Skip to main content

Israel | Bill to prosecute Oct 7 terrorists on genocide charges gains traction

Hamas terrorists attacking an Israeli kibbutz on October 7, 2023.
The Ministerial Committee for Legislation approved a bill on Sunday that seeks to prosecute Hamas Oct. 7 terrorists on charges of genocide against the Jewish state.

The proposed legislation calls for the creation of a special court with 15 judges who would be tasked with handling criminal trials for individuals facing such charges. The new bill calls for the death penalty as the maximum sentence for those convicted of genocide.

The bill was jointly initiated by lawmaker Simcha Rothman, from the Religious Zionism party, and the lawmaker Yulia Malinovsky of the Yisrael Beytenu opposition party. The bill is expected to advance to the Knesset for approval.

The two lawmakers argued that Israel’s current legal tools are insufficient for addressing the crimes against humanity committed by terrorists on Oct. 7, 2023.

“When it comes to the Nukhba terrorists, from a legal standpoint, the State of Israel remains stuck in a mindset that predates October 7. The current legal tools are inadequate and irrelevant for addressing an act of genocide and mass murder,” Rothman stated.

“Anyone trying to force this into the framework of regular criminal law is destroying the entire legal process. As proof, up until now, not even a single indictment has been filed. That’s why we must fundamentally change the legal structure,” he added.

The new bill is calling for a special court with the authority to “deviate from established evidentiary and procedural rules, while taking into account, among other things, the need to protect victims of the crime and their families, to ease the hearing of evidence in multi-defendant proceedings, to reduce intermediate and preliminary procedures, to ensure the public nature of the proceedings and make them accessible to various target audiences in Israel and around the world, and to conduct proceedings efficiently, in order to achieve justice.”

The bill stresses the complexity and severity of the Oct. 7 crimes.

“The complexity of the events [on October 7], their unprecedented scale, and the unique nature of the crimes committed require a distinct legal response. The conventional legal system is not equipped to handle crimes of such magnitude, which were carried out simultaneously by hundreds of perpetrators. Moreover, the special nature of these crimes – including crimes against humanity and acts amounting to genocide – necessitates expertise and a unique legal approach,” the bill states.

The proposed law also seeks to prevent future attacks against the Jewish people in Israel.

“Additionally, there is an urgent need for swift and effective action on this issue, both in terms of deterrence and ensuring justice for the victims and their families.”

“In light of this, a proposal is made to establish a special and separate legal mechanism tailored to address genocide-related crimes, specifically regarding the events of October 7 that amount to such offenses,” it added.

In October 2024, Rothman and Malinovsky revealed their intention to present a bill to prosecute terrorists who committed the massacres and other atrocities against Israeli civilians and foreign nationals during the attack in 2023.

Malinovsky criticized the Netanyahu government at the time for failing to the prioritize prosecution of war crimes against Israelis.

"The government had a whole year to prepare for prosecuting those involved, but failed to make it a priority," she said.

However, the bill is now being challenged by lawyers from the Attorney General’s Office.

“The investigation of the terrorists involved in the events of October 7 is in advanced stages and is being handled as a top priority by law enforcement authorities. The proposal undermines the independence of law enforcement agencies and could harm the international legitimacy of the procedures being carried out – and those that will be carried out – by the State of Israel. Additionally, it may affect Israel’s broader interests in the international arena,” the Israeli lawyers responded.

Source: allisraelnews.com, Staff, May 26, 2025




"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted."
— Oscar Wilde


Comments

Most viewed (Last 7 days)

Gov. Mike DeWine calls for Ohio to abolish the death penalty

COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — Gov. Mike DeWine Tuesday morning called on Ohio to abolish the death penalty, citing data that he said proves it is no longer a deterrent to violent crime. “For the state to take a human life, there must, in my opinion, there must be evidence that in doing so it will help protect the public, that the threat of that action will deter someone from committing murder,” DeWine said. “I do not believe that argument today can be successfully made.” DeWine cited data showing a decline in the last four decades of executions being carried out and an increase in the time inmates spend on death row.

I watched Ohio's last execution. Here's what it was like

As Gov. DeWine calls for Ohio to end capital punishment, the state’s last execution remains the one I witnessed in 2018 Inside Ohio's death house, there is a room for executions and separate witness rooms: one for those connected to the victim and another for those connected to the inmate. Windows separate the death chamber from those watching, the condemned from the living. I was there on July 18, 2018 – during Ohio’s most recent execution. Robert Van Hook was put to death that day for killing David Self in 1985. He sat on death row for three decades. I was one of three media witnesses to the execution.

Kansas AG urges governor to deny clemency to 8 sentenced to death

TOPEKA — Attorney General Kris Kobach on Tuesday urged the governor to deny clemency to Kansas inmates who have been sentenced to death. Eight of nine people sentenced to death in Kansas formally filed clemency requests in May, according to a press release from the Attorney General’s Office. Kobach urged Gov. Laura Kelly to reject them.

20 Minutes to Death: Witness to the Last Execution in France

The following document is a firsthand account of the final moments of Hamida Djandoubi, a convicted murderer executed by guillotine at Marseille’s Baumettes Prison on September 10, 1977. The record—dated September 9—was written by Monique Mabelly, a judge appointed by the state to witness the proceedings. Djandoubi’s execution would ultimately be the last carried out in France before capital punishment was abolished in 1981. At the time, President Valéry Giscard d'Estaing—who had publicly voiced his "deep aversion to the death penalty" prior to his election—rejected Djandoubi’s appeal for clemency. Choosing to let "justice take its course," the President allowed the execution to proceed, just as he had in two previous cases during his term:   Christian Ranucci , executed on July 28, 1976 and Jérôme Carrein , executed on June 23, 1977. Hamida Djandoubi , a Tunisian national, was sentenced to death for killing his former lover, Elisabeth Bousquet. He was execu...

New Mississippi billboard warns criminals: ‘Firing squad is legal’

DESOTO COUNTY, Miss. (WREG) — A billboard standing on Interstate 55 southbound as you cross the Tennessee state line and enter Mississippi from Memphis is sending a grim message to those coming into the state. DeSoto County District Attorney Matthew Barton recently announced the new billboard campaign, which features the sign reading, “WELCOME TO MISSISSIPPI. WHERE THE FIRING SQUAD IS LEGAL. THINK TWICE.” It references Mississippi’s law permitting execution by firing squad under certain circumstances for inmates sentenced to death. Barton says this campaign is aimed at deterring violent crime and sends a direct message to criminals entering Mississippi.

SCOTUS: Alabama can’t execute Jeffery Lee by nitrogen; Thursday execution called off

After a week of legal volleyball, Alabama death row inmate Jeffery Lee’s execution—scheduled for Thursday evening—was called off after federal courts called the state’s nitrogen gas execution method “likely unconstitutional.” The state took the fight to the U.S. Supreme Court, hoping Lee could still be put to death tonight.  In an order issued at 8:10 p.m., the U.S. Supreme Court ordered that it would not lift a ban on Alabama executing Lee via nitrogen . In a short court order, the justices denied Alabama’s motion to go ahead with the execution.  Associate Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch would have granted the appeal and let the execution proceed, according to the order. 

With nitrogen gas blocked, Alabama seeks to execute inmate by lethal injection

Jeffery Lee, who successfully challenged his scheduled Thursday execution by nitrogen gas, argued that execution by firing squad would be less painful. The Alabama Attorney General’s Office Friday sought to put an Alabama death row inmate to death by lethal injection a day after the U.S. Supreme Court rebuffed the state’s attempt to execute him by nitrogen gas. In a filing with the Alabama Supreme Court Friday afternoon, the state sought an expedited motion to set a new execution date for Jeffery Lee, 49. The state said that with a permanent injunction in place against nitrogen gas, the method by which the state intended to execute Lee on Thursday, it could execute him by lethal injection or the electric chair.

Alabama | Judge bars nitrogen gas execution, says method is unconstitutionally cruel

MONTGOMERY, Ala. -- A federal judge on Tuesday permanently blocked Alabama from executing an inmate with nitrogen gas after declaring it violates the ban on cruel and unusual punishment. U.S. District Judge Emily Marks issued the ruling hours after an appeals court reversed her initial finding that the method was constitutional. Marks permanently enjoined the state from executing Jeffrey Lee, 49, by nitrogen gas. He was scheduled to be executed Thursday. The decision, for now, blocks the use of the controversial new execution method that the state has championed since 2024, but the issue will likely end up before the U.S. Supreme Court.

Idaho will soon turn to firing squad executions. Police will pull the triggers

Trained members of Idaho law enforcement with demonstrated firearms proficiency are expected to fill slots for carrying out the death penalty by firing squad as the state prison system transitions to the controversial execution method next month.  Six volunteers certified for no less than three years apiece through Peace Officer Standards and Training, or POST, will be recruited to ensure the Idaho Department of Correction is ready to comply with a state law that prioritizes shooting prisoners to death over lethal injection starting July 1.  No one on the team may have faced disciplinary action over firearms, use of force, or related conduct over the prior year, according to new execution protocols the prison system released this week. 

Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch wanted an execution that a Trump judge deemed illegal

The Supreme Court these days is generally in the business of helping executions go forward. But on Thursday night, the court did something notable: It told Alabama no. Even then, the court wasn't unanimous. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch dissented from the refusal to let the nitrogen gas execution of Jeffery Lee proceed. What prompted the rare rejection? In line with the typical shadow docket practice, the court didn't explain itself. Nor did the dissenters, who merely noted their disagreement. But a deeper look at the case helps us understand why a majority of the court was unwilling to help the state this time.