Skip to main content

In Sunday’s Gospel, Jesus signals His opposition to the death penalty

As the Church's liturgical readings recall Jesus’ encounter with the woman caught in adultery, the Director of the US-based Catholic Mobilizing Network explores the Lord’s rejection of capital punishment.


This Sunday’s Gospel reading for Year C describes the event traditionally called the story of the woman caught in adultery (John 8:1-11). My friends have helped to give it new relevance for me this year.

In our work at Catholic Mobilizing Network, we strive to end the death penalty, advance justice, and begin healing.

From the start, we have learned from the witness of those individuals who have been personally impacted by the scourge of capital punishment. I have the honor of working with people like Syl and Vicki Schieber, who responded to the murder of their daughter by working to abolish capital punishment and uphold the dignity of every human person.

The Schiebers, nearly in their 80’s now, have often shared with me how they have never heard a homily that relates this story of the woman caught in adultery to the death penalty. Yet, for these deeply faithful murder victim family members, it is glaringly apparent.

A former Catholic social justice teacher and friend from my local parish, Tom Faletti, shared with me such a take on this week’s Gospel passage. 

In John 8:1-11, the central characters, other than Jesus, are the scribes and Pharisees. They initiate the action. Drawing on the Law of Moses (Deut. 22:22-24), they ask Jesus whether a woman caught in adultery should be executed by stoning. John 18:31 tells us that the Romans did not allow Jewish leaders to execute people. 

Jesus avoids their trap, saying, “Let the one among you who is without sin be the first to throw a stone at her” (John 8:7b, NABRE).

Since we don’t stone people in our day, we miss the import of His words. We use the phrase “throwing stones” as a metaphor for casting criticism or judgment.

Although Jesus often used metaphors, here the phrase is not just a metaphor. The discussion is about capital punishment. Jesus is being asked whether real stones should be used to literally execute the woman. He answers by saying that there is only one kind of person authorized to literally pick up a stone and hurl it at the woman to kill her: one who is sinless.

To fully appreciate the meaning of Jesus’s words, it helps to translate them into the language of modern-day executions. Modern governments don’t execute people by stoning. They inject people with a deadly drug, or poison with lethal gas, or kill with the bullets of a firing squad.

If we apply Jesus’s words to our modern context, He is saying:

- “Let the one who is without sin administer the deadly drug.”
- “Let the one who is without sin release the poisonous gas.”
- “Let the one who is without sin pull the trigger of the gun.”

This helps us see how the story relates to the death penalty.

The background in the Law of Moses makes it even clearer. According to the Law, two witnesses are required to establish guilt (Deut. 17:6 and 19:15). Those witnesses must be the first to cast the stones of execution (Deut. 17:7), and if they testify falsely, they must receive the penalty that would have been administered to the accused (Deut. 19:16-19).

Because John 8:1-11 is about men seeking to impose the death penalty, we are led to ask: Where is the man with whom the woman committed the act of adultery? Where are the witnesses ready to cast the first stones of execution or die if they are lying?

Jesus recognizes the trap of the situation. His response is that only a sinless person has the authority to execute another person.

When the men have left, Jesus asks the woman, “Has no one condemned you?” (John 8:10b)– i.e., has no one condemned you to death?

“No one,” she says (John 8:11a).

Jesus, who is sinless, rejects the death penalty for the woman: “Neither do I condemn you” (John 8:11b).

None of us are sinless, so there is only one, inescapable conclusion. Do we have the right to impose the death penalty on other people? In John 8:1-11, Jesus gives a clear answer: No, we do not. Even He, the Sinless One, rejects the death penalty.

This story is often described as merely a story about a sinful woman — but it is much more than that.

As my dear friends have pointed out to me, this is a story about Jesus who, when confronted with the opportunity to support the death penalty, refused to do so.

The Church has embraced Jesus’s approach and chosen to reject the death penalty, in light of Jesus’s teachings and Catholic social teaching.

“The Church teaches, in the light of the Gospel, that ‘the death penalty is inadmissible because it is an attack on the inviolability and dignity of the person,’ and she works with determination for its abolition worldwide.” (CCC 2267)

May our faithful education, catechesis, and formation efforts proclaim the defense of life and human dignity at every age and every stage—and include ending the death penalty.

And thank God for friends that bear witness to Jesus’ reconciling way and lift up the Gospel’s more perfect vision of justice.

Source: vaticannews.va, Krisanne Vaillancourt Murphy, April 4, 2025




"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted."
— Oscar Wilde


Comments

Most viewed (Last 7 days)

Iran | Singer Amirhossein Tataloo at Grave Risk of Execution for Blasphemy

Iran Human Rights (IHRNGO); May 17, 2025: Asghar Jahangir, Iran’s Judiciary spokesman announced today that the blasphemy death conviction of Amirhossein Maghsoudloo, known as Tataloo, has been upheld by the Supreme Court and sent for enforcement. The singer’s defence lawyer, Majid Naghshi, previously reported filing a judicial review request. Reiterating its opposition to the death penalty in all circumstances, Iran Human Rights considers the use of this inhumane punishment for charges such as blasphemy to be a flagrant violation of international human rights law and calls on civil society and the international community not remain silent about Amirhossein Maghsoudlou’s death penalty.

Indiana man set for execution in state's second since 2009

MICHIGAN CITY, Ind. (AP) — An Indiana man convicted in the 2000 killing of a police officer is set to receive a lethal injection early Tuesday in the state’s second execution in 15 years. Benjamin Ritchie, 45, has been on death row for more than 20 years after being convicted in the fatal shooting of Beech Grove Police Officer Bill Toney during a foot chase. Unless there’s last-minute court action, Ritchie is scheduled to be executed “before the hour of sunrise” at the Indiana State Prison in Michigan City, according to state officials.

Indiana executes Benjamin Ritchie

Death row inmate Benjamin Ritchie was executed by lethal injection shortly after midnight Tuesday at the Indiana State Prison in Michigan City, according to Department of Correction officials. The death sentence was carried out nearly 25 years after Ritchie shot and killed Beech Grove law enforcement officer William Toney. The condemned man had been on death row since his conviction in 2002. Details about the 45-year-old’s execution were sparse. No independent media representatives were permitted to witness the process.

Texas Set to Execute Fourth Inmate of the Year

Matthew Johnson was convicted of the 2012 murder of Nancy Harris in Dallas County. Matthew Johnson’s guilt was never in question. On the stand during his 2013 trial, he admitted to the crime that landed him on death row. The attack—an early morning robbery and murder in a populous Dallas suburb—was also caught on camera. Johnson is scheduled to be executed by the State of Texas on May 20, exactly 13 years to the day after he robbed a Fina Whip-In convenience store in Garland and set the store clerk on fire. Johnson was convicted of the murder of Nancy Harris, the 76-year-old clerk. 

Oscar Franklin Smith, Tennessee death row inmate, declines to select execution method

Oscar Franklin Smith, a Tennessee death row inmate scheduled for execution on May 22, will die by lethal injection if the process moves forward. Smith, who was asked to choose between lethal injection and the electric chair, declined to pick, his attorney Kelley Henry, a supervisory assistant federal public defender, said. When an inmate does not choose, the method defaults to lethal injection. It's not the first time Smith has been given this grim decision and declined. That decision to not choose ultimately saved his life for three more years.

South Carolina | Death row inmate seeks to volunteer to die after friends are executed

A South Carolina death row inmate has said he wants to become his own attorney, a decision that would likely lead to his own execution after his best friend and four fellow inmates were put to death in less than a year. A 45-day delay in James Robertson's request was ordered by a federal judge, allowing time for a different lawyer to talk to him and make sure he really wants to fire his own attorneys. The consequences of his decision are likely to be lethal. The 51-year-old Robertson has been on death row since 1999 after killing both his parents in their Rock Hill home. He beat his father with the claw end of a hammer and a baseball bat and stabbed his mother. He then tried to make it look like a robbery in hopes he would get his part of their $2.2 million estate, prosecutors said.

Saudi Arabia imposes death sentence for Bible smuggling

November 28, 2014: In a recent official statement from the Saudi Arabian government, the death sentence will now be imposed on anyone who attempts to smuggle Bibles into the country. In actuality, the new law extends to the importing of all illegal drugs and "all publications that have a prejudice to any other religious beliefs other than Islam."  In other words, anyone who attempts to bring Bibles or Gospel literature into the country will have all materials confiscated and be imprisoned and sentenced to death.  Source : heartcrymissionary.com, November 28, 2014

Iran | Convicted killer hanged in Tabriz. Execution carried out by his uncle, who was plaintiff in the case

Iran Human Rights (IHRNGO); May 10, 2025: Hassan Saei, a man on death row for murder, was executed in Tabriz Central Prison. His execution was carried out by his uncle, who was the plaintiff in the case. According to information obtained by Iran Human Rights, a man was hanged in Tabriz Central Prison on 6 May 2025. His identity has been established as Hassan Saei who was sentenced to qisas (retribution-in-kind) for murder by the Criminal Court. An informed source told IHRNGO: “Hassan Saei was arrested for the murder of his cousin and his maternal uncle carried out the execution.”

Florida executes Glen Rogers

Florida executes suspected serial killer once eyed for possible link to the OJ Simpson case  A suspected serial killer once scrutinized for a possible link to the O.J. Simpson case that riveted the nation in the 1990s was executed Thursday in Florida for the murder of a woman found dead in a Tampa motel room.  Glen Rogers, 62, received a lethal injection at Florida State Prison near Starke and was pronounced dead at 6:16 p.m., authorities said. He was convicted in Florida of the 1995 murder of Tina Marie Cribbs, a 34-year-old mother of 2 he had met at a bar.

Wyoming Hasn't Executed Anyone In 33 Years, But It's Tried

It's been 33 years since Wyoming Gov. Mike Sullivan stood in his office next to his priest, warring with himself over the execution of convicted serial killer Mark Hopkinson. The state hasn't executed anyone since that day — but it's tried. In the final few moments of convicted killer Mark Hopkinson’s life, protesters converged on the Wyoming State Capitol while the governor stood in his office, with a priest by his side. The state of Wyoming executed Hopkinson by lethal injection Jan. 22, 1992, at the Wyoming State Penitentiary in Rawlins — 13 years after he was convicted.