FEATURED POST

Arkansas Supreme Court Decision Allows New DNA Testing in Case of the ​“West Memphis Three,” Convicted of Killing Three Children in 1993

Image
On April 18, 2024, the Arkansas Supreme Court decided 4-3 to reverse a 2022 lower court decision and allow genetic testing of crime scene evidence from the 1993 killing of three eight-year-old boys in West Memphis. The three men convicted in 1994 for the killings were released in 2011 after taking an Alford plea, in which they maintained their innocence but plead guilty to the crime, in exchange for 18 years’ time served and 10 years of a suspended sentence. 

Capital punishment and our common values: The European view

The execution of Lady Jane Grey
(London, 12 February 1554)
It is generally assumed the United States and the European Union share the same values. No important speech on both sides of the Atlantic can do without a reference to those common values such as democracy, adherence to the rule of law and human rights. Therefore, it is even more distressing that capital punishment continues to be imposed in the United States. Since its reintroduction in 1976, more than 1,200 people have been executed. According to opinion polls the mainstream of Americans still favors the death penalty. Yet, Europeans — together with a majority of states around the world — have abolished it.

For us, the death penalty is too inhuman and degrading a punishment for any human being. It has been proven over and over again that the death penalty does not make a society more secure, nor does it ensure heinous crimes are not committed. Moreover, as erring is human, the number of innocent persons having been executed or falsely sentenced to death is truly substantial. In the U.S. alone — despite its elaborate judicial system — more than 90 persons have been cleared of all charges after having received initial death sentences.

Europeans believe the elimination of the death penalty is fundamental to the protection of human dignity. Human dignity is the core value of the Western, Judeo-Christian civilization with its humanistic tradition, which
we are proud of on both sides of the Atlantic. For Christians, the abolishment of the death penalty is a response to the divine commandment, "Thou shalt not kill." Capital punishment is not only appalling and inhuman, but also reflects a thinking of the past.

The ius talionis of ancient times ("an eye for an eye") should clearly no longer serve as a guideline of punishing criminals in our times. It was, after all, an Austrian, Grand Duke Leopold who, for the 1st time in history, permanently abolished capital punishment in 18th century Tuscany. This abolition is celebrated annually on Nov. 30 in 300 cities worldwide as the Cities for Life Day.

In Europe, 46 of the 47 member states of the Council of Europe have abolished the death penalty. In fact, nowadays abolition of capital punishment is a requirement of membership both for the European Union and the Council of Europe. Europeans firmly believe it is not possible to accommodate capital punishment with a liberal and democratic constitution and human treatment of offenders. There never was and never will be a humane execution.

U.S. death sentences in cases involving foreigners who had been denied the right of access to consular support have led to a number of judgments and decisions by the International Court of Justice, finding the U.S. in breach of international law and requiring the United States to ensure that such support can be given in each of the U.S. states. In the past few years, several attempts to rectify this situation — by executive order of the president or legislation by Congress — have been undertaken, but have yet failed to result in a solution. While this continues to potentially jeopardize the prospects of defendants in US courts, it may also put at risk the security of U.S. citizens in countries that may consider treating them in their countries the same way their citizens are treated here. It thus appears that the continuation of this situation goes against fundamental U.S. interests.

Besides the more philosophical arguments, the real danger of mistrials resulting in the killing of innocent people, the costly procedure involving many courts and lasting many years, the possibility of a life without parole sentence could lead to a rethinking of the issue on this side of the Atlantic. After all, at present, as far as the numbers of executions are concerned, the U.S. finds itself in fifth place in the company of China, Iran, Saudi-Arabia and Pakistan.

The death penalty is not a necessity; favoring it is an attitude. Attitudes can be changed through education and leadership. We have seen this with regard to slavery, racism and anti-Semitism. But real leadership takes courageous persons. Fundamental values have to do with life and death. We should not take these issues lightly.

Source: Christian Prosl is the ambassador of Austria, a member state of the European Union; The Hill, August 18, 2010

Most Viewed (Last 7 Days)

Arkansas Supreme Court Decision Allows New DNA Testing in Case of the ​“West Memphis Three,” Convicted of Killing Three Children in 1993

Utah requests execution of death row inmate

Alabama SC approves second nitrogen gas execution

Cuba Maintains Capital Punishment to "Deter and Intimidate"

Four More Prisoners Executed in Iran