Skip to main content

Witness to an execution: The human cost of the death penalty

Death House, USP Terre Haute, Indiana
Journalist Liz Bruening recently wrote of her experience being present for an execution and her own family’s ties to tragedy in Arlington.


Editor’s note: This story contains descriptions of violence towards children and the process of an execution that some readers may find disturbing.

In 2004, Alfred Bourgeois was convicted of torturing and murdering his toddler daughter at the Naval Air Station in Corpus Christi. 

According to the prosecution in the case, Bourgeois had abused and neglected her before finally smashing her head against the inside of his truck. 

Because the murder took place on a military base, Bourgeois was tried by the federal government and after he was convicted, he was given the death penalty by lethal injection in 2020


The execution made national headlines and members of the media were in attendance to witness it, including Liz Bruenig. She’s been writing about the death penalty for years now and joined the Texas Standard to talk about her reflections. Listen to the interview here or read the transcript below.

This transcript has been edited lightly for clarity:

Texas Standard: You witnessed the execution of Alfred Bourgeois. Could you tell us a bit about what it looked and sounded like?

Liz Bruenig: Yes, you know, I went in not really knowing what to expect. And on prison grounds, there are multiple buildings, and the media gathered in one building and waited for the execution to get underway.

And at that time, we were taken elsewhere by van to the execution chamber on the prison grounds. It’s a small room, the actual execution chamber inside this building is small and tiled and contains a gurney and not much other space. And it’s like a spoke and a wheel.

And so the other rooms that are adjacent share a window with that room so the viewers can look in. In those rooms are families of the victims, families of the offender, law enforcement officials, and prosecutors at times. And then the media.

We were seated in plastic chairs looking into this window. We were seated at Mr. Bourgeois’ feet. They lowered a microphone in, allowed him to say his last words. He said he was innocent, which is something his family still contends – or members of his family still contend. I haven’t looked into those innocence claims, but that’s something that they say.

Death Chamber, USP Terre Haute, Indiana
At any rate, he was connected via IV line to a source you couldn’t see. The IV line went through a hole in the wall. But the lethal injection, the poison essentially, is behind that wall in a bag. And the medication was administered and they don’t tell you when that happens. We just started to see a reaction, and Mr. Bourgeois started to sort of heave and jerk on the gurneys, his body moved in these sort of jerking contractions.

And at that point, a doctor came in and listened to his heart and declared him dead. And then we were filed back out into vans and taken back to the building we gathered.

Well, Texas leads the nation in executions since the U.S. Supreme Court upheld its use in 1976. Do you chalk that figure up to population size, or do you think Texas takes a fundamentally different approach to criminal justice? 

Yeah, I think a lot of it certainly has to do with population size. Some of it definitely has to do with cultural approaches to capital punishment. Texas, you know, it’s an Old West state in a lot ways.

I was born and raised in Texas. I grew up in Arlington. And I love that about Texas. I love the can-do attitude. I love independence.

But I think it comes with a kind of brand of justice that I consider too harsh and not merciful enough. And I say that with great love and adoration for Texas. On this one point, I just disagree. 

You have, unfortunately, a connection to some of the horrific crime that victims are familiar with. You write about your sister-in-law who, I’m so sorry to say, was murdered in Arlington. Could you talk a little bit about your family’s experience being on that side of such a horrible crime?

Yes, my sister-in-law was 18 months older than my husband and all of us went to the same high school in North Texas. Her name was Heather. She was very lively and very friendly – extremely outgoing.

One day in the summer of 2016, actually only a couple weeks after the birth of our firstborn, we received a call. It was Matt’s dad and his sister had been murdered. And I mean, my husband immediately had to pick up and go back to Texas to help his family.

You know, for a long time afterwards, he was pretty depressed. It, I think, took him to a dark place and I know even now he’s marked that. You know, the more our daughter looks like Heather, sounds like Heather, the more he’s reminded that he’s now older than Heather was when she died. And it’s sort of disconcerting and it is very, very difficult emotionally.

Did beliefs about the death penalty come up in your family’s ongoing reconciliation with what happened?

Yeah, you know, there are members of Matt’s family, certainly, who say they wish he could have received the death penalty. But my husband and I think my husband and his father, Heather’s father, you know, are pretty consistently against the death penalty.

And you know what’s interesting to me – and I have, you know, I admire this in them – is that they haven’t wavered in those principles of opposing capital punishment despite what happened. I think that even having principled opposition to the death penalty doesn’t mean that if something terrible were to happen to you, if a loved one were to be murdered in some horrible way, that you would still feel the same way that you do on balance.

I often think to myself, as someone who opposes the death penalty, that if it were my child being murdered, I don’t know what I would think. I mean, it’s totally possible I would find myself quite on the other side of it because those experiences are, you know, they change you in a lot of ways. And I was just taken with my husband and his family, their willingness to accept another kind of justice.

You’ve worked for some of the biggest media outlets in the world. Do you feel like your reporting on the death penalty has changed anyone’s mind?

I sincerely hope so.

Some of the most satisfying notes from readers I have ever received have come from my own family. My family is a good old conservative Texas family and I love them and I wouldn’t change a thing about them. But we have differences and this is one of our differences.

But I’ve heard from members of my family that they’ve thought about things in a different way. That’s the most meaningful to me – is, you know, connecting with them on this.

Source: texasstandard.org, Sean Saldana, June 18, 2025




"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted."
— Oscar Wilde


Comments

Most viewed (Last 7 days)

Gov. Mike DeWine calls for Ohio to abolish the death penalty

COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — Gov. Mike DeWine Tuesday morning called on Ohio to abolish the death penalty, citing data that he said proves it is no longer a deterrent to violent crime. “For the state to take a human life, there must, in my opinion, there must be evidence that in doing so it will help protect the public, that the threat of that action will deter someone from committing murder,” DeWine said. “I do not believe that argument today can be successfully made.” DeWine cited data showing a decline in the last four decades of executions being carried out and an increase in the time inmates spend on death row.

I watched Ohio's last execution. Here's what it was like

As Gov. DeWine calls for Ohio to end capital punishment, the state’s last execution remains the one I witnessed in 2018 Inside Ohio's death house, there is a room for executions and separate witness rooms: one for those connected to the victim and another for those connected to the inmate. Windows separate the death chamber from those watching, the condemned from the living. I was there on July 18, 2018 – during Ohio’s most recent execution. Robert Van Hook was put to death that day for killing David Self in 1985. He sat on death row for three decades. I was one of three media witnesses to the execution.

Kansas AG urges governor to deny clemency to 8 sentenced to death

TOPEKA — Attorney General Kris Kobach on Tuesday urged the governor to deny clemency to Kansas inmates who have been sentenced to death. Eight of nine people sentenced to death in Kansas formally filed clemency requests in May, according to a press release from the Attorney General’s Office. Kobach urged Gov. Laura Kelly to reject them.

20 Minutes to Death: Witness to the Last Execution in France

The following document is a firsthand account of the final moments of Hamida Djandoubi, a convicted murderer executed by guillotine at Marseille’s Baumettes Prison on September 10, 1977. The record—dated September 9—was written by Monique Mabelly, a judge appointed by the state to witness the proceedings. Djandoubi’s execution would ultimately be the last carried out in France before capital punishment was abolished in 1981. At the time, President Valéry Giscard d'Estaing—who had publicly voiced his "deep aversion to the death penalty" prior to his election—rejected Djandoubi’s appeal for clemency. Choosing to let "justice take its course," the President allowed the execution to proceed, just as he had in two previous cases during his term:   Christian Ranucci , executed on July 28, 1976 and Jérôme Carrein , executed on June 23, 1977. Hamida Djandoubi , a Tunisian national, was sentenced to death for killing his former lover, Elisabeth Bousquet. He was execu...

New Mississippi billboard warns criminals: ‘Firing squad is legal’

DESOTO COUNTY, Miss. (WREG) — A billboard standing on Interstate 55 southbound as you cross the Tennessee state line and enter Mississippi from Memphis is sending a grim message to those coming into the state. DeSoto County District Attorney Matthew Barton recently announced the new billboard campaign, which features the sign reading, “WELCOME TO MISSISSIPPI. WHERE THE FIRING SQUAD IS LEGAL. THINK TWICE.” It references Mississippi’s law permitting execution by firing squad under certain circumstances for inmates sentenced to death. Barton says this campaign is aimed at deterring violent crime and sends a direct message to criminals entering Mississippi.

SCOTUS: Alabama can’t execute Jeffery Lee by nitrogen; Thursday execution called off

After a week of legal volleyball, Alabama death row inmate Jeffery Lee’s execution—scheduled for Thursday evening—was called off after federal courts called the state’s nitrogen gas execution method “likely unconstitutional.” The state took the fight to the U.S. Supreme Court, hoping Lee could still be put to death tonight.  In an order issued at 8:10 p.m., the U.S. Supreme Court ordered that it would not lift a ban on Alabama executing Lee via nitrogen . In a short court order, the justices denied Alabama’s motion to go ahead with the execution.  Associate Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch would have granted the appeal and let the execution proceed, according to the order. 

With nitrogen gas blocked, Alabama seeks to execute inmate by lethal injection

Jeffery Lee, who successfully challenged his scheduled Thursday execution by nitrogen gas, argued that execution by firing squad would be less painful. The Alabama Attorney General’s Office Friday sought to put an Alabama death row inmate to death by lethal injection a day after the U.S. Supreme Court rebuffed the state’s attempt to execute him by nitrogen gas. In a filing with the Alabama Supreme Court Friday afternoon, the state sought an expedited motion to set a new execution date for Jeffery Lee, 49. The state said that with a permanent injunction in place against nitrogen gas, the method by which the state intended to execute Lee on Thursday, it could execute him by lethal injection or the electric chair.

Alabama | Judge bars nitrogen gas execution, says method is unconstitutionally cruel

MONTGOMERY, Ala. -- A federal judge on Tuesday permanently blocked Alabama from executing an inmate with nitrogen gas after declaring it violates the ban on cruel and unusual punishment. U.S. District Judge Emily Marks issued the ruling hours after an appeals court reversed her initial finding that the method was constitutional. Marks permanently enjoined the state from executing Jeffrey Lee, 49, by nitrogen gas. He was scheduled to be executed Thursday. The decision, for now, blocks the use of the controversial new execution method that the state has championed since 2024, but the issue will likely end up before the U.S. Supreme Court.

Idaho will soon turn to firing squad executions. Police will pull the triggers

Trained members of Idaho law enforcement with demonstrated firearms proficiency are expected to fill slots for carrying out the death penalty by firing squad as the state prison system transitions to the controversial execution method next month.  Six volunteers certified for no less than three years apiece through Peace Officer Standards and Training, or POST, will be recruited to ensure the Idaho Department of Correction is ready to comply with a state law that prioritizes shooting prisoners to death over lethal injection starting July 1.  No one on the team may have faced disciplinary action over firearms, use of force, or related conduct over the prior year, according to new execution protocols the prison system released this week. 

Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch wanted an execution that a Trump judge deemed illegal

The Supreme Court these days is generally in the business of helping executions go forward. But on Thursday night, the court did something notable: It told Alabama no. Even then, the court wasn't unanimous. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch dissented from the refusal to let the nitrogen gas execution of Jeffery Lee proceed. What prompted the rare rejection? In line with the typical shadow docket practice, the court didn't explain itself. Nor did the dissenters, who merely noted their disagreement. But a deeper look at the case helps us understand why a majority of the court was unwilling to help the state this time.