Skip to main content

In Sunday’s Gospel, Jesus signals His opposition to the death penalty

As the Church's liturgical readings recall Jesus’ encounter with the woman caught in adultery, the Director of the US-based Catholic Mobilizing Network explores the Lord’s rejection of capital punishment.


This Sunday’s Gospel reading for Year C describes the event traditionally called the story of the woman caught in adultery (John 8:1-11). My friends have helped to give it new relevance for me this year.

In our work at Catholic Mobilizing Network, we strive to end the death penalty, advance justice, and begin healing.

From the start, we have learned from the witness of those individuals who have been personally impacted by the scourge of capital punishment. I have the honor of working with people like Syl and Vicki Schieber, who responded to the murder of their daughter by working to abolish capital punishment and uphold the dignity of every human person.

The Schiebers, nearly in their 80’s now, have often shared with me how they have never heard a homily that relates this story of the woman caught in adultery to the death penalty. Yet, for these deeply faithful murder victim family members, it is glaringly apparent.

A former Catholic social justice teacher and friend from my local parish, Tom Faletti, shared with me such a take on this week’s Gospel passage. 

In John 8:1-11, the central characters, other than Jesus, are the scribes and Pharisees. They initiate the action. Drawing on the Law of Moses (Deut. 22:22-24), they ask Jesus whether a woman caught in adultery should be executed by stoning. John 18:31 tells us that the Romans did not allow Jewish leaders to execute people. 

Jesus avoids their trap, saying, “Let the one among you who is without sin be the first to throw a stone at her” (John 8:7b, NABRE).

Since we don’t stone people in our day, we miss the import of His words. We use the phrase “throwing stones” as a metaphor for casting criticism or judgment.

Although Jesus often used metaphors, here the phrase is not just a metaphor. The discussion is about capital punishment. Jesus is being asked whether real stones should be used to literally execute the woman. He answers by saying that there is only one kind of person authorized to literally pick up a stone and hurl it at the woman to kill her: one who is sinless.

To fully appreciate the meaning of Jesus’s words, it helps to translate them into the language of modern-day executions. Modern governments don’t execute people by stoning. They inject people with a deadly drug, or poison with lethal gas, or kill with the bullets of a firing squad.

If we apply Jesus’s words to our modern context, He is saying:

- “Let the one who is without sin administer the deadly drug.”
- “Let the one who is without sin release the poisonous gas.”
- “Let the one who is without sin pull the trigger of the gun.”

This helps us see how the story relates to the death penalty.

The background in the Law of Moses makes it even clearer. According to the Law, two witnesses are required to establish guilt (Deut. 17:6 and 19:15). Those witnesses must be the first to cast the stones of execution (Deut. 17:7), and if they testify falsely, they must receive the penalty that would have been administered to the accused (Deut. 19:16-19).

Because John 8:1-11 is about men seeking to impose the death penalty, we are led to ask: Where is the man with whom the woman committed the act of adultery? Where are the witnesses ready to cast the first stones of execution or die if they are lying?

Jesus recognizes the trap of the situation. His response is that only a sinless person has the authority to execute another person.

When the men have left, Jesus asks the woman, “Has no one condemned you?” (John 8:10b)– i.e., has no one condemned you to death?

“No one,” she says (John 8:11a).

Jesus, who is sinless, rejects the death penalty for the woman: “Neither do I condemn you” (John 8:11b).

None of us are sinless, so there is only one, inescapable conclusion. Do we have the right to impose the death penalty on other people? In John 8:1-11, Jesus gives a clear answer: No, we do not. Even He, the Sinless One, rejects the death penalty.

This story is often described as merely a story about a sinful woman — but it is much more than that.

As my dear friends have pointed out to me, this is a story about Jesus who, when confronted with the opportunity to support the death penalty, refused to do so.

The Church has embraced Jesus’s approach and chosen to reject the death penalty, in light of Jesus’s teachings and Catholic social teaching.

“The Church teaches, in the light of the Gospel, that ‘the death penalty is inadmissible because it is an attack on the inviolability and dignity of the person,’ and she works with determination for its abolition worldwide.” (CCC 2267)

May our faithful education, catechesis, and formation efforts proclaim the defense of life and human dignity at every age and every stage—and include ending the death penalty.

And thank God for friends that bear witness to Jesus’ reconciling way and lift up the Gospel’s more perfect vision of justice.

Source: vaticannews.va, Krisanne Vaillancourt Murphy, April 4, 2025




"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted."
— Oscar Wilde


Comments

Most viewed (Last 7 days)

Arizona | The cruelty of isolation: There’s nothing ‘humane’ about how we treat the condemned

On March 19, I served as a witness to the execution of a man named Aaron Gunches, Arizona’s first since 2022. During his time on death row, he begged for death and was ultimately granted what is likely more appropriately described as an emotionless state-assisted suicide. This experience has profoundly impacted me, leading to deep reflection on the nature of death, humanity, and the role we play in our final moments. When someone is in the end stages of life, we talk about hospice care, comfort, care, easing suffering and humane death. We strive for a “good death” — a peaceful transition. I’ve seen good ones, and I’ve seen bad, unplanned ones. 

Execution date set for prisoner transferred to Oklahoma to face death penalty

An inmate who was transferred to Oklahoma last month to face the death penalty now has an execution date. George John Hanson, also known as John Fitzgerald Hanson, is scheduled to die on June 12 for the 1999 murder of 77-year-old Mary Bowles.  The Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals on Tuesday set the execution date. The state’s Pardon and Parole Board has a tentative date of May 7 for Hanson’s clemency hearing, executive director Tom Bates said.

Bangladesh | Botswana Woman Executed for Drug Trafficking

Dhaka, Bangladesh – Lesedi Molapisi, a Botswana national convicted of drug trafficking, was executed in Bangladesh on Friday, 21 March 2025. The 31-year-old was hanged at Dhaka Central Jail after exhausting all legal avenues to appeal her death sentence. Molapisi was arrested in January 2023 upon arrival at Hazrat Shahjalal International Airport in Dhaka, where customs officials discovered 3.1 kilograms of heroin hidden in her luggage. Following a trial under Bangladesh’s Narcotics Control Act, she was sentenced to death in May 2024. Her execution was initially delayed due to political unrest in the country but was carried out last week.

'No Warning': The Death Penalty In Japan

Stakes for wrongful convictions are high in Japan, where the death penalty has broad public support despite criticism over how it is carried out. Tokyo: Capital punishment in Japan is under scrutiny again after the world's longest-serving death row prisoner, Iwao Hakamada, was awarded $1.4 million in compensation this week following his acquittal last year in a retrial. Stakes for wrongful convictions are high in Japan, where the death penalty has broad public support despite international criticism over how it is carried out.

Inside Florida's Death Row: A dark cloud over the Sunshine State

Florida's death penalty system has faced numerous criticisms and controversies over the years - from execution methods to the treatment of Death Row inmates The Sunshine State remains steadfast in its enforcement of capital punishment, upholding a complex system that has developed since its reinstatement in 1976. Florida's contemporary death penalty era kicked off in 1972 following the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Furman v. Georgia , which temporarily put a stop to executions across the country. Swiftly amending its laws, Florida saw the Supreme Court affirm the constitutionality of the death penalty in 1976's Gregg v. Georgia case.

Lethal Injection, Electric Chair, or Firing Squad? An Inhumane Decision for Death Row Prisoners

South Carolina resumed executions with the firing squad killing of Brad Sigmon last month. Mikal Madhi’s execution date is days away. The curtain shrieked as it was yanked open to reveal a 67-year-old man tied to a chair. His arms were pulled uncomfortably behind his back. The red bull’s-eye target on his chest rose and fell as he desperately attempted to still his breathing. The man, Brad Sigmon, smiled at his attorney, Bo King, seated in the front row before guards placed a black bag over his head. King said Sigmon appeared to be trying his best to put on a brave face for those who had come to bear witness.

Louisiana | Lawyers of Jessie Hoffman speak about their final moments before execution

As Louisiana prepared its first execution in 15 years, a team of lawyers from Loyola Law were working to save Jessie Hoffman’s life. “I was a young lawyer three years out of law school, and Jessie was almost finished with his appeals at that time, and my boss told me we needed to file something for Jessie because he’s in danger of being executed,” Kappel said. Kappel and her boss came up with a civil lawsuit to file that said since they wouldn’t give him a protocol for his execution, he was being deprived of due process, and the lawsuit was in the legal process for the next 10 years.

USA | Federal death penalty possible for Mexican cartel boss behind 1985 DEA agent killing

Rafael Caro Quintero, extradited from Mexico in 2022, appeared in Brooklyn court as feds weigh capital charges for the torture and murder of Agent Enrique Camarena NEW YORK — The death penalty is on the table for notorious drug lord Rafael Caro Quintero, the so-called “narco of narcos” who orchestrated the torture and murder of a DEA agent in 1985, according to federal prosecutors. “It is a possibility. The decision has not yet been made, but it is going through the process,” Assistant U.S. Attorney Saritha Komatireddy said in Brooklyn Federal Court Wednesday.

South Carolina | Spiritual adviser of condemned inmate: 'We're more than the worst thing we've done'

(RNS) — When 67-year-old Brad Sigmon was put to death on March 7 in South Carolina for the murder of his then-girlfriend's parents, it was the first time in 15 years that an execution in the United States had been carried out by a firing squad. United Methodist minister Hillary Taylor, Sigmon's spiritual adviser since 2020, said the multifaceted, months long effort to save Sigmon's life, and to provide emotional and spiritual support for his legal team, and the aftermath of his execution has been a "whirlwind" said Taylor, the director of South Carolinians for Alternatives to the Death Penalty.

A second South Carolina death row inmate chooses execution by firing squad

Columbia, S.C. — A South Carolina death row inmate on Friday chose execution by firing squad, just five weeks after the state carried out its first death by bullets. Mikal Mahdi, who pleaded guilty to murder for killing a police officer in 2004, is scheduled to be executed April 11. Mahdi, 41, had the choice of dying by firing squad, lethal injection or the electric chair. He will be the first inmate to be executed in the state since Brad Sigmon chose to be shot to death on March 7. A doctor pronounced Sigmon dead less than three minutes after three bullets tore into his heart.