Skip to main content

Florida re-seeks death penalty for killers in 2006 Turnpike slaying after Biden clemency

FORT PIERCE, Fla. (CBS12) — Nearly two decades after a Palm Beach County family was executed along the side of Florida’s Turnpike, state prosecutors are seeking to reimpose the death penalty on the two men convicted of the killings.

The effort comes after former President Joe Biden commuted their federal death sentences in the final days of his administration.

In the waning days of his presidency, Biden commuted the death penalty sentences against nearly all federal inmates on death row, including two men condemned for a quadruple killing in St. Lucie County. The move sparked an uproar from law enforcement nationwide.

Among the prisoners granted clemency were Ricardo Sanchez, Jr., and Daniel Troya, the two men convicted in the 2006 Turnpike killings of a mother, father, and their two young children. Just four and three years old at the time, the boys died wrapped in their mother’s arms.

“They were not wrapped up, but you could see they were embracing,” former St. Lucie County Sheriff Ken Mascara said at the time. “The mother was embracing the children.”

“The image of the mother holding those two little babies while they shot and killed them is embedded in my head,” said John MacVeigh, a former federal investigator. “You're never going to not see that again.”

The murders happened early in the morning of October 13, 2006, when the Sanchez and Troya stopped the family’s Jeep Cherokee along the Turnpike, near Port St. Lucie. Our Sky12 captured the crime scene, showing a blue tent covering four body bags off the Turnpike.

Each family member – Jose Luis Escobedo, Luis Damian Escobedo, Luis Julian Escobedo, and Yessica Guerro Escobedo – was shot, and their bodies were left there. Sanchez and Troya drove off, taking both their Dodge Ram van and the Escobedos’ black Jeep Cherokee.

“This case left a lasting scar on our community,” Sheriff Richard Del Toro recalled. “We owe it to the Escobedo family and the public to pursue every available legal avenue to deliver justice. My office stands ready to support this mission in full.”

“With the federal death sentence no longer in effect, we believe the pursuit of justice now rests with the State of Florida,” State Attorney Thomas Bakkedahl argued. “My office is committed to ensuring that the sentence ultimately reflects the gravity of this crime.”

After the murders, a search of the family’s home led investigators to suspect Jose Luis Escobedo was involved in cocaine trafficking. They soon linked Escobedo to Sanchez and Troya, along with a third person, identified as Danny Varela.

After obtaining a search warrant for the three men’s West Palm Beach home, law enforcement officers discovered more than a kilogram of cocaine, approximately 30 grams of crack cocaine, and 30 tablets of ecstasy. Along with the drugs, investigators found more than a dozen guns, including handguns, rifles, and shotguns.

Following the discovery, all three men were arrested in connection with the drugs and guns, as well as two others, identified as Liana Lopez and Jose Gutierrez, respectively.

In May 2009, Sanchez and Troya were convicted on 11 charges, that included the four counts of causing the deaths of the Escobedo family. That day they were given life in prison and five years of supervised release. Additionally, they were sentenced to be executed – that is, until Biden stepped in.

Prosecutors plans


Next week, Bakkedahl and Del Toro will reveal a new push to begin pursuing state-level capital charges with the expressed aim of obtaining new death penalty convictions.

“The calculated and unspeakably violent murders of the Escobedo family demand the highest level of accountability,” Bakkedahl added.

Under Florida law, murder has no statute of limitations, and defendants can be prosecuted in both state and federal court for the same crime under the concept of dual sovereignty.

MacVeigh, who regularly monitored Troya during his time in custody, says justice demands a second attempt.

“If there is, quote-unquote, the role model case for the death penalty, it was this one,” MacVeigh said. “They’ll try to argue double jeopardy, but that doesn’t apply here. I hope a jury sees this for the horrific crime it was—and imposes the death penalty again.”

The State Attorney’s Office will initiate proceedings against the convicted killers, while the St. Lucie County Sheriff’s Office will offer investigators and resources to ensure prosecutors have what they need if the case goes to trial.

“Where is the justice for the Escobedo family that was murdered in cold blood?”

That was the question then-St. Lucie County Sheriff Keith Pearson asked after learning of the commutations. Starting next Tuesday, he may have his answer.

Source: cw34.com, Nick Viviani, Katie Bente, May 23, 2025




"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted."
— Oscar Wilde


Comments

Most viewed (Last 7 days)

Gov. Mike DeWine calls for Ohio to abolish the death penalty

COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — Gov. Mike DeWine Tuesday morning called on Ohio to abolish the death penalty, citing data that he said proves it is no longer a deterrent to violent crime. “For the state to take a human life, there must, in my opinion, there must be evidence that in doing so it will help protect the public, that the threat of that action will deter someone from committing murder,” DeWine said. “I do not believe that argument today can be successfully made.” DeWine cited data showing a decline in the last four decades of executions being carried out and an increase in the time inmates spend on death row.

I watched Ohio's last execution. Here's what it was like

As Gov. DeWine calls for Ohio to end capital punishment, the state’s last execution remains the one I witnessed in 2018 Inside Ohio's death house, there is a room for executions and separate witness rooms: one for those connected to the victim and another for those connected to the inmate. Windows separate the death chamber from those watching, the condemned from the living. I was there on July 18, 2018 – during Ohio’s most recent execution. Robert Van Hook was put to death that day for killing David Self in 1985. He sat on death row for three decades. I was one of three media witnesses to the execution.

Kansas AG urges governor to deny clemency to 8 sentenced to death

TOPEKA — Attorney General Kris Kobach on Tuesday urged the governor to deny clemency to Kansas inmates who have been sentenced to death. Eight of nine people sentenced to death in Kansas formally filed clemency requests in May, according to a press release from the Attorney General’s Office. Kobach urged Gov. Laura Kelly to reject them.

20 Minutes to Death: Witness to the Last Execution in France

The following document is a firsthand account of the final moments of Hamida Djandoubi, a convicted murderer executed by guillotine at Marseille’s Baumettes Prison on September 10, 1977. The record—dated September 9—was written by Monique Mabelly, a judge appointed by the state to witness the proceedings. Djandoubi’s execution would ultimately be the last carried out in France before capital punishment was abolished in 1981. At the time, President Valéry Giscard d'Estaing—who had publicly voiced his "deep aversion to the death penalty" prior to his election—rejected Djandoubi’s appeal for clemency. Choosing to let "justice take its course," the President allowed the execution to proceed, just as he had in two previous cases during his term:   Christian Ranucci , executed on July 28, 1976 and Jérôme Carrein , executed on June 23, 1977. Hamida Djandoubi , a Tunisian national, was sentenced to death for killing his former lover, Elisabeth Bousquet. He was execu...

New Mississippi billboard warns criminals: ‘Firing squad is legal’

DESOTO COUNTY, Miss. (WREG) — A billboard standing on Interstate 55 southbound as you cross the Tennessee state line and enter Mississippi from Memphis is sending a grim message to those coming into the state. DeSoto County District Attorney Matthew Barton recently announced the new billboard campaign, which features the sign reading, “WELCOME TO MISSISSIPPI. WHERE THE FIRING SQUAD IS LEGAL. THINK TWICE.” It references Mississippi’s law permitting execution by firing squad under certain circumstances for inmates sentenced to death. Barton says this campaign is aimed at deterring violent crime and sends a direct message to criminals entering Mississippi.

SCOTUS: Alabama can’t execute Jeffery Lee by nitrogen; Thursday execution called off

After a week of legal volleyball, Alabama death row inmate Jeffery Lee’s execution—scheduled for Thursday evening—was called off after federal courts called the state’s nitrogen gas execution method “likely unconstitutional.” The state took the fight to the U.S. Supreme Court, hoping Lee could still be put to death tonight.  In an order issued at 8:10 p.m., the U.S. Supreme Court ordered that it would not lift a ban on Alabama executing Lee via nitrogen . In a short court order, the justices denied Alabama’s motion to go ahead with the execution.  Associate Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch would have granted the appeal and let the execution proceed, according to the order. 

With nitrogen gas blocked, Alabama seeks to execute inmate by lethal injection

Jeffery Lee, who successfully challenged his scheduled Thursday execution by nitrogen gas, argued that execution by firing squad would be less painful. The Alabama Attorney General’s Office Friday sought to put an Alabama death row inmate to death by lethal injection a day after the U.S. Supreme Court rebuffed the state’s attempt to execute him by nitrogen gas. In a filing with the Alabama Supreme Court Friday afternoon, the state sought an expedited motion to set a new execution date for Jeffery Lee, 49. The state said that with a permanent injunction in place against nitrogen gas, the method by which the state intended to execute Lee on Thursday, it could execute him by lethal injection or the electric chair.

Alabama | Judge bars nitrogen gas execution, says method is unconstitutionally cruel

MONTGOMERY, Ala. -- A federal judge on Tuesday permanently blocked Alabama from executing an inmate with nitrogen gas after declaring it violates the ban on cruel and unusual punishment. U.S. District Judge Emily Marks issued the ruling hours after an appeals court reversed her initial finding that the method was constitutional. Marks permanently enjoined the state from executing Jeffrey Lee, 49, by nitrogen gas. He was scheduled to be executed Thursday. The decision, for now, blocks the use of the controversial new execution method that the state has championed since 2024, but the issue will likely end up before the U.S. Supreme Court.

Idaho will soon turn to firing squad executions. Police will pull the triggers

Trained members of Idaho law enforcement with demonstrated firearms proficiency are expected to fill slots for carrying out the death penalty by firing squad as the state prison system transitions to the controversial execution method next month.  Six volunteers certified for no less than three years apiece through Peace Officer Standards and Training, or POST, will be recruited to ensure the Idaho Department of Correction is ready to comply with a state law that prioritizes shooting prisoners to death over lethal injection starting July 1.  No one on the team may have faced disciplinary action over firearms, use of force, or related conduct over the prior year, according to new execution protocols the prison system released this week. 

Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch wanted an execution that a Trump judge deemed illegal

The Supreme Court these days is generally in the business of helping executions go forward. But on Thursday night, the court did something notable: It told Alabama no. Even then, the court wasn't unanimous. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch dissented from the refusal to let the nitrogen gas execution of Jeffery Lee proceed. What prompted the rare rejection? In line with the typical shadow docket practice, the court didn't explain itself. Nor did the dissenters, who merely noted their disagreement. But a deeper look at the case helps us understand why a majority of the court was unwilling to help the state this time.