sit at a table to eat dinner and watch TV or play video games. Prosecutors said Jeanette’s blood was found in every room in the house and that her mother used a vacuum cleaner to drown out the sound of the beatings.

The teenager suffered open wounds so deep that one of them exposed her hip bones, prosecutors said, and her only possession was a piece of cardboard she used for a bed.

The girl’s teachers and classmates in Eugene noticed she was skinny and always hungry. She later wrote a letter to a school official, saying she was denied food at home, forced to eat chili peppers and ordered to sit on her knees for long periods as punishment.

The Oregon Department of Human Services investigated by visiting the home, but found it well stocked and closed the case without taking action to protect Jeanette. The girl’s emaciated and battered body was found in the family’s home in 2009.

Her stepfather, Richard McAnulty, pleaded guilty to aggravated murder for his role in the death and was sentenced to life in prison with the possibility of release after 25 years.

In 2012, the state agreed to pay $1.5 million to settle a wrongful death lawsuit for the Department of Human Services’ failure to protect the teenager. Most of the settlement when to her biological father.

In 2014, the Oregon Supreme Court upheld McAnulty’s conviction.

In the draft ruling, Pratt wrote that McAnulty’s defense team was rushed in preparing for trial on Feb. 1, 2011. Less than 1 ½ months earlier, one of the defense attorneys and his investigator had finished a 114-day trial of a father and son who were convicted of killing 2 police officers in the 2008 bombing of a Woodburn bank.

The attorneys had asked a Lane County Circuit judge to postpone McAnulty’s trial, but were denied. Pratt found that the time crunch affected their ability to call skilled mental health experts who could have tried to counter the picture painted by the prosecution of McAnulty as a cold-blooded killer. Experts could have testified, for instance, how McAnulty’s parenting was affected by her own abusive childhood decades earlier and that her lower-than-average intelligence and mental illness affected her decisions, the judge said.

Such testimony could have shown that McAnulty was “not simply evil. ... Jurors were never provided with neuropsychological evidence to assist them in understanding the origins and causes of Petitioner’s behavior,” Pratt wrote.

According to previous coverage of McAnulty’s life, she lost her mother to murder when she was 5. After high school, she abused drugs while living a tumultuous life traveling around with a carnival worker. She had 3 children, but all were taken by California authorities because of abuse or neglect. McAnulty became a mother to 2 more children and ultimately was able to win back custody of 1 of her older children, Jeanette.

It’s unclear when Pratt will issue his final opinion granting McAnulty, now 50, a new trial. Portland defense attorneys Kathleen Correll, Bert Dupre and Gregory Scholl represented McAnulty in her case requesting post-conviction relief. They declined comment.

Representatives from the Lane County prosecutor’s office and the Oregon Department of Justice didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

Krasik, 1 of McAnulty’s original trial attorneys, said he’s relieved to hear of the judge’s draft opinion.

“This is a welcome step towards a fair and rational disposition of this tragic case,” Krasik said Tuesday in an email to The Oregonian/OregonLive. “I support any court decision that undoes Angela’s misguided, horribly disproportionate, death sentence.”

Source: oregonlive.com, Aimee Green, July 9, 2019


⚑ | Report an error, an omission, a typo; suggest a story or a new angle to an existing story; submit a piece, a comment; recommend a resource; contact the webmaster, contact us: deathpenaltynews@gmail.com.


Opposed to Capital Punishment? Help us keep this blog up and running! DONATE!



"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted." -- Oscar Wilde

Most viewed (Last 7 days)

Tennessee executes Harold Wayne Nichols

Thirty-seven years after confessing to a series of rapes and the murder of Karen Pulley, Nichols expressed remorse in final words Strapped to a gurney in the execution chamber at Riverbend Maximum Security Institution Thursday morning, Harold Wayne Nichols made a final statement.  “To the people I’ve harmed, I’m sorry,” he said, according to prison officials and media witnesses. “To my family, know that I love you. I know where I’m going to. I’m ready to go home.”

China | Former Chinese senior banker Bai Tianhui executed for taking US$155 million in bribes

Bai is the second senior figure from Huarong to be put to death for corruption following the execution of Lai Xiaomin in 2021 China has executed a former senior banker who was found guilty of taking more than 1.1 billion yuan (US$155 million) in bribes. Bai Tianhui, the former general manager of the asset management firm China Huarong International Holdings, was executed on Tuesday after the Supreme People’s Court approved the sentence, state broadcaster CCTV reported.

Burkina Faso to bring back death penalty

Burkina Faso's military rulers will bring back the death penalty, which was abolished in 2018, the country's Council of Ministers announced on Thursday. "This draft penal code reinstates the death penalty for a number of offences, including high treason, acts of terrorism, acts of espionage, among others," stated the information service of the Burkinabe government. Burkina Faso last carried out an execution in 1988.

Iran | Child Bride Saved from the Gallows After Blood Money Raised Through Donations, Charities

Iran Human Rights (IHRNGO); December 9, 2025: Goli Kouhkan, a 25-year-old undocumented Baluch child bride who was scheduled to be executed within weeks, has been saved from the gallows after the diya (blood money) was raised in time. According to the judiciary’s Mizan News Agency , the plaintiffs in the case of Goli Kouhkan, have agreed to forgo their right to execution as retribution. In a video, the victim’s parents are seen signing the relevant documents. Goli’s lawyer, Parand Gharahdaghi, confirmed in a social media post that the original 10 billion (approx. 100,000 euros) toman diya was reduced to 8 billion tomans (approx. 80,000 euros) and had been raised through donations and charities.

Oklahoma board recommends clemency for inmate set to be executed next week

A voting board in Oklahoma decided Wednesday to recommend clemency for Tremane Wood, a death row inmate who is scheduled to receive a lethal injection next week at the state penitentiary in McAlester.  Wood, 46, faces execution for his conviction in the 2001 murder of Ronnie Wipf, a migrant farmworker, at an Oklahoma City hotel on New Year's Eve, court records show. The recommendation was decided in a 3-2 vote by the Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board, consisting of five members appointed by either the governor or the state's top judicial official, according to CBS News affiliate KWTV. Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Sitt will consider the recommendation as he weighs whether to grant or deny Wood's clemency request, which would mean sparing him from execution and reducing his sentence to life in prison without the possibility of parole.

Who Gets Hanged in Singapore?

Singapore’s death penalty has been in the news again.  Enshrined in law in 1975, a decade after the island split from Malaysia and became an independent state, the penalty can see people sentenced to hang for drug trafficking, murder or firearms offenses, among other crimes. Executions have often involved trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act, with offenses measured in grams.  Those executed have included people from low-income backgrounds and foreign nationals who are sometimes not fluent in English, according to human rights advocates such as Amnesty International and the International Drug Policy Consortium. 

Afghanistan's Taliban rulers carry out public execution in sports stadium

The man had been convicted of killing 13 members of a family, including children, and was executed by one of their relatives, according to police. Afghanistan's Taliban authorities carried out the public execution of a man on Tuesday convicted of killing 13 members of a family, including several children, earlier this year. Tens of thousands of people attended the execution at a sports stadium in the eastern city of Khost, which the Supreme Court said was the eleventh since the Taliban seized power in 2021 in the wake of the chaotic withdrawal of US and NATO forces.

Afghanistan | Two Sons Of Executed Man Also Face Death Penalty, Says Taliban

The Taliban governor’s spokesperson in Khost said on Tuesday that two sons of a man executed earlier that day have also been sentenced to death. Their executions, he said, have been postponed because the heir of the victims is not currently in Afghanistan. Mostaghfer Gurbaz, spokesperson for the Taliban governor in Khost, also released details of the charges against the man executed on Tuesday, identified as Mangal. He said Mangal was accused of killing members of a family.

Utah | Ralph Menzies dies on death row less than 3 months after his execution was called off

Judge was set to consider arguments in December about Menzies’ mental fitness  Ralph Menzies, who spent more than 3 decades on Utah’s death row for the 1986 murder of Maurine Hunsaker, has died.  Menzies, 67, died of “presumed natural causes at a local hospital” Wednesday afternoon, according to the Utah Department of Corrections.  Matt Hunsaker, Maurine Hunsaker’s son, said Menzies’ death “was a complete surprise.”  “First off, I’d say that I’m numb. And second off, I would say, grateful,” Hunsaker told Utah News Dispatch. “I’m grateful that my family does not have to endure this for the holidays.” 

USA | Should Medical Research Regulations and Informed Consent Principles Apply to States’ Use of Experimental Execution Methods?

New drugs and med­ical treat­ments under­go rig­or­ous test­ing to ensure they are safe and effec­tive for pub­lic use. Under fed­er­al and state reg­u­la­tions, this test­ing typ­i­cal­ly involves clin­i­cal tri­als with human sub­jects, who face sig­nif­i­cant health and safe­ty risks as the first peo­ple exposed to exper­i­men­tal treat­ments. That is why the law requires them to be ful­ly informed of the poten­tial effects and give their vol­un­tary con­sent to par­tic­i­pate in trials. Yet these reg­u­la­tions have not been fol­lowed when states seek to use nov­el and untest­ed exe­cu­tion meth­ods — sub­ject­ing pris­on­ers to poten­tial­ly tor­tur­ous and uncon­sti­tu­tion­al­ly painful deaths. Some experts and advo­cates argue that states must be bound by the eth­i­cal and human rights prin­ci­ples of bio­med­ical research before using these meth­ods on prisoners.