Skip to main content

Singapore | Remembering M Ravi

M Ravi, left, and Yong Vui Kong, right.
A shocking, devastating loss that none of us saw coming. Rest in Power, M Ravi.

How do I process something that doesn’t feel real?

As I'm writing this, the amount of information I have is distressingly small. M Ravi is dead. He was pronounced dead at Tan Tock Seng Hospital this morning. The police say they don’t suspect foul play, but investigations are ongoing.

None of us saw this coming.

Ravi is gone.

The earliest versions of local media reports of his death were awful, mainly listing his series of controversies, disciplinary proceedings, and convictions. “Suspended lawyer”, the headlines called him. “Former lawyer.” The articles have since been updated to include quotes from his peers and mention of his human rights work, but it’s appalling that that was all they had to say in the beginning. And there’s still so much that can be said about a man who really made his presence felt, and whose sudden absence now hits me like a bolt from the blue.


I’m not sure if that had been our very first meeting, but my earliest memory of Ravi is from 2010, of him preparing for a constitutional challenge against the mandatory death penalty, hard at work in a meeting room, assisted by British lawyers from the Death Penalty Project. (This was captured in ‘Yong’s Story’, a documentary for Al Jazeera English’s 101 East.) I was completely new to the death penalty issue, and had only recently learnt about Yong Vui Kong's case. Although the constitutional challenge did not succeed, it bought us time to campaign for Vui Kong. In 2012, amendments were made to the Misuse of Drugs Act, creating limited conditions under which people could be spared the mandatory death penalty for drug trafficking. Vui Kong met the criteria and was resentenced to life imprisonment and caning. He’s still alive today, 16 years after the execution date the state had set for him. The government might insist that these amendments were the result of their own review process and weren’t influenced by activist or international pressure, but I believe that Ravi’s advocacy—above and beyond a lawyer's job scope—and the Save Vui Kong campaign made a difference.

If Ravi hadn’t come forward to take on the case even when it seemed as if all hope was gone, Vui Kong would not be alive today. And, because it was the campaign for Vui Kong that led me into the abolitionist movement, I probably wouldn’t have become an anti-death penalty activist either.

Ravi was part of so many of the death row cases I’ve worked on. After Vui Kong, he introduced us to Cheong Chun Yin’s father; we went to press conferences and campaign events together, even one in the JB pasar malam where Chun Yin and his father ran a stall. (Chun Yin was eventually also resentenced, and is still in Changi Prison.) I remember meeting Ravi with Masoud’s father, cooperating with him to crowdfund for Prabagaran’s mother, scrambling to raise the $20,000 in security that was needed to file an appeal for Roslan and Pausi. Where others hesitated, Ravi stepped forward, making the choice again and again to stick his neck out to file legal applications for death row prisoners. Some people criticised him, calling him reckless, inappropriate, a troublemaker. But saving a life was more urgent and important to Ravi than scoldings, fines, or disciplinary action. And, in a city that values conformity and obedience, change often requires someone who's willing to smash through what's 'proper' and 'expected' and 'sensible'.

Here’s another man Ravi saved: I was in the courtroom in October 2020 when the Court of Appeal overturned Gobi Avedian’s death sentence—a sentence that they'd given him just two years prior. Gobi had already been at the end of the line, as it were; if Ravi hadn’t taken on his case, no one would have filed the criminal motion that saved him, and he would have been hanged. Because of Ravi, Gobi is now home with his family in Malaysia.

I won’t pretend that Ravi was an easy person to get along with, or that we always had an easy friendship. He had his struggles and his failings, some of which were publicly known (as the local media reminded us first thing this morning) and for which he paid a heavy price. I don't want to whitewash or sanitise the person he was—there were times when being his friend and caring about him was difficult and painful—but I also don't want us to only remember his troubles.

He was so, so much more.

In the middle of the Covid pandemic, I filed a Protection from Harassment Act case against someone who was troubling me online. When he heard that I found the process bewildering and stressful, Ravi stepped in. He represented me during the Zoom mediation session, handling the matter with a righteous indignation and flair—what can I say, the man loved ✨drama✨—that I would have struggled to express myself. It massively lightened the load of an awkward and uncomfortable situation, and he did it without any hesitation or fuss because he was my friend.

Ravi could be brash and A Lot, sweeping through like a hurricane, talking a mile a minute, leaving introverts like me feeling slightly flattened by his sheer force of personality (and, sometimes, mania). But he could also be surprisingly perceptive.

“I know when Kirsten is stressed,” he once proclaimed to anyone within earshot, grinning at me as he teased. “When I see her post a lot of cute-cute stuff and then she has a new tattoo, then I know she is very stressed.”

His read was spot on.

I saw Ravi in Hong Lim Park on 15 October, at the vigil we held for Hamzah and his co-accused, both of them executed that morning. Hamzah was a former client; Ravi was sad and a little deflated to have lost yet another person, but still he was calm and agreed that we had to keep going. We didn’t talk much that evening; we just said hi and he gave me a hug. I could never have imagined, would never have believed—not in a hundred years, not ever—that that would be the last time I’d see him alive.

It's been hours since I first heard the news, since the media reports and the flurry of shocked, grieving texts, all of us asking one another questions that no one has the answers to. It still hasn't really sunk in; I still don't quite believe it. Maybe I won't, not until I see him for myself.

Right now, I don't know how to say goodbye to Ravi—my overwhelming, intense, gregarious, dramatic, impulsive, infuriating, inspiring, difficult, kind, mercurial, brave, brilliant friend.

How hollow the world feels today.

Source: wethecitizens.net, Kirsten Han, December 24, 2025




"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted."
— Oscar Wilde


Comments

Most viewed (Last 7 days)

US | Army lays groundwork for death row executions if Trump gives approval

The Army is preparing to carry out the executions of the military's four death-row inmates if ordered to do so by the president, according to an internal planning document reviewed by ABC News. If carried out, it would mark the first time the military executed convicted American inmates in more than a half-century The plan, dubbed "Operation Resolute Justice" and issued internally in February, directs Army officials to coordinate with the Federal Bureau of Prisons to transfer condemned prisoners from the U.S. Disciplinary Barracks at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, to the federal execution facility in Terre Haute, Indiana, where the Justice Department carried out a series of non-military federal executions during President Donald Trump's first term.

Texas | Tanner Horner now incarcerated at the Polunsky Unit

Convicted child killer Tanner Horner has now taken up residence in one of the most brutal death row prisons after being sentenced to die by a Texas jury last month. Horner is incarcerated at the Polunsky Unit, an infamously restrictive prison outside Houston where the state's death row inmates are housed in an all-solitary confinement wing and spend at least 22 hours a day in their 60-square-foot cells. The former FedEx deliveryman, 34, was booked at the notorious prison on May 5 within hours of being sentenced for the gruesome murder of Athena Strand, 7, whom he admitted strangling while delivering a Christmas gift to her home in November 2022.

Alabama | Judge bars nitrogen gas execution, says method is unconstitutionally cruel

MONTGOMERY, Ala. -- A federal judge on Tuesday permanently blocked Alabama from executing an inmate with nitrogen gas after declaring it violates the ban on cruel and unusual punishment. U.S. District Judge Emily Marks issued the ruling hours after an appeals court reversed her initial finding that the method was constitutional. Marks permanently enjoined the state from executing Jeffrey Lee, 49, by nitrogen gas. He was scheduled to be executed Thursday. The decision, for now, blocks the use of the controversial new execution method that the state has championed since 2024, but the issue will likely end up before the U.S. Supreme Court.

Alabama Plans to Execute Jeffrey Lee Despite Jury Vote for Life

Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey has scheduled the execution of Jeffrey Lee by nitrogen suffocation for June 11, 2026, even though his capital jury voted 7-5 against the death penalty and chose a sentence of life imprisonment without parole. The trial judge overrode the jury’s verdict and sentenced Mr. Lee to death in 2000, relying on a unique Alabama practice that allowed judges to overrule jury verdicts in death penalty cases. Alabama is the only state where judges overrode jury verdicts of life to impose the death penalty routinely—in more than 100 cases since 1976. As a result, nearly 20% of the people currently on Alabama’s death row were sentenced to death by elected judges even after their juries chose life imprisonment without parole.

20 Minutes to Death: Witness to the Last Execution in France

The following document is a firsthand account of the final moments of Hamida Djandoubi, a convicted murderer executed by guillotine at Marseille’s Baumettes Prison on September 10, 1977. The record—dated September 9—was written by Monique Mabelly, a judge appointed by the state to witness the proceedings. Djandoubi’s execution would ultimately be the last carried out in France before capital punishment was abolished in 1981. At the time, President Valéry Giscard d'Estaing—who had publicly voiced his "deep aversion to the death penalty" prior to his election—rejected Djandoubi’s appeal for clemency. Choosing to let "justice take its course," the President allowed the execution to proceed, just as he had in two previous cases during his term:   Christian Ranucci , executed on July 28, 1976 and Jérôme Carrein , executed on June 23, 1977. Hamida Djandoubi , a Tunisian national, was sentenced to death for killing his former lover, Elisabeth Bousquet. He was execu...

Texas | Death Row Inmate Gets Resentenced to Life

Harris County district judge recommends compassionate release for Clarence Jordan A 1977 convenience store robbery that resulted in a clerk’s death landed Clarence Jordan on Texas Death Row, where he remained for decades even though he was declared incompetent for execution. On Monday, a judge recommended that the disabled man be released.  Harris County District Court Judge Katherine Thomas resentenced Jordan to life with the possibility of parole and suggested that he be considered for the Texas Department of Criminal Justice’s Medically Recommended Intensive Supervision program, also known as compassionate release.

New Mississippi billboard warns criminals: ‘Firing squad is legal’

DESOTO COUNTY, Miss. (WREG) — A billboard standing on Interstate 55 southbound as you cross the Tennessee state line and enter Mississippi from Memphis is sending a grim message to those coming into the state. DeSoto County District Attorney Matthew Barton recently announced the new billboard campaign, which features the sign reading, “WELCOME TO MISSISSIPPI. WHERE THE FIRING SQUAD IS LEGAL. THINK TWICE.” It references Mississippi’s law permitting execution by firing squad under certain circumstances for inmates sentenced to death. Barton says this campaign is aimed at deterring violent crime and sends a direct message to criminals entering Mississippi.

Oklahoma | Richard Glossip on Life After Decades on Death Row

In an exclusive interview at home in Oklahoma City, Glossip describes his first days of freedom in a world he hasn’t experienced for nearly 30 years. For three decades, Richard Glossip lived on concrete. First at the Oklahoma County jail, after his arrest for murder in 1997, and then in the underground bunker housing death row inmates at the Oklahoma State Penitentiary. As with the rest of his surroundings, he eventually got used to the hard, unforgiving floors, although recently he’d developed painful swelling in his legs.

Florida executes Andrew Richard Lukehart

Jacksonville man who killed his girlfriend’s 5-month-old baby in 1996 executed 30 years later A Jacksonville man who confessed to killing his girlfriend’s 5-month-old daughter and throwing her body in a pond 3 decades ago was executed on Tuesday evening.  Andrew Richard Lukehart, 53, was scheduled to receive a 3-drug injection starting at 6 p.m. at Florida State Prison near Starke.  He was sentenced to death after being convicted of aggravated child abuse and felony murder in the death of Gabrielle Hanshaw. The baby’s mother told News4JAX she plans to attend the execution.

Alabama | Judicial Decision About Nitrogen Hypoxia Renders the Constitutional Prohibition of Cruel Punishment Meaningless

On June 11, the state of Alabama plans to execute Jeffrey Lee with nitrogen hypoxia . He will be the ninth person put to death by this method since its first use in 2024. Lee contends that nitrogen hypoxia will cause him great suffering. On May 28, Federal District Judge Emily Marks agreed with him but said his execution could proceed nonetheless. Hers is a remarkable and shockingly candid decision. It made history, coming after the first trial in the country on the constitutionality of nitrogen hypoxia. To her credit, Judge Marks offered an unusually detailed picture of the pain imposed by capital punishment.