Skip to main content

Israel should not execute Hamas terrorists – or anyone else

We, the 3,800+ members of the group “L’chaim! Jews Against the Death Penalty” wish to respond respectfully to Rabbi Dr. Jonathan Lieberman’s Feb. 15th Jerusalem Post op-ed entitled “Should Israel execute Hamas terrorists for war crimes on par with the Nazis?” In his thoughtful, powerful and nuanced essay, Rabbi Dr. Lieberman expresses how difficult it has been for him as a rabbi and physician to even ask this question, given the sanctity of life to which he has devoted his laudable career. We profoundly honor Rabbi Dr. Lieberman’s sacred callings, as well as his courage in sharing his feelings so openly and vulnerably in the public square. We also empathize with his suffering and understand and respect his position. Indeed, like Jews everywhere, we too have been shocked beyond belief by the horror and barbarity that continue to unfold in the wake of the Oct. 7th, 2023 pogrom. The mutilated bodies of the youngest members of the Bibas family that Hamas just released are a palpable reminder of this abject abomination. May all the people of Israel be comforted after the revelation of this consummate tragedy that defies any sense of morality and reason.

Reasonable minds can indeed agree to disagree when it comes to a subject as triggering as capital punishment. For many reasons, we firmly believe that Judaism in the 21st century must unconditionally reject the death penalty, including for Nazi perpetrators and Hamas terrorists who have committed the most heinous crimes imaginable. First, purely as a practical matter, imposing a judicial death sentence on terrorists provides them with a platform for their message, and why would we want to give them that? Worse, such defendants then become heroes and potential martyrs, over and above how such terrorists are celebrated currently. Because Israel seeks to be a transparent democracy that follows the rule of law, particularly within its judiciary, a judicial death sentencing scheme will be costly both financially and with public perception. Such terrorists believe in what they are doing, and that they will be rewarded upon their physical death. A far harsher punishment is incarceration. Let them have to think every day about what they have done and why they endure the constrictions of a maximum security prison. Finally, the often cited notion that executing terrorists will save the lives of future hostages that the enemy might capture in order to exchange in a prisoner swap is inherently flawed. Executing Hamas prisoners will only lead to Hamas executing Israeli prisoners, perpetuating an endless cycle of violence and killing.

In the wake of the horrors of the Oct. 7th attacks, we never would claim to be speaking for the loved ones of murder victims, z’l. As a hospital chaplain, I regularly counsel mourners that they should feel permission to experience the full gamut of human emotion while grieving, including rage, and even the desire for vengeance where applicable. Let no one ever judge anyone in such a position. If I myself were to lose a loved one to murder, or if my own children were ripped away like 9-month-old baby Kfir and 4-year-old Ariel Bibas, Z’L, and countless others on Oct. 7th, I could very well find myself desiring — and perhaps even advocating for — the death of my loved one’s killer. A civilized society has a responsibility to protect and honor all such mourners, while also upholding the most basic human rights upon which this world stands. Fundamental to these, of course, is the right to life itself. For this reason alone, 70% of the nations of the world have abolished the death penalty in law and practice.

Let there be no doubt: traditional Jewish law does indeed allow for capital punishment, albeit with prodigious safeguards. Let us recall the words of some of the loftiest figures among Chazal: Rabbi Eliezer ben Azariah, Rabbi Tarfon and Rabbi Akiva, as found in the Talmud, Makkot 7a: “A Sanhedrin [Rabbinic court] that affects an execution once in seven years, is branded a destructive tribunal. Rabbi Eliezer ben Azariah says: once in 70 years. Rabbi Tarfon and Rabbi Akiva say: Were we members of a Sanhedrin, no person would ever be put to death. [Thereupon] Rabban Simeon ben Gamaliel remarked, they would also multiply shedders of blood in Israel!”

Rabban Simeon ben Gamaliel and those supporting his view were citing the notion of deterrence and other now antiquated notions of “justice.” They can be forgiven certainly for their views that reflected the understanding of their times, including when it comes to deterrence, as they were not privy to proof that deterrence is indeed a FALLACY when it comes to the death penalty. Indeed, meta-studies have found no meaningful evidence that use of the death penalty deters crime. For this reason alone, most traditional Jewish arguments for the death penalty no longer apply in our world.

But there is more that all Jews must consider in the wake of the Holocaust and the events of the 20th century…

Many of the members of “L’chaim! Jews Against the Death Penalty,” including this author, are direct descendants of Holocaust victims and survivors. We know more than most that capital punishment is not the same as the Shoah. And yet, for many L’chaim! members, the shadow of the Holocaust is inextricably linked to their rejection of the death penalty in all cases, even that of the infamous Tree of Life shooter.

The most common form of execution used by the US federal government and multiple states – and one that likely would be employed by Israel – is lethal injection. Lethal injection itself is a direct Nazi legacy, first implemented by the Third Reich as part of their infamous Aktion T4 protocol to kill people deemed “unworthy of life.” That program was devised by Dr. Karl Brandt, the personal physician of Adolf Hitler. If this were not enough, across the USA, more and more states are erecting gas chambers, including one in Arizona that uses Zyklon B, the same lethal gas used in Auschwitz. No Jewish argument about the death penalty in the 21st century should ignore these proven, direct Nazi legacies, against which the members of L’chaim! firmly chant “NEVER AGAIN to state-sponsored murder!” For these reasons, L’chaim! members view the death penalty as one of the worst kinds of institutionalized evil that stains the United States, Israel or any nation that employs it.

Rabbi Dr. Lieberman reports that the only Israeli execution to have taken place was that of Eichmann. In fact, when the modern state of Israel was established in 1948, the first execution for the nascent state took place after Meir Tobianski, an Israeli army officer, was falsely accused of espionage. He was subjected to a drumhead court martial, found guilty, and executed by firing squad. He was then posthumously exonerated. His shameful wrongful state murder highlights the need to heed what Maimonides articulated so well nearly a millennium ago. Like Dr. Lieberman, the Rambam (Rabbi Moses ben Maimon, 1135-1204) was also a physician, who likewise was dedicated to the universal notion of doing no harm. One of the most renowned pearls of wisdom among the many that Maimonides imparted to the world was the following: “It is better to acquit a thousand guilty persons than to put a single innocent one to death.”

Even if one believes that the Hippocratic Oath does not apply to those who have “forfeited” their most basic human rights (a stance that we at L’chaim find ethically indefensible), Israel’s execution of Meir Tobianski is a clear reminder that innocent human beings are indeed harmed – and murdered – by any inherently imperfect, unjust and broken “machinery of death.” As the objective Death Penalty Information Center reports, the death penalty carries the inherent risk of executing an innocent person, and since 1973, at least 200 people who were wrongly convicted and sentenced to death in the U.S. have been exonerated.

Finally, regarding Israel’s 1962 execution of Nazi perpetrator Adolf Eichmann that Rabbi Dr. Lieberman cites, it is certainly true that many rabbis did not object. Many other Jewish leaders did, however, vociferously protest. These included renowned Hebrew university philosophers Samuel Hugo Bergmann and Nathan Rotenstreich, scholar of Kabbalah Gershom Scholem, and Jewish theologian and philosopher Martin Buber, who called the execution a great “mistake.” Other Holocaust survivors themselves, such as Nobel-prize winning author, Nelly Sachs voiced their strident opposition to Eichmann’s execution.

More than anyone, it was twentieth-century Jewish human rights icon Elie Wiesel whose words encapsulated the stand of the members of L’chaim! When asked about his feelings on capital punishment, Wiesel resolutely stated “Death is not the answer.” On this, Wiesel made no exception, famously stating the following: “With every cell of my being and with every fiber of my memory I oppose the death penalty in all forms. I do not believe any civilized society should be at the service of death. I don’t think it’s human to become an agent of the angel of death.”

Driven by Wiesel’s prophetic call, L’chaim members – together with their partners at Death Penalty Action – ensure there is a vocal Jewish presence at every execution vigil in the USA. We also are pen pals with all Americans in line for state-murder, letting them know that L’chaim! joins all of civilized humanity in standing with them on the side of life. L’chaim! also makes daily calls to all actively executing governors, signs daily petitions, drafts op-eds like this one, delivers synagogue programs, engages in regular TV, radio and podcast interviews, and advocates unceasingly against the increasing calls for executions in the United States and Israel.

In the wake of the Holocaust and the unparalleled horrors of the twentieth century, seventy percent of the nations of the world have recognized the inviolability of the human right of life and have abolished the death penalty. 21st-century Judaism and the state of Israel, both directly targeted by that unparalleled conflagration, must reflect this evolution and become a Tree of Life whose branches extend as a model across our world. This includes for the so-called “worst of the worst,” from Nazi perpetrators, to the Tree of Life shooter, to the Hamas terrorists who carried out the unspeakable October 7th attacks. Let it be known that to our chant of “L’chaim!,” there are no exceptions. The cycle of violence and killing must end.

Still, we very much realize the need for constructive dialogue in our world – now more than ever – and we invite others to respectfully respond with their own perspectives to our position. It is only through such machloket l’sheim shamayim (argument for the sake of heaven) that we can deign to begin to move forward as a civilization…

Cantor Michael J. Zoosman, MSM

Board Certified Chaplain – Ohalah: Association of Rabbis and Cantors for Jewish Renewal

Co-Founder: L’chaim: Jews Against the Death Penalty

Advisory Committee Member, Death Penalty Action

Source: blogs.timesofisrael.com, Michael J. Zoosman, February 21, 2025

_____________________________________________________________________








"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted."

— Oscar Wilde



Comments

Most viewed (Last 7 days)

Iran: flogging still a common practice

Flogging of Sufis in Gonabad: Fourteen Ne’matollahi dervishes received 25 lashes each for allegedly disturbing the public security Public flogging in Iran "The lash ruling against 14 Ne'matollahi dervishes of Gonabad was carried out. They were residents of Baydokht and had been arrested and condemned by the Public Prosecutor of Gonabad after a protest against the illegal treatment dealing with the Sufis in June of last year [2010]. According to the website of Majzuban-e-Nur, Mr. Sa'id Kashani, Mr. Amir Roshan-Mojaver-Sufi, Mr. Alimohammad Amanian, Mr. Ruhollah Safari, Mr. Ali Abbasi-Baydokhti, Mr. Ebrahim Abbaszadeh, Mr. Mohammadali Ja'fari, Mr. Hossein Mahdavi, Mr. Hossein Abbaszadeh-Baydokhti, Mr. Rahmat Hosseini, Mr. Reza Kakhki, Mr. Behruz Mojaver-Sufi, Mr. Ali Mir, and Mr. Hassan Baluchi-Baydokhti are the fourteen dervishes whose requests were not only rejected, but who were condemned to 25 lashes for disturbing the public security. It should be mentioned th...

I watched Ohio's last execution. Here's what it was like

As Gov. DeWine calls for Ohio to end capital punishment, the state’s last execution remains the one I witnessed in 2018 Inside Ohio's death house, there is a room for executions and separate witness rooms: one for those connected to the victim and another for those connected to the inmate. Windows separate the death chamber from those watching, the condemned from the living. I was there on July 18, 2018 – during Ohio’s most recent execution. Robert Van Hook was put to death that day for killing David Self in 1985. He sat on death row for three decades. I was one of three media witnesses to the execution.

Japan’s Internet Wants Uchida Riko Executed. Here’s Why That Won’t Happen

This week, the prosecution in the case of a murder of a 17-year-old girl in Hokkaido came out with its sentencing recommendation. Japanese social media reacted by clamoring for the accused woman’s blood. But, while the facts of the case are heinous, the prosecutor’s decision not to seek the death penalty is grounded in long-standing precedent. Murdered for looking at the accused wrong Uchida Riko (内田梨瑚), 23, and her friends stand accused of murdering 17-year-old Murayama Runa (村山瑠奈) in Hokkaido’s Asahikawa. Prosecutors say the dispute began after Murayama posted a photo of Uchida to social media. They say Uchida’s group abducted the girl, made her undress, and then forced her to jump from a bridge.

Kansas AG urges governor to deny clemency to 8 sentenced to death

TOPEKA — Attorney General Kris Kobach on Tuesday urged the governor to deny clemency to Kansas inmates who have been sentenced to death. Eight of nine people sentenced to death in Kansas formally filed clemency requests in May, according to a press release from the Attorney General’s Office. Kobach urged Gov. Laura Kelly to reject them.

Gov. Mike DeWine calls for Ohio to abolish the death penalty

COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — Gov. Mike DeWine Tuesday morning called on Ohio to abolish the death penalty, citing data that he said proves it is no longer a deterrent to violent crime. “For the state to take a human life, there must, in my opinion, there must be evidence that in doing so it will help protect the public, that the threat of that action will deter someone from committing murder,” DeWine said. “I do not believe that argument today can be successfully made.” DeWine cited data showing a decline in the last four decades of executions being carried out and an increase in the time inmates spend on death row.

New Mississippi billboard warns criminals: ‘Firing squad is legal’

DESOTO COUNTY, Miss. (WREG) — A billboard standing on Interstate 55 southbound as you cross the Tennessee state line and enter Mississippi from Memphis is sending a grim message to those coming into the state. DeSoto County District Attorney Matthew Barton recently announced the new billboard campaign, which features the sign reading, “WELCOME TO MISSISSIPPI. WHERE THE FIRING SQUAD IS LEGAL. THINK TWICE.” It references Mississippi’s law permitting execution by firing squad under certain circumstances for inmates sentenced to death. Barton says this campaign is aimed at deterring violent crime and sends a direct message to criminals entering Mississippi.

20 Minutes to Death: Witness to the Last Execution in France

The following document is a firsthand account of the final moments of Hamida Djandoubi, a convicted murderer executed by guillotine at Marseille’s Baumettes Prison on September 10, 1977. The record—dated September 9—was written by Monique Mabelly, a judge appointed by the state to witness the proceedings. Djandoubi’s execution would ultimately be the last carried out in France before capital punishment was abolished in 1981. At the time, President Valéry Giscard d'Estaing—who had publicly voiced his "deep aversion to the death penalty" prior to his election—rejected Djandoubi’s appeal for clemency. Choosing to let "justice take its course," the President allowed the execution to proceed, just as he had in two previous cases during his term:   Christian Ranucci , executed on July 28, 1976 and Jérôme Carrein , executed on June 23, 1977. Hamida Djandoubi , a Tunisian national, was sentenced to death for killing his former lover, Elisabeth Bousquet. He was execu...

With nitrogen gas blocked, Alabama seeks to execute inmate by lethal injection

Jeffery Lee, who successfully challenged his scheduled Thursday execution by nitrogen gas, argued that execution by firing squad would be less painful. The Alabama Attorney General’s Office Friday sought to put an Alabama death row inmate to death by lethal injection a day after the U.S. Supreme Court rebuffed the state’s attempt to execute him by nitrogen gas. In a filing with the Alabama Supreme Court Friday afternoon, the state sought an expedited motion to set a new execution date for Jeffery Lee, 49. The state said that with a permanent injunction in place against nitrogen gas, the method by which the state intended to execute Lee on Thursday, it could execute him by lethal injection or the electric chair.

Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch wanted an execution that a Trump judge deemed illegal

The Supreme Court these days is generally in the business of helping executions go forward. But on Thursday night, the court did something notable: It told Alabama no. Even then, the court wasn't unanimous. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch dissented from the refusal to let the nitrogen gas execution of Jeffery Lee proceed. What prompted the rare rejection? In line with the typical shadow docket practice, the court didn't explain itself. Nor did the dissenters, who merely noted their disagreement. But a deeper look at the case helps us understand why a majority of the court was unwilling to help the state this time.

SCOTUS: Alabama can’t execute Jeffery Lee by nitrogen; Thursday execution called off

After a week of legal volleyball, Alabama death row inmate Jeffery Lee’s execution—scheduled for Thursday evening—was called off after federal courts called the state’s nitrogen gas execution method “likely unconstitutional.” The state took the fight to the U.S. Supreme Court, hoping Lee could still be put to death tonight.  In an order issued at 8:10 p.m., the U.S. Supreme Court ordered that it would not lift a ban on Alabama executing Lee via nitrogen . In a short court order, the justices denied Alabama’s motion to go ahead with the execution.  Associate Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch would have granted the appeal and let the execution proceed, according to the order.