After acquittal of ex-death row inmate, debate needed on Japan's death penalty

Japan should be ensuring the safety of its citizens, but instead it is taking people's lives. Is it acceptable to maintain the ultimate penalty under such circumstances? This is a serious question for society.

The acquittal of 88-year-old Iwao Hakamada, who had been handed the death penalty, has been finalized after prosecutors decided not to appeal the verdict issued by the Shizuoka District Court during his retrial.

Considering the purpose of the retrial system of providing relief to the innocent, this response is only natural. But Japanese prosecutor-general Naomi Unemoto took the rare step of releasing a statement expressing "strong dissatisfaction" with the finalized ruling, which recognized that investigative authorities fabricated evidence in Hakamada's case.

It was apparent authorities were trying to save face until the end, suggesting that they are not taking seriously their responsibility for producing false charges. Police and public prosecutors should deeply reflect on the matter and immediately launch a probe to unravel the truth behind the unjust investigation.

False charges threatening people's lives

The latest incident brought into relief problems with Japan's death penalty system.

Hakamada spent 34 years incarcerated on death row over the murder of a family of four in eastern Japan's Shizuoka Prefecture. If the death penalty had been carried out there would have been no way to reverse the miscarriage of justice.

"It’s strange when they near your cell. You lose all your strength as if a rope is dragging it out of you. Then the footsteps stop in front of another solitary confinement cell and when you hear the sound of the key turning, you feel relieved."

— Sakae Menda, who was wrongfully convicted of a double-homicide and sentenced
to death in 1949, but was later exonerated by retrial in 1983.
This was the first time anyone was ever released from death row by retrial in Japan.

In the 1980s in Japan there were four similar cases in which people handed the death penalty were found not guilty during retrials. There have also been cases where the validity of convictions was contested even after the death penalty was carried out.

Errors are inevitable even during trials as long as humans are evolved in the process. The danger of putting innocent people to death cannot be eliminated.

Even today, potential sources of false charges, such as forced confessions during investigations and preconceived assumptions remain deep-rooted.

After the death penalty was finalized, Hakamada had to live in constant fear of being executed. Under such circumstances he became mentally ill and even after his release he has had difficulty communicating with others around him.

It was in 1948, soon after the end of World War II, that Japan's Supreme Court ruled the death penalty was constitutional. It ruled that executions did not fall under "cruel punishments" forbidden by Article 36 of the Constitution. At the same time, one judge gave a supplementary opinion stating that it could become unconstitutional if public sentiment changed with the times.

Abolition of the death penalty is a global trend. According to one international nongovernmental organization specializing in human rights, 144 countries are now without the death penalty, including countries that have suspended it. The countries that maintain it, located predominantly in the Middle East and Asia, are the minority.

"The acquittal of Hakamada should be turned into an opportunity to deepen debate with a view to abolishing the death penalty."

In 1989 the United Nations adopted the Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, aiming to abolish the death penalty. Since 2007, the U.N. has repeatedly passed resolutions calling on countries that maintain the death penalty to suspend executions.

Countries develop their own criminal justice systems, but respect for human rights is a universal principle that transcends national frameworks. Life is the foundation of human rights. The abolition of the death penalty is based on the idea that this right must no be infringed on, even by a state.

As for the reason Japan maintains the death penalty, successive justice ministers have stated that "the majority of the public thinks that the death penalty is unavoidable for extremely malicious and violent crimes, and that there remains no end to heinous crimes." Indeed, during a public opinion poll the government conducted in 2019, 80% responded that the death penalty "cannot be helped." However, 35% of respondents said they would support its abolishment if life sentences that incarcerated people for the rest of their natural lives were introduced.

Considering full-scale debate in the Diet

It is necessary to take victims' sentiment on punishment seriously. The feelings of bereaved families whose precious families and loved ones have been murdered, prompting them to call for the perpetrators to pay with their lives, are understandable.

On the other hand, there are families who have ongoing dialogue with the perpetrators to know the truth of the crimes.

Support for the victims of crimes, such as help rebuilding their lives and mental care, must be enhanced separately from punishment of those responsible for the crimes.

Chuo University professor Makoto Ida, a criminal law scholar who has served as head of the Justice Ministry's Legislative Council, emphasized, "Punishment should be considered as a means to impose sanctions on those who violate social rules and to maintain order. It is difficult to justify taking an individual's life for the public good."

Problems with the operation of the death penalty system itself have been pointed out. People on death row are severely restricted from contact with those in the outside world. Moreover, they are not informed of their date of execution until the day in question, and the fear of death continues throughout their incarceration. There is no time for them to say goodbye to family members.

Public opportunities to gain information on the death penalty are limited. The Japanese government does not disclose the decision-making process surrounding executions, such as the timing and who is involved, or provide detailed circumstances on implementation of the penalty.

A Diet members' caucus has undertaken activities to put an end to the death penalty, and in the past, a bill to abolish the death penalty was proposed. But no full-scale discussion has taken place.

It is necessary to create a forum in the Diet to review the death penalty system. The acquittal of Hakamada should be turned into an opportunity to deepen debate with a view to abolishing the death penalty.

↪ Japanese version

Source: mainichi.jp, Staff, October 15, 2024

_____________________________________________________________________

Twitter/X | Instagram | Telegram | Contact Us

"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted."

— Oscar Wilde

USA | What happens in the final weeks before an execution? These reporters were inside the room.

The journalists behind ‘The Last 12 Weeks’ earned extraordinary access to a death penalty defense team—and faced difficult ethical choices Many defense lawyers are naturally cagey. They work in a pressure cooker, protecting their clients’ rights while fighting for the best possible outcome. And arguably, the stakes can’t get any higher than trying to save a client’s life. So no, defense lawyers don’t usually invite journalists into strategy meetings. But that’s what happened when Marshall Project reporter Maurice Chammah and Serial Productions senior producer Alvin Melathe spent the final few months before a Texas execution embedded with a capital defense team.

North Korea | 'I was only 9': North Korean defector recalls childhood memory of public execution

Kim Eun-joo was 9 years old when her teacher stopped their lesson and told the class to follow her outside. The children were marched to a public execution ground in North Korea. “I would cry even when our family dog died,” Kim said in a recent interview with The Korea Times. “But the first time I watched humans killing a human, I had no words for what I was feeling. It was the most brutal scene I have ever seen, in any movie or in real life.” The memory has stayed with her ever since. Now a human rights advocate after defecting from North Korea, Kim recently brought that childhood scene to the 9th World Congress Against the Death Penalty in Paris, where North Korea’s use of public executions and capital punishment was officially placed on the agenda for the first time.

19 July 1943 | Auschwitz's Largest Public Hanging: 12 Polish Prisoners Executed in Escape Reprisal

OSWIECIM, Poland — The SS carried out the largest public hanging in Auschwitz history on July 19, 1943, executing 12 Polish prisoners before other inmates as collective punishment for escapes and civilian contacts. The victims, all from the camp’s surveyors’ labor unit, were hanged on gallows built in front of the camp kitchen during an Auschwitz I roll call. The SS orchestrated this reprisal following prisoner escapes from the surveyors’ detail and unauthorized communication between inmates and civilians. Camp authorities used the recent escapes as a pretext to impose collective punishment.

Former Florida cop to be executed on same day as 80-year-old Pasco man

In an unprecedented move in the modern history of capital punishment, Gov. Ron DeSantis on Tuesday cleared the way for 2 executions to occur on the same day. DeSantis reset the execution of James Duckett, whose execution earlier this year was stayed amid efforts to secure DNA testing and analysis of evidence in his case. Duckett’s execution was reset for July 28. That is the same day previously set for the execution of Dominick Occhicone. Court records indicate that Duckett’s execution is scheduled for noon. Occhicone’s is set to follow at 6 p.m.

Texas: The inmates who refused to die quietly and had to be gassed out of their cells before execution

Former crime reporter Michelle Lyons, who witnessed nearly 300 executions in Texas, US, reveals the desperate acts of death row prisoners who refused to accept their fate After spending years or often decades locked up in a tiny cell for 23 hours a day, most Death Row inmates go willingly to their executions. However, some refuse to die quietly - with officers forced to gas them out of cells, strap up their heads and even give chase across prison grounds. Michelle Lyons, who has witnessed nearly 300 executions in Texas, US, exclusively tells Sun Online how certain inmates "fight like hell" in their last moments. On most occasions, Michelle watched from the witness area, with the killers already on the gurney - the stretcher where they'd be given a lethal injection. Seven prisoners once tried to escape from the Row in Huntsville - with one shoving magazines and newspapers under his clothes to help him roll over razor-wire fences. Others have had to b...

Japan: Capital punishment for a minor

Death chamber at Tokyo Detention Center The Supreme Court's recent decision to uphold the death sentence given in a lay judge trial to a 24-year-old man for murders he committed when he was a minor raises questions about the lay judge trial system and capital punishment. These include whether the lay judges correctly understood the spirit of the Juvenile Law in sentencing the defendant to death. It was the 1st death sentence handed down on a minor in a lay judge trial. The murders took place in Ishinomaki, Miyagi Prefecture, in 2010 when Yutaro Chiba was 18 - meaning he fell under the purview of the Juvenile Law. Chiba was convicted of entering his ex-girlfriend's house and stabbing to death the girl's sister and a female friend of the girl with a butcher knife, seriously injuring a male friend of the sister and abducting the girl. Prosecutors said Chiba killed the victims because they were trying to separate him and his former girlfriend. Since Chiba pleaded n...

Florida to execute William Silvia for 2006 shooting murder of wife

William Silvia, convicted of the 2006 shooting murder of his wife, Patricia, is scheduled to die by lethal injection in August, according to a death warrant filed by Gov. Ron DeSantis on July 17. If all previously scheduled executions go as planned, Silvia will be the 13th person put to death in Florida this year, following a record-breaking 19 executions in 2025. Silvia, now 61, went to his estranged wife's mother's house in Seminole County to attempt to reconcile with her, but first he calmly bought a 12-gauge shotgun and ammunition, prosecutors said. After talking to Patricia Silvia, Silvia got the shotgun from his truck, shot her mother, Betty Woodard, in the face, and fatally shot Patricia in the head, court records show. Woodard, who was standing in front of her daughter, lost her left eye and the top portion of her nose.

Florida executes Dennis Sochor

Man, 74, becomes oldest inmate executed in Florida in state’s 10th lethal injection this year Florida put to death one of its oldest prisoners in its history on Tuesday, a 74-year-old convicted murderer who was 1 of 3 older inmates scheduled for execution within the span of a month in the nation’s busiest death penalty state. Dennis Sochor was pronounced dead at 6:16 p.m. following a 3-drug injection at Florida State Prison near Starke, the office of Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis said. He was convicted of killing a woman on Jan. 1, 1982, just hours after meeting her at a New Year’s Eve party.

Oldest inmate set to be executed in Florida will face strict spending limit for final meal

An entire category of food is also off-limits for final meal requests in Florida Florida is currently preparing to execute its oldest inmate later today (July 14), a 74-year-old convicted murderer who has been on death row since the 1980s—but his final meal will be limited by a strict budget. Dennis Sochor is scheduled to be put to death later today, making history as the oldest inmate to ever be executed in the state. The criminal, who has been on death row for nearly 40 years, will be administered the lethal three-drug injection, with the process due to begin at around 6pm.

Idaho | Death row prisoners sue over state's new firing squad

BOISE (Idaho Statesman) – Days after Idaho made the switch to a firing squad for executions, two Idaho death row prisoners next in line to be put to death sued the state prison system, saying its director withheld information about how she settled on the specifics for carrying out the method. Attorneys for prisoners Thomas Creech and Gerald Pizzuto filed suit this week in state district court against Idaho Department of Correction Director Bree Derrick. In the filing, they called her approval of an updated standard operating procedure for the firing squad and lethal injection as a backup method “arbitrary, capricious, or an abuse of discretion and in excess of the statutory authority of the agency.”

Death Penalty News

Search This Blog