FEATURED POST

Arkansas Supreme Court Decision Allows New DNA Testing in Case of the ​“West Memphis Three,” Convicted of Killing Three Children in 1993

Image
On April 18, 2024, the Arkansas Supreme Court decided 4-3 to reverse a 2022 lower court decision and allow genetic testing of crime scene evidence from the 1993 killing of three eight-year-old boys in West Memphis. The three men convicted in 1994 for the killings were released in 2011 after taking an Alford plea, in which they maintained their innocence but plead guilty to the crime, in exchange for 18 years’ time served and 10 years of a suspended sentence. 

India: Mentally ill convict escapes the noose

SC of India
SC commutes sentence to life

Severe mental illness in a condemned person post his conviction is a factor for commuting the death penalty, the Supreme Court has held.

The court held that mental illness formed post-conviction deprived the death row prisoner of his ability “to understand the implications of his actions and the consequences.”

“In this situation, the execution of such a person would lower the majesty of law... If the accused is not able to understand the impact and purpose of his execution because of his disability, the raison d’être for the execution itself collapses,” a Bench of Justices N.V. Ramana, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar and Indira Banerjee reasoned in their April 12 judgment.

The judgment came in a case of double murder of minor girls, both aged below nine, by their neighbour in 1999. 

The accused, kept anonymous by the court, has been awaiting execution in prison for 17 years.

The court issued guidelines for determining post-conviction mental illness. It did not want convicts to exploit the relief as a loophole to cheat the hangman. 

The assessment of the disability should be done by a multi-disciplinary team of qualified professionals (medical practitioners and criminologists), including professionals with expertise in the particular mental illness of an accused, the court said.

It would be up to the convict to prove with clear evidence that he suffered from severe mental illness. He had to demonstrate active, residual or prodromal symptoms. 

The state could also offer evidence to rebut the claim. In appropriate cases, the courts could set up panels of experts, Justice Ramana, who authored the verdict, explained. 

The convict from Maharashtra had raised the plea of post-conviction illness. 

The court commuted his death penalty to life without remission, saying he was still a threat to society.

Source: The Hindu, Krishnadas Rajagopal, April 17, 2019


⚑ | Report an error, an omission, a typo; suggest a story or a new angle to an existing story; submit a piece, a comment; recommend a resource; contact the webmaster, contact us: deathpenaltynews@gmail.com.


Opposed to Capital Punishment? Help us keep this blog up and running! DONATE!



"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted." -- Oscar Wilde

Most Viewed (Last 7 Days)

Communist Vietnam's secret death penalty conveyor belt: How country trails only China and Iran for 'astonishing' number of executions

Iraq executes 13 on ‘vague’ terrorism charges

Arkansas Supreme Court Decision Allows New DNA Testing in Case of the ​“West Memphis Three,” Convicted of Killing Three Children in 1993

Cuba Maintains Capital Punishment to "Deter and Intimidate"

Iranian Political Prisoners Condemn Looming Execution Of Rapper Toomaj Salehi