Skip to main content

Bali Nine: Joko Widodo 'open to views on executions,' says Jakarta's governor

Indonesian President Joko Widodo
Kerobokan, Bali: Jakarta's governor has told an Indonesian media outlet that the country's President Joko Widodo is "considering different views" on the death penalty, including advice that it should be removed from Indonesia's laws.

Basuki Tjahaja Purnama, better known as Ahok, was Mr Joko's deputy for two years at city hall, and succeeded Mr Joko as governor when he became president.

Visiting a prison in Jakarta on Saturday, Ahok revealed he had told the president he believes the death penalty should be removed from Indonesia's laws and replaced with life in jail without remission.

"If from inside (jail) they're still controlling drugs, then execute them immediately that day," Ahok was quoted by local news website detik.com as saying.

"But if people want to change, give them a chance to live. Maybe he can make other people more aware instead of punishing him with death ... I don't agree with the death penalty."

The governor's comments come days away from the planned transfer of Australians Myuran Sukumaran and Andrew Chan to the island where Indonesia is set to execute them, together with eight other drug offenders.

Bali's chief prosecutor has said they could be taken from their cells in Kerobokan as soon as Sunday and taken to one of several jails on Nusakambangan, known as Indonesia's Alcatraz.

The head of Central Java corrections, Ahmad Yaspahruddin, also confirmed to Fairfax that Nusakambangan would be ready to accept prisoners today.


Source: The Sydney Morning Herald, March 1, 2015 (local time)


Widodo's mate begs him to show mercy

Tony Abbott, Joko Widodo
Indonesian President Joko Widodo's close friend and current Jakarta Governor has delivered a strong anti death penalty argument to the President saying he disagrees with the death penalty for drug traffickers because they can change and be rehabilitated.

Governor Basuki Tjahaja Purnama, popularly known as Ahok, conveyed his views to the President, whom he says is careful and considerate when it comes to taking advice and making decisions.

Ahok was the President's deputy governor for 2 years when Jokowi, as he is known, was the Governor of Jakarta.

The pair are known to be close and Ahok's advice adds significant weight to Andrew Chan and Myuran Sukumaran's bid to be spared the firing squad because of their remarkable rehabilitation in jail.

Ahok, a powerful figure in Jakarta, reportedly made the comments on Saturday during a visit to the Pondok Bambu Prison in East Jakarta.

Chan and Sukumaran, who have reformed and set up a series of rehabilitation programs inside Kerobokan jail in Bali, face imminent execution after the President rejected their clemency pleas and ordered the execution of all drug traffickers.

The central point of their clemency and an appeal in a Jakarta court is that their rehabilitation should be taken into account when considering their bid for a pardon

"I do not agree with the death sentence. They have an opportunity to be a better person," Ahok said of convicted drug criminals, quoted by Indonesian newspaper Kompas.

He told reporters that the sentence for drug criminals should be a life sentence without remission and they should be tightly supervised.

Ahok said that the death sentence only deserved to be given to criminals nabbed for consuming drugs in jail.

"If they still control drugs inside (the prison), they should be executed directly on that day. But if they want to change, give (them) the opportunity to live. Maybe he or she can help other people's awareness of their faults rather than executing them," Ahok said.

Ahok said he did not agree with the death penalty for drugs but agreed if it was a sadistic murderer.

"This is my opinion about human rights. I delivered it to Mr President. I know that he is careful and correct in listening to all suggestions. This is my experience with him," Ahok said.

He did not elaborate on the President's response to his suggestion.

The strong anti death penalty comments come as President Widodo reportedly said the executions of Chan and Sukumaran would go ahead despite his conversation last week with Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott.

"Our position is clear. Our laws cannot be interfered with," the President told Jakarta business newspaper Kontan in answer to a question about the Abbott phone call.

Mr Abbott had earlier said that his Indonesian counterpart was "carefully considering" his position.

Chan and Sukumaran were on Saturday visited in jail by their families as their fate hangs in the balance. They are among 10 drug traffickers, 9 of them foreigners, who face imminent execution on Nusa Kambangan prison island, off the coast of Central Java.

While paramilitary police held a dress rehearsal of their transfer from Bali to Java on Friday, the Attorney General has yet to set a date for their move and execution.

Source: news.com.au, February 28, 2015

Report an error, an omission: deathpenaltynews@gmail.com

Most viewed (Last 7 days)

Gov. Mike DeWine calls for Ohio to abolish the death penalty

COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — Gov. Mike DeWine Tuesday morning called on Ohio to abolish the death penalty, citing data that he said proves it is no longer a deterrent to violent crime. “For the state to take a human life, there must, in my opinion, there must be evidence that in doing so it will help protect the public, that the threat of that action will deter someone from committing murder,” DeWine said. “I do not believe that argument today can be successfully made.” DeWine cited data showing a decline in the last four decades of executions being carried out and an increase in the time inmates spend on death row.

I watched Ohio's last execution. Here's what it was like

As Gov. DeWine calls for Ohio to end capital punishment, the state’s last execution remains the one I witnessed in 2018 Inside Ohio's death house, there is a room for executions and separate witness rooms: one for those connected to the victim and another for those connected to the inmate. Windows separate the death chamber from those watching, the condemned from the living. I was there on July 18, 2018 – during Ohio’s most recent execution. Robert Van Hook was put to death that day for killing David Self in 1985. He sat on death row for three decades. I was one of three media witnesses to the execution.

Kansas AG urges governor to deny clemency to 8 sentenced to death

TOPEKA — Attorney General Kris Kobach on Tuesday urged the governor to deny clemency to Kansas inmates who have been sentenced to death. Eight of nine people sentenced to death in Kansas formally filed clemency requests in May, according to a press release from the Attorney General’s Office. Kobach urged Gov. Laura Kelly to reject them.

20 Minutes to Death: Witness to the Last Execution in France

The following document is a firsthand account of the final moments of Hamida Djandoubi, a convicted murderer executed by guillotine at Marseille’s Baumettes Prison on September 10, 1977. The record—dated September 9—was written by Monique Mabelly, a judge appointed by the state to witness the proceedings. Djandoubi’s execution would ultimately be the last carried out in France before capital punishment was abolished in 1981. At the time, President Valéry Giscard d'Estaing—who had publicly voiced his "deep aversion to the death penalty" prior to his election—rejected Djandoubi’s appeal for clemency. Choosing to let "justice take its course," the President allowed the execution to proceed, just as he had in two previous cases during his term:   Christian Ranucci , executed on July 28, 1976 and Jérôme Carrein , executed on June 23, 1977. Hamida Djandoubi , a Tunisian national, was sentenced to death for killing his former lover, Elisabeth Bousquet. He was execu...

New Mississippi billboard warns criminals: ‘Firing squad is legal’

DESOTO COUNTY, Miss. (WREG) — A billboard standing on Interstate 55 southbound as you cross the Tennessee state line and enter Mississippi from Memphis is sending a grim message to those coming into the state. DeSoto County District Attorney Matthew Barton recently announced the new billboard campaign, which features the sign reading, “WELCOME TO MISSISSIPPI. WHERE THE FIRING SQUAD IS LEGAL. THINK TWICE.” It references Mississippi’s law permitting execution by firing squad under certain circumstances for inmates sentenced to death. Barton says this campaign is aimed at deterring violent crime and sends a direct message to criminals entering Mississippi.

SCOTUS: Alabama can’t execute Jeffery Lee by nitrogen; Thursday execution called off

After a week of legal volleyball, Alabama death row inmate Jeffery Lee’s execution—scheduled for Thursday evening—was called off after federal courts called the state’s nitrogen gas execution method “likely unconstitutional.” The state took the fight to the U.S. Supreme Court, hoping Lee could still be put to death tonight.  In an order issued at 8:10 p.m., the U.S. Supreme Court ordered that it would not lift a ban on Alabama executing Lee via nitrogen . In a short court order, the justices denied Alabama’s motion to go ahead with the execution.  Associate Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch would have granted the appeal and let the execution proceed, according to the order. 

With nitrogen gas blocked, Alabama seeks to execute inmate by lethal injection

Jeffery Lee, who successfully challenged his scheduled Thursday execution by nitrogen gas, argued that execution by firing squad would be less painful. The Alabama Attorney General’s Office Friday sought to put an Alabama death row inmate to death by lethal injection a day after the U.S. Supreme Court rebuffed the state’s attempt to execute him by nitrogen gas. In a filing with the Alabama Supreme Court Friday afternoon, the state sought an expedited motion to set a new execution date for Jeffery Lee, 49. The state said that with a permanent injunction in place against nitrogen gas, the method by which the state intended to execute Lee on Thursday, it could execute him by lethal injection or the electric chair.

Alabama | Judge bars nitrogen gas execution, says method is unconstitutionally cruel

MONTGOMERY, Ala. -- A federal judge on Tuesday permanently blocked Alabama from executing an inmate with nitrogen gas after declaring it violates the ban on cruel and unusual punishment. U.S. District Judge Emily Marks issued the ruling hours after an appeals court reversed her initial finding that the method was constitutional. Marks permanently enjoined the state from executing Jeffrey Lee, 49, by nitrogen gas. He was scheduled to be executed Thursday. The decision, for now, blocks the use of the controversial new execution method that the state has championed since 2024, but the issue will likely end up before the U.S. Supreme Court.

Idaho will soon turn to firing squad executions. Police will pull the triggers

Trained members of Idaho law enforcement with demonstrated firearms proficiency are expected to fill slots for carrying out the death penalty by firing squad as the state prison system transitions to the controversial execution method next month.  Six volunteers certified for no less than three years apiece through Peace Officer Standards and Training, or POST, will be recruited to ensure the Idaho Department of Correction is ready to comply with a state law that prioritizes shooting prisoners to death over lethal injection starting July 1.  No one on the team may have faced disciplinary action over firearms, use of force, or related conduct over the prior year, according to new execution protocols the prison system released this week. 

Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch wanted an execution that a Trump judge deemed illegal

The Supreme Court these days is generally in the business of helping executions go forward. But on Thursday night, the court did something notable: It told Alabama no. Even then, the court wasn't unanimous. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch dissented from the refusal to let the nitrogen gas execution of Jeffery Lee proceed. What prompted the rare rejection? In line with the typical shadow docket practice, the court didn't explain itself. Nor did the dissenters, who merely noted their disagreement. But a deeper look at the case helps us understand why a majority of the court was unwilling to help the state this time.