Saudi Arabia Executes Abdul Majid Al-Nimr

The Judiciary Fabricates Charges and Issues Arbitrary Sentences, While the Interior Ministry Falsifies Information

On August 17, 2024, the Saudi Press Agency published a statement issued by the Ministry of Interior announcing the execution of Abdul Majid bin Hassan bin Abdullah Al-Nimr.

The statement did not specify the type of sentence carried out, but it mentioned that it was issued by the Specialized Criminal Court, indicating that it was likely a discretionary (ta’zir) sentence. The statement listed the charges that the sentence was supposedly based on, including committing criminal acts involving betrayal of his country, joining a terrorist cell affiliated with the Al-Qaeda organization, financing terrorism and terrorist activities, and supporting extremist ideologies.

The European Saudi Organization for Human Rights had included Abdul Majid Al-Nimr’s name on its list of individuals at risk of execution in Saudi Arabia before the sentence was carried out, alongside approximately 70 others, most of whom are facing charges related to expressing opinions or participation in protests and events that took place in the Qatif Governorate in the Eastern Province. شهدتها محافظة القطيف في المنطقة الشرقية.

The preliminary judgment document, which the organization obtained a copy of and was issued against Al-Nimr in October 2021, reveals clear falsification in the Ministry of Interior’s statement and highlights significant flaws in Saudi Arabia’s justice system, alongside blatant violations of international laws.

Charges:

The Ministry of Interior claimed that the charges Al-Nimr faced were related to joining a cell affiliated with the terrorist organization Al-Qaeda, despite the fact that he belongs to the Shia sect. Additionally, the list of charges in the judgment document indicates that the charges he faced are remarkably similar to those routinely directed by the Public Prosecution against defendants sentenced in connection to the events in Qatif Governorate.

According to the document, Al-Nimr faced the following charges:

• Seeking to destabilize the social fabric and national unity through participating in demonstrations, attending funerals of those killed, and repeatedly doing so in Qatif Governorate, supporting sabotage activities, chanting slogans against the state and insulting the ruler, and inciting others to do so.

• Glorifying Nimr Al-Nimr and protesting against the arrest and trial decisions of wanted and detained individuals, and stirring sectarian strife by resigning from military service after the arrest of the deceased Nimr Al-Nimr, and inciting Shia employees at the Dammam Traffic Department to join protests.

• Financing terrorism and terrorist activities, criminalized under the Anti-Terrorism Law, by renting out his brother's farm, knowing that it was being used as an illegal car dismantling site and a hideout for several wanted individuals, providing food supplies to several wanted individuals, and preparing and sending content that could harm public order by joining a WhatsApp group with wanted and detained individuals to exchange information, monitor, and track the movements of security personnel.

The charges mentioned in the ruling do not include the accusation of belonging to Al-Qaeda, as claimed by the Ministry of Interior’s statement, which clearly constitutes a falsification of the truth.

The organization considers this discrepancy as further evidence of the lack of trust in official statements, which the organization had previously identified as containing hidden or inaccurate information.

Justice System:

The European Saudi Organization notes that the Public Prosecution did not initially request the death penalty in the indictment it filed against Abdul Majid Al-Nimr.

According to the ruling document, the Public Prosecution requested the maximum penalty under Article 6 of the Anti-Cybercrime Law and the maximum penalty under Article 16 of the Anti-Money Laundering Law, in addition to a severe discretionary (ta'zir) punishment and a travel ban.

The Specialized Criminal Court issued a ruling against him on 19/3/1443 (Islamic calendar) sentencing him to 9 years in prison and a travel ban. However, the Court of Appeal later changed the sentence to the death penalty, even though the Public Prosecution did not initially request it.

"The organization believes that the escalation of the sentence from imprisonment to execution at the appeal stage shows a complete disregard for the right to life and forces convicts to abandon their right to appeal due to the absence of justice.

The organization also notes that Al-Nimr confirmed during the trial that he was subjected to torture, which led to his transfer to the hospital, and he requested medical reports to prove it. Despite submitting the reports to the court and proving his health condition due to torture, those responsible were not held accountable, and the court relied on confessions extracted under torture.

The European Saudi Organization for Human Rights considers the execution of Abdul Majid Al-Nimr as further evidence of the complete lack of trust in all stages of the justice system in Saudi Arabia, culminating in the execution and the Ministry of Interior’s announcement.

The organization believes that fabricating charges, issuing a death sentence despite him not facing the most severe charges under international law, and the fact that most of the charges relate to freedom of expression and participation in gatherings, along with changing the sentence at the appeal stage and withholding the body after execution, are clear indications of the retaliatory nature of this punishment."

The organization points out that the execution of Abdul Majid Al-Nimr, alongside the high numbers of executions since the beginning of 2024, with the number of those executed reaching 147 by August 19, is a clear message confirming Saudi Arabia's complete disregard for its commitments and promises, and its continued engagement in executions that violate international laws.

Source: ESOHR, Staff, August 19, 2024

_____________________________________________________________________

Twitter/X | Facebook | Telegram | Contact Us

"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted."

— Oscar Wilde

USA | What happens in the final weeks before an execution? These reporters were inside the room.

The journalists behind ‘The Last 12 Weeks’ earned extraordinary access to a death penalty defense team—and faced difficult ethical choices Many defense lawyers are naturally cagey. They work in a pressure cooker, protecting their clients’ rights while fighting for the best possible outcome. And arguably, the stakes can’t get any higher than trying to save a client’s life. So no, defense lawyers don’t usually invite journalists into strategy meetings. But that’s what happened when Marshall Project reporter Maurice Chammah and Serial Productions senior producer Alvin Melathe spent the final few months before a Texas execution embedded with a capital defense team.

North Korea | 'I was only 9': North Korean defector recalls childhood memory of public execution

Kim Eun-joo was 9 years old when her teacher stopped their lesson and told the class to follow her outside. The children were marched to a public execution ground in North Korea. “I would cry even when our family dog died,” Kim said in a recent interview with The Korea Times. “But the first time I watched humans killing a human, I had no words for what I was feeling. It was the most brutal scene I have ever seen, in any movie or in real life.” The memory has stayed with her ever since. Now a human rights advocate after defecting from North Korea, Kim recently brought that childhood scene to the 9th World Congress Against the Death Penalty in Paris, where North Korea’s use of public executions and capital punishment was officially placed on the agenda for the first time.

19 July 1943 | Auschwitz's Largest Public Hanging: 12 Polish Prisoners Executed in Escape Reprisal

OSWIECIM, Poland — The SS carried out the largest public hanging in Auschwitz history on July 19, 1943, executing 12 Polish prisoners before other inmates as collective punishment for escapes and civilian contacts. The victims, all from the camp’s surveyors’ labor unit, were hanged on gallows built in front of the camp kitchen during an Auschwitz I roll call. The SS orchestrated this reprisal following prisoner escapes from the surveyors’ detail and unauthorized communication between inmates and civilians. Camp authorities used the recent escapes as a pretext to impose collective punishment.

Former Florida cop to be executed on same day as 80-year-old Pasco man

In an unprecedented move in the modern history of capital punishment, Gov. Ron DeSantis on Tuesday cleared the way for 2 executions to occur on the same day. DeSantis reset the execution of James Duckett, whose execution earlier this year was stayed amid efforts to secure DNA testing and analysis of evidence in his case. Duckett’s execution was reset for July 28. That is the same day previously set for the execution of Dominick Occhicone. Court records indicate that Duckett’s execution is scheduled for noon. Occhicone’s is set to follow at 6 p.m.

Japan: Capital punishment for a minor

Death chamber at Tokyo Detention Center The Supreme Court's recent decision to uphold the death sentence given in a lay judge trial to a 24-year-old man for murders he committed when he was a minor raises questions about the lay judge trial system and capital punishment. These include whether the lay judges correctly understood the spirit of the Juvenile Law in sentencing the defendant to death. It was the 1st death sentence handed down on a minor in a lay judge trial. The murders took place in Ishinomaki, Miyagi Prefecture, in 2010 when Yutaro Chiba was 18 - meaning he fell under the purview of the Juvenile Law. Chiba was convicted of entering his ex-girlfriend's house and stabbing to death the girl's sister and a female friend of the girl with a butcher knife, seriously injuring a male friend of the sister and abducting the girl. Prosecutors said Chiba killed the victims because they were trying to separate him and his former girlfriend. Since Chiba pleaded n...

Texas: The inmates who refused to die quietly and had to be gassed out of their cells before execution

Former crime reporter Michelle Lyons, who witnessed nearly 300 executions in Texas, US, reveals the desperate acts of death row prisoners who refused to accept their fate After spending years or often decades locked up in a tiny cell for 23 hours a day, most Death Row inmates go willingly to their executions. However, some refuse to die quietly - with officers forced to gas them out of cells, strap up their heads and even give chase across prison grounds. Michelle Lyons, who has witnessed nearly 300 executions in Texas, US, exclusively tells Sun Online how certain inmates "fight like hell" in their last moments. On most occasions, Michelle watched from the witness area, with the killers already on the gurney - the stretcher where they'd be given a lethal injection. Seven prisoners once tried to escape from the Row in Huntsville - with one shoving magazines and newspapers under his clothes to help him roll over razor-wire fences. Others have had to b...

Florida executes Dennis Sochor

Man, 74, becomes oldest inmate executed in Florida in state’s 10th lethal injection this year Florida put to death one of its oldest prisoners in its history on Tuesday, a 74-year-old convicted murderer who was 1 of 3 older inmates scheduled for execution within the span of a month in the nation’s busiest death penalty state. Dennis Sochor was pronounced dead at 6:16 p.m. following a 3-drug injection at Florida State Prison near Starke, the office of Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis said. He was convicted of killing a woman on Jan. 1, 1982, just hours after meeting her at a New Year’s Eve party.

Oldest inmate set to be executed in Florida will face strict spending limit for final meal

An entire category of food is also off-limits for final meal requests in Florida Florida is currently preparing to execute its oldest inmate later today (July 14), a 74-year-old convicted murderer who has been on death row since the 1980s—but his final meal will be limited by a strict budget. Dennis Sochor is scheduled to be put to death later today, making history as the oldest inmate to ever be executed in the state. The criminal, who has been on death row for nearly 40 years, will be administered the lethal three-drug injection, with the process due to begin at around 6pm.

Florida to execute William Silvia for 2006 shooting murder of wife

William Silvia, convicted of the 2006 shooting murder of his wife, Patricia, is scheduled to die by lethal injection in August, according to a death warrant filed by Gov. Ron DeSantis on July 17. If all previously scheduled executions go as planned, Silvia will be the 13th person put to death in Florida this year, following a record-breaking 19 executions in 2025. Silvia, now 61, went to his estranged wife's mother's house in Seminole County to attempt to reconcile with her, but first he calmly bought a 12-gauge shotgun and ammunition, prosecutors said. After talking to Patricia Silvia, Silvia got the shotgun from his truck, shot her mother, Betty Woodard, in the face, and fatally shot Patricia in the head, court records show. Woodard, who was standing in front of her daughter, lost her left eye and the top portion of her nose.

Idaho | Death row prisoners sue over state's new firing squad

BOISE (Idaho Statesman) – Days after Idaho made the switch to a firing squad for executions, two Idaho death row prisoners next in line to be put to death sued the state prison system, saying its director withheld information about how she settled on the specifics for carrying out the method. Attorneys for prisoners Thomas Creech and Gerald Pizzuto filed suit this week in state district court against Idaho Department of Correction Director Bree Derrick. In the filing, they called her approval of an updated standard operating procedure for the firing squad and lethal injection as a backup method “arbitrary, capricious, or an abuse of discretion and in excess of the statutory authority of the agency.”

Death Penalty News

Search This Blog