Skip to main content

Singapore: British writer Alan Shadrake plans to do time with Orwell and Huxley in Changi

Alan Shadrake
At 76, Alan Shadrake knows the books he will be taking into solitary confinement if he is sent to Changi prison by Singapore's Appeals Court today - Rudyard Kipling's Kim, George Orwell's 1984, Aldous Huxley's Brave New World and a couple of his favourite H.G. Wells novels.

Hardly the reading material of a dangerous subversive.

Yet the veteran British journalist wasn't expecting to be arrested last year, let alone convicted, for ''scandalising Singapore's judiciary''. His crime? Writing a book, Once a Jolly Hangman, which began as a profile of Singapore's veteran hangman Darshan Singh - a character who once tried to get into the Guinness World Records book for having executed about 1000 people between 1959 and his retirement in 2006.

But during the course of his research, Shadrake decided many of those people on Singh's gallows had been the victims of the city-state's flawed legal system.

At Shadrake's trial in October, the judge ruled the book could cause readers to lose faith in Singapore's justice system since it implied judges were ''influenced by political and economic situations and are biased against the weak and the poor''. Shadrake was sentenced to eight weeks' imprisonment or 6 weeks' plus a fine - a judgment which attracted criticism around the world.

This week Shadrake spoke exclusively about his book to the Herald. A heavily legalled version will be published in Australia next month, including the original foreword by Margaret John, of Amnesty International, and an updated foreword by the prominent Australian civil rights campaigner Julian Burnside, QC.

Shadrake moved to Singapore in 2003 after a reporting career mainly spent in Fleet Street, Cold War Berlin and California. An early case covered was that of the Vietnamese-born Australian Nguyen Tuong Van, arrested at Changi Airport in possession of less than 400 grams of heroin.

Hangman Darshan Singh
When Nguyen was sentenced to death in 2004, Shadrake interviewed Singh, who boasted that in 1964 he had hanged 18 people in a single day. ''That interview sparked the idea of doing a book on Singh,'' Shadrake said. ''But as I investigated the cases involving the death penalty in Singapore, I realised it had to be a very critical book. So I abandoned that plan and told Singh, but he continued to help me.''(Nguyen was executed - by Singh - in 2005.)

Shadrake continued writing his book for the next four years but its thrust now was that rich citizens of wealthy countries were far more likely to escape a death sentence in Singapore than poor citizens of Third World countries, backed up by many case studies. He quoted data from Amnesty International and the University of California which showed that since 1981, Singapore has executed nearly 470 people. In the mid-1990s, more than 70 a year were being hanged, and from 1994 to 1999 the execution rate of 13.57 per million of the population was the world's highest.

But since 2005 the numbers executed have dropped to single digits. Shadrake's book argues that this is largely the result of pressure from Western and Asian countries.

He says two-thirds of the hangings have been of drug traffickers, usually small-time couriers and low-level dealers while the ''Mr Bigs'' of Singapore's drug trade are rarely caught, or executed. It was this accusation which landed Shadrake in court.

His book was initially published in Malaysia. But it was imported into Singapore, where ''it appeared in all the major bookstores and sold quite well, apparently''. He returned to Singapore for the launch last July because all indications were that nothing would happen: ''But they were waiting to seize me …''

He says he will not pay a fine so if the worst happens he will serve the 8 weeks - ''5 if I'm a good boy. They reckon I'll be in a solitary cell … And I'll be allowed to read books - as long as they are not political.''

Once a Jolly Hangman, by Alan Shadrake, Pier 9, $32.99, will be released on May 1.

Source: Sydney Morning Herald, April 10, 2011


British author appeals six-week jail term

SINGAPORE, April 11, 2011 (AFP) - A British author launched an appeal on Monday against a six-week jail term, saying the charges against him were "bloody nonsense".

Alan Shadrake, 76, was sentenced and fined $20,000 in November last year after Singapore's High Court ruled that his book on the death penalty broke the city-state's laws.

Shadrake's lawyer M. Ravi told the Court of Appeal on Monday the book, entitled "Once a Jolly Hangman: Singapore Justice in the Dock", did not damage public confidence in the judiciary.

"If the book had been considered to be as dangerous and risky... It is astonishing that it is not banned," Ravi said.

"The Singapore citizen is not so gullible as to lose faith in the judicial system... regardless of any abusive criticism directed at it."

The court reserved its judgment.

Shadrake, who is on bail, said after the hearing that bringing the charges against him "is bloody nonsense and if they put me in prison, I don't care".

The Attorney-General's Chambers had argued that a custodial sentence should be imposed on Shadrake as his book risked undermining the judiciary in the eyes of Singaporeans.

Principal senior state counsel David Chong said in court Monday that Shadrake's book had "transgressed the limits" of free speech and that his intention to publish a second edition showed an "avowed intention of the appellant to repeat the offence".

"A sentence of imprisonment is necessary to deter the appellant from repeating (his offence)... He should reap the consequences of his contempt," Chong said.

Shadrake said outside the court he was "feeling quite up" about the proceedings.

He added that the second edition of his book was due to be released May 1 in Australia, with sections deemed offending to the Singapore judiciary deleted or rephrased.

Source: AFP, April 11, 2011
_________________________
Use the tags below or the search engine at the top of this page to find updates, older or related articles on this Website.

Comments

Most viewed (Last 7 days)

Tennessee executes Harold Wayne Nichols

Thirty-seven years after confessing to a series of rapes and the murder of Karen Pulley, Nichols expressed remorse in final words Strapped to a gurney in the execution chamber at Riverbend Maximum Security Institution Thursday morning, Harold Wayne Nichols made a final statement.  “To the people I’ve harmed, I’m sorry,” he said, according to prison officials and media witnesses. “To my family, know that I love you. I know where I’m going to. I’m ready to go home.”

China | Former Chinese senior banker Bai Tianhui executed for taking US$155 million in bribes

Bai is the second senior figure from Huarong to be put to death for corruption following the execution of Lai Xiaomin in 2021 China has executed a former senior banker who was found guilty of taking more than 1.1 billion yuan (US$155 million) in bribes. Bai Tianhui, the former general manager of the asset management firm China Huarong International Holdings, was executed on Tuesday after the Supreme People’s Court approved the sentence, state broadcaster CCTV reported.

Burkina Faso to bring back death penalty

Burkina Faso's military rulers will bring back the death penalty, which was abolished in 2018, the country's Council of Ministers announced on Thursday. "This draft penal code reinstates the death penalty for a number of offences, including high treason, acts of terrorism, acts of espionage, among others," stated the information service of the Burkinabe government. Burkina Faso last carried out an execution in 1988.

Iran | Child Bride Saved from the Gallows After Blood Money Raised Through Donations, Charities

Iran Human Rights (IHRNGO); December 9, 2025: Goli Kouhkan, a 25-year-old undocumented Baluch child bride who was scheduled to be executed within weeks, has been saved from the gallows after the diya (blood money) was raised in time. According to the judiciary’s Mizan News Agency , the plaintiffs in the case of Goli Kouhkan, have agreed to forgo their right to execution as retribution. In a video, the victim’s parents are seen signing the relevant documents. Goli’s lawyer, Parand Gharahdaghi, confirmed in a social media post that the original 10 billion (approx. 100,000 euros) toman diya was reduced to 8 billion tomans (approx. 80,000 euros) and had been raised through donations and charities.

Oklahoma board recommends clemency for inmate set to be executed next week

A voting board in Oklahoma decided Wednesday to recommend clemency for Tremane Wood, a death row inmate who is scheduled to receive a lethal injection next week at the state penitentiary in McAlester.  Wood, 46, faces execution for his conviction in the 2001 murder of Ronnie Wipf, a migrant farmworker, at an Oklahoma City hotel on New Year's Eve, court records show. The recommendation was decided in a 3-2 vote by the Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board, consisting of five members appointed by either the governor or the state's top judicial official, according to CBS News affiliate KWTV. Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Sitt will consider the recommendation as he weighs whether to grant or deny Wood's clemency request, which would mean sparing him from execution and reducing his sentence to life in prison without the possibility of parole.

Who Gets Hanged in Singapore?

Singapore’s death penalty has been in the news again.  Enshrined in law in 1975, a decade after the island split from Malaysia and became an independent state, the penalty can see people sentenced to hang for drug trafficking, murder or firearms offenses, among other crimes. Executions have often involved trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act, with offenses measured in grams.  Those executed have included people from low-income backgrounds and foreign nationals who are sometimes not fluent in English, according to human rights advocates such as Amnesty International and the International Drug Policy Consortium. 

Afghanistan's Taliban rulers carry out public execution in sports stadium

The man had been convicted of killing 13 members of a family, including children, and was executed by one of their relatives, according to police. Afghanistan's Taliban authorities carried out the public execution of a man on Tuesday convicted of killing 13 members of a family, including several children, earlier this year. Tens of thousands of people attended the execution at a sports stadium in the eastern city of Khost, which the Supreme Court said was the eleventh since the Taliban seized power in 2021 in the wake of the chaotic withdrawal of US and NATO forces.

Afghanistan | Two Sons Of Executed Man Also Face Death Penalty, Says Taliban

The Taliban governor’s spokesperson in Khost said on Tuesday that two sons of a man executed earlier that day have also been sentenced to death. Their executions, he said, have been postponed because the heir of the victims is not currently in Afghanistan. Mostaghfer Gurbaz, spokesperson for the Taliban governor in Khost, also released details of the charges against the man executed on Tuesday, identified as Mangal. He said Mangal was accused of killing members of a family.

Utah | Ralph Menzies dies on death row less than 3 months after his execution was called off

Judge was set to consider arguments in December about Menzies’ mental fitness  Ralph Menzies, who spent more than 3 decades on Utah’s death row for the 1986 murder of Maurine Hunsaker, has died.  Menzies, 67, died of “presumed natural causes at a local hospital” Wednesday afternoon, according to the Utah Department of Corrections.  Matt Hunsaker, Maurine Hunsaker’s son, said Menzies’ death “was a complete surprise.”  “First off, I’d say that I’m numb. And second off, I would say, grateful,” Hunsaker told Utah News Dispatch. “I’m grateful that my family does not have to endure this for the holidays.” 

USA | Should Medical Research Regulations and Informed Consent Principles Apply to States’ Use of Experimental Execution Methods?

New drugs and med­ical treat­ments under­go rig­or­ous test­ing to ensure they are safe and effec­tive for pub­lic use. Under fed­er­al and state reg­u­la­tions, this test­ing typ­i­cal­ly involves clin­i­cal tri­als with human sub­jects, who face sig­nif­i­cant health and safe­ty risks as the first peo­ple exposed to exper­i­men­tal treat­ments. That is why the law requires them to be ful­ly informed of the poten­tial effects and give their vol­un­tary con­sent to par­tic­i­pate in trials. Yet these reg­u­la­tions have not been fol­lowed when states seek to use nov­el and untest­ed exe­cu­tion meth­ods — sub­ject­ing pris­on­ers to poten­tial­ly tor­tur­ous and uncon­sti­tu­tion­al­ly painful deaths. Some experts and advo­cates argue that states must be bound by the eth­i­cal and human rights prin­ci­ples of bio­med­ical research before using these meth­ods on prisoners.