Skip to main content

Jury foreman during Dylann Roof trial speaks about death penalty decision

Jury box
CHARLESTON, SC (WCBD) -- On January 11, 2017, US District Court Judge Richard Gergel sentenced Dylann Roof to death for killing 9 parishioners at Emanuel AME Church.

The sentence came after a recommendation from a federal jury.

More than a year after the trial, the jury's foreman, Gerald Truesdale, shared his story with News 2, explaining how he came to the decision of the death penalty.

Truesdale has spent much of his life in an airplane seat. He's a traveling businessman, but has always called Charleston home.

“My [job] territory, at one point, was from Moscow to Johannesburg, South Africa, but I’ve always lived in Charleston,” Truesdale said.

In December 2016, his civic duty put him in the jury seat.

"It felt like a 500 yard walk through the snow … I sat down exactly where you'd think the foreman would be, front, right. I sat down, and as soon as I sat down, Judge Gergel hit the gavel and said, ‘We have a jury.’”

Truesdale said opening statements and testimony immediately began.

Felicia Sanders was the first to take the stand and spoke directly to defendant Dylann Roof.

“When she said, I’m not sure the exact words, but it was something to the effect of, “You deserve to be in the pit of hell,” the only time the entire time of the trial … the only time he had any communication from an emotional standpoint, when she said, ‘the pit of hell,’ he went, ‘Pfft.’That was it,” Truesdale recalled.

Dylan RoofSanders was in the room the night Roof shot and killed nine people at Emanuel AME Church.

Her son, Tywanza, and aunt, Susie Jackson, were both victims.
“It’s ok until you're looking at someone talking in the witness box talking about holding their child for the last time. Nobody gets used to that,” Truesdale said.

At the end of each day, Truesdale returned home to his wife, which is something he hadn't done daily in years due to his job.

However, the law prevented him from talking about the trial.

“It was very strange sitting in a room with the one you most want to communicate with, and you can't talk. That was difficult,” he said.

After the testimony finished, closing arguments were delivered, and jury deliberation began.

The alternates were dismissed leaving 12 jurors--ten women and two men. Truesdale was foreman.

The jury members could finally talk about they had just witnessed.

“I don't think, in all reality, no matter what the thought process was, with the information and the data that was presented, there was no way you could not think that [Roof] did this,” Truesdale said.

Truesdale recalled a video from Shelby, NC of Dylann Roof’s confession with the FBI.

“So, at that point, it was done. We went around the room, ‘Guilty.’ ‘Guilty.’ ‘Guilty.’ Okay," said Truesdale.

The jury found roof guilty on all 33 federal charges.

After a holiday break, the jury returned back to the courtroom in January for sentencing.

After hearing impact statements, the jury went back to deliberation. This time, they were to decide on a sentence recommendation of whether Roof should live or die for his crimes.

Truesdale was once again selected as foreman.

“Let’s go around the room, and get out of your system whatever. Scream, yell, cuss, do whatever we got to do to get your mind right for this monumental decision,” Trueman told the other jurors.

Truesdale’s personal decision about the death penalty went back to that morning when he read his daily devotional.

"’Whoever sheds human blood by humans, shall their blood be shed. For in the image of God has God made mankind.’ There are a lot of verses in the Bible. What are the chances of that one, on that day, at that time on the way, not knowing it was going to be the final day, that pops up on my phone? And, that was one the one I happen to look at?” Truesdale said.

Dylan RoofIn the deliberation room, 11 voted for the death penalty. One juror was unsure and needed to review a piece of evidence.

"She watched it and said, ‘Okay, turn it off, I’m done. Good, guilty, death penalty, I’m good. "

The jury’s recommendation was to sentence Dylann Roof to death.

"Probably the one who turned it to me was Susie Jackson. She's 80-plus years old … I think he shot her 6 times at point blank range … 6 times. She was 80–plus. Really? You're done,” Truesdale said.

Now, more than a year after the trial, Truesdale says he can look back on that time knowing that justice was served.

“People don't necessarily need to make judgments on things they're not involved in because it doesn't really affect you,” Truesdale said.

“You see something on TV, you say, ‘They ought to just kill that person.’ Until you're the guy in the court handing that 33 page document to a federal judge…until you’re the person handing that document that's going to end that man's life, you don't even have the justification to make that comment,” Truesdale said.

Roof is currently on death row in Indiana.

June 17, 2018 will mark 3 years since the shooting.

Source: Nexstar Broadcasting, Libba Holland, May 30, 2018


⚑ | Report an error, an omission, a typo; suggest a story or a new angle to an existing story; submit a piece, a comment; recommend a resource; contact the webmaster, contact us: deathpenaltynews@gmail.com.


Opposed to Capital Punishment? Help us keep this blog up and running! DONATE!



"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted." -- Oscar Wilde

Most viewed (Last 7 days)

Tennessee executes Harold Wayne Nichols

Thirty-seven years after confessing to a series of rapes and the murder of Karen Pulley, Nichols expressed remorse in final words Strapped to a gurney in the execution chamber at Riverbend Maximum Security Institution Thursday morning, Harold Wayne Nichols made a final statement.  “To the people I’ve harmed, I’m sorry,” he said, according to prison officials and media witnesses. “To my family, know that I love you. I know where I’m going to. I’m ready to go home.”

China | Former Chinese senior banker Bai Tianhui executed for taking US$155 million in bribes

Bai is the second senior figure from Huarong to be put to death for corruption following the execution of Lai Xiaomin in 2021 China has executed a former senior banker who was found guilty of taking more than 1.1 billion yuan (US$155 million) in bribes. Bai Tianhui, the former general manager of the asset management firm China Huarong International Holdings, was executed on Tuesday after the Supreme People’s Court approved the sentence, state broadcaster CCTV reported.

Burkina Faso to bring back death penalty

Burkina Faso's military rulers will bring back the death penalty, which was abolished in 2018, the country's Council of Ministers announced on Thursday. "This draft penal code reinstates the death penalty for a number of offences, including high treason, acts of terrorism, acts of espionage, among others," stated the information service of the Burkinabe government. Burkina Faso last carried out an execution in 1988.

Oklahoma board recommends clemency for inmate set to be executed next week

A voting board in Oklahoma decided Wednesday to recommend clemency for Tremane Wood, a death row inmate who is scheduled to receive a lethal injection next week at the state penitentiary in McAlester.  Wood, 46, faces execution for his conviction in the 2001 murder of Ronnie Wipf, a migrant farmworker, at an Oklahoma City hotel on New Year's Eve, court records show. The recommendation was decided in a 3-2 vote by the Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board, consisting of five members appointed by either the governor or the state's top judicial official, according to CBS News affiliate KWTV. Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Sitt will consider the recommendation as he weighs whether to grant or deny Wood's clemency request, which would mean sparing him from execution and reducing his sentence to life in prison without the possibility of parole.

Iran | Child Bride Saved from the Gallows After Blood Money Raised Through Donations, Charities

Iran Human Rights (IHRNGO); December 9, 2025: Goli Kouhkan, a 25-year-old undocumented Baluch child bride who was scheduled to be executed within weeks, has been saved from the gallows after the diya (blood money) was raised in time. According to the judiciary’s Mizan News Agency , the plaintiffs in the case of Goli Kouhkan, have agreed to forgo their right to execution as retribution. In a video, the victim’s parents are seen signing the relevant documents. Goli’s lawyer, Parand Gharahdaghi, confirmed in a social media post that the original 10 billion (approx. 100,000 euros) toman diya was reduced to 8 billion tomans (approx. 80,000 euros) and had been raised through donations and charities.

Who Gets Hanged in Singapore?

Singapore’s death penalty has been in the news again.  Enshrined in law in 1975, a decade after the island split from Malaysia and became an independent state, the penalty can see people sentenced to hang for drug trafficking, murder or firearms offenses, among other crimes. Executions have often involved trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act, with offenses measured in grams.  Those executed have included people from low-income backgrounds and foreign nationals who are sometimes not fluent in English, according to human rights advocates such as Amnesty International and the International Drug Policy Consortium. 

Afghanistan's Taliban rulers carry out public execution in sports stadium

The man had been convicted of killing 13 members of a family, including children, and was executed by one of their relatives, according to police. Afghanistan's Taliban authorities carried out the public execution of a man on Tuesday convicted of killing 13 members of a family, including several children, earlier this year. Tens of thousands of people attended the execution at a sports stadium in the eastern city of Khost, which the Supreme Court said was the eleventh since the Taliban seized power in 2021 in the wake of the chaotic withdrawal of US and NATO forces.

Afghanistan | Two Sons Of Executed Man Also Face Death Penalty, Says Taliban

The Taliban governor’s spokesperson in Khost said on Tuesday that two sons of a man executed earlier that day have also been sentenced to death. Their executions, he said, have been postponed because the heir of the victims is not currently in Afghanistan. Mostaghfer Gurbaz, spokesperson for the Taliban governor in Khost, also released details of the charges against the man executed on Tuesday, identified as Mangal. He said Mangal was accused of killing members of a family.

Utah | Ralph Menzies dies on death row less than 3 months after his execution was called off

Judge was set to consider arguments in December about Menzies’ mental fitness  Ralph Menzies, who spent more than 3 decades on Utah’s death row for the 1986 murder of Maurine Hunsaker, has died.  Menzies, 67, died of “presumed natural causes at a local hospital” Wednesday afternoon, according to the Utah Department of Corrections.  Matt Hunsaker, Maurine Hunsaker’s son, said Menzies’ death “was a complete surprise.”  “First off, I’d say that I’m numb. And second off, I would say, grateful,” Hunsaker told Utah News Dispatch. “I’m grateful that my family does not have to endure this for the holidays.” 

USA | Should Medical Research Regulations and Informed Consent Principles Apply to States’ Use of Experimental Execution Methods?

New drugs and med­ical treat­ments under­go rig­or­ous test­ing to ensure they are safe and effec­tive for pub­lic use. Under fed­er­al and state reg­u­la­tions, this test­ing typ­i­cal­ly involves clin­i­cal tri­als with human sub­jects, who face sig­nif­i­cant health and safe­ty risks as the first peo­ple exposed to exper­i­men­tal treat­ments. That is why the law requires them to be ful­ly informed of the poten­tial effects and give their vol­un­tary con­sent to par­tic­i­pate in trials. Yet these reg­u­la­tions have not been fol­lowed when states seek to use nov­el and untest­ed exe­cu­tion meth­ods — sub­ject­ing pris­on­ers to poten­tial­ly tor­tur­ous and uncon­sti­tu­tion­al­ly painful deaths. Some experts and advo­cates argue that states must be bound by the eth­i­cal and human rights prin­ci­ples of bio­med­ical research before using these meth­ods on prisoners.