Skip to main content

'Eye for an Eye, Tooth for a Tooth': Opinion

“Eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth.” The abbreviation of the Book of Exodus 21:24 is a favorite for those who support the death penalty. So much so, that the verse regularly even gets recited by those trying to justify their own participation in executions. The logic of course is that if you kill someone then you deserve to be killed. On the inverse, the logic is that if you don’t kill someone then you don’t deserve to be killed. Pretty basic stuff, right? 

The State of Oklahoma seems to literally live and die by such logic. But what if I told you that there is someone scheduled for execution who quite possibly has taken no eyes or no teeth? In fact, even prosecutors remain admittedly unsure if whether the person they’re trying to execute actually killed anyone or not.

Though tragic, the events that transpired are rather simple. Emmanuel Littlejohn and Glenn Bethany were desperate to continue funding out of control drug habits. Realizing that the Root-N-Scoot convenience store had a check cashing component, the two guys decided that it was the perfect hit to score a bunch of cash. So, on June 19, 1992, they proceeded to rob the business on the Southside of Oklahoma City. 

Upon entering the store, they turned their guns on the clerk at the desk. From the back, store owner Kenneth Meers charged at them with a broom. Witnesses across the street described the taller shoplifter as having fired the fatal shot that killed Meers. The taller man was Glenn Bethany. Regardless of whether one believes such eyewitnesses or not, a few things are clear… There was only one shot fired. There was only one shooter. 

For his part, Glenn Bethany was convicted of the murder of Kenneth Meers and sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole. 

At trial, prosecutors argued that Bethany was the shooter. Later, prosecutors tried Emmanuel Littlejohn twice and argued that he was the shooter each time. Again, prosecutors said that there was only one shooter, yet they tried two people for being that one shooter. Littlejohn was also convicted of the murder of Kenneth Meers. Yet, prosecutors convinced a jury to sentence Littlejohn to death. 

How is it possible that there is one shooter and two people were convicted of being that one shooter and one gets life and the other gets death? Shouldn’t the fundamental principle of “Eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth” apply? It would seem that you can’t start taking eyes and teeth from people who have taken no eyes or teeth.

There was only one shooter. In both trials prosecutors argued that that man was the shooter. Yet, there was only one shooter. The death penalty should have never even been an option for either man in such circumstances. How in the world could anyone know that they are taking the right eyes or teeth in such a situation? 

While Glenn Bethany still sits in prison, Emmanuel Littlejohn is scheduled to be executed September 26. Shouldn’t basic fairness be the fundamental principle that guides our justice system? What is fair about executing someone who very possibly has never killed anyone? Multiple courts have agreed that the evidence is uncertain. But such courts have also said that Littlejohn’s involvement is enough to warrant a death sentence. I guess they’ve never heard of an “eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth.” 

Societies that self-righteously claim to be following God’s law while doing the opposite are at the apex of hypocrisy. I don’t believe that Emmanuel Littlejohn killed Kenneth Meers. But such belief shouldn’t matter. We are told that the death penalty is for the “worst of the worst.” Yet, Oklahoma is about to execute someone that prosecutors themselves argued wasn’t the actual shooter (in Bethany’s trial). 

Courts have repeatedly questioned the evidence. Littlejohn doesn’t need your sympathy. He simply needs you to live by your oft-stated mantra, “eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth.” Under such words, one has to be certain someone took some eyes or teeth. In this case, there is no way you can be. Those most closely connected to this case still aren’t. 

If the State of Oklahoma kills Emmanuel Littlejohn on September 26, the thing that the State should be honest about is that it really doesn’t believe in an “eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth.” There are too many remaining questions to justify the taking of any “eyes or teeth” from Emmanuel Littlejohn. But if you kill him and he didn’t actually kill Mr. Meers, I guess it will be time to start coming for your “eyes and teeth” next.

Source: mcalesternews.com, Jeff Hood, July 20, 2024. The Rev. Dr. Jeff Hood is the Spiritual Advisor to Emmanuel Littlejohn, the next Oklahoma inmate awaiting execution.

_____________________________________________________________________








"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted."

— Oscar Wilde



Most viewed (Last 7 days)

Tennessee executes Harold Wayne Nichols

Thirty-seven years after confessing to a series of rapes and the murder of Karen Pulley, Nichols expressed remorse in final words Strapped to a gurney in the execution chamber at Riverbend Maximum Security Institution Thursday morning, Harold Wayne Nichols made a final statement.  “To the people I’ve harmed, I’m sorry,” he said, according to prison officials and media witnesses. “To my family, know that I love you. I know where I’m going to. I’m ready to go home.”

China | Former Chinese senior banker Bai Tianhui executed for taking US$155 million in bribes

Bai is the second senior figure from Huarong to be put to death for corruption following the execution of Lai Xiaomin in 2021 China has executed a former senior banker who was found guilty of taking more than 1.1 billion yuan (US$155 million) in bribes. Bai Tianhui, the former general manager of the asset management firm China Huarong International Holdings, was executed on Tuesday after the Supreme People’s Court approved the sentence, state broadcaster CCTV reported.

Burkina Faso to bring back death penalty

Burkina Faso's military rulers will bring back the death penalty, which was abolished in 2018, the country's Council of Ministers announced on Thursday. "This draft penal code reinstates the death penalty for a number of offences, including high treason, acts of terrorism, acts of espionage, among others," stated the information service of the Burkinabe government. Burkina Faso last carried out an execution in 1988.

Oklahoma board recommends clemency for inmate set to be executed next week

A voting board in Oklahoma decided Wednesday to recommend clemency for Tremane Wood, a death row inmate who is scheduled to receive a lethal injection next week at the state penitentiary in McAlester.  Wood, 46, faces execution for his conviction in the 2001 murder of Ronnie Wipf, a migrant farmworker, at an Oklahoma City hotel on New Year's Eve, court records show. The recommendation was decided in a 3-2 vote by the Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board, consisting of five members appointed by either the governor or the state's top judicial official, according to CBS News affiliate KWTV. Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Sitt will consider the recommendation as he weighs whether to grant or deny Wood's clemency request, which would mean sparing him from execution and reducing his sentence to life in prison without the possibility of parole.

Iran | Child Bride Saved from the Gallows After Blood Money Raised Through Donations, Charities

Iran Human Rights (IHRNGO); December 9, 2025: Goli Kouhkan, a 25-year-old undocumented Baluch child bride who was scheduled to be executed within weeks, has been saved from the gallows after the diya (blood money) was raised in time. According to the judiciary’s Mizan News Agency , the plaintiffs in the case of Goli Kouhkan, have agreed to forgo their right to execution as retribution. In a video, the victim’s parents are seen signing the relevant documents. Goli’s lawyer, Parand Gharahdaghi, confirmed in a social media post that the original 10 billion (approx. 100,000 euros) toman diya was reduced to 8 billion tomans (approx. 80,000 euros) and had been raised through donations and charities.

Who Gets Hanged in Singapore?

Singapore’s death penalty has been in the news again.  Enshrined in law in 1975, a decade after the island split from Malaysia and became an independent state, the penalty can see people sentenced to hang for drug trafficking, murder or firearms offenses, among other crimes. Executions have often involved trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act, with offenses measured in grams.  Those executed have included people from low-income backgrounds and foreign nationals who are sometimes not fluent in English, according to human rights advocates such as Amnesty International and the International Drug Policy Consortium. 

Afghanistan's Taliban rulers carry out public execution in sports stadium

The man had been convicted of killing 13 members of a family, including children, and was executed by one of their relatives, according to police. Afghanistan's Taliban authorities carried out the public execution of a man on Tuesday convicted of killing 13 members of a family, including several children, earlier this year. Tens of thousands of people attended the execution at a sports stadium in the eastern city of Khost, which the Supreme Court said was the eleventh since the Taliban seized power in 2021 in the wake of the chaotic withdrawal of US and NATO forces.

Afghanistan | Two Sons Of Executed Man Also Face Death Penalty, Says Taliban

The Taliban governor’s spokesperson in Khost said on Tuesday that two sons of a man executed earlier that day have also been sentenced to death. Their executions, he said, have been postponed because the heir of the victims is not currently in Afghanistan. Mostaghfer Gurbaz, spokesperson for the Taliban governor in Khost, also released details of the charges against the man executed on Tuesday, identified as Mangal. He said Mangal was accused of killing members of a family.

Utah | Ralph Menzies dies on death row less than 3 months after his execution was called off

Judge was set to consider arguments in December about Menzies’ mental fitness  Ralph Menzies, who spent more than 3 decades on Utah’s death row for the 1986 murder of Maurine Hunsaker, has died.  Menzies, 67, died of “presumed natural causes at a local hospital” Wednesday afternoon, according to the Utah Department of Corrections.  Matt Hunsaker, Maurine Hunsaker’s son, said Menzies’ death “was a complete surprise.”  “First off, I’d say that I’m numb. And second off, I would say, grateful,” Hunsaker told Utah News Dispatch. “I’m grateful that my family does not have to endure this for the holidays.” 

USA | Should Medical Research Regulations and Informed Consent Principles Apply to States’ Use of Experimental Execution Methods?

New drugs and med­ical treat­ments under­go rig­or­ous test­ing to ensure they are safe and effec­tive for pub­lic use. Under fed­er­al and state reg­u­la­tions, this test­ing typ­i­cal­ly involves clin­i­cal tri­als with human sub­jects, who face sig­nif­i­cant health and safe­ty risks as the first peo­ple exposed to exper­i­men­tal treat­ments. That is why the law requires them to be ful­ly informed of the poten­tial effects and give their vol­un­tary con­sent to par­tic­i­pate in trials. Yet these reg­u­la­tions have not been fol­lowed when states seek to use nov­el and untest­ed exe­cu­tion meth­ods — sub­ject­ing pris­on­ers to poten­tial­ly tor­tur­ous and uncon­sti­tu­tion­al­ly painful deaths. Some experts and advo­cates argue that states must be bound by the eth­i­cal and human rights prin­ci­ples of bio­med­ical research before using these meth­ods on prisoners.