Will the Supreme Court Kill The Death Penalty This Term?

Will the U.S. Supreme Court add the fate of the death penalty to a term already fraught with hot-button issues like partisan gerrymandering, warrantless surveillance, and a host of contentious First Amendment disputes?
That’s the hope of an ambitious Supreme Court petition seeking to abolish the ultimate punishment. But it runs headlong into the fact that only two justices have squarely called for a reexamination of the death penalty’s constitutionality.
Abel Hidalgo challenges Arizona’s capital punishment system—which sweeps too broadly, he says, because the state’s “aggravating factors” make 99 percent of first-degree murderers death-eligible—as well as the death penalty itself, arguing it’s cruel and unusual punishment.
He’s represented by former acting U.S. Solicitor General Neal Katyal—among the most successful Supreme Court practitioners last term. Hidalgo also has the support of several outside groups who filed amicus briefs on his behalf, notably one from a group including Ari…

The lucrative business of pardoning death row prisoners in Saudi Arabia

Medieval and barbaric: Public execution in Saudi Arabia
Medieval and barbaric: Public execution in Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia has one of the highest execution rates in the world. However, in some cases, inmates facing the death penalty are spared if the victim's family agrees to pardon their crimes ... in exchange for a large sum of money. This practice, known as "diya", has become a dirty, if lucrative, business.

"Diya" is an Islamic concept that essentially equates to "a blood price", or, the amount of money that a murderer (or his family) must pay the family of the victim in order to obtain a pardon.

A video, which was filmed by a passerby on Sunday, March 26, shows an inmate who is on the verge of being beheaded in a public square in Taef, a town located in western Saudi Arabia.

Suddenly, however, a wave of excitement goes through the crowd: the execution has been pushed back because the family of the victim just agreed to negotiate a pardon for the condemned man. The victim's family can make this decision up until the very last second, sometimes waiting until then to announce a decision that was made much earlier.

The execution is put off for 3 months, which is the amount of time that his family has to raise the sum demanded by the victim's family. That's when the mediators step in.

"Mediators encourage the families to ask for astronomical sums of money" 

Mohammad Alsaeedi lives in Qatif, in eastern Saudi Arabia. He has attended public executions before and is a community activist for human rights.

When a family is seeking a pardon for a son who has been convicted of murdering someone, they start by speaking to a mediator. Mediators are usually public figures, a religious leader or sometimes a local emir.

The mediator's 1st task is to convince the victim's family to accept the idea of a pardon. Once the victim's family has declared that they are open to the idea, the negotiations with the killer's family start.

Mediators tend to encourage the victims' families to ask for astronomical sums of money - sometimes as much as 60 million rials [about 15 million euros]. They have a vested interest in doing so, as they get a cut of this money.

In the large majority of cases, the family of the convicted person doesn't have the means to pay that much, so the mediator helps them to launch a fundraising campaign. All of the money raised is funnelled into a bank account that is opened by the local administration with the authorisation of the interior minister.

The mediators are responsible for campaigning for donations from rich businessmen and the most influential tribes in the region.

Fundraising campaigns are also shared widely on social media under the hashtag #?save a life.

It's also common for tribes to organise ceremonies and charity dinners to convince the region's wealthiest and most influential people to donate to the campaign.

A video, which was posted on March 18, 2017, shows a fundraising ceremony organised by a tribe to raise money to buy the pardon of a man accused of killing his brother-in-law during a fight. The programme for the event included tea, traditional dances and, of course, the handing over of cheques.

Saudi law forbids people from promoting fundraising campaigns both in traditional media and on social media. However, Twitter is full of this kind of advertising.

Moreover, a royal decree from 2011 fixes the diya at 400,000 rials [equivalent to about 100,000 euros]. But very few families follow this guideline [in Saudi Arabia, royal decrees aren't obligatory].

For the past few years, it's like there's been a morbid competition to ask for higher and higher diyas. It's become a business. Many families aren't thinking about the virtues of Islam when they offer to pardon someone, they are thinking about the huge amount of money that they could get by doing so.

"Authorities should fix a ceiling for the diya"

The people who are responsible for this situation are the mediators. They are the ones who push families to ask for outrageous sums because they earn a commission from it. They are opportunists who make fortunes off the backs of dead people. Saudi authorities should closely monitor and control this practice. They should start by fixing a ceiling for the diya.

The worst is that once a murderer has been pardoned, he is allowed to leave prison after a few months or even weeks. He ends up serving an extremely light sentence for his crime. I think that creates a situation of rampant impunity for those who can pay.

However, in November 2016, the Saudi Supreme Court did rule that when people convicted of murder are pardoned, judges should commute their sentence to prison terms of at least 5 years.

"A pardon doesn't mean the crime should go unpunished"

In an opinion piece published on the news site Al Riyadh, Abderrahmane Allahem, a lawyer who specialises in human rights in Saudi Arabia, says that 5 years isn't enough for a convicted murderer.

I'm not against the idea of pardons. However, in the case of a death penalty pardon, the court should commute the murderer's sentence to at least 25 years in prison. A pardon doesn't mean the crime should go unpunished. (...)

What's more, the fact that a murderer can be freed so quickly could be a danger for society. Failing to punish a murderer is like depreciating the value of human life.

For the past few months, there have been an increasing number of appeals from lawyers, intellectuals and religious leaders for the government to ban "blood negotiators". For the time being, that has yet to happen.

Source: france24.com, Mohammad Alsaeedi, April 5, 2017

⚑ | Report an error, an omission, a typo; suggest a story or a new angle to an existing story; submit a piece, a comment; recommend a resource; contact the webmaster, contact us: deathpenaltynews@gmail.com.

Opposed to Capital Punishment? Help us keep this blog up and running! DONATE!

Most Viewed (Last 7 Days)

Execution date set for Missouri inmate with rare condition

Iran: Prisoner Hanged in Public

Cruel and Unusual: A Second Failed Execution in Ohio

Record 11 Taiwanese sentenced to death in Indonesia for drug crimes

Will the Supreme Court Kill The Death Penalty This Term?

No Second Chances: What to Do After a Botched Execution

Former Virginia death row inmate Joseph Giarratano granted parole

South Carolina's 1st execution in 6 years set for Dec. 1

UAE: Man who raped, killed eight-year-old boy Obaida executed

Charles Manson Was Sentenced to Death. Why Wasn't He Executed?