Skip to main content

Singapore: Harvesting organs from death row "donors"

Singapore's Changi Prison
Singapore's Changi Prison
In his 12 years of practice, urologist Dr Lim (not his real name) has harvested kidneys from death row inmates a total of 6 times.

As 1 of the 15 doctors in the Ministry of Health's renal transplant team, he is occasionally rostered for duty whenever there are cadaveric kidneys to be harvested.

While most of the kidneys come from brain-dead stroke patients in hospitals, members of the renal transplant team are sometimes required to make a trip to Changi Prison to harvest the kidneys of a prisoner to be hanged.

The harvesting is a voluntary service and doctors do not get paid, he said. If a doctor is not available, he will be replaced by another assigned by a transplant coordinator.

Since hangings at Changi Prison take place on Fridays at 6am sharp, the 2 renal transplant surgeons - a junior and senior doctor rostered - will have to be at the prison by 5.30am.

Said Dr Lim, who was last rostered for duty a year ago: 'By 6am, the whole place will be very solemn and the gates will be closed. There is minimal movement in the prison complex. I'm not sure if this is out of respect for the person to be hanged.'

Also present will be the transplant coordinator and a team of nurses who would have with them the necessary surgical instruments.

If the prisoner wants to donate other organs, an eye doctor for the corneas, a plastic surgeon for the skin and an orthopaedic surgeon for the long bones will also be present.

While waiting for the hanging to take place, the group of doctors will wait in the prison cafeteria and have an early breakfast of roti prata and coffee, said Dr Lim.

Once the hanging has taken place, a flurry of activity will follow.

According to doctors, inmates who have been hanged must be pronounced dead and can be harvested for their organs only after cardiac death, or when their heart stops beating.

When this happens, blood and oxygen will no longer be circulating in the body and the organs will become damaged quickly. In hospitals, on the other hand, organs can be harvested after brain death.

Once the prison doctor has checked the inmate and pronounced him dead, the inmate will be taken from the noose, wrapped in a piece of cloth and put on a stretcher.

Prison guards will carry the body to an operating room nearby, a new feature in the new Changi prison complex.

Said Dr Lim: 'At the old Changi prison, we operated from an air-conditioned container room. It had two little operating tables, a changing area and a wash basin.'

Sometimes, when there is more than one hanging in the same morning, the doctors can be harvesting organs from 3 bodies at one go.

Once the body is laid on the operating table, the 2 urologists will be the first to 'rush in' because kidneys are most susceptible to damage, said Dr Lim. The heart and liver are usually not harvested as they get damaged very quickly after cardiac death.

The kidney surgeons are followed by the eye surgeon, then the plastic surgeon, and last will be the orthopaedic surgeon who will harvest the long bones, which are any of the several elongated bones from the limbs that contain marrow.

Said Dr Lim: 'Sometimes, the eye doctor will come in and we would harvest the organs simultaneously. There is a hive of activity in the operating room.'

He said he tries not to look at the face of the dead inmate when the face mask is removed. Most of the time, the face will look flushed from the hanging and sometimes, the tongue will stick out, he said.

Kidney surgeons are usually done extracting the organs within 20 minutes. The kidneys are individually and carefully packed into two ice boxes which are then passed to waiting courier vehicles. They are then delivered to the hospitals where the recipients will be waiting.

In the past, doctors had to deliver the kidneys to the hospitals themselves using their own cars, said Dr Lim.

'The junior doctor will usually be the driver. But we made noise. We have already done our job harvesting the kidneys and after that we still have to deliver them,' he said.

The courier service was brought in to perform the task about 2 years ago.

When asked if he was ever traumatised by the task of harvesting organs from death row donors, Dr Lim said: 'It is not a very difficult or complicated job. We are just like technicians, cutting and removing.'

No coercion


Prisoners on death row are not forced to donate their organs. Neither is the idea put to them by prison officers.

It is understood that those who request to donate their organs do so of their own initiative. The prison will then act as a facilitator. It will inform the health authorities about the prisoner's request, and the rest of the procedure will be arranged by the Ministry of Health.

Prisoners also have to declare which organs they wish to donate. The One-Eyed Dragon, for example, chose to donate his kidneys, liver and 1 good eye.

Source: Asia One, January 14, 2009

Comments

Most viewed (Last 7 days)

Gov. Mike DeWine calls for Ohio to abolish the death penalty

COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — Gov. Mike DeWine Tuesday morning called on Ohio to abolish the death penalty, citing data that he said proves it is no longer a deterrent to violent crime. “For the state to take a human life, there must, in my opinion, there must be evidence that in doing so it will help protect the public, that the threat of that action will deter someone from committing murder,” DeWine said. “I do not believe that argument today can be successfully made.” DeWine cited data showing a decline in the last four decades of executions being carried out and an increase in the time inmates spend on death row.

I watched Ohio's last execution. Here's what it was like

As Gov. DeWine calls for Ohio to end capital punishment, the state’s last execution remains the one I witnessed in 2018 Inside Ohio's death house, there is a room for executions and separate witness rooms: one for those connected to the victim and another for those connected to the inmate. Windows separate the death chamber from those watching, the condemned from the living. I was there on July 18, 2018 – during Ohio’s most recent execution. Robert Van Hook was put to death that day for killing David Self in 1985. He sat on death row for three decades. I was one of three media witnesses to the execution.

Kansas AG urges governor to deny clemency to 8 sentenced to death

TOPEKA — Attorney General Kris Kobach on Tuesday urged the governor to deny clemency to Kansas inmates who have been sentenced to death. Eight of nine people sentenced to death in Kansas formally filed clemency requests in May, according to a press release from the Attorney General’s Office. Kobach urged Gov. Laura Kelly to reject them.

20 Minutes to Death: Witness to the Last Execution in France

The following document is a firsthand account of the final moments of Hamida Djandoubi, a convicted murderer executed by guillotine at Marseille’s Baumettes Prison on September 10, 1977. The record—dated September 9—was written by Monique Mabelly, a judge appointed by the state to witness the proceedings. Djandoubi’s execution would ultimately be the last carried out in France before capital punishment was abolished in 1981. At the time, President Valéry Giscard d'Estaing—who had publicly voiced his "deep aversion to the death penalty" prior to his election—rejected Djandoubi’s appeal for clemency. Choosing to let "justice take its course," the President allowed the execution to proceed, just as he had in two previous cases during his term:   Christian Ranucci , executed on July 28, 1976 and Jérôme Carrein , executed on June 23, 1977. Hamida Djandoubi , a Tunisian national, was sentenced to death for killing his former lover, Elisabeth Bousquet. He was execu...

New Mississippi billboard warns criminals: ‘Firing squad is legal’

DESOTO COUNTY, Miss. (WREG) — A billboard standing on Interstate 55 southbound as you cross the Tennessee state line and enter Mississippi from Memphis is sending a grim message to those coming into the state. DeSoto County District Attorney Matthew Barton recently announced the new billboard campaign, which features the sign reading, “WELCOME TO MISSISSIPPI. WHERE THE FIRING SQUAD IS LEGAL. THINK TWICE.” It references Mississippi’s law permitting execution by firing squad under certain circumstances for inmates sentenced to death. Barton says this campaign is aimed at deterring violent crime and sends a direct message to criminals entering Mississippi.

SCOTUS: Alabama can’t execute Jeffery Lee by nitrogen; Thursday execution called off

After a week of legal volleyball, Alabama death row inmate Jeffery Lee’s execution—scheduled for Thursday evening—was called off after federal courts called the state’s nitrogen gas execution method “likely unconstitutional.” The state took the fight to the U.S. Supreme Court, hoping Lee could still be put to death tonight.  In an order issued at 8:10 p.m., the U.S. Supreme Court ordered that it would not lift a ban on Alabama executing Lee via nitrogen . In a short court order, the justices denied Alabama’s motion to go ahead with the execution.  Associate Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch would have granted the appeal and let the execution proceed, according to the order. 

With nitrogen gas blocked, Alabama seeks to execute inmate by lethal injection

Jeffery Lee, who successfully challenged his scheduled Thursday execution by nitrogen gas, argued that execution by firing squad would be less painful. The Alabama Attorney General’s Office Friday sought to put an Alabama death row inmate to death by lethal injection a day after the U.S. Supreme Court rebuffed the state’s attempt to execute him by nitrogen gas. In a filing with the Alabama Supreme Court Friday afternoon, the state sought an expedited motion to set a new execution date for Jeffery Lee, 49. The state said that with a permanent injunction in place against nitrogen gas, the method by which the state intended to execute Lee on Thursday, it could execute him by lethal injection or the electric chair.

Alabama | Judge bars nitrogen gas execution, says method is unconstitutionally cruel

MONTGOMERY, Ala. -- A federal judge on Tuesday permanently blocked Alabama from executing an inmate with nitrogen gas after declaring it violates the ban on cruel and unusual punishment. U.S. District Judge Emily Marks issued the ruling hours after an appeals court reversed her initial finding that the method was constitutional. Marks permanently enjoined the state from executing Jeffrey Lee, 49, by nitrogen gas. He was scheduled to be executed Thursday. The decision, for now, blocks the use of the controversial new execution method that the state has championed since 2024, but the issue will likely end up before the U.S. Supreme Court.

Idaho will soon turn to firing squad executions. Police will pull the triggers

Trained members of Idaho law enforcement with demonstrated firearms proficiency are expected to fill slots for carrying out the death penalty by firing squad as the state prison system transitions to the controversial execution method next month.  Six volunteers certified for no less than three years apiece through Peace Officer Standards and Training, or POST, will be recruited to ensure the Idaho Department of Correction is ready to comply with a state law that prioritizes shooting prisoners to death over lethal injection starting July 1.  No one on the team may have faced disciplinary action over firearms, use of force, or related conduct over the prior year, according to new execution protocols the prison system released this week. 

Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch wanted an execution that a Trump judge deemed illegal

The Supreme Court these days is generally in the business of helping executions go forward. But on Thursday night, the court did something notable: It told Alabama no. Even then, the court wasn't unanimous. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch dissented from the refusal to let the nitrogen gas execution of Jeffery Lee proceed. What prompted the rare rejection? In line with the typical shadow docket practice, the court didn't explain itself. Nor did the dissenters, who merely noted their disagreement. But a deeper look at the case helps us understand why a majority of the court was unwilling to help the state this time.