Saudi Arabia Executes Abdul Majid Al-Nimr

The Judiciary Fabricates Charges and Issues Arbitrary Sentences, While the Interior Ministry Falsifies Information

On August 17, 2024, the Saudi Press Agency published a statement issued by the Ministry of Interior announcing the execution of Abdul Majid bin Hassan bin Abdullah Al-Nimr.

The statement did not specify the type of sentence carried out, but it mentioned that it was issued by the Specialized Criminal Court, indicating that it was likely a discretionary (ta’zir) sentence. The statement listed the charges that the sentence was supposedly based on, including committing criminal acts involving betrayal of his country, joining a terrorist cell affiliated with the Al-Qaeda organization, financing terrorism and terrorist activities, and supporting extremist ideologies.

The European Saudi Organization for Human Rights had included Abdul Majid Al-Nimr’s name on its list of individuals at risk of execution in Saudi Arabia before the sentence was carried out, alongside approximately 70 others, most of whom are facing charges related to expressing opinions or participation in protests and events that took place in the Qatif Governorate in the Eastern Province. شهدتها محافظة القطيف في المنطقة الشرقية.

The preliminary judgment document, which the organization obtained a copy of and was issued against Al-Nimr in October 2021, reveals clear falsification in the Ministry of Interior’s statement and highlights significant flaws in Saudi Arabia’s justice system, alongside blatant violations of international laws.

Charges:

The Ministry of Interior claimed that the charges Al-Nimr faced were related to joining a cell affiliated with the terrorist organization Al-Qaeda, despite the fact that he belongs to the Shia sect. Additionally, the list of charges in the judgment document indicates that the charges he faced are remarkably similar to those routinely directed by the Public Prosecution against defendants sentenced in connection to the events in Qatif Governorate.

According to the document, Al-Nimr faced the following charges:

• Seeking to destabilize the social fabric and national unity through participating in demonstrations, attending funerals of those killed, and repeatedly doing so in Qatif Governorate, supporting sabotage activities, chanting slogans against the state and insulting the ruler, and inciting others to do so.

• Glorifying Nimr Al-Nimr and protesting against the arrest and trial decisions of wanted and detained individuals, and stirring sectarian strife by resigning from military service after the arrest of the deceased Nimr Al-Nimr, and inciting Shia employees at the Dammam Traffic Department to join protests.

• Financing terrorism and terrorist activities, criminalized under the Anti-Terrorism Law, by renting out his brother's farm, knowing that it was being used as an illegal car dismantling site and a hideout for several wanted individuals, providing food supplies to several wanted individuals, and preparing and sending content that could harm public order by joining a WhatsApp group with wanted and detained individuals to exchange information, monitor, and track the movements of security personnel.

The charges mentioned in the ruling do not include the accusation of belonging to Al-Qaeda, as claimed by the Ministry of Interior’s statement, which clearly constitutes a falsification of the truth.

The organization considers this discrepancy as further evidence of the lack of trust in official statements, which the organization had previously identified as containing hidden or inaccurate information.

Justice System:

The European Saudi Organization notes that the Public Prosecution did not initially request the death penalty in the indictment it filed against Abdul Majid Al-Nimr.

According to the ruling document, the Public Prosecution requested the maximum penalty under Article 6 of the Anti-Cybercrime Law and the maximum penalty under Article 16 of the Anti-Money Laundering Law, in addition to a severe discretionary (ta'zir) punishment and a travel ban.

The Specialized Criminal Court issued a ruling against him on 19/3/1443 (Islamic calendar) sentencing him to 9 years in prison and a travel ban. However, the Court of Appeal later changed the sentence to the death penalty, even though the Public Prosecution did not initially request it.

"The organization believes that the escalation of the sentence from imprisonment to execution at the appeal stage shows a complete disregard for the right to life and forces convicts to abandon their right to appeal due to the absence of justice.

The organization also notes that Al-Nimr confirmed during the trial that he was subjected to torture, which led to his transfer to the hospital, and he requested medical reports to prove it. Despite submitting the reports to the court and proving his health condition due to torture, those responsible were not held accountable, and the court relied on confessions extracted under torture.

The European Saudi Organization for Human Rights considers the execution of Abdul Majid Al-Nimr as further evidence of the complete lack of trust in all stages of the justice system in Saudi Arabia, culminating in the execution and the Ministry of Interior’s announcement.

The organization believes that fabricating charges, issuing a death sentence despite him not facing the most severe charges under international law, and the fact that most of the charges relate to freedom of expression and participation in gatherings, along with changing the sentence at the appeal stage and withholding the body after execution, are clear indications of the retaliatory nature of this punishment."

The organization points out that the execution of Abdul Majid Al-Nimr, alongside the high numbers of executions since the beginning of 2024, with the number of those executed reaching 147 by August 19, is a clear message confirming Saudi Arabia's complete disregard for its commitments and promises, and its continued engagement in executions that violate international laws.

Source: ESOHR, Staff, August 19, 2024

_____________________________________________________________________

Twitter/X | Facebook | Telegram | Contact Us

"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted."

— Oscar Wilde

Alabama Set To Carry Out Execution This Week

Alabama is preparing to execute Jeremy Williams, who pled guilty to the 2021 rape and murder of five-year-old Kamarie Holland. The execution is scheduled for Thursday (August 13) at the Holman Correctional Facility in Atmore, Alabama. Williams, who is 41, requested the death penalty and waived his right to appeal, making this the first execution in Alabama this year.

Tennessee | The doctor who helps put prisoners to death

Dr. Mark Fowler assisted in the failed execution of a Tennessee prisoner. Physicians are meant to heal patients—why is he working in the death chamber? Mark Fowler, a physician with 25 years’ experience, stepped beneath the bright lights and approached the middle-aged man lying on a gurney. Around him, people in medical gowns prepared needles and sterile tubing. It had all the appearances of a hospital setting. Fowler had been called in to help establish an IV line through which the 57-year-old man, Tony Carruthers, would be injected with pharmaceutical drugs. The team had struggled to find a vein, so Fowler was summoned to set a central line—an intravenous catheter inserted into the major vein below the collarbone.

Alabama executes Jeremy Williams

Tennessee and Oklahoma have put inmates to death within 30 minutes of each other, and Alabama followed suit hours later as U.S. states executed three men in one day. Tennessee and Oklahoma put inmates to death within 30 minutes of each other Thursday, and Alabama followed suit hours later as U.S. states executed three men by lethal injection in one day for the first time since 2010. The Tennessee man was executed for killing a maid at a motel in 1985, and the Oklahoma man for killing his girlfriend in 2003. In Alabama, a man was put to death Thursday evening for killing a 5-year-old girl he had paid her mother to abuse.

Tennessee executes Darrell Hines

The state has spent millions of dollars over decades to execute a seriously ill man who was already incarcerated. The state of Tennessee executed death row inmate Darrell Hines Thursday morning, according to an advocacy group. No formal announcement of the execution has been issued by state leaders yet. The execution was slated for 10 a.m. Thursday at Riverbend Maximum Security Institution in Nashville. [DPN update] Hines was pronounced dead at 10:43 a.m. CDT. His last meal was fried chicken, mashed potatoes and gravy, coleslaw, corn, fries, biscuits, a chicken sandwich, chocolate chip cake, and sweet tea.

The 'Black Widow' shakes Iran: 10 death sentences for a serial killer who killed 12 men

Kolthum Akbari, an Iranian woman widely dubbed the “Black Widow,” was convicted of serial murders of elderly men she married, often temporarily. Official accounts generally center on 11 murders (plus one attempted murder), though Akbari herself gave varying figures and investigations suggested she had many more marriages. The sentencing occurred primarily in September 2025 in Mazandaran Province, with ongoing reporting and updates into 2026. The 56- to 59-year-old killer confessed to killing at least 11 elderly men after temporarily or officially marrying them; Iranian authorities have linked her to additional marriages and possible further victims.

Tennessee set to execute Anthony Darrell Hines

Barring any last-minute interventions, the Tennessee Department of Correction will execute Anthony Darrell Hines by lethal injection at Riverbend Maximum Security Institution in Nashville Thursday morning. This week, two courts had the opportunity to halt the execution: the federal court in Middle Tennessee and the U.S. Supreme Court. Gov. Bill Lee announced Tuesday he personally would not prevent the execution. “After deliberate consideration of Anthony Darrell Hines’ request for clemency, and after a thorough review of the case, I am upholding the sentence of the State of Tennessee and do not plan to intervene,” he said in a written statement. The U.S. Supreme Court has not granted a stay or reprieve.

Oklahoma executes Carlos Cuesta-Rodriguez

Oklahoma has carried out 1 of 3 executions set for the same day in the United States in another sign of the resurgence of the death penalty in the country. Carlos Cuesta-Rodriguez was pronounced dead at 10:13 a.m. on Thursday, Aug. 13, at the Oklahoma State Penitentiary in McAlester. He was put to death by lethal injection for the murder of his common-law wife in 2003 at their Oklahoma City home. He admitted to police he shot her twice during an argument. Cuesta-Rodriguez, 70, did not fight for his life, stunning his attorneys in July when he told the Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board that he didn't want clemency. "It's time for me to pay for what I did," he said.

Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine issues three death penalty reprieves

COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) – Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine issued execution reprieves for three death row inmates on Friday. In a statement, DeWine said he issued reprieves for Keith LaMar, Scott Group, and Davel Chinn, all of whom were set to be executed early next year. LaMar was scheduled to be executed on Jan. 13, 2027. He was convicted of aggravated murder for the deaths of five inmates during a 1993 riot at the Southern Ohio Correctional Institution in Lucasville. He received the death penalty for four of the killings. His new execution date is Jan. 13, 2030. Watch the latest NBC4 headlines in the video player above.

Arizona prosecutors seek death penalty a second time for 2 inmates

County Attorney Brad Miller said Aug. 6 that the nature of the attack and both men's past criminal records meet the strict legal bar required for execution under Arizona law. FLORENCE, Ariz. - Pinal County prosecutors are seeking the death penalty against two inmates accused of violently killing a fellow prisoner behind bars, officials announced Thursday. Pinal County Attorney Brad Miller filed a Notice of Intent to Seek the Death Penalty against Pete Van Winkle and Tracy Hampton in connection with the fatal attack on Kenneth Thompson.

Iran’s War on Women: Executions, Floggings, and the Politics of Fear

The Iranian regime is increasingly using death sentences, corporal punishment, and judicial persecution against women—not only to silence dissent but also to intimidate a society demanding change. The Iranian regime has long viewed women as central to the country’s struggle for freedom—and therefore as central targets of repression. The nationwide uprising of 2022 fundamentally altered the political landscape, demonstrating that Iranian women were no longer merely participants in protest movements but among their principal organizers and symbols. Since then, the authorities have steadily intensified their campaign against women, expanding the use of executions, imprisonment, corporal punishment, and judicial intimidation.

Death Penalty News

Search This Blog