Skip to main content

Philippines | Rodrigo Duterte arrested for crimes against humanity: What’s next?

Former President Rodrigo Duterte was arrested on Tuesday morning following the issuance of an arrest warrant against him by the International Criminal Court (ICC). Lawyers and complainants, however, believe this is only the start of a long legal battle before the international tribunal. 

Malacañang confirmed Tuesday that former President Rodrigo Duterte is under the custody of authorities after getting arrested for crimes against humanity.

In a statement, the Presidential Communications Office (PCO) said that when the former president arrived in Manila, authorities served the warrant of arrest from the International Criminal Court (ICC) against him.

The ICC has been investigating Duterte and other top officials of his administration for crimes against humanity over the alleged systematic drug war deaths in police operations.

These deaths reached around 6,000 based on police records, but human rights groups contend that the deaths were as much as 30,000, including vigilante killings.

Duterte had said he is ready to face the warrant of arrest issued by the ICC for his controversial war against illegal drugs, stressing that he would face it directly as a lawyer and would not escape in another country. 

What happens now?


Following his arrest, Duterte was brought to the Villamor Air Base in Pasay City.

According to the ICC, an arrested individual must be brought promptly before the competent judicial authority in the custodial state, which determines whether the warrant is indeed for the arrested individual, whether he was arrested consistently with due process, and whether his rights were respected.

The ICC said that once an order for surrender is issued, the arrested individual is delivered to the Court and detained at the Detention Center in The Hague, Netherlands.

Following this, the Pre-Trial Chamber will hold a hearing to confirm the identity of the suspect, ensure that the suspect understands the charges, as well as to set a date to begin the confirmation of charges hearing.

At the close of the confirmation hearing, it said the Pre-Trial Chamber may:
  • Decline to confirm the charges; such a decision does not prevent the Prosecution from presenting a subsequent request for confirmation of the charges on the basis of additional evidence;
  • Adjourn the hearing and request the Prosecution to consider providing further evidence or conducting further investigation, or amending the charges;
  • Confirm the charges and commit the case for trial; upon confirmation, the Presidency of the Court constitutes a Trial Chamber responsible for the subsequent phase of the proceedings: the trial.
“After the confirmation of charges, the Pre-Trial Chamber commits the case for trial before a Trial Chamber, which will conduct the subsequent phase of the proceedings: the trial,” it said.

The trial will take place in The Hague, unless otherwise decided.

The ICC said the accused must be present and the trial must be held in public, except when the Chambers decide otherwise in order to protect the safety of victims and witnesses or sensitive information.

The accused may then make an admission of guilty or plead not guilty.

If the accused pleads guilty, the Trial Chamber will consider the admission together with any additional evidence and may convict the accused.

However, if it is not satisfied, the Trial Chamber may consider the admission of guilt as not having been made and the trial will continue under ordinary procedures.

The trial will then take place, where the parties may submit evidence.

According to the international tribunal, the promulgation of the sentence will be made in public and if possible, in the presence of the accused, victims, or their legal representatives.

Lawyer Kristina Conti, ICC assistant to counsel and the representative of the families of drug war victims, said that the average period of trial in the ICC is eight years while the shortest trial period was two years. 

“Depende din ‘yan kung gaano ka litigious o gaano ka iko-contest ng Duterte camp ‘yung mga charges sa kanya,” she said in an interview on Balitanghali.

(It also depends on how litigious or how much the Duterte camp will contest the charges against him.)

Penalties


The ICC cannot impose the death penalty, but the judges may impose a prison sentence, "to which may be added a fine or forfeiture of the proceeds, property and assets derived directly or indirectly from the crime committed," the court said.

“The maximum sentence is 30 years. However, in extreme cases, the Court may impose a term of life imprisonment,” it added.

According to the tribunal, the sentence will be served in the state designated by the Court from a list of states that have indicated their willingness to accept sentenced individuals.

Appeals


The tribunal also said that the judgement may be appealed by the parties.

It said the Appeals Chamber may reverse or amend the decision or order a new trial before a different Trial Chamber. It may also remand a factual issue to the original Trial Chamber.

In 2017, former Magdalo party-list Representative Gary Alejano and former Senator Antonio Trillanes IV  filed a communication to the ICC that adopted and supplemented an earlier complaint filed by Jude Sabio, lawyer for confessed hitman Edgar Matobato.

In 2018, activists and families of eight victims of the drug war filed a complaint against Duterte for alleged crimes against humanity.

However, hours following the arrest, Duterte and Senator Ronald Dela Rosa filed a petition before the High Court asking for his release.

They asked the SC for the issuance of a temporary restraining order prohibiting the government from cooperating with the International Criminal Court (ICC) on its investigation on the Duterte administration’s drug war as well as in assisting the tribunal from enforcing arrest warrants, summons, or requests.

They also asked for the TRO to prohibit the government from coordinating and providing assistance to the International Criminal Police Organization (Interpol) or any foreign law agency regarding the execution of warrants.

Source: gmanetwork.com, Staff, March 11, 2025




"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted."
— Oscar Wilde


Comments

Most viewed (Last 7 days)

Oklahoma executes James Pavatt

Pavatt claimed innocence in the slaying of an Oklahoma City advertising executive for insurance money. His co-defendant and former lover Brenda Andrew is also on death row. James Pavatt made no final statement before being executed Thursday for killing his lover’s estranged husband nearly 25 years ago. Pavatt merely shook his head when asked by Oklahoma Department of Corrections Chief of Operations Jason Sparks if he had any last words. Pavatt appeared to share a quick word with Michael Scott, his spiritual advisor, after microphones inside the death chamber had been cut off.

Oklahoma Death Row inmate James Pavatt scheduled to be executed Thursday

James Pavatt is scheduled to be executed on Thursday for the 2001 killing of an Oklahoma City man. OKLAHOMA CITY—Oklahoma Death Row inmate James Pavatt is set to be executed for the 2001 murder of advertising executive Rob Andrew. His execution is scheduled for Nov. 12, 2026. In 2004, Pavatt and his lover/co-conspirator, Brenda Andrew, were sentenced to death for planning the killing of her estranged husband in an attempt to claim his $800,000 life insurance policy. Brenda is the only woman on Oklahoma’s death row.

Judge allows Tennessee death row inmates to include botched executions in lawsuit

NASHVILLE, Tenn. (WKRN) — Two failed executions in Tennessee are now at the center of a growing legal battle over the state’s lethal injection protocol after a judge ruled in favor of death row inmates Friday. A Davidson County judge ruled death row inmates can expand their lawsuit to include new allegations stemming from the botched executions of Tony Carruthers and Christa Pike. The original lawsuit, filed in March 2025, argues Tennessee’s death penalty protocol violates the constitutional rights of death row inmates with complex medical conditions. More than one year later, the state then failed to execute two inmates: Tony Carruthers and Christa Pike.

Two men set to be executed in Texas and Oklahoma today

The U.S. was preparing to carry out two executions on Thursday, one in Oklahoma and one in Texas. In Texas, the condemned man is John Allen Rubio, 46, who is set to be put to death at the state prison in Huntsville. He was convicted of beheading three young children he was raising in a 2003 killing that rattled a community along the U.S.-Mexico border. The other man facing execution is James Pavatt, 73, who is set to die by lethal injection at Oklahoma's state penitentiary in McAlester.

Texas executes John Rubio

Texas man who killed 3 children is put to death, hours after an Oklahoma execution James Pavatt was put to death in Oklahoma for Rob Andrew’s killing. In Texas, John Allen Rubio was executed for the deaths of Julissa Quesada, John E. Rubio, and Mary Jane Rubio.  A Texas man convicted of fatally stabbing and beheading 3 young children in a squalid, windowless apartment in 2003 was executed Thursday evening, hours after Oklahoma put another man to death. 

Why Many Americans Think Christa Pike Should Undergo a Second Execution Attempt

On October 20, Reuters released the results of a survey showing that 33% of the American public want Tennessee to try again to put Christa Pike to death. Another 26% are undecided. That means 59% of the public would support or be open to such a possibility. I want to suggest a reason why. Second execution attempts are rare in this country and, as a result, the public knows little if anything about them. That may help explain why so many would give Tennessee another chance to kill Christa Pike.

Iran executes three more January protesters accused of spying for Israel, US

In a statement, the judiciary said that “the death sentences of Hassan Deoband, Hamid Kazemi, and Reza Zangana were carried out on charges of ‘participating in operational action for the infamous Zionist regime and the United States and hostile groups.’” ERBIL, Kurdistan Region of Iraq – Iran on Sunday executed three more protesters over their involvement in the nationwide demonstrations in January, the judiciary announced, accusing them of spying for the United States and Israel and destroying infrastructure. 

Alabama executes Michael Shannon Taylor

Alabama executes man convicted of 1991 double murder  The state of Alabama carried out the execution of 54-year-old Michael Shannon Taylor Thursday night for the 1991 murders of an elderly Etowah County couple, 35 years and 1 day after the crime.  Taylor, convicted in 1993 on 3 counts of capital murder, was sentenced to death unanimously by a jury for killing 83-year-old Ivan Ernest Moore and 79-year-old Lucille Moore inside their Gadsden home during a robbery. Taylor was 19 at the time. 

Iran | 10 executed in Ahvaz, Isfahan, Karaj

Four prisoners, including an Afghan national, were executed at Ghezel Hesar Prison in Karaj on Wednesday, November 4, 2026. All four had been sentenced to death under Iran’s qisas (retributive justice) laws on murder charges. According to information obtained by the Hengaw Organization for Human Rights, one of the executed prisoners was identified as Gol Agha Eskandari, an Afghan national. Eskandari had been convicted of murder following a dispute between neighbors in the Khorasan Square area of Tehran in July 2024 and subsequently sentenced to death.

Florida executes Jesse Guardado

Man convicted of 2004 killing is put to death in Florida’s 19th execution this year, tying a record Florida carried out a record-tying 19th execution of the year in an unusual instance of 3 states administering the death penalty on the same day. Jesse Guardado was pronounced dead at 6:13 p.m. following a 3-drug injection at a state prison in Starke. He had pleaded guilty to fatally stabbing 75-year-old Jackie Malone inside her Walton County home in 2004 before stealing her jewelry box, $80, and other valuables to buy drugs. The woman had helped him get a job and housing.