Skip to main content

USA | Federal judge denies attempt to block commuted death row inmates' transfer to 'Supermax' prison

ADX cell
A group of federal inmates who were resentenced under the Biden administration filed a lawsuit trying to stop their move to a high-security Colorado prison.


A federal judge has denied a legal attempt, for now, to prevent the U.S. government from transferring death row inmates whose sentences were commuted by then-President Joe Biden to the "Supermax" in Colorado, the highest-security federal prison in the country.

U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly in Washington, D.C., ruled Tuesday against issuing a preliminary injunction requested in a lawsuit brought by 21 of the 37 former death row inmates, all of whom saw their sentences changed to life without parole in December.

"The Court cannot grant that relief — at least not now," Kelly wrote in his opinion, saying that the plaintiffs must first exhaust their administrative appeals within the federal Bureau of Prisons' transfer process.

The decision comes as the BOP has said it would not transfer any of the plaintiffs to the "Supermax," also known as the Administrative Maximum Facility, or ADX, until at least the end of May.

"The Bureau of Prisons offers an administrative process for challenging final designations to ADX, and Plaintiffs have not completed — or, to the Court's knowledge, even started — that process," Kelly wrote. "Because the Court lacks discretion to append exceptions to Congress's exhaustion requirement, it will deny Plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction."

Nearly all of the former federal death row prisoners remain at the penitentiary at Terre Haute, Indiana, home to the U.S. government's death chamber. The Biden administration halted federal executions, a departure from President Donald Trump's first term, when 13 federal inmates were put to death in a spree of executions not seen since President Grover Cleveland in the late 1800s.

The Justice Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment Wednesday about the judge's ruling.

The American Civil Liberties Union, which is among the legal teams representing the plaintiffs, said it still believes that the inmates "can be safely housed elsewhere in the federal system," and that the BOP agreed with that before the Trump administration's Justice Department stepped in.

"While the court ruled that it could not order the Bureau of Prisons to leave the plaintiffs in place while they appealed their designations to ADX, the fight is far from over," Brian Stull, deputy director of the ACLU's Capital Punishment Project, said in a statement.

Trump was critical of Biden's commutation effort, and on his first day back in office in January, he signed an executive order calling for the U.S. attorney general to ensure the commuted death row inmates "are imprisoned in conditions consistent with the monstrosity of their crimes and the threats they pose." He also restored the federal death penalty.

The "Supermax," which sits in a mile-high desert south of Colorado Springs, is also known as "the Alcatraz of the Rockies" for its isolated conditions and housing some of the most high-profile prisoners deemed safety risks. They currently include drug kingpin Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán and domestic terrorists Eric Rudolph, the 1996 Atlanta Olympics bomber, and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, the Boston Marathon bomber, whose federal death sentence was not commuted by Biden.

The former death row inmates challenging the government's plan to transfer them to the "Supermax" said in their complaint, filed in April in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, that doing so would be unconstitutional.

Their legal teams said the condemned inmates were given interviews in early April to assess whether they should be moved to the "Supermax." But the complaint alleges the hearings were a "sham" because the BOP had already designated some of them under a "security threat" classification that assumes they are promoting violence or terrorist activity in gangs, and can't be safely housed in the general population.

The plaintiffs attempted to show proof that they are not threats, including how despite being on death row they had successful programming and clean disciplinary records, were getting their health care needs met and would be harmed if they were "subjected to extreme isolation at ADX," according to the complaint.

"Unsurprisingly, following each Plaintiff's hearing, and in some cases within minutes or hours, the Hearing Administrator recommended that ADX placement was 'warranted' for every one of them," the complaint says.

"By categorically condemning Plaintiffs to indefinite incarceration in harsh conditions in response to their receipt of clemency from the previous President, it exceeds the statutory authority granted to the Attorney General and her deputy, and is arbitrary, capricious, and an abuse of discretion," the suit adds.

The federal government said in its response to the complaint that the BOP has the statutory authority to designate where inmates can be held, the inmates went through a multilayered hearing process and have had the right to appeal, and "Supermax" inmates are not entirely isolated.

According to the Justice Department attorneys, the prison participates in a federal law known as the First Step Act, which "provides quarterly incentives to reward inmates for completing certain programming," and may be offered "Starbucks coffee, pizza, and candy that is not available at Commissary."

And unlike at the special confinement unit in Terre Haute, "inmates in the ADX may have the opportunity to 'step down' through a progression of housing with fewer restrictions and additional freedoms to the point where they may be transferred out of the ADX entirely to a high-security institution," the government's response said.

Kelly concluded in his ruling that the BOP would, in this case, continue to follow what it has done historically by not transferring inmates to the "Supermax" until remedies for appeal are worn out.

"Of course, if Defendants do transfer any Plaintiffs to ADX before those appeals conclude, or truncate those appeals in an unusual way, such a departure from the BOP's ordinary practice would support Plaintiffs' argument that the designation process at issue here is hardly business as usual for the Bureau," Kelly said. "And it would raise serious questions about who is calling the shots: BOP or someone outside that agency."

Source: nbcnews.com, Erik Ortiz, May 28, 2025




"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted."
— Oscar Wilde


Comments

Most viewed (Last 7 days)

Gov. Mike DeWine calls for Ohio to abolish the death penalty

COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — Gov. Mike DeWine Tuesday morning called on Ohio to abolish the death penalty, citing data that he said proves it is no longer a deterrent to violent crime. “For the state to take a human life, there must, in my opinion, there must be evidence that in doing so it will help protect the public, that the threat of that action will deter someone from committing murder,” DeWine said. “I do not believe that argument today can be successfully made.” DeWine cited data showing a decline in the last four decades of executions being carried out and an increase in the time inmates spend on death row.

I watched Ohio's last execution. Here's what it was like

As Gov. DeWine calls for Ohio to end capital punishment, the state’s last execution remains the one I witnessed in 2018 Inside Ohio's death house, there is a room for executions and separate witness rooms: one for those connected to the victim and another for those connected to the inmate. Windows separate the death chamber from those watching, the condemned from the living. I was there on July 18, 2018 – during Ohio’s most recent execution. Robert Van Hook was put to death that day for killing David Self in 1985. He sat on death row for three decades. I was one of three media witnesses to the execution.

Kansas AG urges governor to deny clemency to 8 sentenced to death

TOPEKA — Attorney General Kris Kobach on Tuesday urged the governor to deny clemency to Kansas inmates who have been sentenced to death. Eight of nine people sentenced to death in Kansas formally filed clemency requests in May, according to a press release from the Attorney General’s Office. Kobach urged Gov. Laura Kelly to reject them.

20 Minutes to Death: Witness to the Last Execution in France

The following document is a firsthand account of the final moments of Hamida Djandoubi, a convicted murderer executed by guillotine at Marseille’s Baumettes Prison on September 10, 1977. The record—dated September 9—was written by Monique Mabelly, a judge appointed by the state to witness the proceedings. Djandoubi’s execution would ultimately be the last carried out in France before capital punishment was abolished in 1981. At the time, President Valéry Giscard d'Estaing—who had publicly voiced his "deep aversion to the death penalty" prior to his election—rejected Djandoubi’s appeal for clemency. Choosing to let "justice take its course," the President allowed the execution to proceed, just as he had in two previous cases during his term:   Christian Ranucci , executed on July 28, 1976 and Jérôme Carrein , executed on June 23, 1977. Hamida Djandoubi , a Tunisian national, was sentenced to death for killing his former lover, Elisabeth Bousquet. He was execu...

New Mississippi billboard warns criminals: ‘Firing squad is legal’

DESOTO COUNTY, Miss. (WREG) — A billboard standing on Interstate 55 southbound as you cross the Tennessee state line and enter Mississippi from Memphis is sending a grim message to those coming into the state. DeSoto County District Attorney Matthew Barton recently announced the new billboard campaign, which features the sign reading, “WELCOME TO MISSISSIPPI. WHERE THE FIRING SQUAD IS LEGAL. THINK TWICE.” It references Mississippi’s law permitting execution by firing squad under certain circumstances for inmates sentenced to death. Barton says this campaign is aimed at deterring violent crime and sends a direct message to criminals entering Mississippi.

SCOTUS: Alabama can’t execute Jeffery Lee by nitrogen; Thursday execution called off

After a week of legal volleyball, Alabama death row inmate Jeffery Lee’s execution—scheduled for Thursday evening—was called off after federal courts called the state’s nitrogen gas execution method “likely unconstitutional.” The state took the fight to the U.S. Supreme Court, hoping Lee could still be put to death tonight.  In an order issued at 8:10 p.m., the U.S. Supreme Court ordered that it would not lift a ban on Alabama executing Lee via nitrogen . In a short court order, the justices denied Alabama’s motion to go ahead with the execution.  Associate Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch would have granted the appeal and let the execution proceed, according to the order. 

With nitrogen gas blocked, Alabama seeks to execute inmate by lethal injection

Jeffery Lee, who successfully challenged his scheduled Thursday execution by nitrogen gas, argued that execution by firing squad would be less painful. The Alabama Attorney General’s Office Friday sought to put an Alabama death row inmate to death by lethal injection a day after the U.S. Supreme Court rebuffed the state’s attempt to execute him by nitrogen gas. In a filing with the Alabama Supreme Court Friday afternoon, the state sought an expedited motion to set a new execution date for Jeffery Lee, 49. The state said that with a permanent injunction in place against nitrogen gas, the method by which the state intended to execute Lee on Thursday, it could execute him by lethal injection or the electric chair.

Alabama | Judge bars nitrogen gas execution, says method is unconstitutionally cruel

MONTGOMERY, Ala. -- A federal judge on Tuesday permanently blocked Alabama from executing an inmate with nitrogen gas after declaring it violates the ban on cruel and unusual punishment. U.S. District Judge Emily Marks issued the ruling hours after an appeals court reversed her initial finding that the method was constitutional. Marks permanently enjoined the state from executing Jeffrey Lee, 49, by nitrogen gas. He was scheduled to be executed Thursday. The decision, for now, blocks the use of the controversial new execution method that the state has championed since 2024, but the issue will likely end up before the U.S. Supreme Court.

Idaho will soon turn to firing squad executions. Police will pull the triggers

Trained members of Idaho law enforcement with demonstrated firearms proficiency are expected to fill slots for carrying out the death penalty by firing squad as the state prison system transitions to the controversial execution method next month.  Six volunteers certified for no less than three years apiece through Peace Officer Standards and Training, or POST, will be recruited to ensure the Idaho Department of Correction is ready to comply with a state law that prioritizes shooting prisoners to death over lethal injection starting July 1.  No one on the team may have faced disciplinary action over firearms, use of force, or related conduct over the prior year, according to new execution protocols the prison system released this week. 

Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch wanted an execution that a Trump judge deemed illegal

The Supreme Court these days is generally in the business of helping executions go forward. But on Thursday night, the court did something notable: It told Alabama no. Even then, the court wasn't unanimous. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch dissented from the refusal to let the nitrogen gas execution of Jeffery Lee proceed. What prompted the rare rejection? In line with the typical shadow docket practice, the court didn't explain itself. Nor did the dissenters, who merely noted their disagreement. But a deeper look at the case helps us understand why a majority of the court was unwilling to help the state this time.