No Second Chances: What to Do After a Botched Execution

Ohio tried and failed to execute Alva Campbell. The state shouldn't get a second chance.
The pathos and problems of America's death penalty were vividly on display yesterday when Ohio tried and failed to execute Alva Campbell. Immediately after its failure Gov. John Kasich set June 5, 2019, as a new execution date.
This plan for a second execution reveals a glaring inadequacy in the legal standards governing botched executions in the United States.
Campbell was tried and sentenced to die for murdering 18-year-old Charles Dials during a carjacking in 1997. After Campbell exhausted his legal appeals, he was denied clemency by the state parole board and the governor.
By the time the state got around to executing Campbell, he was far from the dangerous criminal of 20 years ago. As is the case with many of America's death-row inmates, the passage of time had inflicted its own punishments.
The inmate Ohio strapped onto the gurney was a 69-year-old man afflicted with serious ailm…

Philippines: House starts debate on death penalty bill

President Rodrigo Duterte
President Rodrigo Duterte
The House of Representatives sub-committee on judicial reforms on Wednesday tackled the bill on death penalty amid the administration's push to revive capital punishment as a deterrent to crime.

The subcommittee under the House justice committee tackled the seven bills restoring death penalty, including the principal bill filed by Speaker Pantaleon Alvarez under House Bill 1, which seeks to repeal the law abolishing death penalty.

Subcommittee chairperson Leyte Rep. Vicente "Ching" Veloso, a former Court of Appeals justice, in an interview said he personally supported the restoration of death penalty as an effective deterrent to crime.

Veloso however denied that Alvarez gave the marching orders for the committee to railroad the bill.

Alvarez earlier vowed that the restoration of death penalty would be approved before the December break.

Volunteers Against Crime and Corruption President Dante Jimenez maintained that previous administrations only failed to ensure that death penalty is a deterrent to crime.

"The argument that it is not a deterrent to crime is misleading. The factor of death penalty is clear in history, even martial years and during Marcos years, and in drug trafficking due to capital punishment, when drug lords are publicly executed, sending a chilling signal to hardened criminals and offenders to keep off from illegal activities," Jimenez said.

But Albay Rep. Edcel Lagman, who was among the lawmakers who pushed for the abolition of death penalty in 2006, became irked when Jimenez gave an unresponsive answer to a question.

When Lagman asked Jimenez if he knows that death penalty has been in place since the dawn of civilization, Jimenez answered: "I don't know, I was born in 1952."

"I will not further question this witness for that kind of answer," Lagman said.

After being reprimanded by the committee, Jimenez said he was only answering candidly the question of Lagman.

He appealed that the committee understand his position on death penalty, citing the death of his brother by drug syndicates in 1990 supposedly due to mistaken identity.

"If I offended the congressman, I'm sorry, and I hope you will understand my position here," Jimenez said.

The committee called for an adjournment after Lagman gave a silent treatment to Jimenez.

"I only understand the position of resource person if he answers responsively," Lagman said, before the hearing adjourned until next week Tuesday.

It was Speaker Alvarez who first filed the bill seeking to reimpose death penalty after former President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo abolished capital punishment in 2006 for its failure to deter crime.

Alvarez filed the bill to reinstate death penalty, pursuant to President Rodrigo Duterte's campaign promise of returning capital punishment against heinous criminals.

Alvarez's bill sought to reimpose death penalty on heinous crimes listed under Republic Act 7659, including murder, plunder, rape, kidnapping and serious illegal detention, sale, use and possession of illegal drugs, carnapping with homicide, among others.

In the bill he co-authored with deputy speaker Capiz Rep. Fredenil Castro, Alvarez said there is a need to reimpose death penalty because "the national crime rate has grown to such alarming proportions requiring an all-out offensive against all forms of felonious acts."

"Philippine society is left with no option but to deal with certain grievous offenders in a manner commensurate to the gravity, perversity, atrociousness and repugnance of their crimes," according to the bill.

Duterte had won the elections in a campaign promise to restore death penalty by hanging, even making a snide remark that the convicts' head should be severed from the hanging. Alvarez said Congress would look into the cheapest way for death penalty, either by firing squad, lethal injection, or by hanging.

Source: Philippine Inquirer, November 9, 2016

⚑ | Report an error, an omission; suggest a story or a new angle to an existing story; send a submission; recommend a resource; contact the webmaster, contact us: deathpenaltynews@gmail.com.

Opposed to Capital Punishment? Help us keep this blog up and running! DONATE!

Most Viewed (Last 7 Days)

Ohio: Alva Campbell execution delayed indefinitely

Here's as Crazy a Death Penalty Story as You'll Find

Nevada releases detailed manual on how it plans to execute death row inmate

A Travelling Executioner

No Second Chances: What to Do After a Botched Execution

Ohio: Alva Campbell will get wedge-shaped pillow for execution; his death could become a “spectacle”

Nevada death row inmate placed on suicide watch

Too Old and Too Sick to Execute? No Such Thing in Ohio.

Arizona: Man sentenced to death in 2011 death of 10-year-old locked in storage box

Ohio transfers sick inmate to death house ahead of execution