FEATURED POST

Arkansas Supreme Court Decision Allows New DNA Testing in Case of the ​“West Memphis Three,” Convicted of Killing Three Children in 1993

Image
On April 18, 2024, the Arkansas Supreme Court decided 4-3 to reverse a 2022 lower court decision and allow genetic testing of crime scene evidence from the 1993 killing of three eight-year-old boys in West Memphis. The three men convicted in 1994 for the killings were released in 2011 after taking an Alford plea, in which they maintained their innocence but plead guilty to the crime, in exchange for 18 years’ time served and 10 years of a suspended sentence. 

India: Death penalty no panacea for sexual offences against kids


Indian flag
The Union Cabinet has approved certain amendments to the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012, to strengthen the special law in view of rising sexual crimes against children. 

Approved by the Union Cabinet late last month, the amendments provide for stringent punishment for crimes against children below 18, including death penalty for aggravated sexual assault on minors. 

Sexual offences, particularly against children, have been a big problem in India. In 2016, 21 per cent of the total 39,068 cases of rape were against girls below 16 years of age, forcing the legislature to act against it. 

In recent years, states such as Haryana, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and Arunachal Pradesh have taken legislative measures to prescribe death penalty for the rape of girls below the age of 12 years. At the central level, the NDA government promulgated the Criminal Law (Amendment) Ordinance, 2018, on April 21, 2018, providing for death as the maximum punishment for rape of girls below 12. It has since been passed by both Houses of Parliament. 

Punishment is the most natural response to crime. Also, the quantum of punishment awarded to offenders must be proportionate with the nature and gravity of crime so as to deter criminals from disturbing peaceful citizens and challenging the authority of the state. 

Every time there is a brutal rape of a minor, there is popular demand to hang rapists. But prescribing death penalty for rape of children is a problematic idea. It increases the risk of the victim being killed by the offenders who might think that leaving her alive could send them to the gallows as she would be an eyewitness to the crime. 

Second, it creates a tool that is unlikely to be used against rapists of children. There has not been any execution in India for a non-terror capital crime since August 14, 2004, when Dhananjoy Chatterjee was hanged in Kolkata for the rape and murder of a minor girl. In fact he is the only convict sent to the gallows in the entire country in the 21st century. Before that, serial killer Auto Shankar was hanged on April 27, 1995, in Salem, Tamil Nadu. 

Third, the Indian judiciary is becoming increasingly averse to death penalty. It has already restricted the scope of capital punishment through a series of judgments, the most important being the 1981 Bachan Singh versus State of Punjab (1980) in which it propounded the doctrine of “the rarest of the rare” cases. 

But there are many positive points in the amendments approved by the Cabinet. The POCSO Act is a gender-neutral legislation that defines child as any person below 18 years and one of the amendments proposed to the Section 9 of the Act aims to protect children from sexual offences in times of natural calamities and disasters. 

It also seeks to penalise those administering any hormone or any chemical substance to children to make them attain early sexual maturity for the purpose of sexual assault. 

To address the menace of child pornography, Sections 14 and 15 of the Act are proposed to be amended. Besides fine, the offender can be be jailed for transmitting such material in any manner, except for the purpose of reporting as may be prescribed and for use as evidence in court. It also prescribes more stringent punishment for storing or possessing any child pornographic material. What is needed is a mix of effective preventive social, legal and police action to save children from falling prey to sex maniacs. 

A problematic idea because… 


- Fear of death penalty is likely to increase the risk of the victim being killed by the offenders who might think that leaving her alive could send them to the gallows 

- The provision of death penalty creates a tool that is unlikely to be used against rapists of children; there has not been any execution in India for a non-terror capital crime since August 14, 2004 

Source:  tribuneindia.com, January 7, 2019


⚑ | Report an error, an omission, a typo; suggest a story or a new angle to an existing story; submit a piece, a comment; recommend a resource; contact the webmaster, contact us: deathpenaltynews@gmail.com.


Opposed to Capital Punishment? Help us keep this blog up and running! DONATE!



"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted." -- Oscar Wilde

Most Viewed (Last 7 Days)

Arkansas Supreme Court Decision Allows New DNA Testing in Case of the ​“West Memphis Three,” Convicted of Killing Three Children in 1993

Communist Vietnam's secret death penalty conveyor belt: How country trails only China and Iran for 'astonishing' number of executions

Utah requests execution of death row inmate

Cuba Maintains Capital Punishment to "Deter and Intimidate"

Iranian Political Prisoners Condemn Looming Execution Of Rapper Toomaj Salehi

Iran | 3 Men, Woman Executed in Karaj