FEATURED POST

After acquittal of ex-death row inmate, debate needed on Japan's death penalty

Image
Japan should be ensuring the safety of its citizens, but instead it is taking people's lives. Is it acceptable to maintain the ultimate penalty under such circumstances? This is a serious question for society. The acquittal of 88-year-old Iwao Hakamada, who had been handed the death penalty, has been finalized after prosecutors decided not to appeal the verdict issued by the Shizuoka District Court during his retrial.

Sorry about your time on death row, pal. Nothing we can do.

If you’ve been wrongly convicted through prosecutorial misconduct, there are a few ways you can try to hold the government accountable. The most obvious way would be to sue the prosecutor himself. This is just short of impossible. Anything a prosecutor does in his official capacity is protected by absolute immunity — a mighty, nearly impenetrable shield created by the Supreme Court in the 1970s. Your best hope is if your prosecutor committed the misconduct while acting as an investigator — that is, while performing tasks more associated with policing than with prosecuting. If so, your prosecutor would then be protected “only” by the qualified immunity the courts have given to police. But even that is still a pretty high bar to clear.

You could also try to sue the municipality that employs your prosecutor. It’s called a Monell claim. But this, too, is difficult. You’ll have to show that not only did your prosecutor commit misconduct that violated your constitutional rights but there’s also a system-wide pattern or practice of misconduct in that particular jurisdiction. It isn’t enough merely to show that your prosecutor did this to you. You’ll likely to need to show that other prosecutors in the same office did similar things to other people.

Since judges and prosecutors probably aren’t going to open the files of other cases for you, winning a claim like this is likely to happen only once other people have already shown misconduct from the same office and, presumably, hadn’t yet found enough examples to establish a pattern. If the misconduct is bad and persistent enough, presumably at some point — a point that isn’t really clear but appears to be wholly up to the subjective interpretation of whatever federal judge happen to hear your case — enough people will have shown enough misconduct to establish a pattern. Provided you include them all in your claim. But no matter how many cases come after, those people who filed first, and lost, probably won’t get to have their cases heard again.


Source: Radley Balko, Opinion Blog, The Washington Post, April 2, 2014

Most Viewed (Last 7 Days)

Photos of maximum-security prisons in Norway and the US reveal the extremes of prison life

After acquittal of ex-death row inmate, debate needed on Japan's death penalty

Idaho death-row inmate survived injection intended to kill him. Now state will try again.

Switzerland | The Guillotine of Geneva

Texas Court of Criminal Appeals denies Robert Roberson’s stay of execution request

Wyoming | One of Matthew Shepard’s Murderers Denied Sentence Reduction

Activists Call on President Biden to End the Federal Death Penalty Before Leaving Office

Alabama set to tie record for executions in 50 years with upcoming lethal injection

Iran Executes 16 People in One Day Amid Surge in Death Penalties