A conversation with Death Penalty Action Co-founder and Executive Director Abe Bonowitz. Now that Joe Biden is a lame duck president, activists are holding him accountable to make good on his promise to end the federal death penalty during his remaining six months as president. Biden’s election campaign in 2020 had pledged to end the federal death penalty and incentivize the remaining 27 states that still allow executions to do the same. While he made history as the first president in the United States to openly oppose the death penalty, there has been no movement to actually end federal executions during his nearly four years in office.
Get link
Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps
'I never professed to be an angel, but I didn’t kill anybody!' - Clinton Young, scheduled to be executed by Texas Oct. 26, 2017
Get link
Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps
Published
Clinton Lee Young
‘I never professed to be an angel, but I didn’t kill anybody…’ - Clinton Young, 2013
Clinton Lee Young (born July 19, 1983) was convicted of murder and is currently awaiting execution in the state of Texas.
Young, from Ore City in Upshur County, was convicted and condemned for the November 2001 fatal shootings of Doyle Douglas in Longview and then Samuel Petrey a day or two later in a Midland oil field after carjacking him in Eastland, about 53 miles east of Abilene.
The Case
In the early hours of a cold November morning in east Texas, five people piled in a car for a short trip to Longview. Twenty four hours later, two men were dead and three men were in custody for murder.
Two best friends and one teenager just four months after his 18th birthday, who had only known these people a few short months were the three in custody. The two best friends made deals (unsigned at trial time) to name the teenage acquaintance the ringleader of the murders.
There are two things that motivate a prosecutor to leave deals unsigned at trial. The most important motivation, disclosure. A deal must be disclosed to the jury. By leaving the deal unsigned the testimony that no deal existed is "truthful", therefore the testimony can be trusted.
The second and least spoken about is the obvious control the prosecutor has over the testimony. The teenager was Mr. Young, and the compelling evidence that lead to his conviction was the testimony of the best friends, a police chase, and juvenile records from a time when this young man was tossed from parent to parent, facility to facility.
"Proof beyond a reasonable doubt" is the standard for conviction. The prosecution achieved this by soliciting lies from one of the co defendants. This co defendant failed a lie detector test, in front of his own attorney and the investigator for the prosecution. The prosecution still called him as a witness and incited his less than truthful testimony. This is called prosecutorial misconduct. As an ethical question, it is unethical for an attorney to solicit testimony that is known to be false.
"Preponderance of evidence" is the standard for the death penalty question of future dangerousness. Somehow, Texas believes it has a crystal ball, and can determine whether or not someone will be dangerous in the future. When a jury believes in the punishment phase of a trial that the convicted will commit more crimes from behind bars, a death sentence is warranted.
Arrested and charged with capital murder
Clinton Young was arrested while fleeing from police. He was later indicted by a grand jury for capital murder. Two co-defendants were held on murder charges and later pled guilty to lesser charges. The fourth involved man, who had by his own volition directed the police to one of the bodies, was never charged.
The prosecution’s case
The State’s case against Clinton Young relied primarily on the testimony of the three other involved men. The State maintained that Clinton was the driving force in the murders and kidnapping, and that the other’s involvement was the result of duress caused by Clinton Young. Clinton’s sole purpose over the course of the two murders, according to the State, was to travel to Midland to see his girlfriend.
The defense case
The defense case focused mainly on three problems with the State’s case:
conflicting testimony of the three eyewitnesses;
inconsistent ballistic evidence;
signs of complicity among the three eyewitnesses who claimed to be threatened or held hostage by Clinton Young.
There are no fingerprints and there is no guilt relevant DNA linking Clinton to the murders.
One of the three involved initially told police Clinton fired all three shots at the first victim and then recanted when he learned the other witness had told police the third shot was fired by one of the other men involved.
Another of the three, re-enacted one of the murders on videotape, then reversed his staging of the scene when he learned the coroner’s report rendered his prior version implausible.
Also, there were numerous occasions on which one of the three, who claimed to be a hostage of Clinton, could have easily parted company. This co-defendant admitted to a detective that he had possession of the gun and keys to the vehicle while Clinton was inside a store. He also admitted to the police that Clinton was at times asleep.
Poor police investigation and lost evidence
The police failed to investigate important crime-scenes in this case. For example, the car that belonged to the first victim was never properly tested. Also the home, close to where the first shooting took place, and the area surrounding it, have not been investigated. No clerks or shoppers at the grocery store, where the second victim was allegedly kidnapped from, were interviewed by the police.
The gloves the co-defendant wore during the murders were never tested for gunshot residue. Clinton, in maintaining he didn’t kill anyone, requested the police to test his DNA and test the gloves of the co-defendant for gunshot residue. The gloves were eventually tested for DNA, but only on the outside.
On top of this, the State lost or destroyed evidence that was exculpatory in nature.
Plea deals, false testimonies and a biased judge
Clinton Young’s conviction for capital murder and his punishment of death were based upon suppressed evidence, that two of the involved were given secret plea deals and upon knowingly presented perjured testimony. Furthermore, the judge who presided over Clinton’s trial, motion for new trial and State post-conviction proceeding, was not impartial.
Ballistic results
The ballistic research that was done on the first shooting, when matched with the autopsy report, shows that Clinton was not and could not have been the shooter. However, these ballistic reports were not admitted into evidence in Clinton’s case.
Ineffective assistance of counsel
The defense investigator, who worked on Clinton’s case until 2005 and was hired by Clinton’s habeas counsel, was emotionally unstable, abusing drugs and obtained false declarations. By appointing incompetent counsel and not adopting proper standards to evaluate counsel’s competency, the court denied Clinton his opportunity to properly challenge his conviction and sentence.
Statements by fellow inmates of co-defendants
There are statements by several people that were held in custody with the co-defendant and who came forward concerning the co-defendant talking (bragging) about being the actual killer in this case and getting away with murder, even admitting that Clinton was asleep during one of the murders.
Failed polygraph by co-defendant
The co-defendant and prosecution’s star witness, who was the actual killer, was asked to take a polygraph examination by the prosecution in Clinton’s case. He failed this polygraph. The examiner that took the polygraph was allowed to testify in court in Clinton’s case, but only outside of the jury’s presence. The prosecutors never offered Clinton an opportunity to take a polygraph examination.
Conclusion
It is clear that the prosecution in Clinton’s case intentionally prevented Clinton from putting forth a proper defense. Also, others that were supposed to work for or represent Clinton, have repeatedly failed him. Clinton did not receive any kind of fair trial or even a fair appeal.
➤ The actual legal material, is available on this page
➤ You can download a PDF with more information about his case here, or read it here.
Deal With Death - Clinton Young , a Jessica Vilerius documentary
Published on Apr 28, 2017 with English subtitles (in the making...)
⚑ | Report an error, an omission, a typo; suggest a story or a new angle to an existing story; submit a piece, a comment; recommend a resource; contact the webmaster, contact us: deathpenaltynews@gmail.com.
Opposed to Capital Punishment? Help us keep this blog up and running! DONATE!
A conversation with Death Penalty Action Co-founder and Executive Director Abe Bonowitz. Now that Joe Biden is a lame duck president, activists are holding him accountable to make good on his promise to end the federal death penalty during his remaining six months as president. Biden’s election campaign in 2020 had pledged to end the federal death penalty and incentivize the remaining 27 states that still allow executions to do the same. While he made history as the first president in the United States to openly oppose the death penalty, there has been no movement to actually end federal executions during his nearly four years in office.
On the morning of Wednesday, October 2, 2024, the execution sentence for a woman named Zahra Fayzi was carried out in Tabriz Central Prison. Zahra Fayzi, aged 41 and a resident of Tabriz, was arrested four years ago on charges of murdering her husband and was sentenced to qisas (retribution in kind). The victim’s family demanded 4.5 billion tomans from Zahra’s family to halt the execution, but her family was unable to gather this amount. This sum far exceeds the official blood money rate in Iran, which has been set by the judiciary at 1.2 billion tomans for 2024.
JACKSON, Miss. (AP) — The Mississippi attorney general on Tuesday requested an execution date for the state’s longest-serving death row inmate. Richard Gerald Jordan, now 78, was sentenced to death in 1976 for the kidnapping and killing of Edwina Marter earlier that year in Harrison County. The Mississippi Supreme Court rejected Jordan’s latest appeal Tuesday, and Attorney General Lynn Fitch filed papers hours later asking the court to set a date for the lethal injection.
A Texas man convicted of fatally stabbing twin 16-year-old girls more than 3 decades ago was executed on Tuesday evening. Garcia Glenn White was pronounced dead at 6:56 p.m. CDT following a chemical injection at the state penitentiary in Huntsville. He was condemned for the December 1989 killings of Annette and Bernette Edwards. The bodies of the twin girls and their mother, Bonita Edwards, were found in their Houston apartment. White, 61, was the 6th inmate put to death in the U.S. in the last 11 days. His execution took place shortly after the U.S. Supreme Court, without comment, rejected 3 last-ditch appeals.
Convincing a Republican attorney general to advocate against a death sentence is a near impossible feat, but Supreme Court roadblocks could force Oklahoma to execute a man in a conviction it doesn’t accept. WASHINGTON (CN) — The Supreme Court handed Richard Glossip one loss in 2015 — and if not for a corrections department blunder, he’d be dead. Almost a decade later, Glossip returns to the high court a second time, bringing the justices mountains of support for another trial and hoping a procedural hurdle doesn’t end his case for innocence before it can begin.
Singaporean authorities are reportedly set to execute Mohammad Azwan Bin Bohari (“Azwan“), a 47-year-old Singaporean, on Friday, 4 October 2024. A copy of an execution notice dated 30 September 2024 from the Singapore Prisons Service was published by local rights group Transformative Justice Collective (“TJC“) on Instagram. According to TJC, this is the second execution notice that Azwan’s family received this year. The first scheduled execution in April 2024 was halted as Azwan had a “pending case” before the Courts, TJC said.
Responding to the news that the Singapore authorities executed a man for a drug-related offence today (4 October), Amnesty International’s Deputy Regional Director for Research, Kate Schuetze, said: “Azwan bin Bohari’s execution was clearly unlawful under international law and standards. It is especially concerning that this hanging took place in spite of a pending legal application.
It's been one week since Alabama used nitrogen gas to execute a man convicted of killing three people in back-to-back workplace shootings in 1999. It was the second time the method that has generated debate about its humaneness has been used in the country. Now, a Montgomery nonprofit will hold a panel discussion about the impact of the death penalty in Alabama. Alan Eugene Miller, 59, was executed at a south Alabama prison on Sept. 26. He shook and trembled on the gurney for about two minutes with his body at times pulling against the restraints. That was followed by about six minutes of periodic gulping breaths before he became still.
In the coming months, a slew of legal and procedural processes are expected to play out ahead of Joseph Corcoran’s scheduled execution on Dec. 18. Amid a surge of executions being carried out across the country, Indiana’s first death row inmate in more than a decade is scheduled to meet the same fate before the end of the year, barring a final act of clemency at the discretion of Gov. Eric Holcomb. Joseph Corcoran, who killed four people in 1997, was ordered by the Indiana Supreme Court last month to be executed Dec. 18.