U.S. Supreme Court: In Cory Maples Case, Scalia Is Only Justice to O.K. Capital Punishment Despite Mailroom Mix-Up

Capital punishment is a subject that has received a good deal of media play over the past month or so. In particular, the cases of Texas inmate Duane Buck, who was temporarily spared though a stay in execution, and Georgia inmate Troy Davis, who was killed even though a slew of evidence and witness reports that led to his conviction were later recanted, led to widespread discussions about the nation's application of the death penalty and the legal snags that can make or break a case.

The latest court battle surrounding capital punishment now involves a legal and moral question that has even puzzled the U.S. Supreme Court -- should a prisoner be executed because of a mail room mix-up?

The case in question involves Cory R. Maples, an Alabama death row inmate who is facing execution because two lawyers at a New York law firm handling his appeal left their firm without notifying Maples or the state of Alabama.

Maples was convicted of gunning down two friends after a night of heavy drinking in 1997, with a jury sentencing him to death with a 10-2 vote. Because Alabama is the only state that does not grant taxpayer funded legal assistance to death-row inmates seeking to challenge what happened at trial, when Maples appealed the death sentence he had local counsel acting in name only and was actually represented pro bono by two 2nd-year associates from the New York law firm Sullivan & Cromwell.

It seems like a lucky break, but it wasn't. Maples' lawyers, who associated themselves with an Alabama-licensed attorney, John Butler, Jr., as required by state law, initially filed a petition arguing that their client's death sentence should be overturned due to "ineffective assistance of counsel" at trial. 18 months later, a judge dismissed the petition and the court sent notice of the decision to all three lawyers. However, by that time, both of the New York attorneys had left Sullivan & Cromwell, leading the firm's mailroom to send the decision back to the Alabama court with "Return to Sender" written on the unopened envelope. The county clerk filed the envelope away without informing Butler it had been returned and subsequently Maples -- who thought he had three lawyers on his team but in fact didn't have any -- missed the 42-day deadline for filing another appeal. Eventually, the state sent a notice directly to Maples about his denied appeal.

Although Butler had also received a copy of the ruling, he reportedly did not do anything with it because he assumed Maples' New York team would handle it.

Reviewing courts all rejected Maples' request for an extension in the filing deadline, with the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals ruling that "any and all fault here lies with Maples for not filing a timely notice of appeal." Now, the U.S. Supreme Court must decide whether Maples' missed filing deadline can be excused if he was blameless and if the actions by the Alabama government were a contributing factor to the confusion.

The Supreme Court may have some extreme characters, but according to reports of the hearing, none of them want to be the person that says a man should be executed as a result of a mailing mistake... except Justice Antonin Scalia.

Most of the court seemed surprised at Alabama's decision to deny a man the right to appeal what is literally a life or death sentence when, according to Justice Samuel Alito, the mix up occurred "through no fault of his [Maples] own, through a series of very unusual and unfortunate circumstances."

Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor and Chief Justice John Roberts all questioned former U.S. Solicitor General Gregory Garre, who was hired to represent Maples, on whether the clerk of the court should have known that Butler was not substantively aiding Maples.

Scalia, on the other hand, could not get past the idea that Butler had no function in the case at all. He argued the "Return to Sender" stamp did not mean Maples' lawyers had abandoned him since it could have indicated the Alabama court had simply sent it to the wrong address. He also said that when a prosecutor mailed a letter directly to Maples in prison saying that he had lost his appeal, it wasn't a sign that his lawyers had abandoned him but an "extraneous volunteer statement to Maples."

Kagan, Roberts and Justice Anthony Kennedy also questioned whether the Alabama court should have been suspicious when Maples did not file his appeal since it is unusual for an inmate to not appeal a death penalty decision. Even Alabama Solicitor General John Neiman, when prompted by Kagan, admitted that if he had in the state's position and had the letter sent back unopened from the missing lawyers, he "suspects that in those circumstances I might well personally do something else."

Scalia, however, said there is nothing in the U.S. Constitution or federal rules of procedure that says an accused party has the right to judicial notice, noting that even in capital punishment cases, "Once you are in court and you have a lawyer, it's up to your lawyer to follow what goes on in the court."

That may be the point many Americans should take away from this case. Because, if Scalia is right, it means that in the U.S. court system, an accused party's only lifeline is with their attorney -- whether that attorney is competent or not. It means that even if a lawyer unceremoniously (and unprofessionally) drops a client, even one facing lethal injection, well ... that's just tough.

Source: International Business Times, October 6, 2011

Related articles:

Death Penalty News: A Dreadful Missed Deadline

Oct 05, 2011

Alabama is a step from executing Cory Maples for a reason so grievously wrong that the case argued Tuesday at the Supreme Court should leave no doubt why the death penalty should be abolished. Besides being barbaric ...

http://deathpenaltynews.blogspot.com/

Death Penalty News: U.S. Supreme Court to review on missed death ...

Mar 22, 2011

Lawyers at the firm, Sullivan & Cromwell, had agreed to represent Cory R. Maples, a death row inmate in Alabama, without charge. When an Alabama court sent two copies of a ruling in Mr. Maples's case to the firm in New ...

http://deathpenaltynews.blogspot.com/

Comments

Florida executes Andrew Richard Lukehart

Jacksonville man who killed his girlfriend’s 5-month-old baby in 1996 executed 30 years later A Jacksonville man who confessed to killing his girlfriend’s 5-month-old daughter and throwing her body in a pond 3 decades ago was executed on Tuesday evening. Andrew Richard Lukehart, 53, was scheduled to receive a 3-drug injection starting at 6 p.m. at Florida State Prison near Starke. He was sentenced to death after being convicted of aggravated child abuse and felony murder in the death of Gabrielle Hanshaw. The baby’s mother told News4JAX she plans to attend the execution.

US | Army lays groundwork for death row executions if Trump gives approval

The Army is preparing to carry out the executions of the military's four death-row inmates if ordered to do so by the president, according to an internal planning document reviewed by ABC News. If carried out, it would mark the first time the military executed convicted American inmates in more than a half-century The plan, dubbed "Operation Resolute Justice" and issued internally in February, directs Army officials to coordinate with the Federal Bureau of Prisons to transfer condemned prisoners from the U.S. Disciplinary Barracks at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, to the federal execution facility in Terre Haute, Indiana, where the Justice Department carried out a series of non-military federal executions during President Donald Trump's first term.

Oklahoma | Richard Glossip on Life After Decades on Death Row

In an exclusive interview at home in Oklahoma City, Glossip describes his first days of freedom in a world he hasn’t experienced for nearly 30 years. For three decades, Richard Glossip lived on concrete. First at the Oklahoma County jail, after his arrest for murder in 1997, and then in the underground bunker housing death row inmates at the Oklahoma State Penitentiary. As with the rest of his surroundings, he eventually got used to the hard, unforgiving floors, although recently he’d developed painful swelling in his legs.

20 Minutes to Death: Witness to the Last Execution in France

The following document is a firsthand account of the final moments of Hamida Djandoubi, a convicted murderer executed by guillotine at Marseille’s Baumettes Prison on September 10, 1977. The record—dated September 9—was written by Monique Mabelly, a judge appointed by the state to witness the proceedings. Djandoubi’s execution would ultimately be the last carried out in France before capital punishment was abolished in 1981. At the time, President Valéry Giscard d'Estaing—who had publicly voiced his "deep aversion to the death penalty" prior to his election—rejected Djandoubi’s appeal for clemency. Choosing to let "justice take its course," the President allowed the execution to proceed, just as he had in two previous cases during his term: Christian Ranucci , executed on July 28, 1976 and Jérôme Carrein , executed on June 23, 1977. Hamida Djandoubi , a Tunisian national, was sentenced to death for killing his former lover, Elisabeth Bousquet. He was execu...

New Mississippi billboard warns criminals: ‘Firing squad is legal’

DESOTO COUNTY, Miss. (WREG) — A billboard standing on Interstate 55 southbound as you cross the Tennessee state line and enter Mississippi from Memphis is sending a grim message to those coming into the state. DeSoto County District Attorney Matthew Barton recently announced the new billboard campaign, which features the sign reading, “WELCOME TO MISSISSIPPI. WHERE THE FIRING SQUAD IS LEGAL. THINK TWICE.” It references Mississippi’s law permitting execution by firing squad under certain circumstances for inmates sentenced to death. Barton says this campaign is aimed at deterring violent crime and sends a direct message to criminals entering Mississippi.

Alabama Plans to Execute Jeffrey Lee Despite Jury Vote for Life

Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey has scheduled the execution of Jeffrey Lee by nitrogen suffocation for June 11, 2026, even though his capital jury voted 7-5 against the death penalty and chose a sentence of life imprisonment without parole. The trial judge overrode the jury’s verdict and sentenced Mr. Lee to death in 2000, relying on a unique Alabama practice that allowed judges to overrule jury verdicts in death penalty cases. Alabama is the only state where judges overrode jury verdicts of life to impose the death penalty routinely—in more than 100 cases since 1976. As a result, nearly 20% of the people currently on Alabama’s death row were sentenced to death by elected judges even after their juries chose life imprisonment without parole.

Can the state execute a man who already survived? | Opinion

A second execution would be an unimaginable nightmare for Tony Carruthers and a moral horror for the rest of us. Tony Carruthers is not supposed to be alive . On May 21, Tennessee set out to execute him. It failed. Carruthers survived. He is not the first person to survive an execution in the United States, and he won’t be the last. For Carruthers, the question is: Now what? Will the state seek to arrange a second execution?

Florida | 2-time Jacksonville baby abuser is set for execution

Thirty years ago while on probation for fracturing an infant’s skull, Andrew Lukehart inflicted at least five blows to the head of another baby, then concocted a story that she was abducted before eventually leading authorities to her body in a swamp area. At 6 p.m. Tuesday, June 2, the 53-year-old from Jacksonville is set to become Florida’s eighth man on death row to be executed in 2026. He will become the 36th under Gov. Ron DeSantis after a record 19 inmates were executed by the state in 2025, including another from Duval County: Michael Bell.

Iran executes Esma Zarei in Ardabil Prison after she gave birth in custody

Hengaw – Saturday, May 23, 2026. Iranian authorities have executed Esma Zarei, a 28-year-old Turkish woman from Parsabad in Ardabil Province, who had previously been sentenced to death on charges of “premeditated murder” in connection with the killing of her husband. She is the sixth woman executed in Iran since the beginning of 2026. According to information received by Hengaw Organization for Human Rights, Zarei was executed at dawn on Wednesday, May 20, 2026, in Ardabil Central Prison. She had been sentenced to qisas (retribution-in-kind) after being convicted of her husband’s murder.

Tennessee | Questions Raised About the Doctor Who Was Overseeing Tony Caruthers’ Execution

Mark Fowler, according to a deposition, had not placed a central line in a patient for more than a decade when he attempted to put one in Carruthers Around 11 a.m. Thursday morning in the execution chamber at Riverbend Maximum Security Institution in Nashville, a medical doctor stepped in and attempted to place a central IV line in Tony Carruthers’ chest. By that point, the prison staff had spent some 30 minutes trying unsuccessfully to insert a backup IV line that would allow them to proceed with the lethal injection. According to Carruthers’ attorney Maria DeLiberato, who was in the room, after asking a staff member to attempt inserting a line through Carruthers’ jugular vein, the doctor moved on to the central line, which is identified as the last resort in Tennessee’s lethal injection protocol .

Death Penalty News

Search This Blog