Florida | Witness offers new exculpating evidence in Pablo Ibar case, defense says

A defense attorney for Pablo Ibar, the man sentenced to life in the June 1994 “Casey’s Nickelodeon” murders, is seeking to have his 2019 conviction vacated after a new witness came forward, alleging two people who were never charged were the true killers.

The “newly discovered evidence,” a sworn affidavit from a witness who was previously not known to Ibar’s defense, could have potentially resulted in a different outcome at Ibar’s trial, attorney Daniel Tibbitt wrote in a court motion filed Sunday.

The witness’s identity is not shared in the motion due to safety concerns. The witness signed an affidavit swearing that two people he knows who are referenced in the court filing only as “A.N. aka El Loco” and “F.B. aka Loeva” are responsible for the murders of Casimir “Butch Casey” Sucharski, owner of Casey’s Nickleodeon nightclub, Sharon Anderson and Marie Rogers.

The three were shot to death during an invasion of Sucharski’s home in Miramar early on the morning of June 26, 1994. The murders were captured on grainy home surveillance video. Ibar, originally from the Basque Country in Spain, was charged with the murders and was tried multiple times, in 1997 ending in a hung jury and in 2000 resulting in a sentence to death row, which was changed to a life sentence. Ibar has always maintained that he is innocent, his attorney wrote.

Prosecutors said a T-shirt found at Sucharski’s home had DNA that matched Ibar, with the probability it was a different Caucasian man at one in 11 million, and one in 35 million among Hispanic men. And the man who was identified as Ibar on the surveillance video had worn a T-shirt covering his head during the murders and removed it afterward, walking directly in front of the camera.

Ibar’s defense repeatedly contested the DNA evidence. Seth Penalver, once Ibar’s co-defendant, was also charged, but his 1999 conviction and subsequent death sentence were also overturned, and at a retrial in 2012 he was found not guilty.

Tibbitt told the South Florida Sun Sentinel on Thursday that the new evidence came after the witness contacted a group of Ibar’s supporters, the Pablo Ibar Association, after Ibar had lost an attempt to appeal in the summer of 2023.

The witness swore in the affidavit that he had met “A.N.” when they worked for drug trafficking organizations in South Florida in the 1990s, according to the motion. In the summer of 1994, A.N. asked the witness to help with a home invasion in the summer of 1994, but he did not participate. Months later while surveilling for a home invasion robbery, the witness heard A.N. bragging about “the home invasion and murders that he and F.B. committed” at a home of a person whose name is redacted in the motion but is clear that it is referencing Sucharski.

The witness said both A.N. and F.B. admitted to the murders and that they were directed by someone identified only as “C.P. aka El Gordo” to enter the house “to get the drugs or money” stemming from a drug-related debt. The witness at the time was an “enforcer” for the Colombian drug organization that the two men worked for, Tibbitt said. The witness was arrested in a federal case two years later and swore in the affidavit that he told both federal and Miami-Dade County law enforcement of A.N.’s and F.B.’s crimes, including the murders, according to the motion.

Tibbitt said after further investigation into the witness’ background and the two men he said had confessed, “everything seemed to check out.” The two men the witness named had been in and out of custody in South Florida for other crimes but were not incarcerated at the time of the Casey’s Nickelodeon murders in 1994, he said.

Tibbitt wrote in the motion that Ibar does not know and has never communicated with the witness nor any of the people the witness mentioned until recently, and the defense would have pursued the lead if they had. “If Pablo had known about this, if his attorneys had known about this, and ultimately if the jury had known about this, he would not have been convicted,” Tibbitt told the Sun Sentinel.

“The evidence against him was always weak and questionable. This certainly would have taken it over the top in terms of reasonable doubt.” Tibbitt is asking that the judge grant an evidentiary hearing to determine whether the witness’ information, though acknowledged as hearsay, is credible and reasonably likely that it would result in a different outcome at retrial.

A spokesperson for the Broward State Attorney’s Office told the South Florida Sun Sentinel that appellate attorneys will file a response in court. A response had not been filed as of Thursday.

Ibar’s defense filed a second motion for post-conviction relief on Monday, also seeking the conviction be vacated, arguing that his trial attorneys were ineffective. Information from the Sun Sentinel archives contributed to this report.

Source: sun-sentinel.com, Angie DiMichele, June 26, 2025

"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted."

— Oscar Wilde

Comments

Gov. Mike DeWine calls for Ohio to abolish the death penalty

COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — Gov. Mike DeWine Tuesday morning called on Ohio to abolish the death penalty, citing data that he said proves it is no longer a deterrent to violent crime. “For the state to take a human life, there must, in my opinion, there must be evidence that in doing so it will help protect the public, that the threat of that action will deter someone from committing murder,” DeWine said. “I do not believe that argument today can be successfully made.” DeWine cited data showing a decline in the last four decades of executions being carried out and an increase in the time inmates spend on death row.

I watched Ohio's last execution. Here's what it was like

As Gov. DeWine calls for Ohio to end capital punishment, the state’s last execution remains the one I witnessed in 2018 Inside Ohio's death house, there is a room for executions and separate witness rooms: one for those connected to the victim and another for those connected to the inmate. Windows separate the death chamber from those watching, the condemned from the living. I was there on July 18, 2018 – during Ohio’s most recent execution. Robert Van Hook was put to death that day for killing David Self in 1985. He sat on death row for three decades. I was one of three media witnesses to the execution.

Kansas AG urges governor to deny clemency to 8 sentenced to death

TOPEKA — Attorney General Kris Kobach on Tuesday urged the governor to deny clemency to Kansas inmates who have been sentenced to death. Eight of nine people sentenced to death in Kansas formally filed clemency requests in May, according to a press release from the Attorney General’s Office. Kobach urged Gov. Laura Kelly to reject them.

20 Minutes to Death: Witness to the Last Execution in France

The following document is a firsthand account of the final moments of Hamida Djandoubi, a convicted murderer executed by guillotine at Marseille’s Baumettes Prison on September 10, 1977. The record—dated September 9—was written by Monique Mabelly, a judge appointed by the state to witness the proceedings. Djandoubi’s execution would ultimately be the last carried out in France before capital punishment was abolished in 1981. At the time, President Valéry Giscard d'Estaing—who had publicly voiced his "deep aversion to the death penalty" prior to his election—rejected Djandoubi’s appeal for clemency. Choosing to let "justice take its course," the President allowed the execution to proceed, just as he had in two previous cases during his term: Christian Ranucci , executed on July 28, 1976 and Jérôme Carrein , executed on June 23, 1977. Hamida Djandoubi , a Tunisian national, was sentenced to death for killing his former lover, Elisabeth Bousquet. He was execu...

New Mississippi billboard warns criminals: ‘Firing squad is legal’

DESOTO COUNTY, Miss. (WREG) — A billboard standing on Interstate 55 southbound as you cross the Tennessee state line and enter Mississippi from Memphis is sending a grim message to those coming into the state. DeSoto County District Attorney Matthew Barton recently announced the new billboard campaign, which features the sign reading, “WELCOME TO MISSISSIPPI. WHERE THE FIRING SQUAD IS LEGAL. THINK TWICE.” It references Mississippi’s law permitting execution by firing squad under certain circumstances for inmates sentenced to death. Barton says this campaign is aimed at deterring violent crime and sends a direct message to criminals entering Mississippi.

SCOTUS: Alabama can’t execute Jeffery Lee by nitrogen; Thursday execution called off

After a week of legal volleyball, Alabama death row inmate Jeffery Lee’s execution—scheduled for Thursday evening—was called off after federal courts called the state’s nitrogen gas execution method “likely unconstitutional.” The state took the fight to the U.S. Supreme Court, hoping Lee could still be put to death tonight. In an order issued at 8:10 p.m., the U.S. Supreme Court ordered that it would not lift a ban on Alabama executing Lee via nitrogen . In a short court order, the justices denied Alabama’s motion to go ahead with the execution. Associate Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch would have granted the appeal and let the execution proceed, according to the order.

With nitrogen gas blocked, Alabama seeks to execute inmate by lethal injection

Jeffery Lee, who successfully challenged his scheduled Thursday execution by nitrogen gas, argued that execution by firing squad would be less painful. The Alabama Attorney General’s Office Friday sought to put an Alabama death row inmate to death by lethal injection a day after the U.S. Supreme Court rebuffed the state’s attempt to execute him by nitrogen gas. In a filing with the Alabama Supreme Court Friday afternoon, the state sought an expedited motion to set a new execution date for Jeffery Lee, 49. The state said that with a permanent injunction in place against nitrogen gas, the method by which the state intended to execute Lee on Thursday, it could execute him by lethal injection or the electric chair.

Alabama | Judge bars nitrogen gas execution, says method is unconstitutionally cruel

MONTGOMERY, Ala. -- A federal judge on Tuesday permanently blocked Alabama from executing an inmate with nitrogen gas after declaring it violates the ban on cruel and unusual punishment. U.S. District Judge Emily Marks issued the ruling hours after an appeals court reversed her initial finding that the method was constitutional. Marks permanently enjoined the state from executing Jeffrey Lee, 49, by nitrogen gas. He was scheduled to be executed Thursday. The decision, for now, blocks the use of the controversial new execution method that the state has championed since 2024, but the issue will likely end up before the U.S. Supreme Court.

Idaho will soon turn to firing squad executions. Police will pull the triggers

Trained members of Idaho law enforcement with demonstrated firearms proficiency are expected to fill slots for carrying out the death penalty by firing squad as the state prison system transitions to the controversial execution method next month. Six volunteers certified for no less than three years apiece through Peace Officer Standards and Training, or POST, will be recruited to ensure the Idaho Department of Correction is ready to comply with a state law that prioritizes shooting prisoners to death over lethal injection starting July 1. No one on the team may have faced disciplinary action over firearms, use of force, or related conduct over the prior year, according to new execution protocols the prison system released this week.

Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch wanted an execution that a Trump judge deemed illegal

The Supreme Court these days is generally in the business of helping executions go forward. But on Thursday night, the court did something notable: It told Alabama no. Even then, the court wasn't unanimous. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch dissented from the refusal to let the nitrogen gas execution of Jeffery Lee proceed. What prompted the rare rejection? In line with the typical shadow docket practice, the court didn't explain itself. Nor did the dissenters, who merely noted their disagreement. But a deeper look at the case helps us understand why a majority of the court was unwilling to help the state this time.

Death Penalty News

Search This Blog